It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:13 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 433 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
But he certainly looks like a guy who can be a more than competent starting quarterback for some team in this league.


MCwon might get a bigger contract than Cutler!


No, but he's going to get a bigger contract than the one Boers & bernstein have insisted he will get as they told callers who disagreed they were "football retarded". Beyond that, the team that signs McCown for whatever the number is is much less likely to regret than the one who signs Cutler.


The only point of contention I'd raise here is McCown is unfortunately in the middle of a renaissance year at the wrong age. At 35 years old next year, I think teams should look at him as a great backup option and/or caretaker who can man the position while a rookie takes notes.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Boilermaker Rick wrote:

10 years ago, Jay would stay. Rookie QB's play all the time now. I'd be extremely confident with McCown + rookie next year with the extra $10 million a year spent on upgrading the defense.


What makes you confident that 2013 McCown is what they would get next year and not the McCown that existed prior to this year? The chances of QB the Bears draft sucking is pretty high unless you are just that sold on Trestman's ability to mold a QB at this point.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Northside_Dan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:

10 years ago, Jay would stay. Rookie QB's play all the time now. I'd be extremely confident with McCown + rookie next year with the extra $10 million a year spent on upgrading the defense.


What makes you confident that 2013 McCown is what they would get next year and not the McCown that existed prior to this year? The chances of QB the Bears draft sucking is pretty high unless you are just that sold on Trestman's ability to mold a QB at this point.

See Gannon, Rich

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33815
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
veganfan21 wrote:

The only point of contention I'd raise here is McCown is unfortunately in the middle of a renaissance year at the wrong age. At 35 years old next year, I think teams should look at him as a great backup option and/or caretaker who can man the position while a rookie takes notes.


Yeah, I'm not sure I'm comfortable with him as the starter. Might be a strange offseason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Northside_Dan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:

10 years ago, Jay would stay. Rookie QB's play all the time now. I'd be extremely confident with McCown + rookie next year with the extra $10 million a year spent on upgrading the defense.


What makes you confident that 2013 McCown is what they would get next year and not the McCown that existed prior to this year? The chances of QB the Bears draft sucking is pretty high unless you are just that sold on Trestman's ability to mold a QB at this point.


That's his specialty, and it's been bolstered this year with the stats of McCown and Cutler when compared against prior years, so it's not unreasonable to think Trestman can work well with a rookie QB next year. He cannot make a bad QB become an All Pro, but it seems he knows how to optimize the talents of whoever he has on the roster.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:57 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
veganfan21 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
But he certainly looks like a guy who can be a more than competent starting quarterback for some team in this league.


MCwon might get a bigger contract than Cutler!


No, but he's going to get a bigger contract than the one Boers & bernstein have insisted he will get as they told callers who disagreed they were "football retarded". Beyond that, the team that signs McCown for whatever the number is is much less likely to regret than the one who signs Cutler.


The only point of contention I'd raise here is McCown is unfortunately in the middle of a renaissance year at the wrong age. At 35 years old next year, I think teams should look at him as a great backup option and/or caretaker who can man the position while a rookie takes notes.


Or he could be somebody's Jim Plunkett.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Spaulding wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:

The only point of contention I'd raise here is McCown is unfortunately in the middle of a renaissance year at the wrong age. At 35 years old next year, I think teams should look at him as a great backup option and/or caretaker who can man the position while a rookie takes notes.


Yeah, I'm not sure I'm comfortable with him as the starter. Might be a strange offseason.


Yes I wouldn't sign him as a starter either. It may be that McCown is to the Bears what Flynn and Cassel were to the Packers and Pats, respectively. Unheralded QBs who excelled in a system designed to maximize their abilities, and then faltered elsewhere once removed from the system in which they excelled.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:05 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I still don't think McCown is all that good...


But he certainly looks like a guy who can be a more than competent starting quarterback for some team in this league.
Right now...

That was his 5th start. I need to see more to avoid a Grossman situation where he looked like an all-pro until the league figured him out.
Uh, last night was his 38th career start, and 7th for the Bears.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Northside_Dan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:

10 years ago, Jay would stay. Rookie QB's play all the time now. I'd be extremely confident with McCown + rookie next year with the extra $10 million a year spent on upgrading the defense.


What makes you confident that 2013 McCown is what they would get next year and not the McCown that existed prior to this year? The chances of QB the Bears draft sucking is pretty high unless you are just that sold on Trestman's ability to mold a QB at this point.
I'm not confident, but if that happens the rookie plays.

I do hate the "Bears QB pick will probably suck" line of thinking. Then just sign Jay to a 10 year deal but also fire Emery because he sucks if we can't even trust him to pick a quarterback in a very deep QB draft.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I still don't think McCown is all that good...


But he certainly looks like a guy who can be a more than competent starting quarterback for some team in this league.
Right now...

That was his 5th start. I need to see more to avoid a Grossman situation where he looked like an all-pro until the league figured him out.
Uh, last night was his 38th career start, and 7th for the Bears.
I was talking about this year just like I was talking about Grossman and the one year he started off great. How was that not obvious?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:13 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
2006 offense < 2013 offense
2006 defense >>> 2013 defense

Grossman put up Cutleresque numbers for 5 weeks before putting up real clunkers in week 6, 8, 11, 12, and 17. I don't recall you pining for Kyle Orton to take back the reins at that point.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16489
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
I haven't been following Philly too closely, but are they having the same argument with Foles and Vick? Vick has every bit the arm Cutler has, and is just as mobile (when healthy), but Foles is lighting it up and has the best QB rating in the NFL (McCown now 3rd behind Foles and Manning).

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
I haven't been following Philly too closely, but are they having the same argument with Foles and Vick? Vick has every bit the arm Cutler has, and is just as mobile (when healthy), but Foles is lighting it up and has the best QB rating in the NFL (McCown now 3rd behind Foles and Manning).


No, they've officially moved on from Vick to Foles per the coach. He waited until Vick was done with his rehab to announce the switch.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Frank Coztansa wrote:
2006 offense < 2013 offense
2006 defense >>> 2013 defense

Grossman put up Cutleresque numbers for 5 weeks before putting up real clunkers in week 6, 8, 11, 12, and 17. I don't recall you pining for Kyle Orton to take back the reins at that point.
What exactly are you arguing? What does Orton have to do with 2006?

Rex Grossman looked like an all-pro for about half a season too. I'm not yet convinced that McCown won't see a massive dropoff in production too. I'm comparing the run McCown is on now to what Grossman did.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:24 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
So you are saying you don't expect McCown to throw for 13 TDs and 1 INT over his next 5 games? Way to go out on a limb. Just like Elmhurst Steve didn't think Chris Sale would keep up pace of a 9-2 record and 2.1something ERA during the second half of 2012.

I don't think there is anything wrong with the Bears going into next year with McCown as the #1 guy with a rookie ready to play at a moments notice.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Frank Coztansa wrote:
So you are saying you don't expect McCown to throw for 13 TDs and 1 INT over his next 5 games? Way to go out on a limb. Just like Elmhurst Steve didn't think Chris Sale would keep up pace of a 9-2 record and 2.1something ERA during the second half of 2012.
I didn't intend to make it into an interesting point. You just responded in an illogical way to it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Hatchetman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
But he certainly looks like a guy who can be a more than competent starting quarterback for some team in this league.


MCwon might get a bigger contract than Cutler!

Love it. Using it.


McWIN Baby!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Northside_Dan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:

How long until it's more than a fluke?



Everything in his career has shown me that this isn't him.

http://www.nfl.com/player/joshmccown/2505076/profile

All of the sudden he's a hall of fame player (I know you don't think that, but his stats this year are that of a HoF caliber QB)? I look at the careers of Jay and Josh. Realize Jay has had a better career therefore his 16 average will, in all likelihood, be better than Josh's.

Yeah, he's probably slightly better. Not 15 million dollars a year better.

Id rather save that money and spend it on the D or a Mannelly statue

And, Id be careful to judge McCown. He had 13 starts with the god awful Cardinals and then 9 with the Raiders. Those are teams that are both capable of making good/decent players look bad.


Last edited by rogers park bryan on Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Also, don't discount how virtually every broadcast team talks about how much the "other players love McCown".

I would guess that 75% of the locker room would be happy to see Jay go. It's obvious hearing Alex Brown talk that many on the defense didn't like Jay.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:07 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I would guess that 75% of the locker room would be happy to see Jay go.
Pure speculation on your part. Alex Brown played with 6 people (Jay included) who are currently on the roster, and one of them is a kicker and the other a long snapper.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I would guess that 75% of the locker room would be happy to see Jay go.
Pure speculation on your part.
Do you know what the word "guess" means?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:12 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
No, I thought it was a jean company.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
PFF ranks of the defenses McCown has played significant snaps against: 30, 26, 22, 3, 24, 29.
Cutler: 11, 24, 21, 9, 10, 16, 9


3 was Baltimore for Josh.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82235
I thought he played well against the Ravens, especially given the conditions. He certainly outplayed Flacco

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
good dolphin wrote:
I thought he played well against the Ravens, especially given the conditions. He certainly outplayed Flacco



I agree. Just found that info and adding it to the discussion. Josh has played against, on average, weaker competition. All part of the calculations here.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Northside_Dan wrote:
PFF ranks of the defenses McCown has played significant snaps against: 30, 26, 22, 3, 24, 29.
Cutler: 11, 24, 21, 9, 10, 16, 9


3 was Baltimore for Josh.

PFF is sketchy. They shouldn't be trusted. Their stats leads a GM into thinking Shea McClellin is a good player.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:28 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
bigfan wrote:
4 year $21 million. GET IT DONE EMERY!

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16489
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Northside_Dan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I thought he played well against the Ravens, especially given the conditions. He certainly outplayed Flacco



I agree. Just found that info and adding it to the discussion. Josh has played against, on average, weaker competition. All part of the calculations here.


Yes, but in beating the team with the 3rd best defense, McCown put up a 92.9, which is better than Cutler's 88.4 against lesser-ranked defenses. Which doesn't prove that much, granted, but shows McCown can beat a good defense.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Northside_Dan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I thought he played well against the Ravens, especially given the conditions. He certainly outplayed Flacco



I agree. Just found that info and adding it to the discussion. Josh has played against, on average, weaker competition. All part of the calculations here.

Cutler also had an advantage in that he was set up on shorter fields by the defense when they could actually stop an offense and create turnovers before all the injuries.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82235
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I thought he played well against the Ravens, especially given the conditions. He certainly outplayed Flacco



I agree. Just found that info and adding it to the discussion. Josh has played against, on average, weaker competition. All part of the calculations here.


Yes, but in beating the team with the 3rd best defense, McCown put up a 92.9, which is better than Cutler's 88.4 against lesser-ranked defenses. Which doesn't prove that much, granted, but shows McCown can beat a good defense.


in a deluge

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 433 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: NME and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group