It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 9:15 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 85 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 8:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
mel junior wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:
If the Big 10 gets Notre Dame, I think it'll stop at 12 teams. Notre Dame doesn't want to divide the revenue sharing pie with 15 other schools


Does adding ND to the Big 10 force new markets to pick up the Big 10 Network? I don't know if it does .... Chicago/Indiana/Michigan already pick up the network. Granted ND has a national following, but I don't know if it's enough to force out of market cities to add the channel.
.



I would assume it does. There is a huge ND following on the East Coast. I'm guessing NBC has done research at a national level to justify the contract to show their football games.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 8:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
So, it seems that the Big 12 is the conference most a risk to be pillaged by the Big 10 and Pac 10.

My question is why aren't they being more aggressive to keep their conference in tact. Either in terms of renegotiating their revenue sharing, enhancing their television network or even seeking to expand themselves? I haven't heard too much from the conference officially other than Kansas campaigning to Mizzou/Nebraska to stay

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 9:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
I still maintain that there is absolutely no chance that Rutgers isn't invited also even if Notre Dame were to accept today.

Jim Delany clearly likes to make big moves even if they are considered high risk at the time(Big Ten Network, going after conference expansion). Rutgers is the moderate risk/high reward option.

Now, of course they can't just add Rutgers and no one else, because Rutgers is a long term play, but they will add them and it will seem like a genius move down the line.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
Northside_Dan wrote:
So, it seems that the Big 12 is the conference most a risk to be pillaged by the Big 10 and Pac 10.

My question is why aren't they being more aggressive to keep their conference in tact. Either in terms of renegotiating their revenue sharing, enhancing their television network or even seeking to expand themselves? I haven't heard too much from the conference officially other than Kansas campaigning to Mizzou/Nebraska to stay


They are landlocked when it comes to expansion. No 'big schools' to the west and the East is locked in with the Big Ten. As for a network, that might be possible, but that's probably something that takes 1-2 years to plan out. They don't have that time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Northside_Dan wrote:
My question is why aren't they being more aggressive to keep their conference in tact. Either in terms of renegotiating their revenue sharing, enhancing their television network or even seeking to expand themselves? I haven't heard too much from the conference officially other than Kansas campaigning to Mizzou/Nebraska to stay
I don't think they can renegotiate revenue sharing unless it's giving a bigger piece of the already bigger piece of the pie that Texas gets. They aren't going to take less money to stay when they can make significantly more in the Pac-10 or Big Ten.

The Big 12 seems to be a pretty weak alliance with the revenue sharing the way it is though. There is clearly some resentment over it, especially from Nebraska.

This is why it's absolutely essential that all conference teams share the major sources of revenue. Ohio State still makes a lot more money than most other schools in the Big Ten but the revenue sharing keeps everyone happy and at least somewhat competitive revenue wise. That's why something like this would never happen to the Big Ten.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 5:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Looks like Nebraska is Big Ten bound and the whole Big 12 is falling apart. The Pac-10 will be the first super conference.

Scary days for Missouri right now. They'll probably get invited too but it seems odd that there isn't really any talk of it right now.

I'd imagine that Rutgers and a final answer on Notre Dame are the next dominoes to fall.

Syracuse and Maryland may also be in the mix.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
mel junior wrote:
I think the Big 10 makes their moves in the next 30 days.

In:
Mizzou
Nebraska
Notre Dame

Two seven team divisions:
East:
Penn State
Ohio State
Michigan
Michigan State
Indiana
Purdue
Notre Dame

West:
Wisconsin
Illinois
Northwestern
Iowa
Minnesota
Mizzou
Nebraska

i think this would be a great big ten conference school-wise. a great, strong midwest-based conference. notre dame belongs in this conference and should make this happen ASAP.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 2:46 pm
Posts: 6251
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
I have a question on the Big 10, let's say Notre Dame comes and says we will not go to a conference at this time, does the Big 10 still go after Missouri. I know there has been talk all along the Missouri would go Big 10, but since the Big 10 has Nebraksa now and let's say can't get somebody else, do this stick with just getting Nebraska and that's it. 2 divisions of 6 or still take Missouri and have 1 division have an extra team.

One more question since the Big 10 can now have a title game, where do you play that at, Lucas Oil Field where the Colts play, make the Mac title game on a Thursday and play at the Ford Field where the Lions play, because I would think you would want the game inside, maybe not.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:23 pm
Posts: 16779
pizza_Place: Little Caesar's
reents wrote:
One more question since the Big 10 can now have a title game, where do you play that at, Lucas Oil Field where the Colts play, make the Mac title game on a Thursday and play at the Ford Field where the Lions play, because I would think you would want the game inside, maybe not.

Chicago Meathead wrote:
Soljerz Feeled!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 09, 2010 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Other Chicago Meathead wrote:
Naw, theys should do it at Wrigley Feeldz!

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Looks like Nebraska is Big Ten bound and the whole Big 12 is falling apart. The Pac-10 will be the first super conference.

Scary days for Missouri right now. They'll probably get invited too but it seems odd that there isn't really any talk of it right now.

I'd imagine that Rutgers and a final answer on Notre Dame are the next dominoes to fall.

Syracuse and Maryland may also be in the mix.

I agree with this.

One question that had crossed my mind is why not Boston College? Fairly good school - opens up Boston to the TV markets...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
Fairly good school?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 8:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
good dolphin wrote:
Fairly good school?

Not sure which way you were headed but....in the latest US News rankings:

It's a Tier 1 school, ranked 34th in the nation. above even the University of Illinois (at 39th)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:16 pm
Posts: 3414
pizza_Place: Gino's East.
RFDC wrote:
The Pac-10 is prepared to offer six Big 12 schools -- Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State and Colorado -- invitations to join its league, Chip Brown of OrangeBloods.com reported Thursday afternoon.

http://gary-parrish.blogs.cbssports.com ... ines;other


Colorado has accepted the offer to join the Pac-10.

The Big 12 is done.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:18 pm
Posts: 4503
Location: connoisseur of women's non-revenue sports
pizza_Place: I vehemently disagree
Hawkeye Vince wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Fairly good school?

Not sure which way you were headed but....in the latest US News rankings:

It's a Tier 1 school, ranked 34th in the nation. above even the University of Illinois (at 39th)


I was kinda scratching my head with that statement too, Vince. I assume he was being sarcastic. BC is a great school.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Why don't Texas and Oklahoma go independent? It sounds weird at first but they are nationally known and could package themselves together with their own TV deal.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:18 pm
Posts: 4503
Location: connoisseur of women's non-revenue sports
pizza_Place: I vehemently disagree
reents wrote:
I have a question on the Big 10, let's say Notre Dame comes and says we will not go to a conference at this time, does the Big 10 still go after Missouri. I know there has been talk all along the Missouri would go Big 10, but since the Big 10 has Nebraksa now and let's say can't get somebody else, do this stick with just getting Nebraska and that's it. 2 divisions of 6 or still take Missouri and have 1 division have an extra team.

One more question since the Big 10 can now have a title game, where do you play that at, Lucas Oil Field where the Colts play, make the Mac title game on a Thursday and play at the Ford Field where the Lions play, because I would think you would want the game inside, maybe not.


Re: Missouri... I'm with you. I'm not sure what the Missouri attraction is now.

Re: Playoff... didn't Big 10 officials say they don't want a conference playoff? But then again, I'm having a hard time seeing how they can avoid it with so many teams.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:18 pm
Posts: 4503
Location: connoisseur of women's non-revenue sports
pizza_Place: I vehemently disagree
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Why don't Texas and Oklahoma go independent? It sounds weird at first but they are nationally known and could package themselves together with their own TV deal.


You are right... they only difficult thing might be scheduling and Bowl tie-ins, but I think they pull enough weight to overcome that obstacle. Or at least they would still make enough money through TV contracts to make up for that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Well, I would think the Big 10 wants to stay at an even amount of teams.

It'll be interesting to see if they get more aggressive now with expansion now that the PAC 10 looks like they'll try to become the Pac 16. I'd love to see the Big 10 pull in ND and Rutgers and call it a day.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
Oklahoma St looks to be the next one gone to the Pac 10.

Texas and Texas A&M are meeting today and supposedly A&M is trying to convince Texas to go with them to the SEC.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:18 pm
Posts: 4503
Location: connoisseur of women's non-revenue sports
pizza_Place: I vehemently disagree
The only way we can fix this is to get the federal government involved... this is worse than the oil spill.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:18 pm
Posts: 4503
Location: connoisseur of women's non-revenue sports
pizza_Place: I vehemently disagree
Northside_Dan wrote:
Well, I would think the Big 10 wants to stay at an even amount of teams.

It'll be interesting to see if they get more aggressive now with expansion now that the PAC 10 looks like they'll try to become the Pac 16. I'd love to see the Big 10 pull in ND and Rutgers and call it a day.



I agree... I really want ND, but if they can't do it, then I'd prefer we stay at 12... even if the Pac-10 and SEC go to 16 each. With the Big 10 Network money and our bowl tie-ins, I'm not sure the Big 10 is pressure to add any more teams..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
Man this stuff down here in Big 12 country is getting crazy. I tuned into a KC sports talk show this afternoon and they had a report on there that the reason Mizzou was left out of the deal was that Texas and Texas A&M are meeting today to petition the Big 10 for entrance. They supposedly soured on the idea of the Pac 10 since they selected Colorado first when they both wanted Baylor to be considered for that spot. They also say that OU is wanting to go to the SEC and is putting a lot of pressure on Okla St to not go to the Pac 10 but to stick with them and joining the SEC.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Nebraska, Texas, Texas A&M, Rutgers, and Notre Dame would be a complete home run.

Even if they substitute a Big East team for Notre Dame it still would be.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:18 pm
Posts: 4503
Location: connoisseur of women's non-revenue sports
pizza_Place: I vehemently disagree
RFDC wrote:
Man this stuff down here in Big 12 country is getting crazy. I tuned into a KC sports talk show this afternoon and they had a report on there that the reason Mizzou was left out of the deal was that Texas and Texas A&M are meeting today to petition the Big 10 for entrance. They supposedly soured on the idea of the Pac 10 since they selected Colorado first when they both wanted Baylor to be considered for that spot. They also say that OU is wanting to go to the SEC and is putting a lot of pressure on Okla St to not go to the Pac 10 but to stick with them and joining the SEC.



I heard that too right here:
http://kctv.m0bl.net/w/main/story/11576649/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nebraska, Texas, Texas A&M, Rutgers, and Notre Dame would be a complete home run.

Even if they substitute a Big East team for Notre Dame it still would be.


Completely agree.

They also reported that up until yesterday morning Mizzou was under the impression they were getting the same deal as Nebraska and they had the rug pulled out from under them and the scene in Columbia ysterday afternoon was described as "nuclear winter." :lol:

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
RFDC wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nebraska, Texas, Texas A&M, Rutgers, and Notre Dame would be a complete home run.

Even if they substitute a Big East team for Notre Dame it still would be.


Completely agree.

They also reported that up until yesterday morning Mizzou was under the impression they were getting the same deal as Nebraska and they had the rug pulled out from under them and the scene in Columbia ysterday afternoon was described as "nuclear winter." :lol:
If this happens I'd love to read a book as to exactly how this whole thing went down.

The subplot of Missouri wanting to get out of the Big 12 to get away from Texas only to have Texas leave the Big 12 and freeze out Missouri would be worth it on it's own. Obviously that's far from a done deal but wow.

Just wait until the lawsuits start.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:18 pm
Posts: 4503
Location: connoisseur of women's non-revenue sports
pizza_Place: I vehemently disagree
I might get the scoop in the Fall. I regularly tailgate with a Big Ten admin guy (on the basketball side). He won't tell (and I'd feel odd asking) now, but I think after a few beers in the Fall I'll get the scoop.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
orangebloods.com is reporting today that it is a done deal -- Texas, Texas Tech, OU, and Okla St. are going to the Pac 10 now that Nebraska has made it official. The regents at Texas are having a meeting on Tues and it is believed it will be announced after that meeting that they are going to the Pac 10. Texas A&M is holding out as of now and is still considering the SEC. If that happens it looks like either Kansas or Utah will take their slot in the Pac 10/16.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
I found the response from the president and AD at ISU comical, to say the least...

ISU officials disappointed by Nebraska's decision

...specifically this...

Geoffroy and Pollar wrote:
The joint statement says the future of college athletics appears to be less about academics and competitive success and more about money.

...

Iowa State fans wrote:
Competitive success? What's that?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 85 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group