It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 8:22 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 4:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 3:15 am
Posts: 118
pizza_Place: Uno's
Not saying if the trade was good or bad here. But Hudson's stats: 8 innings 3 hits, 1 run, 4 k and 1 walk. Looks like Edwin has something to shoot for.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 6:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Yeah, a playoff spot.

Good for Hudson.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Everyone always says that you have to wait for things to play out in order to evaluate trades. I, on the other hand, look at it as an evaluation of current values. I cannot see how Hudson's value relative to other pitching prospects is less than Jackson's. Even if Jackson turns things around, I think KW gave up more value than he got...especially because you know that THE BEST you get out of Jackson is 1 1/4 seasons.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:46 am
Posts: 2288
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
Everyone always says that you have to wait for things to play out in order to evaluate trades. I, on the other hand, look at it as an evaluation of current values. I cannot see how Hudson's value relative to other pitching prospects is less than Jackson's. Even if Jackson turns things around, I think KW gave up more value than he got...especially because you know that THE BEST you get out of Jackson is 1 1/4 seasons.

I don't know if you can take The Club seriously, especially since it's just a series of edited clips, but it was pretty clear that Kenny considered EJ an upgrade over Hudson. Why, I'm not sure. Hudson was shaky in his first few starts, sure, but wasn't this kid supposed to be really good? Did three big league starts change Kenny's mind? How tightly have the Red Sox hung onto Clay Buchholz and now it's paying off for them?

I also saw Kenny in The Club last night say that he DID NOT offer Washington EJ for Dunn. So that mean EJ is Kenny's guy, for sure, not trade bait. Puzzling. I'd rather hang on to the young pitcher.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
Some people are stars and some work backstage.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 5:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 9:48 pm
Posts: 241
pizza_Place: Palermo's in Chicago
johnnyfontane wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Everyone always says that you have to wait for things to play out in order to evaluate trades. I, on the other hand, look at it as an evaluation of current values. I cannot see how Hudson's value relative to other pitching prospects is less than Jackson's. Even if Jackson turns things around, I think KW gave up more value than he got...especially because you know that THE BEST you get out of Jackson is 1 1/4 seasons.

I don't know if you can take The Club seriously, especially since it's just a series of edited clips, but it was pretty clear that Kenny considered EJ an upgrade over Hudson. Why, I'm not sure. Hudson was shaky in his first few starts, sure, but wasn't this kid supposed to be really good? Did three big league starts change Kenny's mind? How tightly have the Red Sox hung onto Clay Buchholz and now it's paying off for them?

I also saw Kenny in The Club last night say that he DID NOT offer Washington EJ for Dunn. So that mean EJ is Kenny's guy, for sure, not trade bait. Puzzling. I'd rather hang on to the young pitcher.


Isn't EJ only 26? I believe Hudson is 23, not much of a difference in my view. Yeah, I wanted to see Hudson's potential as a member of the Sox, but if Jackson can pitch as well as he did against the Tiger, then I'm definitely OK with that. Also, possibly for next year, Jackson might have more trade value than Hudson.

There's a part of me that would love to see for next year: Peavy (big ?), Dank, Floyd, Sale and Buerhle. Or keep Jackson and trade Buerhle for some prospects. Or is that blasphemy on my part?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 5:24 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
johnnyfontane wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Everyone always says that you have to wait for things to play out in order to evaluate trades. I, on the other hand, look at it as an evaluation of current values. I cannot see how Hudson's value relative to other pitching prospects is less than Jackson's. Even if Jackson turns things around, I think KW gave up more value than he got...especially because you know that THE BEST you get out of Jackson is 1 1/4 seasons.

I don't know if you can take The Club seriously, especially since it's just a series of edited clips, but it was pretty clear that Kenny considered EJ an upgrade over Hudson. Why, I'm not sure. Hudson was shaky in his first few starts, sure, but wasn't this kid supposed to be really good? Did three big league starts change Kenny's mind? How tightly have the Red Sox hung onto Clay Buchholz and now it's paying off for them?

I also saw Kenny in The Club last night say that he DID NOT offer Washington EJ for Dunn. So that mean EJ is Kenny's guy, for sure, not trade bait. Puzzling. I'd rather hang on to the young pitcher.


If you believe Cowley's Twitter feed the Sox never considered Hudson to project as more than a fifth starter and more likely as a middle reliever.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:46 am
Posts: 2288
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
johnnyfontane wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Everyone always says that you have to wait for things to play out in order to evaluate trades. I, on the other hand, look at it as an evaluation of current values. I cannot see how Hudson's value relative to other pitching prospects is less than Jackson's. Even if Jackson turns things around, I think KW gave up more value than he got...especially because you know that THE BEST you get out of Jackson is 1 1/4 seasons.

I don't know if you can take The Club seriously, especially since it's just a series of edited clips, but it was pretty clear that Kenny considered EJ an upgrade over Hudson. Why, I'm not sure. Hudson was shaky in his first few starts, sure, but wasn't this kid supposed to be really good? Did three big league starts change Kenny's mind? How tightly have the Red Sox hung onto Clay Buchholz and now it's paying off for them?

I also saw Kenny in The Club last night say that he DID NOT offer Washington EJ for Dunn. So that mean EJ is Kenny's guy, for sure, not trade bait. Puzzling. I'd rather hang on to the young pitcher.


If you believe Cowley's Twitter feed the Sox never considered Hudson to project as more than a fifth starter and more likely as a middle reliever.

Well if that's the case the trade makes sense.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
Some people are stars and some work backstage.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:12 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
johnnyfontane wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
If you believe Cowley's Twitter feed the Sox never considered Hudson to project as more than a fifth starter and more likely as a middle reliever.

Well then the trade makes sense.


I'm not saying that's true, but Cowley tweeted it and used that nugget to tweak Phil Rogers who had written about what a bad trade it was. Rogers actually compared Hudson to Jered Weaver which is pretty ridiculous in my mind.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 9:02 am
Posts: 468
Location: Schaumburg
Would not be shocked if Jackson signed a short extension and either Floyd or Danks were traded in the offseason. Going forward, they may not be able to keep them both long-term.

_________________
"YOU GOTTA BE BLEEPING ME"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
OldSchoolScoreFan wrote:
Would not be shocked if Jackson signed a short extension and either Floyd or Danks were traded in the offseason. Going forward, they may not be able to keep them both long-term.


Boras. Jackson is here a MAXIMUM of 1.3 years...at over 8 per year.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
johnnyfontane wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
If you believe Cowley's Twitter feed the Sox never considered Hudson to project as more than a fifth starter and more likely as a middle reliever.

Well then the trade makes sense.


I'm not saying that's true, but Cowley tweeted it and used that nugget to tweak Phil Rogers who had written about what a bad trade it was. Rogers actually compared Hudson to Jered Weaver which is pretty ridiculous in my mind.


That's utter horseshit. They moved him up 4 levels in one year. If you do that to a person you project as a middle reliever or 5th starter, you have serious organizational problems.

See, I'm not that smart or that connected and even I could punch holes in that bullshit logic. Shouldn't an unbiased beat reporter be able to do the same.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
I think they said he's a 5th starter or middle reliever NOW. He'll be a middle guy on a good team. Again, they just didn't trust him in a pennant race.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:46 am
Posts: 2288
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Well, regardless, Kenny obviously thought EJ gave them the best chance to win this year, so he pulled the trigger. Did he mortgage the future? Maybe, but as somebody said, Hudson is only 3 years younger than EJ.

And I gotta admire that, btw. The Club has really given me a new perspective on Kenny and Ozzie. I like them both much more now that I have seen what they're all about. Kenny wants to win, and he pushes the envelope every year. I like that.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
Some people are stars and some work backstage.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
So Jackson gets you past the Yankees?

I know of guys who bet big amounts all the time and lose. I don't admire them.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:06 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Keyser Soze wrote:
I think they said he's a 5th starter or middle reliever NOW. He'll be a middle guy on a good team. Again, they just didn't trust him in a pennant race.


Nope. Supposedly at best.

http://twitter.com/cst_sox

"By the way, privately Sox felt that Hudson was a future No. 5 starter/middle reliever at best. Sorry Phillip, do some work."

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:08 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
good dolphin wrote:
That's utter horseshit. They moved him up 4 levels in one year. If you do that to a person you project as a middle reliever or 5th starter, you have serious organizational problems.


Or you have nothing else. Or you're playing the hell out of your hand and moving him along for a lot more than he's worth. You have to admit Kenny's been pretty good at doing exactly that.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
Keyser and gd talking Sox is always fun.

Oh and JORR STFU!

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:12 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Oh and RFDC, Go Fuck Yourself. TWICE.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:46 am
Posts: 2288
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
So Jackson gets you past the Yankees?

I know of guys who bet big amounts all the time and lose. I don't admire them.

Name the rotation that gets you past the Yankees. Tell your guys to bet on the Yankees. Big.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
Some people are stars and some work backstage.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
johnnyfontane wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
So Jackson gets you past the Yankees?

I know of guys who bet big amounts all the time and lose. I don't admire them.

Name the rotation that gets you past the Yankees. Tell your guys to bet on the Yankees. Big.


I kind of like the Rangers and the Braves, but not necessarily just because of the rotations.

The point is, despite what he might think, this is not a world series caliber team and the addition of Jackson makes them only incrementally better. There was not reason to mortgage the future (I know it's an overstatement) for Jackson. There is a strong chance that he would not even start should they reach the world series.

I just see no way that this move is a win, and you can be damned sure KW will be saying his "cannot spend a dollar when you have 50 cents" this offseason as Jackson is due his 8 million.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:46 am
Posts: 2288
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
johnnyfontane wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
So Jackson gets you past the Yankees?

I know of guys who bet big amounts all the time and lose. I don't admire them.

Name the rotation that gets you past the Yankees. Tell your guys to bet on the Yankees. Big.


I kind of like the Rangers and the Braves, but not necessarily just because of the rotations.

The point is, despite what he might think, this is not a world series caliber team and the addition of Jackson makes them only incrementally better. There was not reason to mortgage the future (I know it's an overstatement) for Jackson. There is a strong chance that he would not even start should they reach the world series.

I just see no way that this move is a win, and you can be damned sure KW will be saying his "cannot spend a dollar when you have 50 cents" this offseason as Jackson is due his 8 million.

It really all goes back to what they thought of Hudson. I was under the impression that he was a stud prospect, but that may not have been the case.

_________________
rogers park bryan wrote:
Some people are stars and some work backstage.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:21 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
johnnyfontane wrote:
It really all goes back to what they thought of Hudson. I was under the impression that he was a stud prospect, but that may not have been the case.



Well, Cowley insists they didn't think much, but he sure has looked like a stud in his first two out for Arizona.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:35 pm
Posts: 4896
Location: Division 1 Cook County Jail
pizza_Place: NEW YORK STYLE PEPPERONI FROM LOMBARDI'S IN MANHATTAN.
The Sox haven't had a STUD PROSPECT pitcher in 20 years.

_________________
There goes one over the fence..Tru Link Fence..Beauty, Privacy Security....Call Tru Link.
Murph's Union 76 Truck Stop....A great Thanksgiving Tradition!!!!

WOO LIFE!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hudson's First Start
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 9:02 am
Posts: 468
Location: Schaumburg
Aggravated Sox Fan Bob wrote:
The Sox haven't had a STUD PROSPECT pitcher in 20 years.


Yes they have...
Scott Ruffcorn
Rodney Bolton
James Baldwin
Lance Broadway
Brandon McCarthy

_________________
"YOU GOTTA BE BLEEPING ME"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group