It is currently Fri Nov 29, 2024 7:48 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19386
This article should have been written already about the NFL, exchange Bolt for any NFL player.


http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/08/12/ ... u-know-it/

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
He's right.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19386
Terry's Peeps wrote:
He's right.


It's the selective persecution. All over track and baseball, never touches Football or Basketball.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More
conns7901 wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
He's right.


It's the selective persecution. All over track and baseball, never touches Football or Basketball.


Selective listening. I've heard him reference "most of the NFL" being on HGH multiple times.

_________________
Telegram Sam wrote:
I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:38 pm
Posts: 3838
Location: West Quahog, R.I.
pizza_Place: Duneland Pizza
Danny, WYC.
I believe Dan only likes watching golf -- when Tiger is in the hunt. There are questions about possible PED usage with Mr. 14 Majors.
PEDs are in issue in several athletic realms, singling out the Olympics seems a little short-sighted.
Dan also talked about returnigg to the sports that matter. Nice little jab at the Olyies (sp.?), but those other sports also having the problem.
The issue is PEDs in all sports, and what can be done to lessen their usage.

_________________
President of Blake Shetlon fan club


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 3:19 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 1:01 pm
Posts: 7331
Location: County Seat of LaSalle County
pizza_Place: Bianchi's - Ottawa
Drop In wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
He's right.


It's the selective persecution. All over track and baseball, never touches Football or Basketball.


Selective listening. I've heard him reference "most of the NFL" being on HGH multiple times.

_________________
"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." ~ H.L. Mencken


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 3:40 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 1:01 pm
Posts: 7331
Location: County Seat of LaSalle County
pizza_Place: Bianchi's - Ottawa
Drop In wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
He's right.


It's the selective persecution. All over track and baseball, never touches Football or Basketball.


Selective listening. I've heard him reference "most of the NFL" being on HGH multiple times.[/qu
ote]

Yes, I've heard him say that about the NFL before, and I agree. He hasn't done that with anyone in the NBA that I'm aware of. Are Lebron, Kobe, Durant, using HGH? Let's just say I have my opinion. Bernstein and Boers never go there.

_________________
"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." ~ H.L. Mencken


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 6:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:55 pm
Posts: 3287
pizza_Place: Olde Silver Tavern, Manalapan, NJ [R.I.P.?]
The problem is that Dan blithely excuses NFL doping as an extension of the grand bloodsport of America's Game, but he treats doping in baseball or cycling or track or basically anything else as a crime against humanity that needs to be exposed and punished to the full extent of his hysteria.

There's also the lamentable but utterly predictable fact that he's never uttered the words "HGH" and "NBA" in the same sentence.

_________________
The Bulls haven't done anything wrong, and they're not going to do anything wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More
Dave In Champaign wrote:
The problem is that Dan blithely excuses NFL doping as an extension of the grand bloodsport of America's Game, but he treats doping in baseball or cycling or track or basically anything else as a crime against humanity that needs to be exposed and punished to the full extent of his hysteria.

There's also the lamentable but utterly predictable fact that he's never uttered the words "HGH" and "NBA" in the same sentence.


I've never heard it brought up with the NBA, and that's a great point made by others in the thread. I have no reason to defend Bernstein, and I'm not. But I also hate when people create their own bad narrative against him, becoming hypocrites.

_________________
Telegram Sam wrote:
I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 7:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:55 pm
Posts: 3287
pizza_Place: Olde Silver Tavern, Manalapan, NJ [R.I.P.?]
Drop In wrote:
Dave In Champaign wrote:
The problem is that Dan blithely excuses NFL doping as an extension of the grand bloodsport of America's Game, but he treats doping in baseball or cycling or track or basically anything else as a crime against humanity that needs to be exposed and punished to the full extent of his hysteria.

There's also the lamentable but utterly predictable fact that he's never uttered the words "HGH" and "NBA" in the same sentence.


I've never heard it brought up with the NBA, and that's a great point made by others in the thread. I have no reason to defend Bernstein, and I'm not. But I also hate when people create their own bad narrative against him, becoming hypocrites.


I gotcha. I generally enjoy Dan, to be honest, but he really annoys the ever-loving piss out of me sometimes.

_________________
The Bulls haven't done anything wrong, and they're not going to do anything wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:16 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79591
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Of course Bolt is doping. It's impossible to compete at an elite level without doping. It's very similar to Lance Armstrong. Could it really be possible that in sports where every guy is juiced, the only one that isn't just happens to be the best one?

I've raced a lot of top class harness horses. Every jurisdiction has its own rules and regulations regarding medication, but they all pretty much come down to nothing on race day except state-regulated meds like Lasix or Bute. So now we start looking at the definition of "nothing on race day." It can be interpreted in different ways. To most guys it means nothing that will show up in a post-race test. You'll hear old guys talking about racing them on "hay, oats, and water". Let me tell you, if you try that, you're going to go broke in a hurry. So it becomes a matter of constantly pulling blood and making sure whatever you're giving them clears before the test. The really advanced guys use blood builders just like the cyclists. That's why you have anemic horses and so many instances of heart arrhythmia.

Anyway, it's exactly the same for high level human athletes. They're going to push it to the absolute limit. And the money at stake for a guy like Bolt is far greater. And although everyone is doing something, there seems to be some imaginary line that shouldn't be crossed. In horse racing when a guy is winning over a third of his races, that line is apparently crossed. See Lou Pena. In track I have to believe a guy breaking world records while dancing The Macarena and blowing kisses over the last ten meters of a 100 meter race is crossing some line. There will undoubtedly be backlash. In other words, it's okay to cheat. Just don't shove it in everyone else's face.

As far as the NBA and NFL are concerned, of course many guys are doped. Nobody cares because those sports aren't as important as baseball which connects us with the past and the history of our country.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
As far as the NBA and NFL are concerned, of course many guys are doped. Nobody cares because those sports aren't as important as baseball which connects us with the past and the history of our country.

Rack him


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92108
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
As far as the NBA and NFL are concerned, of course many guys are doped. Nobody cares because those sports aren't as important as baseball which connects us with the past and the history of our country.
It's more about the records. Baseball builds up certain records as being important. Track certainly does. I don't even know if there is a single meaningful NFL record out there. When all these QB passing records have been beaten lately most people just shrug and move on.

Track is boring. That gives you time to concentrate on just how artificially enhanced the participants are.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:39 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79591
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
As far as the NBA and NFL are concerned, of course many guys are doped. Nobody cares because those sports aren't as important as baseball which connects us with the past and the history of our country.
It's more about the records. Baseball builds up certain records as being important. Track certainly does. I don't even know if there is a single meaningful NFL record out there. When all these QB passing records have been beaten lately most people just shrug and move on.

Track is boring. That gives you time to concentrate on just how artificially enhanced the participants are.


I don't know if it's boring. It's the most basic of all sports. Who is fastest? I had an argument with my girlfriend during the Olympics about athletes and some of these sports that relatively few people actual play. For example, if you put Cam Newton on skis and taught him how to shoot, he might be the best biathlete in the world. If Wallace Spearmon got on a bike, he might win more Tours than Armstrong. I think the less equipment required, the purer sport. That's why the best athletes in the world are probably soccer or basketball players. Those sports are more accessible to the masses. And everybody can get out and run.

Anyway, a further point is the comparison between the athletes of today and those of the past. No educated person could possibly think man has evolved in two generations. So I think when they say "today's athletes are superior", they really aren't thinking it through. There are more people. And more of them participate in recreational sports. But if you could bring Jim Thorpe or Jesse Owens forth in a time machine and gave them whatever Bolt is taking, they might well run a 9.6.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
conns7901 wrote:
This article should have been written already about the NFL, exchange Bolt for any NFL player.


http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/08/12/ ... u-know-it/


Wow. BernSTINE really risking his career by going after the super-secret, hush-hush taboo subject that is drugs and sports.


JORR wrote:
Anyway, a further point is the comparison between the athletes of today and those of the past. No educated person could possibly think man has evolved in two generations. So I think when they say "today's athletes are superior", they really aren't thinking it through. There are more people. And more of them participate in recreational sports. But if you could bring Jim Thorpe or Jesse Owens forth in a time machine and gave them whatever Bolt is taking, they might well run a 9.6.


I think that may be true when it comes to true physical evolution and such but there is more to it than just the PED's. Training, diet, preparation, recovery from injury and the athletes focus on said sport/event/whatever is superior to what was the norm in the 1930's.

The athletes baseline physical talents may not have changed by leaps and bounds but the "other stuff" has.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:49 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79591
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
SomeGuy wrote:

I think that may be true when it comes to true physical evolution and such but there is more to it than just the PED's. Training, diet, preparation, recovery from injury and the athletes focus on said sport/event/whatever is superior to what was the norm in the 1930's.

The athletes baseline physical talents may not have changed by leaps and bounds but the "other stuff" has.



Yeah, sure that's right. But whoever was here would enjoy the current methods. It's like arguing that Terry's Peeps is a better communicator than Ronald Reagan because Reagan didn't have a Twitter account.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 7:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92108
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Anyway, a further point is the comparison between the athletes of today and those of the past. No educated person could possibly think man has evolved in two generations. So I think when they say "today's athletes are superior", they really aren't thinking it through. There are more people. And more of them participate in recreational sports. But if you could bring Jim Thorpe or Jesse Owens forth in a time machine and gave them whatever Bolt is taking, they might well run a 9.6.
I think the biggest difference in athletes has been the sheer numbers of people who try to play and the full time nature of sports. In the 1940s, there just weren't that many people who wanted to play basketball, so the best wouldn't be quite as good. Also, many of them still, even once professional, had to have other jobs. Not to mention, they had to go off to war or work on the farm and you just aren't getting the level of practice that they do now.

The question is when did the generation of players in any sport become "full time". I would guess in the NBA it is the generation of Magic and Bird(basketball was on television, the NCAA tournament existed, and the NBA was at least somewhat popular). It's later for football, and earlier for baseball.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 8:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:

I think that may be true when it comes to true physical evolution and such but there is more to it than just the PED's. Training, diet, preparation, recovery from injury and the athletes focus on said sport/event/whatever is superior to what was the norm in the 1930's.

The athletes baseline physical talents may not have changed by leaps and bounds but the "other stuff" has.



Yeah, sure that's right. But whoever was here would enjoy the current methods. It's like arguing that Terry's Peeps is a better communicator than Ronald Reagan because Reagan didn't have a Twitter account.



I hear you...loud and clear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 8:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
conns7901 wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
He's right.


It's the selective persecution. All over track and baseball, never touches Football or Basketball.

They've both said plenty of times that they accept that the NFL is a freak show and that most of the league is likely dirty.

Edit: Thanks Drop In.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 6:35 pm
Posts: 1905
Location: Up Where We Belong
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Anyway, a further point is the comparison between the athletes of today and those of the past. No educated person could possibly think man has evolved in two generations. So I think when they say "today's athletes are superior", they really aren't thinking it through. There are more people. And more of them participate in recreational sports. But if you could bring Jim Thorpe or Jesse Owens forth in a time machine and gave them whatever Bolt is taking, they might well run a 9.6.


I see two sides to this: At the 2011 Illinois High School finals, the winning time for class 1A was 10.79 in the 100M, that time would have placed 6th in a field of 6 in the 1936 Olympics that Owens won. The winning time for the 3A of 10.49 would have won a Bronze in that event. Aside from better training, nutrition, equipment, technology in footwear and surfaces, evolution has to be a factor as well.

Conversely, give Owens or Ralph Metcalfe access to the same training, equipment, nutrition and technology, and I'm sure that their times would improve.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
No Clever Moniker wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Anyway, a further point is the comparison between the athletes of today and those of the past. No educated person could possibly think man has evolved in two generations. So I think when they say "today's athletes are superior", they really aren't thinking it through. There are more people. And more of them participate in recreational sports. But if you could bring Jim Thorpe or Jesse Owens forth in a time machine and gave them whatever Bolt is taking, they might well run a 9.6.


I see two sides to this: At the 2011 Illinois High School finals, the winning time for class 1A was 10.79 in the 100M, that time would have placed 6th in a field of 6 in the 1936 Olympics that Owens won. The winning time for the 3A of 10.49 would have won a Bronze in that event. Aside from better training, nutrition, equipment, technology in footwear and surfaces, evolution has to be a factor as well.

Conversely, give Owens or Ralph Metcalfe access to the same training, equipment, nutrition and technology, and I'm sure that their times would improve.


I understand your point but evolution played absolutely no role.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
"There is another place where too many still exist, however, that is as intellectually dishonest as it is willfully ignorant, where convenient blind spots and emotionaI neediness cause otherwise intelligent people to create fairylands of childish naiveté." - Dan Bernstein

And THIS from the charter member of the Theo Epstein ALS Club-Chicago Branch! :wink:

As for his assertion that Usain Bolt's achievements aren't exactly "human" :wink: , he perhaps should consider his choice of words with a bit more care. His own inner lunkhead is showing, imo.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Regular Reader wrote:
"There is another place where too many still exist, however, that is as intellectually dishonest as it is willfully ignorant, where convenient blind spots and emotionaI neediness cause otherwise intelligent people to create fairylands of childish naiveté." - Dan Bernstein

And THIS from the charter member of the Theo Epstein ALS Club-Chicago Branch! :wink:

As for his assertion that Usain Bolt's achievements aren't exactly "human" :wink: , he perhaps should consider his choice of words with a bit more care. His own inner lunkhead is showing, imo.


Ben Johnson was Jamaican and juiced to the gills as well. Ole' Ben ran a 9.79 and a world record, he was juiced (caught using Winstrol, who knows what else.) and had access to the best regimes. Was his talent, even with the training advances and drugs, only worth a 9.79 100m dash? His subsequent comeback attempts were poor, although I do realize he was a bit older.

In the end, it's about baseline talent and potential. Training, mechanics,diet, drugs and the myriad of other sports sciences will help someone realize it, surpass it or achieve it sooner. And some might just be in the "All Drugs" category.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
Ben was Canadian in both the common and CBOT meaning of the word.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
good dolphin wrote:
Ben was Canadian in both the common and CBOT meaning of the word.


He left his native lands for the Maple Leaf at around 16.

He was born a Jamaican and dammit if he didn't take steroids like a Jamaican as well!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:10 pm 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79591
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Anyway, a further point is the comparison between the athletes of today and those of the past. No educated person could possibly think man has evolved in two generations. So I think when they say "today's athletes are superior", they really aren't thinking it through. There are more people. And more of them participate in recreational sports. But if you could bring Jim Thorpe or Jesse Owens forth in a time machine and gave them whatever Bolt is taking, they might well run a 9.6.
I think the biggest difference in athletes has been the sheer numbers of people who try to play and the full time nature of sports. In the 1940s, there just weren't that many people who wanted to play basketball, so the best wouldn't be quite as good. Also, many of them still, even once professional, had to have other jobs. Not to mention, they had to go off to war or work on the farm and you just aren't getting the level of practice that they do now.

The question is when did the generation of players in any sport become "full time". I would guess in the NBA it is the generation of Magic and Bird(basketball was on television, the NCAA tournament existed, and the NBA was at least somewhat popular). It's later for football, and earlier for baseball.



I agree with this for the most part. However, I believe the effect of the population boom on the quality of sports is mitigated, to at least some degree, by the myriad choices available to people. And not simply among sports, but pastimes in general. For example, Lipid appears to be a big, strong fellow. Perhaps we have our generation's Al Oerter right here among us, but he was lost to Track and Field via his obsession with Halo. Or the Eagles.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:25 am
Posts: 10462
pizza_Place: Investigating
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The question is when did the generation of players in any sport become "full time". I would guess in the NBA it is the generation of Magic and Bird(basketball was on television, the NCAA tournament existed, and the NBA was at least somewhat popular). It's later for football, and earlier for baseball.


I agree with this for the most part. However, I believe the effect of the population boom on the quality of sports is mitigated, to at least some degree, by the myriad choices available to people. And not simply among sports, but pastimes in general. For example, Lipid appears to be a big, strong fellow. Perhaps we have our generation's Al Oerter right here among us, but he was lost to Track and Field via his obsession with Halo. Or the Eagles.

Interesting. I would go with the period of 1970 - 1975 and the MLBPA gaining strength as the probably the single most important action in them gaining general wealth. For basketball and football, even with additional "options", TV contracts were probably the second largest influence on player wealth followed in the 1980's by the creation of cable outlets reaching a much greater portion of society with discretionary income. Advertising as a whole got much better at spending more money on the sports they deemed their target audience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
Would you believe Bernsy got mentioned this morning...on ESPN Radio's "The Herd with Colin Cowherd", simulcast on ESPNU, DIRECTV 208?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
SHARK wrote:
Would you believe Bernsy got mentioned this morning...on ESPN Radio's "The Herd with Colin Cowherd", simulcast on ESPNU, DIRECTV 208?


Oh great....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33070
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
SHARK wrote:
Would you believe Bernsy got mentioned this morning...on ESPN Radio's "The Herd with Colin Cowherd", simulcast on ESPNU, DIRECTV 208?


Baby SHARKs are never going to happen if you continue to spend all your time consuming this type of media. ESPNU, really?

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group