It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 5:41 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Cutler/Ponder comparison
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Just a little food for thought.....in the 2012 regular season Cutler amassed 3033 yards passing. Poder had just 98 fewer yards (2935). Cutler completed 58.8% of his passes, while Poder completed 62.1%. Cutler threw 19 touchdown passes and had 14 interceptions. Ponder had 18 TD's and just 12 picks. I'm not suggesting Christian Ponder is a franchise QB. in fact, like most people I think he's pretty bad. But when the stats line up as closely for these 2 as they do, it makes it hard to call Cutler a franchise QB. The NFL has Cutler ranked in the lower half of starting QB's in it's QB ranking for good reason. It's where he belongs.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
The Minnesota OL is far superior to the Bears. Also, Ponder is a QB on a running team. Cutler is a QB on a passing team.

That said, Cutler isn't that great.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Yeah, me and Rick mentioned this like 6 weeks ago. Keep up.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19374
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Just a little food for thought.....in the 2012 regular season Cutler amassed 3033 yards passing. Poder had just 98 fewer yards (2935). Cutler completed 58.8% of his passes, while Poder completed 62.1%. Cutler threw 19 touchdown passes and had 14 interceptions. Ponder had 18 TD's and just 12 picks. I'm not suggesting Christian Ponder is a franchise QB. in fact, like most people I think he's pretty bad. But when the stats line up as closely for these 2 as they do, it makes it hard to call Cutler a franchise QB. The NFL has Cutler ranked in the lower half of starting QB's in it's QB ranking for good reason. It's where he belongs.


You should call in to four shows tomorrow with these thoughts.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Last edited by conns7901 on Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:28 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Big Chicagoan wrote:
The Minnesota OL is far superior to the Bears. Also, Ponder is a QB on a running team. Cutler is a QB on a passing team.

That said, Cutler isn't that great.

Cutler is on a passing team?? Weren't they like last place or bottom 3 or whatever in passing this season?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
FavreFan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
The Minnesota OL is far superior to the Bears. Also, Ponder is a QB on a running team. Cutler is a QB on a passing team.

That said, Cutler isn't that great.

Cutler is on a passing team?? Weren't they like last place or bottom 3 or whatever in passing this season?


They are a pass first team, is what I mean. Not good at it, but they are.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Big Chicagoan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
The Minnesota OL is far superior to the Bears. Also, Ponder is a QB on a running team. Cutler is a QB on a passing team.

That said, Cutler isn't that great.

Cutler is on a passing team?? Weren't they like last place or bottom 3 or whatever in passing this season?


They are a pass first team, is what I mean. Not good at it, but they are.

Yeah but only because Mike Tice is interchangeable with Honey Boo Boo as an offensive coordinator, combined with Forte being banged up a bit throughout the season. Noone in their right mind looks at a team starting Cutler and Forte and decides they are better off passing first.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
FavreFan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
The Minnesota OL is far superior to the Bears. Also, Ponder is a QB on a running team. Cutler is a QB on a passing team.

That said, Cutler isn't that great.

Cutler is on a passing team?? Weren't they like last place or bottom 3 or whatever in passing this season?


They are a pass first team, is what I mean. Not good at it, but they are.

Yeah but only because Mike Tice is interchangeable with Honey Boo Boo as an offensive coordinator, combined with Forte being banged up a bit throughout the season. Noone in their right mind looks at a team starting Cutler and Forte and decides they are better off passing first.


Except the Bears brain trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Poi Dog Pondering should be renamed Poi Dog Cutlering.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 12:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Poi Dog Pondering should be renamed Poi Dog Cutlering.


LOL... good show, doctor, you've unseated my current signature quote with that one. it truly transcended the thread.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 6:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Just a little food for thought... they are both QBs on NFL teams and are white. I think it is a good comparison.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 7:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92082
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Yeah, me and Rick mentioned this like 6 weeks ago. Keep up.
:lol:

This is just Elmhurst Steve attempting to make us look like idiots by having a similar thought.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
If only Cutler played half his games in a dome, he'd really light it up.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:00 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Thanks for telling us you think Cutler is mediocre at best, Steve. Really earth shattering opinion there.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82235
I noticed yesterday that Samantha Steele had already changed her name to Ponder...much stronger pimp hand than Cutler

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
immessedup17 wrote:
I disagree with Steve in Elmhurst's assumption that most believe Ponder is bad. I don't hear that at all. He is a very serviceable QB in his first couple seasons in the NFL, at least on a running team. He gets the job done, and isn't careless with the ball. He is mobile, and can make things happen. And best yet...he has shown he can improve. We're never going to talk about him being great...but he won't lose many games for a team.
badrogue17 wrote:
If only Cutler played half his games in a dome, he'd really light it up.

The Bears played in very favorable weather all season. I can only think of one "cold" game they played.


In most games, he's asked to do little. That said, in the last game VS the Packers he made some key plays and probably had his best game .....of his career to date. But I think the majority of Football fans would consider him well below average as QB's go. If he has another good game this weekend VS the Packers (in Green Bay) it can be discussed further.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Oh, and Cutlers QB rating 81.3. Ponders QB rating 81.2. The stats overall are nearly identical. IMU-as a Viking fan your opinion on Ponder must be biased. Nobody outside Vikings fans consider Ponder a good QB. He's right at the top of the list for QB's likely to be replaced in 2013, along with Sanchez, Gabbert/Henne, and Jake Locker.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Ponder is not seen as a good QB. He is easily in the bottom 10 QB's in the league.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
immessedup17 wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Oh, and Cutlers QB rating 81.3. Ponders QB rating 81.2. The stats overall are nearly identical. IMU-as a Viking fan your opinion on Ponder must be biased. Nobody outside Vikings fans consider Ponder a good QB. He's right at the top of the list for QB's likely to be replaced in 2013, along with Sanchez, Gabbert/Henne, and Jake Locker.

One can be a fan and still be unbiased. It is called being an intelligent fan.

He is in his second year. No, he is not at the top of the list of QB's being replaced. He is the QB of a playoff team. A QB that never hurts his offense. He is a dependable game manager on a run-based team.

If I was crazy in this opinion, I'd have 10-20 CSFMB members calling me on it.


It is a crazy opinion and if you were not debating ME on the subject many would have called you on it. Of all the QB's rated prior to the season, only Jake Locker and Blaine Gabbert were rated lower. Kevin Kolb Ryan Fitzpatrick, Sam Bradford and Matt Cassel were all rated higher. he's a QB of a playoff team because he plays with the greatest RB in the league. He's a passenger on this cruise, not the Captain. I give him credit for a good game last week against the Packers, but I'll bet he doesn't have a similar effort this weekend in Green Bay. He'll revert to being a lousy game manager, incapable of making plays when needed. Packers 27-13.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
immessedup17 wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Of all the QB's rated prior to the season, only Jake Locker and Blaine Gabbert were rated lower.

How about you bring up current QB power rankings? Of not both QB's starting in Week 17, but all QB's that have started at least a few games in 2012.

The fact that he was ranked 30th of 32, and now is ranked better should show that he is capable of improvement. Which is a good thing, you know.


The power rankings I read all season had him listed at the bottom of the barrel.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 12:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
immessedup17 wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Of all the QB's rated prior to the season, only Jake Locker and Blaine Gabbert were rated lower.

How about you bring up current QB power rankings? Of not both QB's starting in Week 17, but all QB's that have started at least a few games in 2012.

The fact that he was ranked 30th of 32, and now is ranked better should show that he is capable of improvement. Which is a good thing, you know.


In the latest Power rankings on NFL.com Ponder is listed in the bottom 8 of the league. It doesn't give an exact number, he's just listed in the catagory "Bottom of the barrel". Other Catagories include Top shelf (Brady, Manning and Rodgers) Knocking on the door (Ryan, Brees, Rothlisberger and Eli Manning_I disagree with that one), Also Top 10 (RG3, Romo and Luck) Middle of the Pack (Newton, Cutler, Flacco, Schaub, Kapernick, Stafford, Rivers, Smith, Dalton and Tannehill) Below average (freeman, Vick, Bradford, Fitzpatrick and Palmer) and FINALLY.....Bottom of the barrel (Locker, Foles, Weeden, Cassel, Gabbert, Henne, PONDER and Sanchez.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 12:24 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
immessedup17 wrote:
The only Week 17 ones I can find show him at 25th out of the 32 starting QB's for Week 17. It did not count any of the season's failed QB's, which I believe would all be ranked under Ponder. I believe in his third season he will show more improvement, and as a fan, the team could do much worse. Hopefully Harvin will be healthy next year, and the Vikings can find a solid #2, or Simpson / Jenkins will step up.


Is Harvin going to be back next year? I've heard a couple of Minneapolis reporters suggest that he doesn't mesh well with Leslie Frazier and thus won't return.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Of all the QB's rated prior to the season, only Jake Locker and Blaine Gabbert were rated lower.

How about you bring up current QB power rankings? Of not both QB's starting in Week 17, but all QB's that have started at least a few games in 2012.

The fact that he was ranked 30th of 32, and now is ranked better should show that he is capable of improvement. Which is a good thing, you know.


In the latest Power rankings on NFL.com Ponder is listed in the bottom 8 of the league. It doesn't give an exact number, he's just listed in the catagory "Bottom of the barrel". Other Catagories include Top shelf (Brady, Manning and Rodgers) Knocking on the door (Ryan, Brees, Rothlisberger and Eli Manning_I disagree with that one), Also Top 10 (RG3, Romo and Luck) Middle of the Pack (Newton, Cutler, Flacco, Schaub, Kapernick, Stafford, Rivers, Smith, Dalton and Tannehill) Below average (freeman, Vick, Bradford, Fitzpatrick and Palmer) and FINALLY.....Bottom of the barrel (Locker, Foles, Weeden, Cassel, Gabbert, Henne, PONDER and Sanchez.


















Is that just one writers opinion or are there stats with rankings? ....ponder is much better than locker and Sanchez and weeden...breed is top tier, that list is awful...Sanchez n locker,weeden are not starters. In this league...ponder is an average qb..like cutler.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
immessedup17 wrote:
Well, there are a ton of WR in free agency this off-season, and the Vikings have a bunch of cap room. We'll see. Too early to call it right now, imo.

The rumor I hear most is Mike Wallace to Vikings...a fit for everyone, but those rumors talk about partnering him with Harvin.


:lol: :lol: :lol: Wallace and other top tier WR's (like the soon to depart Percy Harvin) don't want to play with a scrub QB like Ponder. Dream on...

Go to NFL.com and view the rankings and you will see them listed as I posted them here.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Harbin is not a top tier wr, he has chronic migraines...no thanks.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
312player wrote:
ponder is an average qb...



Ponder aspires to be average. But then you are the same guy that said nobody in the A.L.would want Dempster at the trade deadline and then Texas traded for him him, where he did very well and then he signs a contract with Boston this off-season ......

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
immessedup17 wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
Well, there are a ton of WR in free agency this off-season, and the Vikings have a bunch of cap room. We'll see. Too early to call it right now, imo.

The rumor I hear most is Mike Wallace to Vikings...a fit for everyone, but those rumors talk about partnering him with Harvin.


:lol: :lol: :lol: Wallace and other top tier WR's (like the soon to depart Percy Harvin) don't want to play with a scrub QB like Ponder. Dream on...

Go to NFL.com and view the rankings and you will see them listed as I posted them here.

NFL.com has a writer with personal opinions like like every other writer on every other website. Their list isn't any more "official" than the list I found.


Please do tell where you "found" your list. I would love to go search out the list you say has Ponder listed significantly higher.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 12:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Of all the QB's rated prior to the season, only Jake Locker and Blaine Gabbert were rated lower.

How about you bring up current QB power rankings? Of not both QB's starting in Week 17, but all QB's that have started at least a few games in 2012.

The fact that he was ranked 30th of 32, and now is ranked better should show that he is capable of improvement. Which is a good thing, you know.


In the latest Power rankings on NFL.com Ponder is listed in the bottom 8 of the league. It doesn't give an exact number, he's just listed in the catagory "Bottom of the barrel". Other Catagories include Top shelf (Brady, Manning and Rodgers) Knocking on the door (Ryan, Brees, Rothlisberger and Eli Manning_I disagree with that one), Also Top 10 (RG3, Romo and Luck) Middle of the Pack (Newton, Cutler, Flacco, Schaub, Kapernick, Stafford, Rivers, Smith, Dalton and Tannehill) Below average (freeman, Vick, Bradford, Fitzpatrick and Palmer) and FINALLY.....Bottom of the barrel (Locker, Foles, Weeden, Cassel, Gabbert, Henne, PONDER and Sanchez.

Im basically just gonna ignore any list that has Tannehill ranked higher than Bradford or Freeman.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
immessedup17 wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
312player wrote:
ponder is an average qb...



Ponder aspires to be average. But then you are the same guy that said nobody in the A.L.would want Dempster at the trade deadline and then Texas traded for him him, where he did very well and then he signs a contract with Boston this off-season ......

He had a 5.09 ERA for the Rangers.

Is that very well?



Dempster had 2 really bad starts that inflated his ERA. Overall, he was very good and had a 7-3 record for the Rangers in his stay there.


Still waiting on that (made up) list you SAY you found that has Ponder listed significantly higher than the one I posted listing him (accurately) as "Bottom of the Barrel".

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Of all the QB's rated prior to the season, only Jake Locker and Blaine Gabbert were rated lower.

How about you bring up current QB power rankings? Of not both QB's starting in Week 17, but all QB's that have started at least a few games in 2012.

The fact that he was ranked 30th of 32, and now is ranked better should show that he is capable of improvement. Which is a good thing, you know.


In the latest Power rankings on NFL.com Ponder is listed in the bottom 8 of the league. It doesn't give an exact number, he's just listed in the catagory "Bottom of the barrel". Other Catagories include Top shelf (Brady, Manning and Rodgers) Knocking on the door (Ryan, Brees, Rothlisberger and Eli Manning_I disagree with that one), Also Top 10 (RG3, Romo and Luck) Middle of the Pack (Newton, Cutler, Flacco, Schaub, Kapernick, Stafford, Rivers, Smith, Dalton and Tannehill) Below average (freeman, Vick, Bradford, Fitzpatrick and Palmer) and FINALLY.....Bottom of the barrel (Locker, Foles, Weeden, Cassel, Gabbert, Henne, PONDER and Sanchez.

Im basically just gonna ignore any list that has Tannehill ranked higher than Bradford or Freeman.


Freeman had a 5-6 game stretch where he was terriffic. About as good as anyone in the league. But early and especially late in the season, he was mostly awful. Bradford is not consistent either. He has some good games and just about as many bad games. Tannehill is probably ranked a bit high, but I have more issue with where Rivers is ranked (too high). Also not really in step with Rothlisberger and Eli Manning being ranked along with Ryan and Brees. Brees belongs in the Top Tier. But the fact that Ponder is ranked in the bottom catagory is not something I have issue with. Do you?

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group