It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 8:39 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43579
Mini Ditka wrote:
Can't they just amnesty Boozer?

Only in the off-season. You can't do it in the middle of a season, and there's no way Jerry eats that money.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Mini Ditka wrote:
Can't they just amnesty Boozer?




no...i doubt any player gets amnestied ..you still have to pay his contract and boozer is not a bum he is pretty good

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:46 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Would Howard make a huge impact on the Bulls? Yes. Would I like to see Rose and Howard on the floor at the same time? Yes.

But I just simply do not see how Orlando can justify a trade to Chicago from both a financial and conference-perspective.

Furthermore, I am not totally sold on the idea that adding Howard makes you better than Miami. Not if it means giving up a player like Deng or Gibson, which will have to happen.

Rose and Wade match-up well. Howard would own the paint. But who gets stuck gaurding LeBron?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57247
FavreFan wrote:
Love and Rubio are a pretty awesome combination, they have a great coach, they could be really good a lot sooner than you think. It sounds like you're underrating Love and Rubio's potential considering how good he already is at this age and point of his rookie season.


And they have this guy as an assistant coach. Greatness is not far off...

Image

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Douchebag wrote:
312player wrote:
taj/noah > gasol/bynum

I still can't figure out if your sports thoughts are real, or if you just troll this board.




you think gasol and bynum have more value than taj/noah..i disagree..gasol is 32 and bynum is a career 10 ppg/7 rebounds.. noah >bynum and taj may be a 6th man here but he is going to start for any other team.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43579
312player wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
312player wrote:
taj/noah > gasol/bynum

I still can't figure out if your sports thoughts are real, or if you just troll this board.




you think gasol and bynum have more value than taj/noah..i disagree..gasol is 32 and bynum is a career 10 ppg/7 rebounds.. noah >bynum and taj may be a 6th man here but he is going to start for any other team.

Yep, just trolling.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
immessedup17 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Because that was the max contract for Love's age.

Exactly. That's the new value of a standard four year max contract. It makes Boozer's contract clearly a liability more than an asset.

If Love was in the NBA as long as Boozer was, Love would have gotten paid way more than 4y/62M. It is difficult to compare contracts in the NBA as it is the only league that limits what a player can make based on experience. MLB has a similar idea but it works a lot differently.

This is why Rashard Lewis', Gilbert Arenas', and Kobe Bryant's max contracts were a lot larger than LeBron James', Derrick Rose's, and Russell Westbrook's. It is an unfair system that rewards experience over skill.[/quote]

Kobe was the best player in the game and Otis Smith bid $40M dollars more than everyone else.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
312player wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
312player wrote:
taj/noah > gasol/bynum

I still can't figure out if your sports thoughts are real, or if you just troll this board.




you think gasol and bynum have more value than taj/noah..i disagree..gasol is 32 and bynum is a career 10 ppg/7 rebounds.. noah >bynum and taj may be a 6th man here but he is going to start for any other team.

Taj Gibson....great basketball player.....or greatest basketball player?

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
trolling? nah man..i have seen some of you guys future hall of fame lists with names like ohn salmons on it..taj is a good player who is under paid and young..a future starter no doubt he has a lot of value and so does noah...gasol is 32 and on the decline and making too much money..bynum is having a career year after being chronically injured almost yearly. taj/noah have more value than bynum/gasol.. every g.m. in the league agrees with me

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
312player wrote:
trolling? nah man..i have seen some of you guys future hall of fame lists with names like ohn salmons on it..taj is a good player who is under paid and young..a future starter no doubt he has a lot of value and so does noah...gasol is 32 and on the decline and making too much money..bynum is having a career year after being chronically injured almost yearly. taj/noah have more value than bynum/gasol.. every g.m. in the league agrees with me

I always thought ohn salmons was the real deal

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:12 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
312player wrote:
trolling? nah man..i have seen some of you guys future hall of fame lists with names like ohn salmons on it..taj is a good player who is under paid and young..a future starter no doubt he has a lot of value and so does noah...gasol is 32 and on the decline and making too much money..bynum is having a career year after being chronically injured almost yearly. taj/noah have more value than bynum/gasol.. every g.m. in the league agrees with me


Nothing like a sweeping generalized statement to drive home a point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 12:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
312player wrote:
trolling? nah man..i have seen some of you guys future hall of fame lists with names like ohn salmons on it..taj is a good player who is under paid and young..a future starter no doubt he has a lot of value and so does noah...gasol is 32 and on the decline and making too much money..bynum is having a career year after being chronically injured almost yearly. taj/noah have more value than bynum/gasol.. every g.m. in the league agrees with me


Nothing like a sweeping generalized statement to drive home a point.

Every person in the entire world realizes that ohn salmons is a first ballot hall of famer.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
312player wrote:
trolling? nah man..i have seen some of you guys future hall of fame lists with names like ohn salmons on it..taj is a good player who is under paid and young..a future starter no doubt he has a lot of value and so does noah...gasol is 32 and on the decline and making too much money..bynum is having a career year after being chronically injured almost yearly. taj/noah have more value than bynum/gasol.. every g.m. in the league agrees with me


Nothing like a sweeping generalized statement to drive home a point.




was just using that statement as an example..nothing personal..taj/noah value over bynum/gasol is not really a controversial stance or trolling.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Here's why DB said you were trolling.. Bynum and Gasol are worth more than Noah and Taj. A lot more. I would bet everything I owned every single GM would agree.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
d bag is true to his name i will give him that.. gasol is 32 and making 17 million a year..taj gibson is making 2 million...bynum is making 16 million..noah makes 11...taj/noah is better bang for buck and younger.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 1:26 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:04 am
Posts: 2251
RFDC wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Love and Rubio are a pretty awesome combination, they have a great coach, they could be really good a lot sooner than you think. It sounds like you're underrating Love and Rubio's potential considering how good he already is at this age and point of his rookie season.


And they have this guy as an assistant coach. Greatness is not far off...

Image


:lol: My REC league team mates call me "Sikma" when I shoot my jumper. NEEDLESS to say I've lost my vertical at 43.


Last edited by Mr. Belvidere on Thu Feb 02, 2012 1:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 1:34 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:04 am
Posts: 2251
Boozer can shoot the turn around jumper and the 15 footer. THATS IT. Gibson has a decent baseline jumper, runs the floor on the break, blocks shots which creates a fast break, contests shots, bodys up, battles both ends boards and can guard the SF PF and Center. This is very simple. Gibsons defense and limited offense is way better (IMO) on a full court than Boozer offers. I wanted Boozer and I was wrong. The upside is the Bulls have depth that makes them hard to game plan for. Thats a good thing.

If Gibson is not on the Magic, the Bulls will make Gibson a very rich man. Especially with Thibbs as coach.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
Boozer needs launched via amnesty after the season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
cpguy wrote:
Boozer needs launched via amnesty after the season.


But the Bulls don't want to pay him and then have to dump him. I would think they would try to trade him if they really wanted to get rid of him.

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 1:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:30 pm
Posts: 802
Mini Ditka wrote:
cpguy wrote:
Boozer needs launched via amnesty after the season.


But the Bulls don't want to pay him and then have to dump him. I would think they would try to trade him if they really wanted to get rid of him.

But they will have to trade him for an equally overpaid player, who they will not be allowed to amnesty.

I would hope that the Bulls would amnesty Boozer if they are guaranteed to acquire a legit superstar by doing so, but they won't do it just to improve the position from "decent" to "good" or "very good."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 1:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43579
Trading Boozer for a different bad contract would probably get you something worse in return.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:07 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Douchebag wrote:
Trading Boozer for a different bad contract would probably get you something worse in return.


Unless it is A'mare.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43579
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Trading Boozer for a different bad contract would probably get you something worse in return.


Unless it is A'mare.

Not a chance that happens.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
I really think the Wolves will be very good a lot sooner than some realize

as i've said before, all they really need is a outside shooter to ease the defense. right now Rubio doesn't shoot all that well so teams dare him to shoot and on most nights he can't, and they double team Love. Barea is not the answer. neither is wayne ellington, anthony tolliver, etc.

find a decent two guard and a role player or two and they're right there


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Douchebag wrote:
Trading Boozer for a different bad contract would probably get you something worse in return.

A rich man's Ben Wallace for Larry Hughes trade.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 4:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Bagels wrote:
I really think the Wolves will be very good a lot sooner than some realize

as i've said before, all they really need is a outside shooter to ease the defense. right now Rubio doesn't shoot all that well so teams dare him to shoot and on most nights he can't, and they double team Love. Barea is not the answer. neither is wayne ellington, anthony tolliver, etc.

find a decent two guard and a role player or two and they're right there


Considering I picked them to make the playoffs you're behind. Just as I told you all when David Stern was destroying the Hornets the Wolves pick will be better than the Rockets. Just another sign the Lakers deal was better.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
HOVA wrote:
Bagels wrote:
I really think the Wolves will be very good a lot sooner than some realize

as i've said before, all they really need is a outside shooter to ease the defense. right now Rubio doesn't shoot all that well so teams dare him to shoot and on most nights he can't, and they double team Love. Barea is not the answer. neither is wayne ellington, anthony tolliver, etc.

find a decent two guard and a role player or two and they're right there


Considering I picked them to make the playoffs you're behind. Just as I told you all when David Stern was destroying the Hornets the Wolves pick will be better than the Rockets. Just another sign the Lakers deal was better.


i agree with you , i don't think many people disagree that the Lakers deal was better. As i posted awhile back, Gordon turned down the hornets extension....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 4:22 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Douchebag wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Trading Boozer for a different bad contract would probably get you something worse in return.


Unless it is A'mare.

Not a chance that happens.


Probably right. But with a team that lacks cohesion as much as the Knickerbockers, who would be the most likely player they will trade with the chance of getting anything of value in return?

It ain't Carmelo. He's not going anywhere.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
HOVA wrote:
Bagels wrote:
I really think the Wolves will be very good a lot sooner than some realize

as i've said before, all they really need is a outside shooter to ease the defense. right now Rubio doesn't shoot all that well so teams dare him to shoot and on most nights he can't, and they double team Love. Barea is not the answer. neither is wayne ellington, anthony tolliver, etc.

find a decent two guard and a role player or two and they're right there


Considering I picked them to make the playoffs you're behind. Just as I told you all when David Stern was destroying the Hornets the Wolves pick will be better than the Rockets. Just another sign the Lakers deal was better.

You only said that because they have a dominant center like Beasley.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
boozers contract is not good but it is not as bad as a ben wallace more like equal to a joe johnson level of bad.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group