It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 11:21 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 129 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:37 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 3:19 pm
Posts: 2348
Location: Shorewood, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Country Bumpkin wrote:
What part of my statement above is so "out there"?


Just a public service reminder for anyone reading your posts.

So.... Nothing?


Anything RFDC? This retard is waiting. What has Cutler shown you that makes my statements ridiculous? After all the dicksucking from local sports radio about Cutler has lost weight, he was the first here, etc., etc., I havent seen shit from this guy. You can't question his toughness, but his ability and skill are open for dissection.

_________________
RFDC thinks I'm retarded.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57262
mrgoodkat and leashyourkids both stated it all very well.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:40 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 3:19 pm
Posts: 2348
Location: Shorewood, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
K. Got it.

_________________
RFDC thinks I'm retarded.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33819
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
I agree with what they said but he cannot make some of the mistakes he made today.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 10:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
When the Bears traded for cutler I paid particular attention to an interview on ESPN radio from Mark Schlereth. Schlereth had the opportunity to watch cutler regularly when Cutler was playing for the Bronco's. I knew that Schlereth might be a bit biased in some of things he might say as Cutler had basically demanded he be dealt after he learned that the team had sent out a couple feelers concerning potential interest in him in a trade. I got the feeling schlereth didn't like Cutler much, but that didn't matter to me. But the thing that stood out in the interview was Schlereth's claim that Cutlers biggest obstacle as a QB had been poor decision making. He caused too many turnovers due to poor decisions he made throwing the football. That particular problem is amplified in games in which Cutler is under pressure from the defense, of course. Could he do better if he had an All-pro offensive line and top flight receivers...sure. but thats true for any QB. His decision making continues to be a problem.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Quote:
When the Bears traded for cutler I paid particular attention to an interview on ESPN radio from Mark Schlereth.

Image

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Oh, and this thread title is hilariously naive, because there will always be excuses for Cutler. If there weren't, fans* would have to admit they were wrong about something. They can't second-guess this like they can a play call or a draft pick.

*I liked the Cutler trade at the time. I said I was wrong quite some time ago.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 12:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 10:33 pm
Posts: 300
Location: ICIA
pizza_Place: Magliozzi's
I'd say that having the worst o-line and the worst recievers in the league is a good excuse.

_________________
Git on back there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:39 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 9:58 am
Posts: 4456
Location: @ ROH Show Near Me.
pizza_Place: Freezer.
I was afraid, when the trade was made, that the Bears would ruin Cutler by not having a good O for him to work with.

The line was better this week, but the results weren't there. Well, no surprise there: Jay has taken a pounding and sees more coming his way, soonest.

And really, this is Angelo's fault for trading for the guy without quality receivers, line, run game...

_________________
Middle Aged Crazy, like Uncle Terry


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

Does he suck as a QB or does the entire offense (sans Forte, running behind a shitty line) suck around him?

This is not basketball. Cutler cannot "take over the game" and compensate for his shitty teammates. Yes. Cutler missed some open throws yesterday. Yes, he had some time to throw on some plays. BUT, in this offense, he's supposed to unload the ball as soon as he completes his drop, to a spot where his receiver is supposed to be. He can't do that because his receivers are either never open/in the wrong place. He has no confidence in their ability to run a route and be where they're supposed to be. Do any of you?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Killer V wrote:
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

Does he suck as a QB or does the entire offense (sans Forte, running behind a shitty line) suck around him?

This is not basketball. Cutler cannot "take over the game" and compensate for his shitty teammates. Yes. Cutler missed some open throws yesterday. Yes, he had some time to throw on some plays. BUT, in this offense, he's supposed to unload the ball as soon as he completes his drop, to a spot where his receiver is supposed to be. He can't do that because his receivers are either never open/in the wrong place. He has no confidence in their ability to run a route and be where they're supposed to be. Do any of you?


If he were throwing the ball ON TIME to a spot where the receiver was supposed to be, but the receivers were just not there in time that would be fine. But he's holding onto the ball too long and taking sacks or overthrowing the receiver and getting intercepted. He's just not that good. Again a great O-line and receivers would help. But for whatever reason, Angelo did not really shore up those positions greatly, save for the pick of Carimi. He's the only significant piece aquired to help Cutler. Sure Roy Williams will probably have 1 or 2 good games before the season is over, but he is not the Brandon Marshall type of -go get it receiver that really could have made a difference.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Jay Cutler wrote:
I ran out of gas. I... I had a flat tire. I didn't have enough money for cab fare. My tux didn't come back from the cleaners. An old friend came in from out of town. Someone stole my car. There was an earthquake. A terrible flood. Locusts! IT WASN'T MY FAULT, I SWEAR TO GOD!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
If time after time, you threw the ball to a spot and no one was there, would you hesitate from then on, to see if your teammate would actually be there? If he just kept throwing it to no one or to the other team, everyone would be saying how much he sucks and not placing any blame on his teammates. It's just like Jay's demeanor, no matter how he acts, it's wrong.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
When the Bears traded for cutler I paid particular attention to an interview on ESPN radio from Mark Schlereth. Schlereth had the opportunity to watch cutler regularly when Cutler was playing for the Bronco's. I knew that Schlereth might be a bit biased in some of things he might say as Cutler had basically demanded he be dealt after he learned that the team had sent out a couple feelers concerning potential interest in him in a trade. I got the feeling schlereth didn't like Cutler much, but that didn't matter to me. But the thing that stood out in the interview was Schlereth's claim that Cutlers biggest obstacle as a QB had been poor decision making. He caused too many turnovers due to poor decisions he made throwing the football. That particular problem is amplified in games in which Cutler is under pressure from the defense, of course. Could he do better if he had an All-pro offensive line and top flight receivers...sure. but thats true for any QB. His decision making continues to be a problem.


It probably should matter to you.

I can't take any point seriously that quotes Mark Schlereth.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
badrogue17 wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
But of course you won't say anything about the dropped passes :roll:


That wouldn't serve the purpose for Farvio. He is trying to piss Bear fans off around here. That is what he enjoys doing lately with the no heart thread and now this one. It seems to be working quite well.

Cutler has been horrible this game, absolutely no doubt about it. But so has everyone else on this offense--Forte, Williams, Davis, etc.

I dont know how you guys can keep defending Cutler, especially against Green Bay he's been fucking awful for 4 games now. At what point is it he just isnt very good against good teams. FF is correct, even when he has time to throw he sucks. He just got bailed out again from another horeshit thrown ball by the penaty or it would be 14 of 30 with 3 picks. I expected a lot more from " the best qb in Bears history".


+1

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
W_Z wrote:
i think the jeff george comparisons are starting look look more and more apt.

Agreed

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
The Martz offense does not maximize his skill set. He is better than this offense makes him look. The fact that he can not audible is a joke. He should have that option. He is also quite good outside the pocket but Martz will not allow him to leave it.


The Martz offense isn't forcing him to miss wide open receivers. He's the only QB that's played in Martz system that has put up big numbers. It's the QB. Every QB that has played for Martz got sacked a lot but they still had great numbers.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
I don't think Cutler sucks. He is as unsophisticated with the game as you can get for a guy who has been a starting QB probably since the time he put on a helmet. I don't think he is dumb but he sure looks like it when he plays the game. He makes the same mistakes he made three years ago.

I know that the Steelers have Wallace and Ward, who are light years ahead of everything on the Bears but they have a QB who holds the ball too long, an OL who cannot block resulting in a good RB who has no room to run and an aging defense, yet they win in a superior conference.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Country Bumpkin wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
The Martz offense does not maximize his skill set. He is better than this offense makes him look. The fact that he can not audible is a joke. He should have that option. He is also quite good outside the pocket but Martz will not allow him to leave it.


Yeah, good point, he needs to perform better but they aren't exactly helping him out. They are wasting the talent he does have. It's really a shame.


What really is Jay's talent? Holding the ball too long, taking a sack rather than rolling out or running, or throwing picks? Any QB can throw hard, so that really isn't a talent. I thought Cutler would be a savior, he's just part of the problem.


+

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
mrgoodkat wrote:
Even beginning to judge what Cutler ultimately is on the Bears without anything resembling an NFL WR corps, is entirely moronic. And even if he has time, do you really think that somewhere in his mind he isn't wondering when the next wetting of the pants, comes?

I absolutely agree with the idea that skills wise, Cutler could conceivably be tops in the league. And I watched him almost get into the playoffs in Denver with a team that had three legit NFL WR's, and little else. No running game and a young O-line that was not playing well. But they played to his strengths.

There is really no other position in sport that relies on teammates so heavily. People want to hug Rodgers' nuts with the talent on that offense, and then crucify Cutler? They have a WR in Jones that would immediately be the #1 on the Bears based on pure talent, but he cannot find the field on Packers.

Remove head from anus...


Considering what the Bears gave up to get him it is his job to make them look better. When you have guy like Manning that can make a guy on the practice squad look like an all pro receiver Cutler isn't get a pass from me because he don't have a Greg Jennings on his team. The Bears made that deal thinking that a good to great QB would make the guys around him better. Unfortunately Cutler has been average to below average most of his time here. He's looked more like Grossman than many people want to admit.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
leashyourkids wrote:
mrgoodkat wrote:
Even beginning to judge what Cutler ultimately is on the Bears without anything resembling an NFL WR corps, is entirely moronic. And even if he has time, do you really think that somewhere in his mind he isn't wondering when the next wetting of the pants, comes?

I absolutely agree with the idea that skills wise, Cutler could conceivably be tops in the league. And I watched him almost get into the playoffs in Denver with a team that had three legit NFL WR's, and little else. No running game and a young O-line that was not playing well. But they played to his strengths.

There is really no other position in sport that relies on teammates so heavily. People want to hug Rodgers' nuts with the talent on that offense, and then crucify Cutler? They have a WR in Jones that would immediately be the #1 on the Bears based on pure talent, but he cannot find the field on Packers.

Remove head from anus...


Agree with almost everything.

Jay Cutler might not ever be that good. Then again, he might be very good. The problem is that there is no way to tell. This is not just a mediocre or even bad offense, talent-wise. It is horrendous. If the Bears had any semblance of talent at any position other than QB or RB, it would be fair to judge. It is not. They are the least talented offense in the NFL at the WR and OL positions. Their only two WRs that even resemble "weapons" are a converted 3rd rd cornerback/athlete and a 5th rd WR. Oh, and they are running an offense that was successful one time 15 years ago with 5 future hall of famers.

Cutler makes occasional bad throws. He is also constantly looking down the field at WRs who are blanketed, can't get off jams, or aren't running the right routes. Assuming he does get a good 4 seconds to throw, and a receiver actually gets open, how the hell could he possibly be focusing on staying in the pocket, maintaining footwork, reading the defense correctly, and delivering the ball where it should be? Offense is about rhythm and timing. There is no QB in the NFL who would succeed in this offense. None, including Rodgers.... he would be better than Cutler, but he would not put up prolific numbers.

If they gave us a fair chance to judge, and Cutler sucked, I would be the first to admit it. I won't say it with the hand he's been dealt.


Very few QB's in the NFL get a lot of time to throw the ball. You have to be able to make quick decisions. At least 25% of Cutler's sacks are the result of him holding onto the ball too long. It's like he's waiting for his receiver to be open by at least 5 yards. Even then he's liable to miss them. Cutler gets at least half of the blame for the Bears offense. Continuing to make excuses for him at this point is just silly.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Killer V wrote:
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

Does he suck as a QB or does the entire offense (sans Forte, running behind a shitty line) suck around him?

This is not basketball. Cutler cannot "take over the game" and compensate for his shitty teammates. Yes. Cutler missed some open throws yesterday. Yes, he had some time to throw on some plays. BUT, in this offense, he's supposed to unload the ball as soon as he completes his drop, to a spot where his receiver is supposed to be. He can't do that because his receivers are either never open/in the wrong place. He has no confidence in their ability to run a route and be where they're supposed to be. Do any of you?


This happens every game though. At some point you have to remove the but.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
if you had to rank the qb's around the league..cutler would finish around 15....tough shit that the bears over paid because they can not draft...the wr's are THE WORST WR CORE IN THE LEAGUE FOR 3 YEARS NOW...do i think cutler will ever be a top 5 qb? no....i never did ....the line is bad..martz and his system is bad....cutler is eli manning with a stronger arm and worse line and running game

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
When the Bears made the deal I was excited. I thought they had traded for a young guy that could be a top 5 QB in the league. At this point he's not better that Jim Miller or Erik Kramer. We can even debate if he would have been better than Orton. Especially considering who the Bears planned on drafting if they couldn't get him.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Cutler is firmly in the second tier of QB's that can look great at times with the right circumstances but too often looks horrible. Eli, Orton, Romo, Hasselbeck, Cutler.

Actually might be third tier. Not sure Id put those guys ahead of the young guys: Stafford, Bradford, McCoy, Freeman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
HOVA wrote:
When the Bears made the deal I was excited. I thought they had traded for a young guy that could be a top 5 QB in the league. At this point he's not better that Jim Miller or Erik Kramer. We can even debate if he would have been better than Orton. Especially considering who the Bears planned on drafting if they couldn't get him.


Orton would have been dead and burried with this team. There is no way in the world he wold have survived.

Now, he would have had Hakeem Nicks or Jeremy Maclin (the two guys the Bears were targeting with the first #1 they gave up) and who knows what else. Still, I guarantee that JA would not have given him a better OL.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Don't know about Cutler,but how come HOVA has a avatar of WGN's Roy Leonard?

Image

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
HOVA wrote:
When the Bears made the deal I was excited. I thought they had traded for a young guy that could be a top 5 QB in the league. At this point he's not better that Jim Miller or Erik Kramer. We can even debate if he would have been better than Orton. Especially considering who the Bears planned on drafting if they couldn't get him.




better than miller..kramer i dunno about that..miller sucked

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92107
Location: To the left of my post
If it would be easier for some, you can just PM me your apologies rather than publicly post it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
If it would be easier for some, you can just PM me your apologies rather than publicly post it.

I'm sorry.

What are we apologizing for?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 129 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group