It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 12:36 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Irish Boy wrote:
reents wrote:
I am with you Northside Dan, also why would A&M want to go to the SEC, played and SEC team in their last 2 bowl appearances and have gotten trounced.

Sweet, sweet money.

I'm really not trying to cross-contaminate threads here, but..............

What?!?!? This conflicts with that other thread?

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
In my opinion, the SEC/Big Ten/Pac 12 are working towards being the three dominant conferences with the fourth shaking out however. That's why the SEC would want A&M. It was well known that the Pac 12 and Big Ten were working together. It only makes sense for the SEC to align with them and not go against them.

Obviously, it's just speculation but those three conferences can start dividing the money 4 ways instead of 6 ways and make even more.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
RFDC wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Texas is going to wind up an independent...this Longhorn Network thing is going to basicall assure them of that.


I think they will end up in the PAC 10. I think there are a lot of folks at Texas that have wanted that all along.

I can't see the Pac-12 caving on the equitable distribution question. Longhorn Network would be dead in the water. Maybe they make an exception because it is Texas, but there are a lot of "smaller" schools in the Pac-12 that would really resent it (Wazzu, Oregon State, Stanford, Cal, Utah, kinda Colorado).

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
If any of this ends up in the demise of the Longhorn Network, I'm in favor of it.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
spanky wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
reents wrote:
I am with you Northside Dan, also why would A&M want to go to the SEC, played and SEC team in their last 2 bowl appearances and have gotten trounced.

Sweet, sweet money.

I'm really not trying to cross-contaminate threads here, but..............

What?!?!? This conflicts with that other thread?

I don't see the contradiction. Schools try to maximize revenue, and there is a significant different between the Big 12 and the SEC.

My other thread is only about what goes into the pie, and how the pie gets split up. It's not about whether the pie is too big, too small, split fairly, etc. Those are open questions that can be debated by reasonable people.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
spanky wrote:
If any of this ends up in the demise of the Longhorn Network, I'm in favor of it.

I'll never understand for the life of me why ESPN and the University of Texas collaborated on that...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Why would the cap presumably be at 16 teams? Easy inter division scheduling?

If the 16 number is accurate, Would these super conferences consider revoking membership to schools that don't produce or tap into a valuable market ie Vanderbilt if that would allow them to absorb a better program?

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Northside_Dan wrote:
Why would the cap presumably be at 16 teams? Easy inter division scheduling?
It's mostly an easily manageable number, and does open up the opportunity of an interconference weekend of games(Big Ten vs. SEC ranked 1 through 16 all on the same day or weekend). Also, it's the easiest way to make sure the whole conference plays each other.
Northside_Dan wrote:
If the 16 number is accurate, Would these super conferences consider revoking membership to schools that don't produce or tap into a valuable market ie Vanderbilt if that would allow them to absorb a better program?
I don't see it in the Big Ten or Pac 12. Those are filled with long lasting and sustained rivalries. Also, every conference needs bottom feeders. You'll always have a last place team so you might as well keep yours.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Quote:
If the 16 number is accurate, Would these super conferences consider revoking membership to schools that don't produce or tap into a valuable market ie Vanderbilt if that would allow them to absorb a better program?

That's really tough to imagine, especially in Vanderbilt's case. They are an original member of the conference, and there is quite a bit of institutional unity between the schools. It would be like the Big Ten kicking out Northwestern; that's just not going to happen.

Plus, there's a theory (that was a lot more popular 20 years ago) that conferences need teams that everyone knows will be bad, or else one of those good programs will become bad. They used to call it the corn-cob theory and talk about it all the damn time. I think Florida, Alabama, and the other major schools like having an almost-guaranteed conference win every season more than the pure financial mathematics might indicate.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
More crazy thoughts:

-Why is Kansas more expendable than Baylor? Wouldn't a conference rather have a well-rounded, established program like KU than Baylor?

-I'm thinking if a school "left" the SEC, it wouldn't be Vandy, it'd be Arkansas. They could re-attach with some old SWAC friends, and along with some of the other cast-offs from other conferences, form a respectable conference that is just as geographically logical as what is going on now (I realize geography really isn't the main factor in any of this, just saying).

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
spanky wrote:
More crazy thoughts:

-Why is Kansas more expendable than Baylor? Wouldn't a conference rather have a well-rounded, established program like KU than Baylor?

Texas football market

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43566
NCAA Conference Switch talk =

Image

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
spanky wrote:
-Why is Kansas more expendable than Baylor? Wouldn't a conference rather have a well-rounded, established program like KU than Baylor?
Rumor is that Kansas has made it clear that Kansas and Kansas State are a package deal wherever they go. However, that's going to be a tough principle to keep if they are looking at dropping out completely of a BCS conference.

The Big Ten would possibly consider Kansas for basketball reasons but not if they had to take Kansas State.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Baylor has no market. Baylor is on very shaky ground now that A&M is gone.

You know who should be really, really afraid? DePaul. The Chicago market is all pretend for the Big East.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
Irish Boy wrote:
Baylor has no market. Baylor is on very shaky ground now that A&M is gone.



They may not have a market, but they have some very deep and entrenched relationships in the state of Texas. That is how they got in the conference to begin with and that is not going to change any time soon.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19369
Irish Boy wrote:

You know who should be really, really afraid? DePaul. The Chicago market is all pretend for the Big East.


They are a Horizon league school playing in the Big East anyways.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 2:46 pm
Posts: 6251
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
There was talk earlier in the week of having SMU maybe joining the Big 12 too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30318
Texas A&M is a big get for the SEC in the big scheme of things. Down south there in Texas they are a powerful school that has the type of presence to bring Texas with them. Texas has natural rivalries in Arkansas, LSU and of course Texas A&M, and I am sure that is what the SEC is hoping. I fully expect to see the other 2 teams come from the ACC or the Big East that will join for the other side of the conference.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
That was mainly because of Ann Richards, but she's sitting over a loved one's mantle in an urn right now.

Besides, even if Baylor has influence in Texas, the A&M defection ruins that. Used to be "want UT and A&M? Take Tech and Baylor." Now what? The Pac 12 will just say fuck Tech too if they try to pull that.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
What is the deal with FSU and 2 other ACC teams joining the SEC as well? Is that actually going to happen or was that just a rumor?

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
FSU I can see, though there are rumors that Florida vehemently doesn't want that.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
RFDC wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
Baylor has no market. Baylor is on very shaky ground now that A&M is gone.



They may not have a market, but they have some very deep and entrenched relationships in the state of Texas. That is how they got in the conference to begin with and that is not going to change any time soon.

Not as entrenched as A&M - and they are finding a way to get over those feelings.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 2:46 pm
Posts: 6251
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
I heard with Florida State, also Virginia Tech would jump with them, not sure about the other team.

If all this stuff ever happens and more and more sounds like it's coming, I know it's all about football, but could you imagine the conference tournaments in basketball, may take a week to play them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
spanky wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
Baylor has no market. Baylor is on very shaky ground now that A&M is gone.



They may not have a market, but they have some very deep and entrenched relationships in the state of Texas. That is how they got in the conference to begin with and that is not going to change any time soon.

Not as entrenched as A&M - and they are finding a way to get over those feelings.


2 completely different situations. A&M wants out. Baylor doesn't. Obviously, if Baylor wanted out those entrenched relationships wouldn't matter.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
If OU stays with the Big 12, that conference could be alright, but they'd obviously add members. SMU has been mentioned alot, and so has Houston. I bet TCU wishes they'd waited a year (if nothing else so they could consider all options equally) - and maybe there would be an outside chance they could get somebody like BYU (Big 12 obviously has no qualms about schools with their own networks).

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 8:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:23 pm
Posts: 16779
pizza_Place: Little Caesar's
reents wrote:
I heard with Florida State, also Virginia Tech would jump with them, not sure about the other team.

If all this stuff ever happens and more and more sounds like it's coming, I know it's all about football, but could you imagine the conference tournaments in basketball, may take a week to play them.

Miami? Or are they manus non grata?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
PAC - 16?? :shock:

http://espn.go.com/college-sports/story ... ource-says

PAC-10 says the "Longhorn Network" is not gonna happen if Texas joins them. Good for them. Really hope they make that stick.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 10:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
Quote:
"We're wedded to that model," Scott said, adding, "anyone who is going to be a member of our conference is going to be a part of our network model."

However, a source told ESPN's Schad that Pac-12 officials believe the parties could work through Texas' network issues.


I am telling you guys Texas is going to end up in the Pac 10 and still have their TV deal.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
RFDC wrote:
I am telling you guys Texas is going to end up in the Pac 10 and still have their TV deal.
While a Longhorn Network may technically exist there is no way that the Pac 12 is letting Texas join and take an uneven share of the tv contract.

What benefit does it give to the Pac 12 to bring them in if they don't provide any value to the other schools?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 04, 2011 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
What benefit does it give to the Pac 12 to bring them in if they don't provide any value to the other schools?


Getting an open door into Texas provides value to all the other schools. I really hope I am wrong on this as I do not think it would be right to let them in with their TV deal, but I still think Texas finds a way to pull this off.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group