It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 2:53 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Advance Scout on Cutler
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65767
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Courtesy Sun-Times:
Quote:
''The person who is going to kill this team is the quarterback,'' he said of Jay Cutler. ''Don't take my word for it. Talk to somebody who really knows quarterback fundamentals, and fundamentally this guy is a nightmare right now. Where he holds the ball, how he winds up. His lower half is completely out of sync with his upper half. He almost looks like a guy out in the parking lot throwing a football. Fundamentally, as far as stepping into his throws, setting his feet, the way he carries the ball, it's not very good.

''He's got this everything-is-going-to-be-OK attitude. I don't believe it for a minute. I think he lacks confidence in his offensive line and isn't on the same page with his receivers


Wow. Maybe I'm not so up to speed on quarterback fundamentals. I always thought he was referred to as a gifted, natural quarterback.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:39 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
he is....when he's not fearing that a large black man is going to press him into the earth.

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
This is all Peyton Manning's fault. He was fine until he got thrown in the pool at the pro bowl. He has never recovered.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
doug - evergreen park wrote:
he is....when he's not fearing that a large black man is going to press him into the earth.

He's probably squirms a bit when he sees that Sports Authority (or is it Dicks?) with Ndamakong Suh hunting down QB's....

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 3:49 pm
Posts: 9340
Location: UM?
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Does Sports Authority even have commericals Spmack? It was Dicks.

_________________
Hank Scorpio wrote:
What the hell, I would. Post op is OK right? Right?!?!?!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
Chris_in_joliet wrote:
Does Sports Authority even have commericals Spmack? It was Dicks.

My bad...well I know for a fact that the commercial where the high schooler puts on Under Armour equipment and he morphs into Rey Maluaga is a Sports Authority one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJy2a2Fn ... re=related

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 1:55 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 3:19 pm
Posts: 2348
Location: Shorewood, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Darkside wrote:
Courtesy Sun-Times:
Quote:
''The person who is going to kill this team is the quarterback,'' he said of Jay Cutler. ''Don't take my word for it. Talk to somebody who really knows quarterback fundamentals, and fundamentally this guy is a nightmare right now. Where he holds the ball, how he winds up. His lower half is completely out of sync with his upper half. He almost looks like a guy out in the parking lot throwing a football. Fundamentally, as far as stepping into his throws, setting his feet, the way he carries the ball, it's not very good.

''He's got this everything-is-going-to-be-OK attitude. I don't believe it for a minute. I think he lacks confidence in his offensive line and isn't on the same page with his receivers


Wow. Maybe I'm not so up to speed on quarterback fundamentals. I always thought he was referred to as a gifted, natural quarterback.


I hope this isn't true, but this is so Chicago Bears though I am not surprised.

_________________
RFDC thinks I'm retarded.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
were all those INTs due to bad mechanics or bad decisions?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65767
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
The bears were in a perfect storm of suck to throw a ton of ints. The receivers suck. The QB was new to them, in a bad scheme with poor pass protection. But no matter how you slice it, 14 RZ int's is bad bad bad.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:57 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:03 pm
Posts: 4944
Could Denver really have gotten the best of that deal? We need to give it a few more years, but I said it then, we overpaid.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 5:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 6513
pizza_Place: sit down
The 2 ints Cutler threw in that pre-season game were tight spirals and right on the numbers of the d-backs.
Looked like perfect throws. Maybe it's all arm strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
It is possible this particular unnamed scout sucks at his job and/or has an axe to grind.

He's working behind a shitty line and with receivers that surely have to have their new shoes laced for them. Maybe he's not all that great after all, but there is no way you can judge him accurately - good, bad, or indifferent - on this team at this time.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:23 pm
Posts: 16779
pizza_Place: Little Caesar's
Spaulding is probably too upset about Purdue's massacre yesterday to respond to this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 11:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Cutler has always held the ball low & had a big wind up...not quite Tim Tebows wind up but a wind up none the less. Too bad the great Pep Hamilton is no longer with the Bears as QB coach to fix this. He is now Harboughs QB coach at Stanford. Maybe Shane Day can help Jay with his mechanics.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
yeah hes no tim tebow. how did that guy even get drafted? tebows windup is horrific... and he also sucks at football... oh well, at least denver has a new cheerleader.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Couple things:

- He has always had the same throwing motion/bad footwork. Same as last year, same as the year he went to the Pro Bowl.

- The Bears certainly overpaid for Cutler. I think that statement holds up whether you look at it the day of the trade, today or 5 years down the road. It just had to be done if you wanted to get him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
They didn't over pay for him IMO. Getting a young franchise QB and Knox for what they gave up was great. We can now see the draft picks too. None of them are or likely will be good enough that you wouldn't trade them for Cutler. The mistake the Bears made was that they didn't think Orton was good enough to start (like many of us) even if he had good receivers around him. He's proven that isn't the case. There were no good/great receivers available last off season but Boldin and he misses about 4 games a year because of injury. With everything I know now I would still make the deal.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
HOVA wrote:
We can now see the draft picks too. None of them are or likely will be good enough that you wouldn't trade them for Cutler.
I'm trying to stay out of the whole Cutler bashing stuff I've been known for, but this isn't really a good way to judge things. Denver had different needs and the Bears would have made different picks. For instance, the obvious choice if the Bears had the picks instead was Jeremy Maclin. In my opinion, he's definitely a starter and a clear upgrade over whoever ends up on the bench over him. Given that WR was and still is one of the biggest holes on the team that would be a significant improvement. It's harder to say who they would have picked with the other ones though. Draft picks are extremely valuable. That's why it's so rare to have a blockbuster trade involving multiple first round picks.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
They planned on trading that pick though. In fact they wanted to get Boldin (after the trade) but Arizona wouldn't accept a 2nd round pick for him. IMO if they didn't deal for Cutler they would have traded the pick for a WR. While Maclin is better than Knox we may find out this year it's not really by much. There is no question that Cutler is better than Orton. Orton is a great QB for a team that has a great defense (like the Broncos did to start the season) but he really isn't a guy you can count on the light up the scoreboard. When I look at the teams I believe the Bears improved more than the Broncos and will continue to be better in the future. The Broncos got lucky and were able to keep Orton. If that weren't the case the gap would be wider IMO. While draft picks are valuable it was a no brainer to me for a team that hasn't had a franchise type QB in over 20 years. If Cutler stays healthy we shouldn't hear about Sid Luckman too much longer and they should be able to compete in a division that may have the best young QB's in the NFL.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
HOVA wrote:
We can now see the draft picks too. None of them are or likely will be good enough that you wouldn't trade them for Cutler.
I'm trying to stay out of the whole Cutler bashing stuff I've been known for, but this isn't really a good way to judge things. Denver had different needs and the Bears would have made different picks. For instance, the obvious choice if the Bears had the picks instead was Jeremy Maclin. In my opinion, he's definitely a starter and a clear upgrade over whoever ends up on the bench over him. Given that WR was and still is one of the biggest holes on the team that would be a significant improvement. It's harder to say who they would have picked with the other ones though. Draft picks are extremely valuable. That's why it's so rare to have a blockbuster trade involving multiple first round picks.


I have absolutely no reason to believe the Bears would have taken Maclin with that pick.

And wasn't it you that was saying we would have to wait to see who the draft picks turned out to be in order to adequately judge this trade??

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
HOVA wrote:
While Maclin is better than Knox we may find out this year it's not really by much.
:lol: The Bears may win the Super Bowl this year too. However, at the end of the season, both of those will look to be pretty silly.

Maclin, with a lower quality of QB throwing to him, will outperform Knox barring injury.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
RFDC wrote:
I have absolutely no reason to believe the Bears would have taken Maclin with that pick.
They would have been crazy not to.
RFDC wrote:
And wasn't it you that was saying we would have to wait to see who the draft picks turned out to be in order to adequately judge this trade??
Maybe I did but I thought I said that we'll have to wait and see what the Bears could have gotten. I mean, I'm pretty sure that linebacker wasn't going to be the pick there which means that it's really not fair to use Robert Ayers to judge the trade.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
HOVA wrote:
While Maclin is better than Knox we may find out this year it's not really by much.
:lol: The Bears may win the Super Bowl this year too. However, at the end of the season, both of those will look to be pretty silly.

Maclin, with a lower quality of QB throwing to him, will outperform Knox barring injury.


Not saying you are wrong. I'm saying the gap may not be as wide as you and I believe it is now. Knox was extremely raw last year.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
They would have been crazy not to.


I agree, I think he or Oher should have been the pick. But I think either one of two things happens if the Bears had that pick. Either Philly trades up before them to get him knowing the Bears may want him. Or he is there and Angelo decides to go with a Safety from University of Missouri-Rolla that no one had ever heard of.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
HOVA wrote:
Not saying you are wrong. I'm saying the gap may not be as wide as you and I believe it is now. Knox was extremely raw last year.
I still go back to the fact that last year, after the first two games, Knox only had one game where he could even be considered playing like an average starting WR. He was great for the first two games but I think he ultimately got exposed as many new players do. Until I see otherwise, my opinion is that if Knox is a starting WR for you, then you aren't very good at WR.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
RFDC Angelo said he would have drafted a WR if he kept the pick.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65767
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
HOVA wrote:
Not saying you are wrong. I'm saying the gap may not be as wide as you and I believe it is now. Knox was extremely raw last year.
I still go back to the fact that last year, after the first two games, Knox only had one game where he could even be considered playing like an average starting WR. He was great for the first two games but I think he ultimately got exposed as many new players do. Until I see otherwise, my opinion is that if Knox is a starting WR for you, then you aren't very good at WR.

Are you saying that you're against renaming Soldier Field "Fort Knox"?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
I like Cutler and Knox better than a potential Orton and Maclin.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
HOVA wrote:
RFDC Angelo said he would have drafted a WR if he kept the pick.


Maybe he would have, but I just don't trust that he would have pulled the trigger on it in the first round. It is easy for him to say he would have after the fact.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
spmack wrote:
I like Cutler and Knox better than a potential Orton and Maclin.


Me too, and IMO it is not even close.

Another thing that bugs me about all of this and people saying that we paid to much for Cutler. Can you imagine the outcry from people if Angelo refused the deal and it came out later that Denver would have taken Orton and 2 first round picks? People would be screaming left and right calling Angelo an idiot for passing up that deal.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group