It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 6:27 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 6:27 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 3:19 pm
Posts: 2348
Location: Shorewood, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Nas wrote:
Country Bumpkin wrote:
Nas wrote:
That's a bullshit excuse today. The defense didn't lose this game. Trestman's bad decisions cost them.


Sorry Nas, the defense had to stop ONE fucking guy today that wears #28 in purple and they couldn't do it. The LB's take bad angles and the DB's try to strip him instead of tackling him. You wanna stop him, take his knees out. Can't run on you from the sidelines.

Mel Tucker has fucked this defense and Trestman is a glorified OC.


No doubt the players have been bad or injured. They gave up a ton of yards again but points are what is most important. I just feel that Trestman became too conservative in the 4th and in overtime. If this was last year or any year before then it would make sense. You can't expect this defense to stop anyone. No defensive call made on 4th and 11? That was a bad coached game all around. Tucker should be fired after the season.


Agree with you on Tucker and Trestman. Not impressed with either. Briggs, Peanut, etc should be rested for the remainder of the season. No sense for them to come back with this bad of a team.

_________________
RFDC thinks I'm retarded.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 6:30 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Trestman is great for the offense but I'm not sure he has the decision making ability to be a good head coach. I'm willing to give him at least 1 more year to fix the brain farts. Tucker hasn't been able to get through to the defense all year. I know there are injuries and this team lacks any depth but giving up 1200 yards in 6 weeks says a lot about effort more than talent. He's responsible for that.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 6:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
He had 2 more downs to work with and yes it's inexcusableto make that decision to kick then.

MN should never have been in that game. The defense is just all kinds of bad all over the field.


No doubt the defense is bad and injured. We've known that for a while. Because of that you cannot make some of the decisions Trestman made. You expect the defense to give up more than 20 points and they only gave up 20 in regulation. Trestman got too conservative in the 4th quarter and overtime and it cost the Bears.
Yeah D was gashed but only gave up 20. No way this is on them. Trestman fucked this game up along with his O line who couldn't open holes on the tough yardage situations along with the fact the Bears don't have a back who can get any push when they need it. BAd play calling and execution when they needed it the most. Defense did its job all things considered. Allowing 20 points in reg should've been enough to win.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 6:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
No way this is on the D? How about 4th and 11 in the shadow of their end zone? Trying to tackle AP in OT? Taunting? Sure the kick on 2nd down was dumb but cmon.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27518
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
His presser makes him sound like a damn fool. Just stop talking and explaining....it was a bad call...own it and move along.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 7:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
He threw his offense under the bus saying he didn't want to risk a penalty or loss of yards on the next play. I'd be very surprised if the percentages supported his move.

Well, it looks like the NFC North is the dumpster of head coaches.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 7:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27518
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Kirkwood wrote:
He threw his offense under the bus saying he didn't want to risk a penalty or loss of yards on the next play. I'd be very surprised if the percentages supported his move.

Well, it looks like the NFC North is the dumpster of head coaches.

He also referenced the "penalty on the other team" Was he thinking they would have an absurd offensive facemask on a field goal??

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 7:18 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
He coached scared. He was so worried about making mistakes that he ended up making a few. I hope he learns from this. It would be better if his brain farts didn't result in losses.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 7:20 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
If McCown throws a pass (that Bennett doesn't have to fall on the ground to catch) for at least 7 yards with 15 seconds left we probably aren't having this conversation either. Gould would have been good for about 61 on that kick.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
You all are funny in the rush to scapegoat Mel Tucker. Especially this week. The defensive coaching staff didn't lose this game, hell the defense didn't lose this game (as pointed out by many).

The defense has lost three Pro Bowlers, one at each level this year. Right now they have 1 DB worth a damn, no linebackers, no defensive tackles, and a DE that plays sometimey. This young coach was foolishly brought in expressly to run Lovie's defense, and basically to replace not only Lovie (a 9-10 yr Bear coach) but also Marinelli with the level of experience he had. Hell, most of you all now complaining hated Lovie's D for the last 4-5 years anyway, or have you forgotten?

His hands are then tied with only three consistent players all year, two of which have been out for a month+. You have nothing in the pipeline that vaguely approximates young defensive talent, and a new coaching staff (plus the GM) that apparently does not understand the skill set required to run the cover-2. But it's Tucker's fault. Laughable.

I don't know who's worse the idiot coach in Detroit, or the idiot GM & lacking perspective head coach here. I think the only coach that really realizes the near absolute lack of talent on that side of the ball is Tucker. But it's easy to bash him, not the OC (former) genius whose line hasn't done dick in a month. The same line that got all of last season's largesse.

Highest $ for an OL signing, two draft picks (one a 1st rounder who hasn't done shit in awhile), another FA lineman, a TE that the OC doesn't seem to know how (or remember) to use for oddly long stretches. All last offseason. The glory of the team after the first quarter of the season. Spare me.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 7:41 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
He was put in a bad spot following a successful defensive coach and having an aging and injured defense. I know he's working with scraps and they aren't very talented. The coach can make sure the effort is there. Getting gashed for 1200 yards rushing in 6 weeks has more to do with effort than it does talent. Not getting a play in on 4th and 11 is a coaching error that a high school DC wouldn't make.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 7:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Regular Reader wrote:
You all are funny in the rush to scapegoat Mel Tucker. Especially this week. The defensive coaching staff didn't lose this game, hell the defense didn't lose this game (as pointed out by many).

The defense has lost three Pro Bowlers, one at each level this year. Right now they have 1 DB worth a damn, no linebackers, no defensive tackles, and a DE that plays sometimey. This young coach was foolishly brought in expressly to run Lovie's defense, and basically to replace not only Lovie (a 9-10 yr Bear coach) but also Marinelli with the level of experience he had. Hell, most of you all now complaining hated Lovie's D for the last 4-5 years anyway, or have you forgotten?

His hands are then tied with only three consistent players all year, two of which have been out for a month+. You have nothing in the pipeline that vaguely approximates young defensive talent, and a new coaching staff (plus the GM) that apparently does not understand the skill set required to run the cover-2. But it's Tucker's fault. Laughable.

I don't know who's worse the idiot coach in Detroit, or the idiot GM & lacking perspective head coach here. I think the only coach that really realizes the near absolute lack of talent on that side of the ball is Tucker. But it's easy to bash him, not the OC (former) genius whose line hasn't done dick in a month. The same line that got all of last season's largesse.

Highest $ for an OL signing, two draft picks (one a 1st rounder who hasn't done shit in awhile), another FA lineman, a TE that the OC doesn't seem to know how (or remember) to use for oddly long stretches. All last offseason. The glory of the team after the first quarter of the season. Spare me.


I find your post funny, considering that the title of this thread is blaming the loss on the head coach. And everyone since the OP has blamed the head coach. Mel Tucker is bad. But his lack of effectiveness ultimately falls on Trestman and then Emery - they hired him. The defense has lost Pro Bowlers, yes, but they don't seem to understand a gap-controlled defense. They overpursue. They don't have a defensive play on 4th and 11. Chris Conte is somehow still playing! This is inexcusable. Many faults of this defense are not about skill; they are about discipline. So, ultimately, who is responsible for that? Mel Tucker didn't impress me to begin with, and he impresses me less now. He never should have been brought in.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 7:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Nas wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Trestman can run. an offense, but his in-game decisions, personnel decisions, and support of Mel Tucker are all bad.


He's proving that he should have just been the offensive coordinator. He may be in over his head. There is some snotty nose 8 year old playing Madden that knows better than to do something like that.


Agreed. I'm beginning to see why it took him forever to get his 1st NFL head coaching job.

2 guys who would have never got their jobs if it wasn't for the creepy Bears: Emery and Trestman.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27518
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Imagine if Lovie got dressed down for his offense...was told to be HC and defensive influence only and they let Trestman run the offense with no Lovie interference. Total control over play calling.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Nas wrote:
He was put in a bad spot following a successful defensive coach and having an aging and injured defense. I know he's working with scraps and they aren't very talented. The coach can make sure the effort is there. Getting gashed for 1200 yards rushing in 6 weeks has more to do with effort than it does talent. Not getting a play in on 4th and 11 is a coaching error that a high school DC wouldn't make.


His scraps are horrid. You have zero team speed. You don't have big or even athletic bodies where you need them. You don't have particularly football smart players once Tillman left the field. No athletic tools + no real football instincts or intelligence isn't exactly a formula for running this defense, nor for any adjustments any bona fide coaching staff could even attempt. Getting "NFL effort" from middle of the road college talent isn't a reasonable idea now, nor was it when as soon as they lost the all-pros that could hide the defensive talent shortcomings/inabilities. You can get all the effort you want from Conte, Wright, the LBs, any d-lineman when Peppers isn't playing (except maybe Wootton) but it won't matter in an actual NFL game. Hell, Steltz gave effort today....what good did it do? This team is a whipped dog. They gave effort, realize it didn't matter, they were still gonna get scorched. Now they're shell shocked.

I just think it's myopic to blame a kid DC who's hands were hog tied before play one. The lack of a timely call was bad, but it seems almost routine (again) on the opposite (beloved) side of the ball.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Regular Reader wrote:
I just think it's myopic to blame a kid DC who's hands were hog tied before play one.


DC at Jacksonville since 2009. Interim head coach for 5 games in 2011. Hardly a babe in the woods.

Also strongly endorsed by Hub Arkush. That should have been a big red flag.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Damn I miss Lovie Smith. He was so awesome. Never made a questionable call.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:13 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 3:19 pm
Posts: 2348
Location: Shorewood, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
The defense and offense for that matter are woefully undisciplined. The amount of penalties being racked up by both sides of the ball is laughable. This boils down to the leadership of both units. You can be a mid-talent player and still make fundamental tackles or take the appropriate angle of attack if your coach is doing his job, which Tucker is not.

Trestman and Tucker are tied together in this loss.

_________________
RFDC thinks I'm retarded.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
leashyourkids wrote:
I find your post funny, considering that the title of this thread is blaming the loss on the head coach. And everyone since the OP has blamed the head coach. Mel Tucker is bad. But his lack of effectiveness ultimately falls on Trestman and then Emery - they hired him. The defense has lost Pro Bowlers, yes, but they don't seem to understand a gap-controlled defense. They overpursue. They don't have a defensive play on 4th and 11. Chris Conte is somehow still playing! This is inexcusable. Many faults of this defense are not about skill; they are about discipline. So, ultimately, who is responsible for that? Mel Tucker didn't impress me to begin with, and he impresses me less now. He never should have been brought in.


Exactly who in the defense is worth a damn in your opinion?

There is less football talent on this side of the ball than in the 35+ years I've been watching the Bears and I can't find a singular member of the defense that I'd actually think would now be a valuable free agent. This failure lies on the GMs (past & present) offices....and the idiots who ask a kid DC to come in and replace 25-30 yr veteran coaches in as exact a fashion as he can, with that lack of talent.

He's made mistakes, certainly, but if you ask me to note the greatest failures on this team, Tucker would be far down the list.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:17 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12450
There were, no doubt, questionable strategy used by Trestman today (I thought Minnesota's decision to kick the FG with 1:40 left was extremely poor clock management, no reason to give the Bears any time with the clock if Walsh misses that 2nd attempt in OT), but the simple fact is that Robbie Gould missed a FG he would normally make probably 95% of the time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:18 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hatchetman wrote:
Damn I miss Lovie Smith. He was so awesome. Never made a questionable call.


The Bears would have won at least 1 SB if they had a top 10 offense under Lovie. What's sad is I believe we are seeing the opposite with Trestman. If this was the top 10 defense we've seen over the past 10 years this Bears team would be SB favorites. I would just love to one day have both at the same time.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Peoria Matt wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
I just think it's myopic to blame a kid DC who's hands were hog tied before play one.


DC at Jacksonville since 2009. Interim head coach for 5 games in 2011. Hardly a babe in the woods.

Also strongly endorsed by Hub Arkush. That should have been a big red flag.


And what defense did they run in Jacksonville? I don't recall it being the cover 2. I may be wrong though.

But I can't argue about the Arkush endorsement = Red Flag call though.... :lol:

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55959
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Peoria Matt wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
I just think it's myopic to blame a kid DC who's hands were hog tied before play one.


DC at Jacksonville since 2009. Interim head coach for 5 games in 2011. Hardly a babe in the woods.

Also strongly endorsed by Hub Arkush. That should have been a big red flag.


Hehe, guys, I gotta tell ya, if you saw what Mel Tucker was doing down there in Jacksonville, well, boys, not a lot of people did see what Mel Tucker was doing down there in Jacksonville, but hehe, this is a guy who really lives the game, and, well, hehe, that's what football's all about, really, heh. I mean, guys, hehe, I gotta say, I'd bet everything I have on Mel Tucker, hehehe.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:25 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:27 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
It was a horrible decision. 47 yarder? Try to get more yards, you dumb ass. If it's a 30 yarder I would accept kicking it on 2nd down.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:30 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Beardown wrote:
It was a horrible decision. 47 yarder? Try to get more yards, you dumb ass. If it's a 30 yarder I would accept kicking it on 2nd down.


Agreed. Forte had gained over 20 yards on the last 3 plays called. Give it to him at least one more time.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
once again it was 2nd down not 3rd for the possible missed snap or whatever. inexcusable

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
bad call for sure, but that kick was brutal. would it have made it from 30?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Hatchetman wrote:
bad call for sure, but that kick was brutal. would it have made it from 30?


yes

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 8:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65768
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
pittmike wrote:
once again it was 2nd down not 3rd for the possible missed snap or whatever. inexcusable

Yeah seriously what the fuck was this? Why? What could have possibly been the reason?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group