It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 2:37 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 122 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43577
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Had he not been the first black player in the major leagues, chances are good he never would have been selected for the Hall of Fame.

Had he not been the first black player, he also would have played 6-8 more years of pro ball.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 10:53 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79580
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Nas wrote:
I know it's sexy to stomp Steve every time he posts something and he enjoys it too but in no world is Jackie Robinson better than Willie Mays or Frank Robinson or Hank Aaron or Ernie Banks.

You'll notice, I am not one to stomp everything Steve says.

Jackie Robinson was as good as Frank, and Ernie Banks in this world that you and I live in. I dont know why you would say it like that, since its obviously subjective to a degree. I specifically said Mays was better and Aaron as good or better, so I dont know why you're bringing them up.

I mean, obviously, if you give a lot of credit for longevity, but I dont think you should hold it against Robinson that he missed those 6 years.



Jackie wan't as good as Frank Robinson or Ernie. Frank Robinson is nearly on the level with Aaron, Mays, and Mantle. Ernie was the best slugging shortstop ever outside the steroid era.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Best 5 seasons for each player:

Jackie Robinson
1949 .342 16 HR 124 RBI 37 SB By far his best season.
1950 .328 14HR 81 RBI 12 SB
1951 .338 19 HR 88 RBI 25 SB
1952 .308 19 HR 75 RBI 24 SB
1953 .329 12 HR 95 RBI 17 SB

Frank Robinson (The better one)

1959 .311 36 HR 125 RBI 18 SB
1961 .323 37 HR 124 RBI 22 SB
1962 .342 39 HR 136 RBI 18 SB
1965 .296 33 HR 113 RBI 13 SB
1966 .316 49 HR 122 RBI 8 SB

Hank Aaron

1959 .355 39 HR 123 RBI 8 SB
1961 .327 34 HR 120 RBI 21 SB
1962 .323 45 HR 128 RBI 15 SB
1963 .319 44 HR 130 RBI 31 SB
1966 .279 47 HR 127 RBI 21 SB

Ernie Banks
1958 .313 47 HR 129 RBI 4 SB
1959 .304 45 HR 143 RBI 2 SB
1960 .271 41 HR 117 RBI 1 SB
1962 .269 37 HR 104 RBI 5 SB
1969 .309 23 HR 106 RBI 1 SB

Willie Mays- Too many seasons with over a .320 average, 30-50 HR's and 100-130 RBI to list.

My original statement was just that there were better players in the Negro League at the time Jackie Robinson was selected to play for the Dodgers. RPB was the one that challenged that statement, so I supported it with names and statistics that bolstered my statement. According to stats accumulated, Jackie Robinson's career stats compare to Edgar Martinez, Carlos Guillen, Jeff Cirillo and Joe Randa. Had he not been the first black player in the major leagues, chances are good he never would have been selected for the Hall of Fame.

So, now we are taking their 5 best years and comparing them?

You underrate Jackie Robinson because you dont understand a lot of the history of baseball and how things played differently in different eras (As evidenced by your comparing Robinson's steals to guys who played 4 decades later)


Jackie Robinson was in the MVP discussion for 80% of his career. Seems Hall of Fame-ish to me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 10:56 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
just watch the Ken Burns documentary already.

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 10:59 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79580
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Elmhurst Steve wrote:

My original statement was just that there were better players in the Negro League at the time Jackie Robinson was selected to play for the Dodgers.


Not the guys you're suggesting who were about 14 years old in 1947.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
[ If you were ever on a movie/TV set, you would realize that it's not unusual for a scene to require many takes. .


I feel that this part was glossed over by the group. You just got BIG TIMED!

Steve probably has the most on camera experience on the board other than Shakes.



I get to go in the time machine this week on the set of Chicago Fire, where I play a Police Officer. Week before last, I had 4 days working on an ABC pilot called Doubt, in which I will have a recurring role if the series gets picked up. All part of "operation expand the Brand"!

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Nas wrote:
I know it's sexy to stomp Steve every time he posts something and he enjoys it too but in no world is Jackie Robinson better than Willie Mays or Frank Robinson or Hank Aaron or Ernie Banks.

You'll notice, I am not one to stomp everything Steve says.

Jackie Robinson was as good as Frank, and Ernie Banks in this world that you and I live in. I dont know why you would say it like that, since its obviously subjective to a degree. I specifically said Mays was better and Aaron as good or better, so I dont know why you're bringing them up.

I mean, obviously, if you give a lot of credit for longevity, but I dont think you should hold it against Robinson that he missed those 6 years.



Jackie wan't as good as Frank Robinson or Ernie. Frank Robinson is nearly on the level with Aaron, Mays, and Mantle. Ernie was the best slugging shortstop ever outside the steroid era.

Im going by numbers I was told to look up.

I disagree. I think a lot of what's being lost here is the eras they played in and the length. I think if Jackie played for 20 years into the late 60's and early 70's his numbers would look similar.

Were not talking just slugging


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Best 5 seasons for each player:

Jackie Robinson
1949 .342 16 HR 124 RBI 37 SB By far his best season.
1950 .328 14HR 81 RBI 12 SB
1951 .338 19 HR 88 RBI 25 SB
1952 .308 19 HR 75 RBI 24 SB
1953 .329 12 HR 95 RBI 17 SB

Frank Robinson (The better one)

1959 .311 36 HR 125 RBI 18 SB
1961 .323 37 HR 124 RBI 22 SB
1962 .342 39 HR 136 RBI 18 SB
1965 .296 33 HR 113 RBI 13 SB
1966 .316 49 HR 122 RBI 8 SB

Hank Aaron

1959 .355 39 HR 123 RBI 8 SB
1961 .327 34 HR 120 RBI 21 SB
1962 .323 45 HR 128 RBI 15 SB
1963 .319 44 HR 130 RBI 31 SB
1966 .279 47 HR 127 RBI 21 SB

Ernie Banks
1958 .313 47 HR 129 RBI 4 SB
1959 .304 45 HR 143 RBI 2 SB
1960 .271 41 HR 117 RBI 1 SB
1962 .269 37 HR 104 RBI 5 SB
1969 .309 23 HR 106 RBI 1 SB

Willie Mays- Too many seasons with over a .320 average, 30-50 HR's and 100-130 RBI to list.

My original statement was just that there were better players in the Negro League at the time Jackie Robinson was selected to play for the Dodgers. RPB was the one that challenged that statement, so I supported it with names and statistics that bolstered my statement. According to stats accumulated, Jackie Robinson's career stats compare to Edgar Martinez, Carlos Guillen, Jeff Cirillo and Joe Randa. Had he not been the first black player in the major leagues, chances are good he never would have been selected for the Hall of Fame.

So, now we are taking their 5 best years and comparing them?

You underrate Jackie Robinson because you dont understand a lot of the history of baseball and how things played differently in different eras (As evidenced by your comparing Robinson's steals to guys who played 4 decades later)


Jackie Robinson was in the MVP discussion for 80% of his career. Seems Hall of Fame-ish to me.


Big difference betwen winning MVP's (Banks, Frank Robinson, Aaron, Mays all did it multiple times-Frank Robinson in both leagues) and being in a discussion. Jackie really has stats that are pretty unimpressive. He had 1 outstanding season and was the first black player in MLB....thats all.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Nas wrote:
I know it's sexy to stomp Steve every time he posts something and he enjoys it too but in no world is Jackie Robinson better than Willie Mays or Frank Robinson or Hank Aaron or Ernie Banks.

You'll notice, I am not one to stomp everything Steve says.

Jackie Robinson was as good as Frank, and Ernie Banks in this world that you and I live in. I dont know why you would say it like that, since its obviously subjective to a degree. I specifically said Mays was better and Aaron as good or better, so I dont know why you're bringing them up.

I mean, obviously, if you give a lot of credit for longevity, but I dont think you should hold it against Robinson that he missed those 6 years.



Jackie wan't as good as Frank Robinson or Ernie. Frank Robinson is nearly on the level with Aaron, Mays, and Mantle. Ernie was the best slugging shortstop ever outside the steroid era.

Im going by numbers I was told to look up.

I disagree. I think a lot of what's being lost here is the eras they played in and the length. I think if Jackie played for 20 years into the late 60's and early 70's his numbers would look similar.

Were not talking just slugging


But the guy only had a high of 37 stolen bases and never more than 25 otherwise. He only had a single season with 100 RBI and NEVER hit even 20 HR's. Overrated....

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82249
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
[ If you were ever on a movie/TV set, you would realize that it's not unusual for a scene to require many takes. .


I feel that this part was glossed over by the group. You just got BIG TIMED!

Steve probably has the most on camera experience on the board other than Shakes.



I get to go in the time machine this week on the set of Chicago Fire, where I play a Police Officer. Week before last, I had 4 days working on an ABC pilot called Doubt, in which I will have a recurring role if the series gets picked up. All part of "operation expand the Brand"!


That sounds like fun. Do you ever get speaking roles or are they all walk on/extra stuff?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82249
doug - evergreen park wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
[ If you were ever on a movie/TV set, you would realize that it's not unusual for a scene to require many takes. .


I feel that this part was glossed over by the group. You just got BIG TIMED!

Steve probably has the most on camera experience on the board other than Shakes.


The part that was glossed over is "Lando" and that someone then thought it well enough it write about the fundamentals of acting. Yes, I've been on multiple movie and commercial sets.


I have no idea what you are saying but I'm sure I would be impressed.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
He wasnt a slugger. He was a great all around player.

Hitting .311 or higher with about 15 homers, 80 RBI's and about 25 steals in the late 40's and 50's was pretty good.

He did win an MVP and was a six time all star.

We'll just have to agree to disagree on how Jackie Robinson was/is rated.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Elmhurst Steve wrote:

But the guy only had a high of 37 stolen bases and never more than 25 otherwise. He only had a single season with 100 RBI and NEVER hit even 20 HR's. Overrated....

Steve look at the stolen base numbers from back then.

Think of Roberto Alomar. (maybe the GOAT) Thats what Robinson was like.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
[ If you were ever on a movie/TV set, you would realize that it's not unusual for a scene to require many takes. .


I feel that this part was glossed over by the group. You just got BIG TIMED!

Steve probably has the most on camera experience on the board other than Shakes.



I get to go in the time machine this week on the set of Chicago Fire, where I play a Police Officer. Week before last, I had 4 days working on an ABC pilot called Doubt, in which I will have a recurring role if the series gets picked up. All part of "operation expand the Brand"!


That sounds like fun. Do you ever get speaking roles or are they all walk on/extra stuff?


Some parts I have had to audition (speaking) for, while others are "featured roles" but not speaking parts. The role I had in Shameless with William Macy for example where I played a mayoral candidates bodyguard. Macy was a great guy and a lot of fun to work with in the scene. Also for a part (2 episodes) where I played Connie Nielsen's bodyguard (she was Meredith-the Mayors wife in BOSS). I get a lot of opportunities to play a Cop, Detective, Bodyguard, etc... But I don't do general background (people walking or sitting somewhere in the background of scenes) work. I did 5 episodes of The Mob Doctor, as one of Constantine's Thugs. To date, that has been the only true recurring role I have had. The commercial with Derek Rose should air when he returns. I play a Bulls coach in it, but thats all I can say about it. I had to sign a non-disclosure deal and I'm sure if I said too much that someone would happily pass it on. it has been a lot of fun. Thats why I do it. It's fun, it's interesting and it's different. I don't have great aspirations of a real TV/Movie career. I'm just having fun.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:22 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79580
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Mays, and Mantle. Ernie was the best slugging shortstop ever outside the steroid era.

Im going by numbers I was told to look up.

I disagree. I think a lot of what's being lost here is the eras they played in and the length. I think if Jackie played for 20 years into the late 60's and early 70's his numbers would look similar.

Were not talking just slugging[/quote]

But slugging is important. Clemente couldn't understand why he wasn't considered on the same level as Aaron and Mays. He wasn't as good. He didn't slug as much.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:

But the guy only had a high of 37 stolen bases and never more than 25 otherwise. He only had a single season with 100 RBI and NEVER hit even 20 HR's. Overrated....

Steve look at the stolen base numbers from back then.

Think of Roberto Alomar. (maybe the GOAT) Thats what Robinson was like.



Okay-I like that comparison a lot more. He was a very good player and could help a team in a lot of ways. But he couldn't carry a team like an Aaron, Mays, Banks or Frank Robinson. if you want to look at stolen base numbers from back then, look at TY Cobb's. Then you will see a great base-runner of that era.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Mays, and Mantle. Ernie was the best slugging shortstop ever outside the steroid era.

Im going by numbers I was told to look up.

I disagree. I think a lot of what's being lost here is the eras they played in and the length. I think if Jackie played for 20 years into the late 60's and early 70's his numbers would look similar.

Were not talking just slugging


Quote:
But slugging is important. Clemente couldn't understand why he wasn't considered on the same level as Aaron and Mays. He wasn't as good. He didn't slug as much.


Correct. Clemente was outstanding, but never had the monster power numbers they had. Aaron and Mays ran very well too in their early years. Guys like that were true 5 tool players. Calling a guy who never topped 19 homers a 5 tool player is silly.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Mays, and Mantle. Ernie was the best slugging shortstop ever outside the steroid era.

Im going by numbers I was told to look up.

I disagree. I think a lot of what's being lost here is the eras they played in and the length. I think if Jackie played for 20 years into the late 60's and early 70's his numbers would look similar.

Were not talking just slugging


Quote:
But slugging is important. Clemente couldn't understand why he wasn't considered on the same level as Aaron and Mays. He wasn't as good. He didn't slug as much.


Correct. Clemente was outstanding, but never had the monster power numbers they had. Aaron and Mays ran very well too in their early years. Guys like that were true 5 tool players. Calling a guy who never topped 19 homers a 5 tool player is silly.

Steve, you dont have to lead the league in homers for that to be true.

124 RBI's means you have plus power. Doesnt really matter how many went over the fence when you put up those numbers.

Roberto Alomar was also a 5 tool guy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:34 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Think of Roberto Alomar. (maybe the GOAT) Thats what Robinson was like.
Kenny Williams would have traded for him twice in the late 50's then?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Nas wrote:
Especially when it tells you a guy like Zobrist is better than damn near every superstar player. .

I dont think this is an argument against WAR though.

Why do we have these stats if every time they bare out something we didnt expect we just dismiss them?

Zobrist was a monster that year and played plus defense all over the field. I think its possible he was more valuable to his team but not in ways we are used to seeing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
The deification of an athlete is usually not a good idea.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30328
Keeping Score wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
The deification of an athlete is usually not a good idea.


Correct. Najeh Davenport got in big trouble for that.

+#2

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
:lol:

Not bad...

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:07 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79580
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
if you want to look at stolen base numbers from back then, look at TY Cobb's. Then you will see a great base-runner of that era.


My dad told me about the time Ty Cobb came spikes up into Jackie at first. That Cobb was a fuckin' racist.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:25 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Keeping Score wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
The deification of an athlete is usually not a good idea.


Correct. Najeh Davenport got in big trouble for that.
Image

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
What was the Brickhouse story? I've heard reference to it.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30328
Keeping Score wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
What was the Brickhouse story? I've heard reference to it.


He apparently had a thing for having a Cleveland Steamer done to him by call girls.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:14 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
rogers park bryan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Especially when it tells you a guy like Zobrist is better than damn near every superstar player. .

I dont think this is an argument against WAR though.

Why do we have these stats if every time they bare out something we didnt expect we just dismiss them?

Zobrist was a monster that year and played plus defense all over the field. I think its possible he was more valuable to his team but not in ways we are used to seeing.


That's why some people dismiss the numbers though. I love stats but IMO the sabermetrics can fail the eye test. They can be useful but when WAR tells me Zobrist is more valuable than Pujols then I know the formula could use some tweaking. Similar to when Holliger's PER had good to mediocre players ranked higher than Kobe and other superstars.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Nas wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Especially when it tells you a guy like Zobrist is better than damn near every superstar player. .

I dont think this is an argument against WAR though.

Why do we have these stats if every time they bare out something we didnt expect we just dismiss them?

Zobrist was a monster that year and played plus defense all over the field. I think its possible he was more valuable to his team but not in ways we are used to seeing.


That's why some people dismiss the numbers though. I love stats but IMO the sabermetrics can fail the eye test. They can be useful but when WAR tells me Zobrist is more valuable than Pujols then I know the formula could use some tweaking. Similar to when Holliger's PER had good to mediocre players ranked higher than Kobe and other superstars.

I think if you look at offensive war only it helps take out some of those things.

Zobrist had a 6.1 which is a lot closer to the eye test than the 8.6 overall. The defense is overvalued somehow.

Same thing was happening with Brett Lawrie last year. I think playing multiple positions well shoots you up a little too much.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 42
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2013 9:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
if you want to look at stolen base numbers from back then, look at TY Cobb's. Then you will see a great base-runner of that era.


My dad told me about the time Ty Cobb came spikes up into Jackie at first. That Cobb was a fuckin' racist.



He was also a guy who had 7 seasons (Robinson had just 1) with 100 RBI or more (as well as 2 more with 99) as well as 897 career steals (compare that to Jackie Robinsons 197) Also compare Robinsons high of just 37 steals (and his 2nd high total of just 25) to season totals by Cobb of 53, 76,65,83,96 andd 68. There were many more seasons with a higher total than Robinson ever had. Compare Cobbs .366 career average to Robinson's .311 . Ty Cobb was a racist....okay. He was also one of the best ballplayers in the game's history.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Last edited by Elmhurst Steve on Mon Apr 15, 2013 9:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 122 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group