It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:36 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Got a Sox guy at the UC last night talking up the Twins are not that good.

So I asked if the Sox were good?

He of course proceeded to explain how good they are and how close they came to winning the division because at one point they led the division?

I then explained to the great philosopher that if the Twins are not that good and they beat the Sox's collective asses, then by the transitive properties of reasoning the Sox couldn't be the good by his own admission.

To that I got a "You don't what the fuck you are alking about, because you are a Cub fan"

Good talk, 'See ya's at city halls'

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Twins aren't that good. Good teams don't get their asses handed to them in the playoffs. Good teams don't fail to win a postseason game in consecutive seasons. Good teams manage to at least win one game.See what I did there?

In all seriousness, Twins had a good season. Sox were less good. Their starting pitching was just way too weak. And they couldn't hit.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Twins aren't that good. Good teams don't get their asses handed to them in the playoffs. Good teams don't fail to win a postseason game in consecutive seasons. Good teams manage to at least win one game.See what I did there?

In all seriousness, Twins had a good season. Sox were less good. Their starting pitching was just way too weak. And they couldn't hit.


I don't agree, they just dont have the aces that teams have to win postseason games. It is the single most important thing a team needs. Bonafied #1 shutdown starter. Stops the long losing streak, wins games in short series and if you have a good manager, you can even bring them in to close out a series. (See 2003 NLCS...and I am not talking about Dave Veres)

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
I meant weak for the playoffs. In the regular season, you can get away with having no true #1. Very rarely can that work in the playoffs.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 1:02 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Of course the Twins were better than the Sox. They won the division and the Sox didn't. That seems simple but obviously it isn't. I mean I hear little danny bernstein say all the time that the only thing that matters is winning the championship. He'll often talk as if losing in the first round of the playoffs is equivalent to finishing last. I don't believe that, but many fans these days seem to. B&b will discuss Chicago baseball by saying.... BAD. Well, the Cubs were bad. The Sox weren't. They won 88 games and had a pretty good season. Not as good as Coztansa and I would have liked, but still pretty good. I've seen more than one thread in this very forum about "bad Chicago baseball". This year Chicago baseball had one bad team and one good one. If you don't acknowledge that and actually believe they were somehow equally bad because neither won a championship, I don't see what the difference is in thinking the Twins were equally bad as well.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 3:44 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Once the playoffs start, the Twins are not that good apparently.

12 postseason losses in a row, 9 at the hands of the Yankees.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55953
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
The Twins are really testing the "win a long season enough times and you'll win a short postseason" theory of baseball, aren't they? They had better get some pitching this winter.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
It's the Twins philosophy to draft 'strike throwers' instead of 'power arms'. The Twins last two 1st rounders, Kyle Gibson (Missouri) and Alex Wimmers (Ohio St) fit that mold. They're both extremely polished sinker/slider/changeup guys with fastballs that sit in the low 90's. If they stay healthy they have the potential to be consistent 15-18 game winners but will not matchup in the playofffs against power pitchers like CC, Cliff Lee, David Price, etc. Unless the Twins change their philosophy and start drafting a different type of pitcher they will continue to compete for division titles but have quick exits from the playoffs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
bigfan wrote:

He of course proceeded to explain how good they are and how close they came to winning the division because at one point they led the division?

I then explained to the great philosopher that if the Twins are not that good and they beat the Sox's collective asses, then by the transitive properties of reasoning the Sox couldn't be the good by his own admission.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
It says that even though the Sox have their issues, the Twins are not some insurmountable force that cannot be overcome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:35 pm
Posts: 4896
Location: Division 1 Cook County Jail
pizza_Place: NEW YORK STYLE PEPPERONI FROM LOMBARDI'S IN MANHATTAN.
Maybe, just maybe, JERRY REINSDOUCHE AND HIS CLOWN COLLEGE CALLED A BASEBALL OPERATION is the insurmountable force that CAN NOT be overcome!!!!!!!!! :x

_________________
There goes one over the fence..Tru Link Fence..Beauty, Privacy Security....Call Tru Link.
Murph's Union 76 Truck Stop....A great Thanksgiving Tradition!!!!

WOO LIFE!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 3:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92063
Location: To the left of my post
It's pretty obvious they aren't a dominant team. They do seem to have quite a talent of beating the Tigers and the White Sox though.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82231
IIRC the Tigers had done very well against the Twins the past few years, similar to what the Twins did to the Sox.

Take an MVP and top reliever from any team and see how dominant it will be.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 7:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Of course the Twins were better than the Sox. They won the division and the Sox didn't. That seems simple but obviously it isn't. I mean I hear little danny bernstein say all the time that the only thing that matters is winning the championship. He'll often talk as if losing in the first round of the playoffs is equivalent to finishing last. I don't believe that, but many fans these days seem to. B&b will discuss Chicago baseball by saying.... BAD. Well, the Cubs were bad. The Sox weren't. They won 88 games and had a pretty good season. Not as good as Coztansa and I would have liked, but still pretty good. I've seen more than one thread in this very forum about "bad Chicago baseball". This year Chicago baseball had one bad team and one good one. If you don't acknowledge that and actually believe they were somehow equally bad because neither won a championship, I don't see what the difference is in thinking the Twins were equally bad as well.

It seems that every one of your sports assessments (in every sport) somehow involves an attempt to refute a B&B theory. Why not just give your own opinion? Why is it always about them and how they feel?

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 8:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Of course the Twins were better than the Sox. They won the division and the Sox didn't. That seems simple but obviously it isn't. I mean I hear little danny bernstein say all the time that the only thing that matters is winning the championship. He'll often talk as if losing in the first round of the playoffs is equivalent to finishing last. I don't believe that, but many fans these days seem to. B&b will discuss Chicago baseball by saying.... BAD. Well, the Cubs were bad. The Sox weren't. They won 88 games and had a pretty good season. Not as good as Coztansa and I would have liked, but still pretty good. I've seen more than one thread in this very forum about "bad Chicago baseball". This year Chicago baseball had one bad team and one good one. If you don't acknowledge that and actually believe they were somehow equally bad because neither won a championship, I don't see what the difference is in thinking the Twins were equally bad as well.

It seems that every one of your sports assessments (in every sport) somehow involves an attempt to refute a B&B theory. Why not just give your own opinion? Why is it always about them and how they feel?


Kid, why do you always feel a need to take up for B&B if someone dares to not see them in the same light as you?

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
spmack wrote:
Kid, why do you always feel a need to take up for B&B if someone dares to not see them in the same light as you?

I don't do that and you know it. I don't care if people like them or not. It was an observation. I just noticed that JORR often goes back to referencing B&B whenever he has a sports thought and I was wondering why. He's the only guy here who does that so of course it's gonna be noticeable. His point was completely intact without the reference to Bernstein.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 8:35 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
spmack wrote:
Kid, why do you always feel a need to take up for B&B if someone dares to not see them in the same light as you?

I don't do that and you know it. I don't care if people like them or not. It was an observation. I just noticed that JORR often goes back to referencing B&B whenever he has a sports thought and I was wondering why. He's the only guy here who does that so of course it's gonna be noticeable. His point was completely intact without the reference to Bernstein.


Obviously, a lot of people agree with bernstein. He is a major proponent of the viewpoint I was talking about and has a bully pulpit from which to espouse it. And espouse it he does.

I'll ask you, do you agree with it? If not, why are you defending him rather than simply agreeing with me? Or are you going to suggest that he has never made the statement that winning championships is all that matters? If the 2010 Cubs are the same as the 2010 Sox, then aren't the 2010 Sox the same as the 2010 Twins? They're all just non-champions, right?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 8:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I'll ask you, do you agree with it? If not, why are you defending him rather than simply agreeing with me? Or are you going to suggest that he has never made the statement that winning championships is all that matters? If the 2010 Cubs are the same as the 2010 Sox, then aren't the 2010 Sox the same as the 2010 Twins? They're all just non-champions, right?

I don't necessarily agree with it. I agree with him that as an organization you build a team to win a championship. But as a fan, understanding that every year there is a 1 in 30 chance of your team winning the championship, no I don't think winning a championship is all that matters. It's obviously the ultimate goal but not necessarily the only goal. I enjoyed the season overall. Late August was very painful watching them slide, but it was a fun season.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:00 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79559
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
I don't necessarily agree with it. I agree with him that as an organization you build a team to win a championship. But as a fan, understanding that every year there is a 1 in 30 chance of your team winning the championship, no I don't think winning a championship is all that matters. It's obviously the ultimate goal but not necessarily the only goal. I enjoyed the season overall. Late August was very painful watching them slide, but it was a fun season.


That's exactly how I look at it.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:36 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
1 in 26. The Pirates, Royals, Orioles, and Cubs have no chance at winning.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
Frank Coztansa wrote:
1 in 26. The Pirates, Royals, Orioles, and Cubs have no chance at winning.

True.

BTW of those four, I think the Coob will rise to respectability sooner than the rest.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Curious Hair wrote:
The Twins are really testing the "win a long season enough times and you'll win a short postseason" theory of baseball, aren't they?


Same goes for the Orioles, A's, Indians, Giants, and Astros from the mid 1990's to the early 2000's.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group