It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 9:21 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:37 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
30 starts at 7 innings (avg) per start gives him 210.

Steve, do you do your own math when figuring out how much paint you need for a job? If so, I would guess you have hundreds of gallons wasted every year.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
30 starts at 7 innings (avg) per start gives him 210.

Steve, do you do your own math when figuring out how much paint you need for a job? If so, I would guess you have hundreds of gallons wasted every year.


At his current pace he will exceed 30 starts. Take the number of remaining games and divide that by 5 and you get the remaining starts he should get. How are you only coming up with 30 starts? Are you assuming they shut him down in September? He should get 21 more starts this season and that should result in 147 additional innings to add to the 75 he has already =222 innings. Thats 84 more innings than he has ever pitched in a season and 151 more innings than last season.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Last edited by Elmhurst Steve on Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:05 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:59 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Reply to Chus's post.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Reply to Chus's post.



There is really nothing of substance to reply to. I never made any claims that were not true. I claimed that my team had won our league Championships in 2010 and 2011 and that I had a 700 series as well as winning an award for high average in a league (different league than the one in which my team won the league titles) All of those things are true. As far as whether Chus "lays off" or not, it's of no consequence to me. It's mind over matter. I don't mind because he doesn't matter.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Reply to Chus's post.

This is weak. I hate ES as much as the next guy, but this would be like ES saying to you "reply to RPB's post".

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:17 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79573
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
To be fair to Steve, Sale has had 11 starts. Id guess he ends up with 33. Using that math he's around 222


I don't think he can get 33 considering he already missed one when they "moved him to the bullpen" and they're going to work around his likely start in the All-Star game. I'd guess he ends up with 28-30 starts and then gets about five more in the postseason.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
I believe the Sox said they would skip one start around the AS game - assuming he pitches in the AS game. That may only be an inning or two, but that counts against the wear and tear in his arm also when you consider warming-up, side sessions, etc. So it's actually like a really short start, not skipping a a start all together.

They should strongly consider limiting him this year. Learn from everyone else's mistakes.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I'd guess he ends up with 28-30 starts and then gets about five more in the postseason.

:? :lol:

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Reply to Chus's post.



There is really nothing of substance to reply to. I never made any claims that were not true. I claimed that my team had won our league Championships in 2010 and 2011 and that I had a 700 series as well as winning an award for high average in a league (different league than the one in which my team won the league titles) All of those things are true. As far as whether Chus "lays off" or not, it's of no consequence to me. It's mind over matter. I don't mind because he doesn't matter.


I believe Frank was referring to Chus challenging your math.

Chus wrote:
Sale has pitched 73 2/3 innings in 11 starts, and one inning in one relief appearance. He is averaging 6.7 IP per start. With 102 games remaining, and Sale not scheduled to pitch until Friday, that means he "should have" 20 starts remaining. If you multiply 20 by 6.7, the result is 134.

134 + 74.67 = 208.67, not 230

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Elmhurst Steve wrote:


There is really nothing of substance to reply to. I never made any claims that were not true. I claimed that my team had won our league Championships in 2010 and 2011 and that I had a 700 series as well as winning an award for high average in a league (different league than the one in which my team won the league titles) All of those things are true. As far as whether Chus "lays off" or not, it's of no consequence to me. It's mind over matter. I don't mind because he doesn't matter.


Steve, I know all of the leagues in which you bowled. I'm looking at your averages right now. I said if that was the high average in any league, you were bowling against sub-par competition, and really shouldn't be bragging. 183, 176, and 182 are your last three averages.

You said that I was ignorant, even though I have the proof. Proof which I have shared with a few other people here. Everything that I have said about your bowling is true, and you know it. Stop lying.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
To be fair to Steve, Sale has had 11 starts. Id guess he ends up with 33. Using that math he's around 222


I don't think he can get 33 considering he already missed one when they "moved him to the bullpen" and they're going to work around his likely start in the All-Star game. I'd guess he ends up with 28-30 starts and then gets about five more in the postseason.

That makes sense. But I wouldnt blame someone for using that number like Steve did

6.7 innings X 22= 147.4 + 74 =221.4


Im just saying, its not like some absurd number

EDIT: I like your moxie with the 5 post season starts!

JORR has now guaranteed a 2012 World Series for the White Sox


Last edited by rogers park bryan on Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:32 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
spanky wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Reply to Chus's post.

This is weak.
No, what's weak is Steve attempting basic math, gets called out for being wrong, and then doesn't reply to that post.

Barring injury, officer Steve, Sale will NOT be shut down early if the Sox are still in the division race. The Sox will probably give him an extended rest over the AS break, and you might see him skipped here or there due to a rainout or when the rosters expand in September, but they are not gonna shut him down.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57244
The sequel is always worse than the original

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
RFDC wrote:
The sequel is always worse than the original

Godfather II and Empire Strikes Back.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Frank Coztansa wrote:
spanky wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Reply to Chus's post.

This is weak.
No, what's weak is Steve attempting basic math, gets called out for being wrong, and then doesn't reply to that post.

Ok, so then didn't you (and others) do the same thing regarding RPB's post? That's using math that's even more basic, and it's different than your numbers. Plus, if you think the Sox are gonna make the postseason, don;t you have to figure those innings into the workload on his arm?

Like RPB said, none of these numbers are that extreme anyway, and nobody knows for sure. All of the various estimates come up above 200+ IP, and his previous high is in the 70's. So you can bicker about exact IP (which can't be exactly known anyway for at least another 5 months) or you can realize that no matter the number, his arm is gonna experience unprecedented wear/tear. His mechanics are "funky" to say the least. I'm not a big "he's too skinny" guy - Lincecum is just as skinny and Randy Johnson always was.
But the concern is legit.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Terry's Peeps wrote:
RFDC wrote:
The sequel is always worse than the original

Godfather II and Empire Strikes Back.


Kill Bill: Volume 2

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Chus wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
RFDC wrote:
The sequel is always worse than the original

Godfather II and Empire Strikes Back.


Kill Bill: Volume 2


I don't think that's really a sequel though. It was filmed as one movie and split up for marketing.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
spanky wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
spanky wrote:
This is weak.
No, what's weak is Steve attempting basic math, gets called out for being wrong, and then doesn't reply to that post.

Ok, so then didn't you (and others) do the same thing regarding RPB's post? That's using math that's even more basic, and it's different than your numbers. Plus, if you think the Sox are gonna make the postseason, don;t you have to figure those innings into the workload on his arm?

Like RPB said, none of these numbers are that extreme anyway, and nobody knows for sure. All of the various estimates come up above 200+ IP, and his previous high is in the 70's. So you can bicker about exact IP (which can't be exactly known anyway for at least another 5 months) or you can realize that no matter the number, his arm is gonna experience unprecedented wear/tear. His mechanics are "funky" to say the least. I'm not a big "he's too skinny" guy - Lincecum is just as skinny and Randy Johnson always was.
But the concern is legit.


Speigel's column on this subject.
http://t.co/pGECfvSu

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
spanky wrote:
Ok, so then didn't you (and others) do the same thing regarding RPB's post? That's using math that's even more basic, and it's different than your numbers. Plus, if you think the Sox are gonna make the postseason, don;t you have to figure those innings into the workload on his arm?

Like RPB said, none of these numbers are that extreme anyway, and nobody knows for sure. All of the various estimates come up above 200+ IP, and his previous high is in the 70's. So you can bicker about exact IP (which can't be exactly known anyway for at least another 5 months) or you can realize that no matter the number, his arm is gonna experience unprecedented wear/tear. His mechanics are "funky" to say the least. I'm not a big "he's too skinny" guy - Lincecum is just as skinny and Randy Johnson always was.
But the concern is legit.


Of course, everyone is just estimating based on current pace, and there are several ways to do it. I took Steve's formula, and plugged in the actual numbers, and he got it wrong.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Speigel's column on this subject.
http://t.co/pGECfvSu

You think biscuit actually wrote that?

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:48 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
spanky wrote:
Ok, so then didn't you (and others) do the same thing regarding RPB's post? That's using math that's even more basic, and it's different than your numbers. Plus, if you think the Sox are gonna make the postseason, don;t you have to figure those innings into the workload on his arm?

Like RPB said, none of these numbers are that extreme anyway, and nobody knows for sure. All of the various estimates come up above 200+ IP, and his previous high is in the 70's.
I never said steve's numbers were extreme. I said that he has shown his math skills on the board here time and time again, and he was proven wrong like 2 posts later.


My bigger point is that nobody from the Sox has said anything about "lowering the Sale" or shutting him down. Not a word. The only thing anybody with the Sox said is that they are looking to give him a long lay off over the AS break; that's it. As far as concern, I'm more concerned with Floyd and Humber than I am with Sale.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Chus wrote:
Of course, everyone is just estimating based on current pace, and there are several ways to do it. I took Steve's formula, and plugged in the actual numbers, and he got it wrong.

Calling ES out on his bowling legend is funny because he is lying about actual numbers that have (or haven't :lol: ) occurred.

Frank using your estimations to call out ES is............. :|

The point is - either way, he's gonna have a ton of innings on that arm with a jacked-up delivery. Skipping one start at the AS game means.....nothing really, does it?

If the Sox don't rest him, and an injury/severe fatigue/loss of effectiveness occurs, are Sox fans gonna place the blame on Coop/Ventura/Kenny like they should? Dusty would get blown up for the same thing.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:56 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
But in skipping that one start over the AS break, it actually really gives him a rest. He will start 4 games max in July if they line up the rotation the way they say they are gonna. And even if he starts/pitches in the AS game, that is only going to be about 30 pitches. He is also in the middle of a stretch where he has 6 days off in between 4 of his 5 starts.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Frank Coztansa wrote:
But in skipping that one start over the AS break, it actually really gives him a rest. He will start 4 games max in July if they line up the rotation the way they say they are gonna. And even if he starts/pitches in the AS game, that is only going to be about 30 pitches. He is also in a stretch where he has 6 days off in between the 4 of his 5 starts.

If they skip his start at the AS break (and he pitches in the game), he's getting basically the exact same rest that all of the other non-AS pitchers get at that time but has to have a, right? It's really not much of a rest (if any).
Or am I mis-understanding their plan?

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:02 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I would think that most pitchers would say that throwing an inning or 2 in the AS game is a lot less physically and mentally taxing than starting and chucking anywhere from 5-8 innings in a regular game

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:25 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79573
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
spanky wrote:
Plus, if you think the Sox are gonna make the postseason, don;t you have to figure those innings into the workload on his arm?


I dont care about his arm. Im not his mommy. If he pitched the Sox to a World Series its more than most Sox pitchers and all Cub pitchers have done in the last,100 years.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:25 am
Posts: 10462
pizza_Place: Investigating
...Re: Chris Sale IP Watch

I keep reading this and wonder who gives a shit about the internet protocol on Sale's watch.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 11:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Chus wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:


There is really nothing of substance to reply to. I never made any claims that were not true. I claimed that my team had won our league Championships in 2010 and 2011 and that I had a 700 series as well as winning an award for high average in a league (different league than the one in which my team won the league titles) All of those things are true. As far as whether Chus "lays off" or not, it's of no consequence to me. It's mind over matter. I don't mind because he doesn't matter.


Steve, I know all of the leagues in which you bowled. I'm looking at your averages right now. I said if that was the high average in any league, you were bowling against sub-par competition, and really shouldn't be bragging. 183, 176, and 182 are your last three averages.

You said that I was ignorant, even though I have the proof. Proof which I have shared with a few other people here. Everything that I have said about your bowling is true, and you know it. Stop lying.



I never began lying. The league I had the high average in last year (2011) was at Poplar creek in the Lane Ducks league. I had a 193 average (look it up asshole) this season in that league, but didn't lead the league this time because I expanded the league by 2 teams and amongst the new bowlers I brought in were several friends with high averages (One averages about 220) But finishing with a 193 average was something I was quite content with-it was just short of the 194 average I had a few years ago. You are ignorant or you wouldn't make claims as you have. You think that you can look up posted averages from the USBC and know everything, but because this league was not sanctioned by the USBC, the information was not available to you. Yet you make statements as if you have all the facts, when in fact you did not. Now go look up the information like a good boy and get better informed......

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 9:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
If it's not a sanctioned league, then it doesn't count. It's just like going up to the bowling alley for open bowling, and rolling a few games with your friends.

Another point that I have often made, which you conveniently ignore, is that leading a league with a 194 is nothing to brag about. You would be somewhere in the middle of our league, and it isn't even the highest competition level. If you bowled on a Friday league, you would have one of the lowest averages.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Chris Sale IP Watch
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Chus wrote:
If it's not a sanctioned league, then it doesn't count. It's just like going up to the bowling alley for open bowling, and rolling a few games with your friends.

Another point that I have often made, which you conveniently ignore, is that leading a league with a 194 is nothing to brag about. You would be somewhere in the middle of our league, and it isn't even the highest competition level. If you bowled on a Friday league, you would have one of the lowest averages.



The lane conditions are the same in that league as they are for the leagues that bowl there that are USBC sanctioned leagues. The only difference is that the league doesnt pay fees to the USBC so it doesn't get any USBC awards. Doesn't change the bowling in any way and I don't give a shit if my 194 average wouldn't lead other leagues. I only claimed (accurately) to have led my league. Where I would rank in any other league is immaterial to the discussion and I don't give a shit what you think of that average. I feel content with it and how you feel about it couldn't possibly mean less to me. Now go get your shine box boy...

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group