I'm really not.

More reps are always helpful.

They would have been more helpful this pre-season.

But not enough for anyone to care about it.

Bears went 3-0 without the reps.

IMO, that means they were a non-issue. Not worth even chatting about.

So if that Calvin Johnson catch ended up counting and the Bears lose all of a sudden the offense needed the extra reps? The Bears may have been 3-0 but that didn't mean that the team didn't have problems. I guess the running game was just fine too since we were 3-0.
So the Bears had no issues to worry about? Your logic would indicate that everything is great because they won 3 games. I choose to take a look at more than just record.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

But you're also ignoring the Dallas game, in which our offense looked as good as I have ever seen a Bears offense.


20 more pre-season reps doesn't fix the problems the Bears have, and IMO, it certainly wouldn't have been worth the risk of injury.

I'm not ignoring it. They did a really good job. If it had continued then it would be relevant. However, I saw an offense in week 3 and 4 that looked like it needed work. The fact that it looked good before didn't change that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

El season is finis.

_________________