It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 2:44 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 154 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
D Line
Even assuming Peppers has a good year (not even close to a given) what are you getting from the "other guys"? Tommie Harris is mediocre on his best day. Mark Anderson is still suspect on anything but 3rd and long.

Linebackers
Cletus Urlacher is a HUGE question mark. There is no telling what he'll be with the age and injury. Briggs is still a stud. They dont have a lot of Depth here either.

Secondary
Im slightly optimistic about Bowman. Id like to see Manning become a football player and not just a freak athlete that occasionally makes a big play. Glad to have Chris Harris back, but lets not go nuts. It almost got a little Aaron Rowandish around here when he was resigned.



Overall, it looks average to bad to me.

A lot of things have to go right for this defense to be good.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
Now this is gonna sound meatballish, but if the offense can keep the damn D off the field for long stretches they might be ok.

Martz was known for having too many 3-and-outs, even when he had a HOF QB, RB and WRs..

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:46 am
Posts: 2288
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
As you know, the Lovie defense is dead without a pass rush. Will Peppers be enough? He should draw a double team. The key to the whole defense is Harris. If he can disrupt and draw a double team, they should be able to get pressure. That makes a mediocre secondary alot better.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
Some people are stars and some work backstage.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
johnnyfontane wrote:
As you know, the Lovie defense is dead without a pass rush. Will Peppers be enough? He should draw a double team. The key to the whole defense is Harris. If he can disrupt and draw a double team, they should be able to get pressure. That makes a mediocre secondary alot better.



I agree, if it requires 4 guys to block 2, then we should have a pass rush.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:27 pm
Posts: 2251
pizza_Place: Gino's East - Pepperoni & Garlic Deep Dish
If Tommie is healthy, he and Peppers should make each other better.

_________________
Second City Saint


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Jack Bauer wrote:
If Tommie is healthy, he and Peppers should make each other better.

healthy?

He doesnt have an injury, he has a condition.

2006 Tommie is gone for good.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:53 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
The biggest improvement this D can make from the last couple of years is to tackle. Turnovers are great and yeah the ball punch causes that, but (Peanut Tillman) what the fuck good does it do if you don't strip the ball, but also miss the tackle allowing the opposing player with the ball to run another 10, 20, 40 yards downfield?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The biggest improvement this D can make from the last couple of years is to tackle. Turnovers are great and yeah the ball punch causes that, but (Peanut Tillman) what the fuck good does it do if you don't strip the ball, but also miss the tackle allowing the opposing player with the ball to run another 10, 20, 40 yards downfield?


+55
( http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_ ... -nfc-north )

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Concerns? That there isn't a ranking higher than #1.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 4:18 pm
Posts: 13406
Location: The Crownville Lab
pizza_Place: Langel's
Jack Bauer wrote:
If Tommie is healthy, he and Peppers should make each other better.

Tommie Harris even looked gimpy while throwing out the first/second pitch Monday night at The Cell, IMO.

_________________
-"God is great. Beer is good. And People are crazy!"
bigfan wrote:
I am in the urination, puking, drunk, yelling zone.

The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
I once jerked in a chicken truck, so I have that going for me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
One of the great mysteries is why the Bears continue to pay Tommie Harris piles & piles of money. He was just payed a $2.5 Million roster bonus in June. He is the typical selfish modern day athlete who has one great year & lands a huge contract, who never again reaches the level of play that got him the contract. Harris is a head case. I gotta believe that he has worn out his welcome in the locker room.
The Bears would have been better off keeping Ogunleye & Brown & releasing Harris.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Scorehead wrote:
One of the great mysteries is why the Bears continue to pay Tommie Harris piles & piles of money. He was just payed a $2.5 Million roster bonus in June. He is the typical selfish modern day athlete who has one great year & lands a huge contract, who never again reaches the level of play that got him the contract. Harris is a head case. I gotta believe that he has worn out his welcome in the locker room.
The Bears would have been better off keeping Ogunleye & Brown & releasing Harris.


The guys has been hurt. When healthy he was one of the best tackles in the game. He's played with the injury the last few years. Nothing about what he has done says selfish other than maybe trying to play when he is injured. The Bears wouldn't have been better with Brown and Ogunleye. Ogunleye is hurt and keeping both means you wouldn't have Peppers.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 2:11 pm
Posts: 1073
Anything above mediocre would be good from Harris. Can he be elite? I dont know, but people keep forgetting there are two tackle positions. Adams played well last year and Harrison show some potential if he keeps the weight off. Izzy at the other end intrigues me, I think he could start and bring Anderson in on pass rushing duties.

_________________
good dolphin wrote:
312player wrote:
there is different kinds of smart..book/street .


the victory cry of low achievers


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:09 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
So what have we learned about the Bears Defense after two preseason games?

A few random thoughts:

To my eyes, Tommie Harris hasn't been very impressive. He lacks explosiveness off the snap and looks like "just another guy" on the field. Anthony Adams has been the team's best defensive tackle recently, and it appears things will be no different in the coming season. That ain't good.

Zach Bowman can't be that bad, can he? He looks like he'll need a compass and map to find the receivers he's supposed to be covering. Peanut is still the team's best cornerback.

The overall level of physical play displayed thus far has been very disappointing. Compared to other teams I've watched this preseason--Jets, Giants, Vikings, 49ers, Patriots, Packers--the Bears look soft. And I don't believe they're going to close the "physicality" gap when the regular season arrives. The Bears need Major Wright in the starting lineup. He's one of the few thumpers they have.

The coaching staff still has no idea how to design effective blitzing schemes.

While I'm sure the team will improve over the next month, other teams will, too. The defense is aging, weak and (in many respects) poorly coached. They're going to make this another long year for Bears fans. Julius Peppers will have a positive impact, but he can't be expected to carry a unit with so many glaring weaknesses (defensive tackle, cornerback, safety).

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48801
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Tall Midget wrote:
The overall level of physical play displayed thus far has been very disappointing. Compared to other teams I've watched this preseason--Jets, Giants, Vikings, 49ers, Patriots, Packers--the Bears look soft. And I don't believe they're going to close the "physicality" gap when the regular season arrives. The Bears need Major Wright in the starting lineup. He's one of the few thumpers they have.


They are soft. They've been soft for a long time.

But they'll punch the ball out of your hands as you are running away from them while you are not bothering to tackle them. Sometimes.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Tall Midget wrote:
So what have we learned about the Bears Defense after two preseason games?

A few random thoughts:

To my eyes, Tommie Harris hasn't been very impressive. He lacks explosiveness off the snap and looks like "just another guy" on the field. Anthony Adams has been the team's best defensive tackle recently, and it appears things will be no different in the coming season. That ain't good.

What made Tommie special, his quickness off the ball and exceptional athleticism for his position, is gone forever.

His knees wont allow him to be that guy anymore.

He is precisely "just a guy"



Tall Midget wrote:
Zach Bowman can't be that bad, can he? He looks like he'll need a compass and map to find the receivers he's supposed to be covering. Peanut is still the team's best cornerback.

Thats not good considering Peanut would be better at safety. Not throwing in the towel on Bowman yet though.

Tall Midget wrote:
The overall level of physical play displayed thus far has been very disappointing. Compared to other teams I've watched this preseason--Jets, Giants, Vikings, 49ers, Patriots, Packers--the Bears look soft. And I don't believe they're going to close the "physicality" gap when the regular season arrives. The Bears need Major Wright in the starting lineup. He's one of the few thumpers they have.

Im not sure you can make that assessment from watching presason.

I like Major Wright though.


Tall Midget wrote:
The coaching staff still has no idea how to design effective blitzing schemes.

You expected them to?

What did they take a blitzing seminar in the off season?

Tall Midget wrote:
While I'm sure the team will improve over the next month, other teams will, too. The defense is aging, weak and (in many respects) poorly coached. They're going to make this another long year for Bears fans. Julius Peppers will have a positive impact, but he can't be expected to carry a unit with so many glaring weaknesses (defensive tackle, cornerback, safety).

Thats the stuff 7-9 is made of.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48801
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
rogers park bryan wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
The coaching staff still has no idea how to design effective blitzing schemes.

You expected them to?

What did they take a blitzing seminar in the off season?


They don't have the personnel to blitz.

It's not in Lovie's system's DNA and when forced to do so due to a lack of pressure, they are bad and expose the defense even more.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
The coaching staff still has no idea how to design effective blitzing schemes.

You expected them to?

What did they take a blitzing seminar in the off season?


They don't have the personnel to blitz.

It's not in Lovie's system's DNA and when forced to do so due to a lack of pressure, they are bad and expose the defense even more.

True
Urlacher and Briggs are bad at blitzing

Not sure if ya wanna bring some exotic blitzes (Copyright Jimmie Johnson's estate) but the two guys who should be good, arent.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:25 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
The coaching staff still has no idea how to design effective blitzing schemes.

You expected them to?

What did they take a blitzing seminar in the off season?


They don't have the personnel to blitz.

It's not in Lovie's system's DNA and when forced to do so due to a lack of pressure, they are bad and expose the defense even more.


But they only play Cover 2--that's what you're referencing as "Lovie's System," correct?--about 30% of the time whereas they've blitzed something like 40% of the time over the past couple seasons. The Cover 2 may be Lovie's System, but he doesn't play that system.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48801
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
I'm on record here in posts that I'm sure are long gone that I hate Lovie's system. I think it is ill-suited to finding the special personnel needed to make it great and, at this point, old-hat in the league.

Hell, even Chris Harris said nothing has changed in the 3 years he's been gone.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48801
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Tall Midget wrote:
But they only play Cover 2--that's what you're referencing as "Lovie's System," correct?--about 30% of the time whereas they've blitzed something like 40% of the time over the past couple seasons. The Cover 2 may be Lovie's System, but he doesn't play that system.


But, the people here are Lovie's people. That's what I'm referencing.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:59 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
But they only play Cover 2--that's what you're referencing as "Lovie's System," correct?--about 30% of the time whereas they've blitzed something like 40% of the time over the past couple seasons. The Cover 2 may be Lovie's System, but he doesn't play that system.


But, the people here are Lovie's people. That's what I'm referencing.


But what is his system? He blitzes more than he plays a non-blitzing, straight Cover 2 scheme.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Tall Midget wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
But they only play Cover 2--that's what you're referencing as "Lovie's System," correct?--about 30% of the time whereas they've blitzed something like 40% of the time over the past couple seasons. The Cover 2 may be Lovie's System, but he doesn't play that system.


But, the people here are Lovie's people. That's what I'm referencing.


But what is his system? He blitzes more than he plays a non-blitzing, straight Cover 2 scheme.

Isnt that him straying from the plan because theyre getting their asses kicked?

Usually the line is getting 0 pressure so he's forced to blitz.


So, I think in Lovetron's mind, they are still primarily Cover-2

You and I know they should plan for when the line fails to get pressure. Not sure Lovetron thinks that way.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48801
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Tall Midget wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
But they only play Cover 2--that's what you're referencing as "Lovie's System," correct?--about 30% of the time whereas they've blitzed something like 40% of the time over the past couple seasons. The Cover 2 may be Lovie's System, but he doesn't play that system.


But, the people here are Lovie's people. That's what I'm referencing.


But what is his system? He blitzes more than he plays a non-blitzing, straight Cover 2 scheme.


Yes, and they suck at it because he's got Briggs and Urlacher who are fast and can run backwards very well and aren't very good at blitzing.

They blitz because people pick the Cover-2 apart when they aren't getting enough pressure from the front 4 and their backs aren't good enough to cover for as long as they need to when Tommie Harris is getting pancaked and Mark Anderson is getting his spin move stuffed on a regular basis.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:30 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:

Yes, and they suck at it because he's got Briggs and Urlacher who are fast and can run backwards very well and aren't very good at blitzing.

They blitz because people pick the Cover-2 apart when they aren't getting enough pressure from the front 4 and their backs aren't good enough to cover for as long as they need to when Tommie Harris is getting pancaked and Mark Anderson is getting his spin move stuffed on a regular basis.


I dunno, I'd like to see the stats on this but it seemed like the blitzes were better designed and more effective under Rivera. They had similar personnel then. Additionally, I find Lovie's blitz packages very predictable; this has nothing to do with the players on the field.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Tall Midget wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:

Yes, and they suck at it because he's got Briggs and Urlacher who are fast and can run backwards very well and aren't very good at blitzing.

They blitz because people pick the Cover-2 apart when they aren't getting enough pressure from the front 4 and their backs aren't good enough to cover for as long as they need to when Tommie Harris is getting pancaked and Mark Anderson is getting his spin move stuffed on a regular basis.


I dunno, I'd like to see the stats on this but it seemed like the blitzes were better designed and more effective under Rivera. They had similar personnel then. Additionally, I find Lovie's blitz packages very predictable; this has nothing to do with the players on the field.

I think they were more effective because they were rarer, and because the front four was better at generating pressure on its own. If you need six to block four, that fifth rusher is going to be more effective.

Defense in football is pretty simple. The more players you need to get pressure, the less effective the defense will be. The cover two worked so well in 2005 and 2006 because the front four generated good (but not great) pressure, and you had an all-pro MLB. The corners were also effective at playing the rush, which helps. Once that pressure dissipated, the defense needed to play more "aggresive," and the personnel didn't match that. Plus, aggressiveness is fine, until you get burned repeatedly, then it is really bad. Of course, no one will ever blame the aggressiveness, and the call will probably be for more aggressiveness, not less.

The only D-lineman that regularly commanded double teams last year was Tommy Harris. If Julius Peppers and Tommy Harris require double teams this year, that means six will be needed to block four again, or one of those two will go against a single blocker. That's the plan. Let's see if it works.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65767
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Tall Midget wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:

Yes, and they suck at it because he's got Briggs and Urlacher who are fast and can run backwards very well and aren't very good at blitzing.

They blitz because people pick the Cover-2 apart when they aren't getting enough pressure from the front 4 and their backs aren't good enough to cover for as long as they need to when Tommie Harris is getting pancaked and Mark Anderson is getting his spin move stuffed on a regular basis.


I dunno, I'd like to see the stats on this but it seemed like the blitzes were better designed and more effective under Rivera. They had similar personnel then. Additionally, I find Lovie's blitz packages very predictable; this has nothing to do with the players on the field.

That similar personel is getting older. There's a definate difference in pressure up front too. Harris was twice the player that season than he has been since, Brown (gone now) was a much better disrupter then. That was Tank's career year.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The biggest improvement this D can make from the last couple of years is to tackle. Turnovers are great and yeah the ball punch causes that, but (Peanut Tillman) what the fuck good does it do if you don't strip the ball, but also miss the tackle allowing the opposing player with the ball to run another 10, 20, 40 yards downfield?


Exactly right. Yet the Bears still run the easiest country club non contact camp in the NFL, with no tackling to the ground, which is why they get the results that they do in games. You play like you practice.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Scorehead wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The biggest improvement this D can make from the last couple of years is to tackle. Turnovers are great and yeah the ball punch causes that, but (Peanut Tillman) what the fuck good does it do if you don't strip the ball, but also miss the tackle allowing the opposing player with the ball to run another 10, 20, 40 yards downfield?


Exactly right. Yet the Bears still run the easiest country club non contact camp in the NFL, with no tackling to the ground, which is why they get the results that they do in games. You play like you practice.


I agree to a point. Too soft or too hard of a practice is not good. I always say,if they are going to get injured at least do it when it counts.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Defense Concerns
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
jimmypasta wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The biggest improvement this D can make from the last couple of years is to tackle. Turnovers are great and yeah the ball punch causes that, but (Peanut Tillman) what the fuck good does it do if you don't strip the ball, but also miss the tackle allowing the opposing player with the ball to run another 10, 20, 40 yards downfield?


Exactly right. Yet the Bears still run the easiest country club non contact camp in the NFL, with no tackling to the ground, which is why they get the results that they do in games. You play like you practice.


I agree to a point. Too soft or too hard of a practice is not good. I always say,if they are going to get injured at least do it when it counts.


Easy practices lead to soft play which leads to injuries. The less aggressive you play this game the more prone to injury you are. Most High Schools & Colleges hit harder in practice than the Bears. I went to a Steelers camp at St. Vincents a couple of years ago while traveling in PA on business, & Tomlin had them running the Oklahoma & nut buster drills. He worked their asses off with full contact & tackling to the ground. Spend a day at Bears camp & you will see none of that. Say what you want about fire & passion & all that...but you can't play football passively. For some reason the Bears think you can.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 154 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: The Doctor Of Style and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group