It is currently Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:54 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: CAP QUESTION
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 1:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
The Bulls will have the MLE and the BAE to use to sign free agents. They can also fill the rest of their roster with players that sign for the minimum even if they are already over the cap. They won't have a problem have 12-15 guys on their roster.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CAP QUESTION
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 1559
pizza_Place: Barracco's in The EP.
Because the Bulls will be under the cap to start the season, they will not have the MLE to use this year. Everyone on the Bulls roster this year will have to fit under the $56MM salary cap.

I don't know what the BAE is ....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CAP QUESTION
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
mel junior wrote:
Because the Bulls will be under the cap to start the season, they will not have the MLE to use this year. Everyone on the Bulls roster this year will have to fit under the $56MM salary cap.

I don't know what the BAE is ....


They get to use the mid level exception regardless of their cap situation. The BAE (Bi-Annual Exception) of 2.08M (starting salary) can be used to sign any player because they didn't use it last year.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CAP QUESTION
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 1559
pizza_Place: Barracco's in The EP.
HOVA wrote:

They get to use the mid level exception regardless of their cap situation. The BAE (Bi-Annual Exception) of 2.08M (starting salary) can be used to sign any player because they didn't use it last year.


I'll have to look into this, but I didnt' think that was right.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CAP QUESTION
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 3:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Yes sir. Every team doesn't always use the MLE but it is there for them to use every year.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CAP QUESTION
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:08 pm
Posts: 1559
pizza_Place: Barracco's in The EP.
HOVA wrote:
Yes sir. Every team doesn't always use the MLE but it is there for them to use every year.



Here's what the hoop heads at Real GM say:

By definition, the mid level exception is an exception to being over the salary cap and still sign players. Since you have to renounce that exception to have your full cap space (and you don't get it back), the Bulls don't have one. They also don't have a LLE for two reasons, but just know the Bulls have no exceptions to use.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CAP QUESTION
PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
The Bulls will be over the cap in no time. They don't have to be over the cap when the free agency period starts.



If a team is below the cap, then their Disabled Player, Bi-Annual, Mid-Level and/or Traded Player exceptions are added to their team salary, and the league treats the team as though they are over the cap. This is to prevent a loophole, in a manner similar to free agent amounts (see question numbers 29, 30, 31, 32). A team can't act like they're under the cap and sign free agents using cap room, and then use their Disabled Player, Bi-Annual, Mid-Level and/or Traded Player exceptions. Consequently, the exceptions are added to their team salary (putting the team over the cap) if the team is under the cap and adding the exceptions puts them over the cap. If a team is already over the cap, then the exceptions are not added to their team salary. There would be no point in doing so, since there is no cap room for signing free agents.

So being under the cap does not necessarily mean a team has room to sign free agents. For example, assume the cap is $49.5 million, and a team has $43 million committed to salaries. They also have a Mid-Level exception for $5 million and a Traded Player exception for $5.5 million. Even though their salaries put them $6.5 million under the cap, their exceptions are added to their salaries, putting them at $53.5 million, or $4 million over the cap. So they actually have no cap room to sign free agents, and instead must use their exceptions.

Teams have the option of renouncing their exceptions in order to claim the cap room. So in the example above, if the team renounced their Traded Player and Mid-Level exceptions, then the $10.5 million is taken off their team salary, which then totals $43 million, leaving them with $6.5 million of cap room which can then be used to sign free agent(s).


Starting January 10 of each season, the Mid-Level, Bi-Annual, Larry Bird, Early-Bird and Non-Bird exceptions begin to reduce in value. For example, if there are 180 days in the season, then these exceptions (if they are still unused) reduce by 1/180 of their initial value each day starting January 10. If a team uses their $5 million Mid-Level exception on February 1, then the exception is actually worth $4,361,111.

The Disabled Player, Bi-Annual, Mid-Level and Traded Player exceptions may be lost entirely, or the team may never receive them to begin with. This happens when their team salary is so low that when the exceptions are added to the team salary, the sum is still below the salary cap. If the team salary is below this level when the exception arises, then the team doesn't get the exception. If the team salary ever drops below this level during the year, then any exceptions they had are lost.

For example, with a $49.5 million salary cap, assume it's the offseason, and a team has $41 million committed to salaries, along with a Mid-Level exception for $5 million, a Traded Player exception for $2.5 million, and an unrenounced free agent whose free agent amount is $2 million. Their salaries and exceptions total $50.5 million, or $1 million over the cap. What if their free agent signs with another team? The $2 million free agent amount comes off their cap, so their team salary drops to $48.5 million. This total is below the cap so the team loses its Mid-Level and Traded Player exceptions.

There is logic behind this. The whole idea behind an "exception" is that it is an exception to the rule which says a team has to be below the salary cap. In other words, an exception is a mechanism which allows a team to function above the cap. If a team isn't over the cap, then the concept of an exception is moot. Therefore, if a team's team salary ever drops this far, its exceptions go away. The effect is that a team may have either exceptions or cap room, but they can't have both.


http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group