It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 10:24 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 223 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Scorehead wrote:
Bears can't cover anybody. Our Defensive backfield play has been terrible.

No, they played well, considering. Con-fucking-sidering the fact that the interior D-line is incapable of getting any push whatsoever, and they can't even hurry the opposing QB without a blitz.

This game was a fucking travesty. The Bears should apologize to the sport of football for this "performance." I think I'd be willing to actually murder Pace for that false start. I mean, what the fuck. What. The. Fuck. That looked to be a sneak, so there was no reason he had to be in a big-ass hurry to get a good jump. All he had to do was not fuck it up and fuck us once a-fucking-gain on that drive. But no. Nope, we just couldn't have a single positive play on that drive without someone getting his head trapped in his rectal duct.

12 men on the field? Really? Again? Someone explain to me how this manages to continue being a problem. What, no one on the coaching staff can count?

Last but not least, I'm officially on the "Fuck Ron Turner" bandwagon. Frankly, when you're generally losing two yards per run play, you just need to concede you can't run. He didn't do that. But that wasn't what got me on the bandwagon. What did it was running twice in a row from the 2 yard line, the second time after your RB just fumbled the ball and you were lucky to recover it. Somehow, he thought a sweep play was the way to go there. Unimaginable. I really never thought humans who seemingly are in control of their faculties could possibly be that stupid. The Bears have several red-zone plays in their arsenal which have succeeded every goddamn time they've been run. Yet, Turner opts to run twice in a row, on a night where his running game hadn't done a single positive thing.

Thank god I have beer in the fridge.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Irish Boy wrote:
newper wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
Right. Atlanta has a ton of weapons: they go legitimately two-deep at RB, great TE, very good QB, weapons on the outside. And your defense shut them down pretty well.

You should give Roddy White more credit than an anonymous weapon on the outside. He is a top 10 WR in the league.


I said that sometime last year and people pounded me for it. I think what I said is that Roddy White is better than Bernard Berrian and there was no end to the gnashing of teeth. I try not to refight old battles.

IB, the price of freedom is eternal vigilance.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Also (I thought this was amazing), the stats they showed for the field splits on the CBs were unreal. The "Tillman" side (also probably the Roddy White side tonight; it was tough to tell) was performing ridiculously well.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Scorehead wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
The Falcons didn't play much no huddle offense in the second half. And they only scored seven points after halftime. Try again.

The Falcons did use no huddle in the second half & when they did the Bears D was confused.
I would like to see the Bears use the no huddle offense on occcasion.

That's what I said, but then I considered that if they went no huddle, that'd make it harder for Turner to run his obligatory run play that loses two yards every series. So they're not going to do that. They're a running team, damnit, even if they can't run.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:02 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57249
MattInTheCrown wrote:
12 men on the field? Really? Again? Someone explain to me how this manages to continue being a problem. What, no one on the coaching staff can count?


Probably the most frustrating play of the game IMO. How in the hell does that happen?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Irish Boy wrote:
Right. Atlanta has a ton of weapons: they go legitimately two-deep at RB, great TE, very good QB, weapons on the outside. And your defense shut them down pretty well.

Sometimes you play better than the other team and lose. Sometimes you play worse (Pittsburgh) and you win. It almost always evens out.


Nah. You are giving Atlanta too much credit. The Bears outplayed the Falcons tonight & lost...you said so yourself. Atlanta is a good team, but I wont say they are better than the Bears after watching tonights game. However, at the skill positions, I would rather have Turner, White & Gonzo than Forte, Hester, & Olsen. QB is a toss up so I'll be a homer & take Cutler.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
They need to run the ball, if for no other reason but to make the play fake honest. If you lose the PA pass, you're screwed with this O-line.

I also disagree with Matt about the play calling on the goalline. They ran one of those "always works" plays on first down and the Falcons were all over it. The second down call was just a plain "dive" play and not altogether surprising or interesting; If Forte holds onto the damn ball he might get in, or get close enough for the sneak. The sweep play is one of those things that, if it works, it looks great, and it would have worked if they sold out against the pass on the exterior, which they did on first down.

I do agree with you about the secondary/pass rush, however. Its the rush that's the problem, not the secondary. The interior was fine, at least against the rush, but this team simply cannot rush four and get to the QB with any consistency. I'm not a big fan of the defensive scheme, but it's probably a necessary evil given the weakness at DE.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
RFDC wrote:
MattInTheCrown wrote:
12 men on the field? Really? Again? Someone explain to me how this manages to continue being a problem. What, no one on the coaching staff can count?

Probably the most frustrating play of the game IMO. How in the hell does that happen?

Especially at that juncture. That simply cannot happen. It's minimized because they were able to get a lucky interception (which, surprise, was fumbled of course), but very nearly ended the game then and there.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Scorehead wrote:
OB is ripping Lovie right now on the Score for the Defensive fiasco tonight. The Bears had 2 weeks to prepare for this game & it is inexcusable for the Defense to look as confused & lost as they did.

He's right, too.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:48 am
Posts: 672
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
If Omiyale isn't immediately replaced by Beekman tomorrow then something is rotten in the state of Hallas Hall...

_________________
HOVA wrote:
I never liked that Fixed Glee guy even though he has never done anything to me. If I saw him I would punch him in the face.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Irish Boy wrote:
They need to run the ball, if for no other reason but to make the play fake honest. If you lose the PA pass, you're screwed with this O-line.

Oh, they need to run the ball, but they cannot. They just can't. Which brings me to the most important point, which I somehow neglected:

I have decided this coaching staff is incompetent, as long as they continue to run Omiyele out there (I don't care to spell that piece of filth's name correctly). This line is not good enough to have a total dog as its left guard. I understand they want him to get experience, but they just can't afford it. If they're going to have him in, they have to accept that they cannot run the ball.

Quote:
I also disagree with Matt about the play calling on the goalline. They ran one of those "always works" plays on first down and the Falcons were all over it. The second down call was just a plain "dive" play and not altogether surprising or interesting; If Forte holds onto the damn ball he might get in, or get close enough for the sneak. The sweep play is one of those things that, if it works, it looks great, and it would have worked if they sold out against the pass on the exterior, which they did on first down.

You disagree, but they fumbled twice, and didn't get close to the goal line on either attempt (Edit: the first time because, surprise, piece of filth let a man get under him, causing Forte to have to jump too early).

Quote:
I do agree with you about the secondary/pass rush, however. Its the rush that's the problem, not the secondary. The interior was fine, at least against the rush, but this team simply cannot rush four and get to the QB with any consistency. I'm not a big fan of the defensive scheme, but it's probably a necessary evil given the weakness at DE.

I still think they should bump receivers at least some. They never do it. Ever. That makes it too tough on the secondary. People don't understand what those guys are up against. They're almost always short-handed because of blitzes, and the opposing QB usually has a nice pocket to throw from. You're going to see lots of completions under those circumstances, no matter how good your corners and safeties are. They better cut Tommie next year. I said they should cut him this year, and I was clearly right. Yeah, you got burned on the bonus money, but that's no reason to get burned a second time on salary. You can't pay a guy that kind of money, and still have a line that gets no interior penetration.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Last edited by MattInTheCrown on Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
CSFMB Guy wrote:
If Omiyale isn't immediately replaced by Beekman tomorrow then something is rotten in the state of Hallas Hall...


That's probably my biggest coaching complaint as well. I understand that evaluating O-lineman isn't always easy without game tape. I also understand that how people play during the preaseason isn't always indicative of their preparedness during the week, or their ability during the long haul of practices. But the evidence has more than accumulated that Omiyale is just really bad. And Beekman was a relative bright spot on the line last year. That's a switch that should have been made a month ago.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
schmitty1121 wrote:
Forte, 15 carries, 23 yards, and 2 fumbles. What a night.

If that's not a line that screams "abandon the running game," then there is no such thing.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Quote:
You disagree, but they fumbled twice, and didn't get close to the goal line on either attempt.


I forgot that Ron Turner called the "fumble the football" play.

Look, he did exactly what you said he should do on first down; they ran almost exactly (if not exactly) the same play they ran two weeks ago against Detroit. The Falcons sold out against the pass, because after a while you can't keep using play action at the goal line and expect it to work, and those sorts of plays only really work when the defense sells out against the run. So on second down they ran a straight dive. Contrary to what you said, it did get close. In fact, if Forte holds onto the ball, he might get in. Worst case scenario is you have the ball on the 3 inch line, at which point you just ram the QB. It's not Ron Turner's fault that Forte didn't hold onto the ball, which caused them to lose yardage and defeated the third down plan.

So now, on third down, you have a few options, but you know that the defense sold out against the pass on first down in a very similar situation. So you break tendency and run a sweep. Sometimes you break tendencies at it works, and everyone says "what a ballsy call" and everyone gets to applaud such presience. And sometimes it doesn't work and we all get to second-guess how stupid it is. And even still, worst case scenario, it should still be a FG, unless Ron Turner also cast an unusually effective hex on Forte while calling the play.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Irish Boy wrote:
The takeaway from this game is probably that the Bears are one of the top few teams in the NFC (define few however you want) but that's about all. 1 for 4 in the red zone will kill you, but it's also a sign that your offense was moving pretty well throughout the game. The defense had trouble and got a deep INT in a tip, but at the same time they kept the running game in check pretty well while only giving up 21 points to a team that just lit up the supposedly good 49ers.

In my mind, there are (in no particular order):

Packers
Vikings
Bears
Falcons
Saints
Giants
Eagles

Only five of those teams are going to make the playoffs. I hazard no guesses as to which two will be left out.

I like a Saints-Vikings NFC championship game in a big way. I wonder what the line is on that.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
I predict........... Kahlil Bell will be activated for next game, and Bears will sign an OLineman....

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Maybe this is insane, but I remember certain Drew Bledsoe teams winning throwing the ball 50+ times a game. Is it time to cut bait on running the ball for this year? Maybe 15 runs total for a game, but when we "get off the bus running" and gain nothing but 2 yards per carry, we've got problems. I just want to do whatever is the best for this team offensively, and if we can't run, maybe we just have to realize that we can't run.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Forte only had 15 carries. They're pretty close to that already. How many did Wolfe have? three? under five, I'm sure.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:30 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:17 am
Posts: 3073
Location: Chicago-West Side
John Mullin is on CSN now for post game talking about how Cutler "needs to grow up" and other crap after his postgame comments. What did he say? Or is this just some more BS made up by our stupid media?


Last edited by hawkeye on Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Irish Boy wrote:
Quote:
You disagree, but they fumbled twice, and didn't get close to the goal line on either attempt.

I forgot that Ron Turner called the "fumble the football" play.

Oh, so it would have been so much better to just out-and-out waste two plays on the 2 yard line? Even if he doesn't fumble, those are wasted plays. There's just no way he scores there. The evidence throughout the game was clear. He picked up a few yards here and there, but at the goal-line, those were sure losers. The first one was almost excusable, but running again after that fumble was just ridiculous. I'm sorry, that's football-stupid. It just is.

Quote:
Look, he did exactly what you said he should do on first down; they ran almost exactly (if not exactly) the same play they ran two weeks ago against Detroit. The Falcons sold out against the pass, because after a while you can't keep using play action at the goal line and expect it to work, and those sorts of plays only really work when the defense sells out against the run.

The fullback just got hung up. They probably would have scored if they ran that exact play again. Crossing the tight ends would have done it as well.

Quote:
So on second down they ran a straight dive. Contrary to what you said, it did get close. In fact, if Forte holds onto the ball, he might get in. Worst case scenario is you have the ball on the 3 inch line, at which point you just ram the QB. It's not Ron Turner's fault that Forte didn't hold onto the ball, which caused them to lose yardage and defeated the third down plan.

...and Pace or some other retard jumps off-sides. You don't seem to appreciate how woeful the line-play is on running plays.

Quote:
So now, on third down, you have a few options, but you know that the defense sold out against the pass on first down in a very similar situation. So you break tendency and run a sweep. Sometimes you break tendencies at it works, and everyone says "what a ballsy call" and everyone gets to applaud such presience. And sometimes it doesn't work and we all get to second-guess how stupid it is. And even still, worst case scenario, it should still be a FG, unless Ron Turner also cast an unusually effective hex on Forte while calling the play.

They've ran sweeps many times this season, and it's almost invariably resulted in a loss of yards. I bet better than 2/3's of the time it's resulted in a loss of yards. Sorry, a smart coordinator doesn't run plays which are very likely to use yards in a goal-line scenario. Let me go Stacy King on you: KY-motherfucking-P. He doesn't.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 4:54 pm
Posts: 112
pizza_Place: Cafe Greco (Rockford)
One of the few good things about a Bears loss is the post game.

Two top sayings

"Stupid Pills"

"They are not pushing guys around" (which is true when it comes to the offensive line)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Irish Boy wrote:
Forte only had 15 carries. They're pretty close to that already. How many did Wolfe have? three? under five, I'm sure.

Then my complaint is when we run. When we get to 4 yds within the goal line, we should run one guy on a fade, another on a cross, and one of the HBs on a flat run. That should be a TD every time. Not this dive or pitch or whatever they want to do. It is a passing play with three reads, success rate around 90%.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
ib was right about the line. Their stats have been lying. Cutler's great but i'm not sure he's a winner

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:35 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
hawkeye wrote:
John Mullin is on CSN now for post game talking about how Cutler "needs to grow up" and other crap after his postgame comments. What did he say? Or is this just some more BS made up by our stupid media?


Really? I hate our sports media. Why does Chicago have so many dumb ones?


Last edited by Beardown on Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
MattInTheCrown wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
They need to run the ball, if for no other reason but to make the play fake honest. If you lose the PA pass, you're screwed with this O-line.

Oh, they need to run the ball, but they cannot. They just can't. Which brings me to the most important point, which I somehow neglected:

I have decided this coaching staff is incompetent, as long as they continue to run Omiyele out there (I don't care to spell that piece of filth's name correctly). This line is not good enough to have a total dog as its left guard. I understand they want him to get experience, but they just can't afford it. If they're going to have him in, they have to accept that they cannot run the ball.

Quote:
I also disagree with Matt about the play calling on the goalline. They ran one of those "always works" plays on first down and the Falcons were all over it. The second down call was just a plain "dive" play and not altogether surprising or interesting; If Forte holds onto the damn ball he might get in, or get close enough for the sneak. The sweep play is one of those things that, if it works, it looks great, and it would have worked if they sold out against the pass on the exterior, which they did on first down.

You disagree, but they fumbled twice, and didn't get close to the goal line on either attempt (Edit: the first time because, surprise, piece of filth let a man get under him, causing Forte to have to jump too early).

Quote:
I do agree with you about the secondary/pass rush, however. Its the rush that's the problem, not the secondary. The interior was fine, at least against the rush, but this team simply cannot rush four and get to the QB with any consistency. I'm not a big fan of the defensive scheme, but it's probably a necessary evil given the weakness at DE.

I still think they should bump receivers at least some. They never do it. Ever. That makes it too tough on the secondary. People don't understand what those guys are up against. They're almost always short-handed because of blitzes, and the opposing QB usually has a nice pocket to throw from. You're going to see lots of completions under those circumstances, no matter how good your corners and safeties are. They better cut Tommie next year. I said they should cut him this year, and I was clearly right. Yeah, you got burned on the bonus money, but that's no reason to get burned a second time on salary. You can't pay a guy that kind of money, and still have a line that gets no interior penetration.


Tommie Fucking Harris is the highest paid player on the Bears at $10 Million dollars per year!!! Harris's Bears contract is the equivalent of the Cubs Soriano & Bradley contracts.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
The primary target was the TE on the first play. The Falcons dropped players into the zone, which is exactly what you can't have on those little play action passes on the goal line. They'll kill you every time with any pass defense, because you have no time to throw or wait for routes to develop.

Your attack on the second play call is that "they would have screwed it up on third down anyway", which, OK, I guess I can't argue against what would have happened in an alternate world where Forte didn't fumble, but Ron Turner can't make all his play calls with the expectation that they'll get penalties to negate everything anyway. And once again, for every person complaining about the sweep on third down, there would be a person on here bitching about throwing the ball twice from the goal line.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Irish Boy wrote:
Forte only had 15 carries. They're pretty close to that already. How many did Wolfe have? three? under five, I'm sure.

This is a historically pathetic running game. Let me ask you this: have you ever seen a team (not just the Bears, any team) that is as pathetic in the running game as this Bears team? Forget the stats for a minute, just go by the eye test. There are defenders in the backfield on Bears running play with mind-blowing consistency. I honestly cannot recall seeing a team that, week-in, week-out is so thoroughly incapable of running the ball.

We're not talking about a team that is poor at running the ball: we're talking about the team that is congenitally incapable of running the ball. Maybe that changes if you get Beekman in there, but as it stands now, you need to be a visionary as an O-coordinator. Refusing to acknowledge your colossal failure to run the ball doesn't fool anyone: it just gives plays away. And that's what they did. They wasted one of three downs just about every time they got a first down. They were in third-and-long all fucking night, and it's mostly because they ran a run up the middle for a loss on first or second down throughout the night.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Irish Boy wrote:
The primary target was the TE on the first play. The Falcons dropped players into the zone, which is exactly what you can't have on those little play action passes on the goal line. They'll kill you every time with any pass defense, because you have no time to throw or wait for routes to develop.

No, that one was to the FB all the way. The TE was a decoy.

Quote:
Your attack on the second play call is that "they would have screwed it up on third down anyway", which, OK, I guess I can't argue against what would have happened in an alternate world where Forte didn't fumble, but Ron Turner can't make all his play calls with the expectation that they'll get penalties to negate everything anyway. And once again, for every person complaining about the sweep on third down, there would be a person on here bitching about throwing the ball twice from the goal line.

He can't make his play-calls acknowledging the fact that his line is filled with incompetents? That's strange, because I'd definitely do just that.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
newper wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
Forte only had 15 carries. They're pretty close to that already. How many did Wolfe have? three? under five, I'm sure.

Then my complaint is when we run. When we get to 4 yds within the goal line, we should run one guy on a fade, another on a cross, and one of the HBs on a flat run. That should be a TD every time. Not this dive or pitch or whatever they want to do. It is a passing play with three reads, success rate around 90%.


You'll never get three reads off from the goal line. You get, at most, two, and usually they're just "pray the guy is wide open" one read passes because, usually, they are open since there are 10 guys running towards the running back. But that assumes basic competency at running, because if they don't have to focus on that even when you have three TEs on the field, there's no magic answer.

Quote:
He can't make his play-calls acknowledging the fact that his line is filled with incompetents? That's strange, because I'd definitely do just that.


What play call would you have made to have Orlando Pace not jump offsides? Since that seems to be your main fear about 3rd and practically nothing.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 5/16
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Scorehead wrote:
Tommie Fucking Harris is the highest paid player on the Bears at $10 Million dollars per year!!! Harris's Bears contract is the equivalent of the Cubs Soriano & Bradley contracts.

Whoa there, let's not get crazy! The outrage is that the Bears are lucky enough to have the option to walk away from bad contracts, but failed to do so. Say what you will about Hendry, but I have little doubt in my mind he'd nix that contract in a second. I think the finger-crossing era with Tommie Harris is over, even for the most optimistic fan/GM.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 223 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group