It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 6:37 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2011 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
No wins and, in my opinion, sucking huge cock this year so far. I really don't give a shit about fuck heads and numbers and shit, this guy is sub-par and on par with a giant turd.

5+ ERA

Not many K's

1.51 WHIP

Batters hitting almost .300 off of him.

ZERO WINS.

Floyd is the better of the two and it may be wishful thinking but Danks goes to the bullpen when/if the 6 man rotation gets axed. Fuck this guy.

I will see you in hell, Danks

Hey John! Stop cocking your hat to the side, stop sucking at baseball and start pitching better!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2011 3:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
SomeGuy wrote:
No wins and, in my opinion, sucking huge cock this year so far. I really don't give a shit about fuck heads and numbers and shit, this guy is sub-par and on par with a giant turd.

5+ ERA

Not many K's

1.51 WHIP

Batters hitting almost .300 off of him.

ZERO WINS.

Floyd is the better of the two and it may be wishful thinking but Danks goes to the bullpen when/if the 6 man rotation gets axed. Fuck this guy.

I will see you in hell, Danks

Hey John! Stop cocking your hat to the side, stop sucking at baseball and start pitching better!


Shit man...what about quality starts he has like 7 or 8, that with Dunns OPSBOPRAGGMOPP this team will be in 1st place by All Star break :roll:

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2011 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
SomeGuy wrote:
No wins and, in my opinion, sucking huge cock this year so far. I really don't give a shit about fuck heads and numbers and shit, this guy is sub-par and on par with a giant turd.

5+ ERA

Not many K's

1.51 WHIP

Batters hitting almost .300 off of him.

ZERO WINS.

Floyd is the better of the two and it may be wishful thinking but Danks goes to the bullpen when/if the 6 man rotation gets axed. Fuck this guy.

I will see you in hell, Danks

Hey John! Stop cocking your hat to the side, stop sucking at baseball and start pitching better!


Please call Ranger

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2011 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
No wins and, in my opinion, sucking huge cock this year so far. I really don't give a shit about fuck heads and numbers and shit, this guy is sub-par and on par with a giant turd.

5+ ERA

Not many K's

1.51 WHIP

Batters hitting almost .300 off of him.

ZERO WINS.

Floyd is the better of the two and it may be wishful thinking but Danks goes to the bullpen when/if the 6 man rotation gets axed. Fuck this guy.

I will see you in hell, Danks

Hey John! Stop cocking your hat to the side, stop sucking at baseball and start pitching better!


Shit man...what about quality starts he has like 7 or 8, that with Dunns OPSBOPRAGGMOPP this team will be in 1st place by All Star break :roll:


Yes! Don't worry about the stats above! He is pitching just fine! wins, whip, Ba against, ERA, K's....all kiddie stats with little meaning!

You gotta go to fan graphs and Baseball Prospectus to find the latest obscure stat like VORGONFUCKYOURSELF, which will show you he is just fine!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
I thought W-L record had no meaning.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 9:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
They don't.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
How much money has he cost himself this year?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Not sure. Initial reaction would be to say a lot. But then I think of the money the Ross Ohlendorf got.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Not sure. Initial reaction would be to say a lot. But then I think of the money the Ross Ohlendorf got.

Yeah probably not a ton. His agent can spin it as an abberation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
I think thats true.

The new world of MLB stats and effects on contracts.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 10:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Arbitration is based more on service time over results. There was a case where an arbitrator had to have 'RBI' explained to him. So no, advanced stats aren't a factor either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Keyser Soze wrote:
Arbitration is based more on service time over results. There was a case where an arbitrator had to have 'RBI' explained to him. So no, advanced stats aren't a factor either.

What about Russ Ohlendorf?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 10:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Service time comparables. That's when all this came out because the stats geeks started saying that the arbitrators must have looked at sabermetrics. They didn't.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 2:17 pm
Posts: 602
Location: Born: Rockford Live: Aurora
pizza_Place: Lino's in Rockford
Title should read "Danks = Bad lately". He has been pretty damn good the last three years. I hope that this poor play convinces him to sign a long term contract with the White Sox. Also, the eternal question: Who would you replace him with?

_________________
" THis poster said it's 90% that Bernstein goes national. He put a percentage on it. " - Beardown


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 3:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
No.

He's your mess and I'll be damned if I'm gonna clean him up.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 3:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43570
I finally dumped John Danks from my fantasy team. I predict he throws a perfect game in his next start.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Douchebag wrote:
I finally dumped John Danks from my fantasy team. I predict he throws a perfect game in his next start.


I'm on the brink of letting him go.......I just can't do it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Tue May 31, 2011 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
HossasSlavicRage wrote:
Title should read "Danks = Bad lately". He has been pretty damn good the last three years. I hope that this poor play convinces him to sign a long term contract with the White Sox. Also, the eternal question: Who would you replace him with?


He's been good. He's really inefficient which results in higher pitch counts than you would think he would have. It's not that he walks guys but it sure seems like he goes from 1-2 to 3-2 much too often. It seems like he wants to be paid like a great pitcher but despite what many others think, I think a great pitcher needs to be someone who goes out there and wins games. I'll grant that he is still maturing and these are results of immaturity.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 10:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
The White Sox have pushed John Danks' next start back to next Monday against Seattle and moved Jake Peavy up a day to start Sunday's game against the Tigers. Edwin Jackson also said he would accept a move to the bullpen.

Hopefully the 6-man rotation is finally coming to an end.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 12:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Hawk was talking about the 6-man rotation and said Peavy likes it because of the extra day of rest. I wonder if they're thinking about making him a sunday starter. They obviously aren't afraid of thinking out of the box. Making him a sunday starter will give him his rest between starts and the other guys can pitch a little more frequently and not have so many days off between starts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 3:33 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79558
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
The reason teams were able to use sunday starters was because of the doubleheaders.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: DANKS = BAD
PostPosted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 9:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Keyser Soze wrote:
The White Sox have pushed John Danks' next start back to next Monday against Seattle and moved Jake Peavy up a day to start Sunday's game against the Tigers. Edwin Jackson also said he would accept a move to the bullpen.

Hopefully the 6-man rotation is finally coming to an end.


I'm shocked Boras hasn't sewed his mouth shut over this. Jackson is in a contract year and if he shows anthing as a starter he will get some big money.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group