i know, i know. another bradley thread. but this is a bit intriguing because i wanted to hear from other cubs players who were black and what they got compared to what bradley was saying. interesting that i never hear anything from derek lee about it--and he is nowhere to be found in this article. and why i find that interesting is the last line of the article - "It will depend on whether an individual less controversial than Bradley says the same thing about Wrigleyville in the future." Derek Lee is less controversial than Bradley...I know he's said things about booing but I can't remember if he's said that it was racially charged.
Billy Williams is interviewed in the article. He said that he got hate mail. *Every* black player got hatemail back then. That is not the same thing as what Bradley is saying. This isn't 1961.
The author uses examples comparatively with Hawkins, Jacque Jones, and Dusty Baker. with the possible exception of jones, the others came in with high expectations and fell drastically short of what they were expected to do. And they made excuses.
What I'd like to know is if Dusty's getting the same fervor in Cincinnati.
the problem i have with this article is that the author doesn't want to completely dismiss bradley. you aren't dismissing racism by dismissing bradley. you are dismissing bradley, and you should. the guy is a certified attention whore and a prick. his resume speaks for itself. his tenure is very short lived most wherever he goes.
If you want to make a statement about racism in baseball among fans, then do it by going to every stadium in every city to see where it's still prevalent or at least evident. don't use bradley as a jumping off point. you're just giving him more leverage.
http://mlb.fanhouse.com/2010/03/10/dont-totally-dismiss-bradley-on-cubs/