Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The Illini have to land some of these top guys out of Chicago. It's the state school. It has to own the state. Unlike Big Chicagoan, I don't really think the results of this season are as crucial for Weber as the recruiting. He can't let Self and Calipari waltz in and grab Parker, Hamilton, etc. And with the new AD, the Richmond fiasco, and now Head leaving, I don't think Weber is in the greatest position.
Hasn't the success of Illinois been more closely related to Peoria recruiting when they are stocked with talent?
Fans love to look at Chicago and think that is the key to the promised land. Purdue fans do it too. It's true there are some absolute studs in Chicago, but those cost a lot of money when people like Calipari is involved. The others still have a ton of baggage and may not work out and are often a bigger distraction than a great player. I guess it depends on what your definition of Chicago is. If you are counting the suburbs too, then I agree. If you are talking about the players within the city limits I understand why any coach is hesitant to enter that mess. I don't think Illinois wants to be that dirty, and since they aren't Kentucky or Ohio State, they can't get away with things with a slap on the wrist from the NCAA.
I do think it's amazing how few players from the city of Chicago end up at Big Ten universities. Proviso and others produce a lot but you'd think for a supposed great high school basketball town that the Big Ten would be stocked with them. That makes it even more amazing that DePaul can't land any of them either.
I agree with a lot of what you said there and in this era quite a few of the kind of guys I'm talking about are "one and done" anyway. But I think what's as important as the actual players themselves is the perception that your program is THE Program in the state. Just like Ohio State doesn't want that top fullback from Cincinnati going to Michigan, even though he might be the fourth guy on the Buckeyes depth chart. That's why Richmond was important for the Illini, regardless of the way it turned out. It showed Weber could recruit with the big guys and keep a top guy in-state.
Generally, when I talk about "Chicago" with regard to high school players I mean the major conferences in the Chicago area- the Public and Catholic Leagues as well as the Central Suburban, SICA, etc. It just so happens that the Public League is currently loaded. The Red South is really strong.
Illinois has always dominated recruiting downstate. Wayne McClain has had a lot to do with that in recent years, but Illinois has always been on the top of the list for the raw-boned farm boys from places like Effingham or Marion anyway.
DePaul rebuilt its program in the late seventies with Chicago area players including a lot of Public League guys. It was a disaster for DePaul when they alienated the Public coaches and Illinois once again had a shot at the top players. I think that golden age for DePaul was a perfect storm that probably can't be duplicated. The Bulls were horrible and Chicago was starving for a winner. There were lots of Chicago guys like me that went to other schools but were fans of DePaul basketball.