It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:10 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 113 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57234
Nas wrote:
If all goes well the Bulls may have 3 lottery picks in possibly the best draft since 2003.

I am not seeing how this is possible. Please elaborate.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43567
RFDC wrote:
Nas wrote:
If all goes well the Bulls may have 3 lottery picks in possibly the best draft since 2003.

I am not seeing how this is possible. Please elaborate.

Kings magically become good, but not playoff good. Same with Bobcats. Bulls also tank and finish in lottery,

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
RFDC wrote:
Nas wrote:
If all goes well the Bulls may have 3 lottery picks in possibly the best draft since 2003.

I am not seeing how this is possible. Please elaborate.

It would require the Kings to get hot and stay out of the lottery basically.

1. The Bulls pick if they make the lottery
2. Charlotte pick if they miss the playoffs and end up with any pick after 10.
3. Cleveland (via Sacto) pick is they miss the playoffs and end up with any pick after 12 (so basically just missing playoffs as well)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57234
So a lot of IFs that are not likely. Got it.

They will be lucky to get that Kings pick in the first round, it will drag out til it magically becomes a 2nd rounder. (Which I still do not quite understand.)

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55946
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
The NBA is so obnoxiously byzantine when it comes to player-personnel stuff. It's like they gave some accountants some mescaline and locked them in a room.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:49 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
RFDC wrote:
So a lot of IFs that are not likely. Got it.

They will be lucky to get that Kings pick in the first round, it will drag out til it magically becomes a 2nd rounder. (Which I still do not quite understand.)


It is likely they will have 2 (Bobcats and theirs).

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Deng was a glue guy. He really did a lot to hold this team together. His defense, scoring, rebounding, and passing were all above average and he always hustled. Thibs cannot be happy to see a guy who was a great leader like Deng was, traded. That said, they had to make the deal and I agree with it. Trading him when he was playing real well and was healthy, got them a nice return and saved them millions. This deal seems to assure that Rose's statement about not closing the door on a return for the playoffs this season, is something we can ignore. This also gives Jimmy Butler the starting spot at the position he's best suited to fill. I wish Luol Deng the best of luck and hope he can stay healthy and get the big contract he has worked so hard to earn. I'm fine with the fact it will be coming from another team though.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57234
Hawkeye Vince wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Nas wrote:
If all goes well the Bulls may have 3 lottery picks in possibly the best draft since 2003.

I am not seeing how this is possible. Please elaborate.

It would require the Kings to get hot and stay out of the lottery basically.

1. The Bulls pick if they make the lottery
2. Charlotte pick if they miss the playoffs and end up with any pick after 10.
3. Cleveland (via Sacto) pick is they miss the playoffs and end up with any pick after 12 (so basically just missing playoffs as well)

So we need Charlotte to play worse but not bad enough to get a top 10 pick?

The 3rd one is the one that seems really confusing. It is based on Sacramento or Cleveland? It is based on Sacramento and they need to play better in order for the Bulls to get that pick, yes?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
RFDC wrote:
Hawkeye Vince wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Nas wrote:
If all goes well the Bulls may have 3 lottery picks in possibly the best draft since 2003.

I am not seeing how this is possible. Please elaborate.

It would require the Kings to get hot and stay out of the lottery basically.

1. The Bulls pick if they make the lottery
2. Charlotte pick if they miss the playoffs and end up with any pick after 10.
3. Cleveland (via Sacto) pick is they miss the playoffs and end up with any pick after 12 (so basically just missing playoffs as well)

So we need Charlotte to play worse but not bad enough to get a top 10 pick?

The 3rd one is the one that seems really confusing. It is based on Sacramento or Cleveland? It is based on Sacramento and they need to play better in order for the Bulls to get that pick, yes?

The 3rd pick is based on Sacto.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
It's reported that Deng turned down a 2 year, 30 million dollar extension shortly before this deal was struck. That's not great money by any means, but I'm kinda surprised they made that offer.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19370
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
It's reported that Deng turned down a 2 year, 30 million dollar extension shortly before this deal was struck. That's not great money by any means, but I'm kinda surprised they made that offer.



RFDC wrote:
Sam Smith ‏@SamSmithHoops 2m
Turns out Bulls and Deng were in contract talks at last minute. Deng turned down $30 million for three, thus convincing Bulls he was leaving

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:41 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Someone should tell Reggie Rose to shut the fuck up.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19370
Nas wrote:
Someone should tell Reggie Rose to shut the fuck up.


What did he say now? Link?

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
Nas wrote:
If all goes well the Bulls may have 3 lottery picks in possibly the best draft since 2003.


Where are the lottery picks? I thought the picks were protected from being lottery.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
conns7901 wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
It's reported that Deng turned down a 2 year, 30 million dollar extension shortly before this deal was struck. That's not great money by any means, but I'm kinda surprised they made that offer.



RFDC wrote:
Sam Smith ‏@SamSmithHoops 2m
Turns out Bulls and Deng were in contract talks at last minute. Deng turned down $30 million for three, thus convincing Bulls he was leaving


An offer of just 10 million a year for a 2 time All-Star, having another good season, seems to me like more of a gesture than a real offer. They are probably glad he turned it down.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
From what I understand this isn't a great trade, but it's not really a bad one either. It's good for JR because the Bulls wont have to pay the tax this season. But the picks we got are going to end up being pretty meaningless and we were letting Deng go anyway. Im sure the Bulls wanted a better offer but none were there. And Im sure Steve is correct that the offer was made just so they could say they made Deng an offer. Hard for him to accept a 3/30 contract when some dumbass team will pay him 4/50 this summer.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Deng is kind of caught in-between being an above average player but not really a star
10 million is isn't insane by any means, but i'm not sure i'd want him on my team for too much more than that . 13-15 mil ? no thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
FavreFan wrote:
From what I understand this isn't a great trade, but it's not really a bad one either. It's good for JR because the Bulls wont have to pay the tax this season. But the picks we got are going to end up being pretty meaningless and we were letting Deng go anyway. Im sure the Bulls wanted a better offer but none were there. And Im sure Steve is correct that the offer was made just so they could say they made Deng an offer. Hard for him to accept a 3/30 contract when some dumbass team will pay him 4/50 this summer.


he currently has the 27th highest salary in the league
no way is he in the top 27 players


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Agreed. He's good enough to get paid $12M+/year by someone, but not good enough to be worth that much, especially with the current CBA.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57234
FavreFan wrote:
From what I understand this isn't a great trade, but it's not really a bad one either. It's good for JR because the Bulls wont have to pay the tax this season. But the picks we got are going to end up being pretty meaningless and we were letting Deng go anyway. Im sure the Bulls wanted a better offer but none were there. And Im sure Steve is correct that the offer was made just so they could say they made Deng an offer. Hard for him to accept a 3/30 contract when some dumbass team will pay him 4/50 this summer.

That is how I am seeing this as well. People seem excited about the draft picks, but they seem like they will be nothing at best. But I guess I should know by now that Nas is going to Nas.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
hey, this makes the Cavs the 3rd best team in the East now !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43567
Bagels wrote:
hey, this makes the Cavs the 3rd best team in the East now !

I thought the Cavs would actually be good this year, but they're awful. Maybe they are tanking again for another #1 pick. Gotta sweeten the pot for the inevitable return of Lebron.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92043
Location: To the left of my post
RFDC wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
From what I understand this isn't a great trade, but it's not really a bad one either. It's good for JR because the Bulls wont have to pay the tax this season. But the picks we got are going to end up being pretty meaningless and we were letting Deng go anyway. Im sure the Bulls wanted a better offer but none were there. And Im sure Steve is correct that the offer was made just so they could say they made Deng an offer. Hard for him to accept a 3/30 contract when some dumbass team will pay him 4/50 this summer.

That is how I am seeing this as well. People seem excited about the draft picks, but they seem like they will be nothing at best. But I guess I should know by now that Nas is going to Nas.
It saved Jerry a lot of money though.

I wish all Chicago teams would intentionally lose.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57234
:lol: Oh Brick.

The thing that really pisses me off about it is that the Bulls will probably still sneak into the playoffs in the horrible East and not get a lottery pick.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Douchebag wrote:
Bagels wrote:
hey, this makes the Cavs the 3rd best team in the East now !

I thought the Cavs would actually be good this year, but they're awful. Maybe they are tanking again for another #1 pick. Gotta sweeten the pot for the inevitable return of Lebron.


well they might be good if Irving hadn't been injured and if Anthony Bennett was even remotely contributing....is it too soon for the BUST label ?
And Tristan Thompson looked pretty good last year and seems to have regressed


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43567
Bagels wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Bagels wrote:
hey, this makes the Cavs the 3rd best team in the East now !

I thought the Cavs would actually be good this year, but they're awful. Maybe they are tanking again for another #1 pick. Gotta sweeten the pot for the inevitable return of Lebron.


well they might be good if Irving hadn't been injured and if Anthony Bennett was even remotely contributing....is it too soon for the BUST label ?
And Tristan Thompson looked pretty good last year and seems to have regressed

Anthony Bennett needs to go to the D-League. He obviously wasn't ready to make the jump to the pros. Not sure what playing 10 minutes a game for the Cavs is going to do for his development.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19370
Bagels wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Bagels wrote:
hey, this makes the Cavs the 3rd best team in the East now !

I thought the Cavs would actually be good this year, but they're awful. Maybe they are tanking again for another #1 pick. Gotta sweeten the pot for the inevitable return of Lebron.


well they might be good if Irving hadn't been injured and if Anthony Bennett was even remotely contributing....is it too soon for the BUST label ?
And Tristan Thompson looked pretty good last year and seems to have regressed


Dion Waiters fighting with Irving and Thompson hasn't helped either.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Douchebag wrote:
Anthony Bennett needs to go to the D-League. He obviously wasn't ready to make the jump to the pros. Not sure what playing 10 minutes a game for the Cavs is going to do for his development.


yeah, good point...there has been all this 'oh my god' about Rondo playing in the D-League to rehab
i imagine it would be equally as shocking (not to mention embarrassing) if Bennett was sent down
i mean what if he was sent down and did shitty in the D-League ? :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Bagels wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Bagels wrote:
hey, this makes the Cavs the 3rd best team in the East now !

I thought the Cavs would actually be good this year, but they're awful. Maybe they are tanking again for another #1 pick. Gotta sweeten the pot for the inevitable return of Lebron.


well they might be good if Irving hadn't been injured and if Anthony Bennett was even remotely contributing....is it too soon for the BUST label ?
And Tristan Thompson looked pretty good last year and seems to have regressed

I think the answer is to that is no. He's a bust for sure. I think a better question might be: Is it too soon for the worst #1 pick in NBA history label?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11005
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
FavreFan wrote:
From what I understand this isn't a great trade, but it's not really a bad one either. It's good for JR because the Bulls wont have to pay the tax this season. But the picks we got are going to end up being pretty meaningless and we were letting Deng go anyway. Im sure the Bulls wanted a better offer but none were there. And Im sure Steve is correct that the offer was made just so they could say they made Deng an offer. Hard for him to accept a 3/30 contract when some dumbass team will pay him 4/50 this summer.


agree, from what i heard had they stayed in the tax this year the penalties would have been more severe since it would have been the 2nd year in a row they'd be in the tax... be getting out of the tax this year the penalties restart if in a future year they end up in the tax again...

Im actually disapointed they wont be able to take a chance on bynum... if someone could convince him to give a crap about basketball he could possibly be dominant


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 113 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group