It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 12:45 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:08 am
Posts: 892
Quote:
yet at the same time it pushes Mac’s credibility paper thin.


agreed. If Mac just "whips" Grossman for a reaction, I find that annoying radio and if he actually looked at sunday's game and finds Grossman's play as the thing that jumped out at him then I've lost a lot of respect for Mac's football knowledge. Grossman had four potential drives stopped by two fumbles by his running backs, a lazy wide receiver, and a botched punt return. The o line and running backs get the blame for the loss.

_________________
May 1, 2007 - CSFMB Civil War
“Those who don’t remember history are doomed to repeat it.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91903
Location: To the left of my post
Nas,
Will you let us know when people are allowed to think that Rex should be benched? I'm not there yet but there is a good chance that I will feel that way at some point this season. Mac doesn't think that Rex is our best chance to win and Rex really didn't do anything to change that opinion on Sunday. He didn't do anything that you can really point to and say that he should be benched but why would you expect someone who clearly believes that Rex should not be our quarterback to look at how he played at that game and say that he shouldn't be.

The San Diego game didn't change my opinion of Rex. I believe that we still don't know if he can handle the starting job or not and he has at least a couple weeks to prove it. It obviously didn't change your opinion. Why should you expect it to change Mac's opinion?

Rex is going to have detractors until he shows that he can consistently be a good quarterback.

At what time can someone start to believe that Rex Grossman should be benched? If the time comes where he is, were the people clamoring for it earlier still wrong?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:32 pm
Posts: 495
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan86 wrote:
OK Nas, you dont seem to be able to be objective in your unconditional love for Grossman either. Mac saying he would take Huard over him was stupid, but Jurko said he would much rather have Griese rather than Grossman, and you say he is objective, so maybe you could be wrong when it comes to Grossman. Also the name of the thread isnt even true, his biggest criticism is the offensive line, which was also mine. So stop making judgements based on 3 minutes of convo and go back to B&B


I'm not on the radio. I'm a fan posting on a message board and if you read my thoughts on the game yesterday I was critical of his dumb fumble.


His fumble is too easy to criticize, it wasnt even forced and it was obviously a stupid fumble and its one of Rex's many problems. He led them to 3 points and 4 turnovers yesterday. Im not saying they are all his fault, because like I have said over and over again your biggest problem is the line, not the Grossman or Benson, but they arent far behind. How can you critricize Mac for saying Rex didnt do shit yesterday..... He didnt! Like Mac said, he made some decent throws, but is the bar so low that we point to an NFL QB making NFL throws as a good thing. He definitely didnt lose the game for them but he did not do anything to help them win it either.


Farve the last time I checked the Chargers have a top 3-5 defense. The interception was not Grossman's fault as much as Berrrians. LT even said he told his team we are not going to run up & down the field on another championship level team. The fumbles by the RBs & Mcgowan lost the game. Being objective gives more credibility.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:08 am
Posts: 892
I hope he is as critical of Philip Rivers who 1. played worse than Rex on sunday and 2. went one and out in the playoffs last year.

_________________
May 1, 2007 - CSFMB Civil War
“Those who don’t remember history are doomed to repeat it.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:15 pm
Posts: 4184
Location: Somewhere on I-355
OakBrookJoe wrote:
I hope he is as critical of Philip Rivers who 1. played worse than Rex on sunday and 2. went one and out in the playoffs last year.

Throw Drew Brees into the "should we bench him" discussion as well.
What did he do on Thursday?
0 TD's, 2 Picks against what's supposed to be a Pussy Colts Defense. :wink:

_________________
“Mmmm. Move over, eggs. Bacon just got a new best friend - fudge.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:26 pm
Posts: 1564
Quote:
Oak Brook Joe wrote:

I hope he is as critical of Philip Rivers who 1. played worse than Rex on sunday and 2. went one and out in the playoffs last year.


This brings up a pet peeve of mine, the reliance of passer rating in grading QB's. Rivers rating of 73 was twenty points better than Grossman yet in my opinion Rivers was as effective (or ineffective) as Grossman, Rivers is better at throwing the 3 yard pass. Big whoop.

Another how example in the flaw in the rating. First and ten, QB#1 goes 3-3 but passes for nine yards. Team has to punt. A QB#2 goes 1-3 for 10 yards, makes a first down. QB#1 has a rating of 79, QB#2 has a rating of 43. Makes sense :roll:

not saying the QB rating is compleely useless, Grossman's 0 rating against the Packers last year was justified. But it seems like too many pundits look at it as gospel.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:17 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
rivers should have had a better rating from the simple fact that his team didnt put the ball on the turf 3 times

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:08 am
Posts: 892
Quote:
rivers should have had a better rating from the simple fact that his team didnt put the ball on the turf 3 times


huh?

_________________
May 1, 2007 - CSFMB Civil War
“Those who don’t remember history are doomed to repeat it.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:25 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
what do you mean 'huh'? the bears turned it over 4 times, so rex had 4 less chances to make a play. dont get me wrong, rex certainly didnt step up and put the team on his shoulders and lead them to a win, but as ive said before, he is way down on the list of reasons for why they lost on sunday

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:08 am
Posts: 892
Frank,

I took your comment wrong. I agree. I thought you were blaming rex for the others' turnovers.

_________________
May 1, 2007 - CSFMB Civil War
“Those who don’t remember history are doomed to repeat it.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Candyland
Mac has made references to Rex's upbringing in the past as one reason why he doesn't think he will succeed as an NFL QB.

_________________
"Tubby? Oh yes, Tubby."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Candyland
It also factors in yards per attempt. Rex's yards per attempt was only around 6 for the game.

_________________
"Tubby? Oh yes, Tubby."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Bulldog Scott wrote:
It also factors in yards per attempt. Rex's yards per attempt was only around 6 for the game.


Id have to put that more on Ron Turner though.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91903
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas,
Will you let us know when people are allowed to think that Rex should be benched? I'm not there yet but there is a good chance that I will feel that way at some point this season. Mac doesn't think that Rex is our best chance to win and Rex really didn't do anything to change that opinion on Sunday. He didn't do anything that you can really point to and say that he should be benched but why would you expect someone who clearly believes that Rex should not be our quarterback to look at how he played at that game and say that he shouldn't be.

The San Diego game didn't change my opinion of Rex. I believe that we still don't know if he can handle the starting job or not and he has at least a couple weeks to prove it. It obviously didn't change your opinion. Why should you expect it to change Mac's opinion?

Rex is going to have detractors until he shows that he can consistently be a good quarterback.

At what time can someone start to believe that Rex Grossman should be benched? If the time comes where he is, were the people clamoring for it earlier still wrong?


Rick I guess you didn't read any of my posts in this thread. I don't care that Mac or Jurko don't like Grossman. That's fine. A lot of fans have the same opinion. The basis of this thread wasn't about Grossman getting benched it was about Mac being objective. Grossman could throw 5 touchdowns in a game and Mac would bash him for not throwing 6 or because something like his shoe laces were double knotted. Kind of how Murph gives it to Jacque Jones. Jurko thinks Griese should start but at least he is objective in his analysis of the game. That's all I expect the driver of the show to be. There will be games this year where Grossman is probably awful and may cost the Bears a win but Sunday wasn't one of them.


I read them all. Mac doesn't have to be objective on Rex Grossman. He's not doing play by play. He is paid to have an opinion. He has an opinion that Rex isn't the future. Rex did NOTHING to change that opinion on Sunday. My opinion going into the game was that Rex needs to show that he can be a consistent QB. My opinion on that did not change. It was at best an average performance. If I had already given up on Rex then I would still have that opinion that Rex needs to be benched. There is nothing illogical about people who have already given up on Grossman. I don't happen to be one of them but I'm not going to bash someone for doing it just like I won't bash you for predicting that Rex Grossman will have a pro bowl season.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Bulldog Scott wrote:
Mac has made references to Rex's upbringing in the past as one reason why he doesn't think he will succeed as an NFL QB.


I heard that too. If Grossman has shown anything he has shown that he is tough and he wants to win. That's why the guys on the team like him. He won't throw anyone under the bus. Grossman threw a pick against Miami last year because Clark ran the wrong route(none of us knew or could tell this)but he never brought it up after the game. He took the heat. No one knew Clark ran the wrong route until Clark brought it up a few weeks later. He didn't throw Berrian under the bus Sunday either. The guy stands up in front of the media and takes criticism like I’ve never seen another player take it. The guy has battled back from injuries that might demoralize a lot of guys.


I agree completely. I do think he has mental blocks when it comes to handling 4th quarter pressure, but anyone who says he isnt a physically tough player isnt watching the games. Mac really needs to stop bringing the upbringing into every discussion about people. Its not how much money your parents made that made you as a person, its how many lessons they taught you and they're actions in front of you. People shouldnt apologize for having a good upbringing.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23740
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Nas wrote:
I heard that too. If Grossman has shown anything he has shown that he is tough and he wants to win.


He's the Aaron Rowand of quarterbacks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 1:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33782
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Maybe it's a case of transference. What he says about Grossman is really what he thinks about Harry. Or he's trying to get under Harry's skin.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 1:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:08 am
Posts: 892
Quote:
Maybe it's a case of transference. What he says about Grossman is really what he thinks about Harry. Or he's trying to get under Harry's skin.


.....or he feels the need to offset Harry's homerism

_________________
May 1, 2007 - CSFMB Civil War
“Those who don’t remember history are doomed to repeat it.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
Mac hasn't replied yet......hmm.........

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 3:35 pm
Posts: 20
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Not sure I understand...but why does Mac have to be objective about Grossman? It's sports radio, not hard news.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
Nas wrote:
1982 posts spmack. That was a great year :wink:


Yeah I missed my year post about 3 posts back. Well 4 after this one.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 3:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 7:27 pm
Posts: 1402
Lots of selective memory going on here.... lots of laughs, too.
Hey Nas.... do your heroes B&B think Grossman played well Sunday? Did you? And what was it about Huard's 108.9 rating against the Chargers you didn't like?
Rex Grossman sucks. Warm up to it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 3:45 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:33 am
Posts: 325
Mac wrote:
Rex Grossman sucks. Warm up to it.




OH MY!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 4:26 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12443
Mac wrote:
Lots of selective memory going on here.... lots of laughs, too.
Hey Nas.... do your heroes B&B think Grossman played well Sunday? Did you? And what was it about Huard's 108.9 rating against the Chargers you didn't like?
Rex Grossman sucks. Warm up to it.


B/B's position was that Grossman wasn't at fault for the loss, but I'm sure you knew that already.

Damon Huard is a career backup QB who played well in a stretch last seson for the Chiefs. You can have him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 4:28 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12443
Mac wrote:
Lots of selective memory going on here.... lots of laughs, too.
Hey Nas.... do your heroes B&B think Grossman played well Sunday? Did you? And what was it about Huard's 108.9 rating against the Chargers you didn't like?
Rex Grossman sucks. Warm up to it.


No, Rex Grossman doesn't suck. He has horrible games, but for every one of those, we can talk about a great game. Funny how you don't want to focus only on the negatives ? I'm not saying he's even the future of the team - this year will determine that as he must become more consistent, less peaks and valley's, but you sound like Mariotti with your focus on what he doesn't do over what he has done.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:01 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:29 pm
Posts: 4614
Mac's right, Rex sucks. He should be a backup, just like Huard should be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 2:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 4:50 pm
Posts: 2173
Location: Where do you think?
pizza_Place: Gino's East
I have to say this was a very enjoyable thread to read. Real intense at times. Huard over Grossman, please. Huard might be losing his job to THE Broydie Croyle (sp). Taking everything into account, Rex right now is an average starting NFL quarterback. He will have his great games and his lousy games; therefore, balancing it out. I still believe Rex could be the quarterback to take the Bears to the super bowl.

And another note, Harry is a complete ass for his Mike Brown comments yesterday. Spaulding hit it right on the nose when she asked if Harry would cry if someone poured a bottle of tequila on the floor right in front of him. But I guess you can expect a comment like that from some one like him who couldn't even plays sports at a competitive level when he was a youth. A guy spends his whole life playing football and after getting injured once again, faces the real possibility of his career being over. How the hell do you expect him to react? I guess he thinks the losing team in the LLWS were a bunch of pussies because they cried.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Darren - Tinley Park wrote:
I have to say this was a very enjoyable thread to read. Real intense at times. Huard over Grossman, please. Huard might be losing his job to THE Broydie Croyle (sp). Taking everything into account, Rex right now is an average starting NFL quarterback. He will have his great games and his lousy games; therefore, balancing it out. I still believe Rex could be the quarterback to take the Bears to the super bowl.

And another note, Harry is a complete ass for his Mike Brown comments yesterday. Spaulding hit it right on the nose when she asked if Harry would cry if someone poured a bottle of tequila on the floor right in front of him. But I guess you can expect a comment like that from some one like him who couldn't even plays sports at a competitive level when he was a youth. A guy spends his whole life playing football and after getting injured once again, faces the real possibility of his career being over. How the hell do you expect him to react? I guess he thinks the losing team in the LLWS were a bunch of pussies because they cried.


Harry had a change of heart. I guess that happens when 1,000,000 people disagree with you and nobody agrees with you.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:32 pm
Posts: 495
FavreFan wrote:
Darren - Tinley Park wrote:
I have to say this was a very enjoyable thread to read. Real intense at times. Huard over Grossman, please. Huard might be losing his job to THE Broydie Croyle (sp). Taking everything into account, Rex right now is an average starting NFL quarterback. He will have his great games and his lousy games; therefore, balancing it out. I still believe Rex could be the quarterback to take the Bears to the super bowl.

And another note, Harry is a complete ass for his Mike Brown comments yesterday. Spaulding hit it right on the nose when she asked if Harry would cry if someone poured a bottle of tequila on the floor right in front of him. But I guess you can expect a comment like that from some one like him who couldn't even plays sports at a competitive level when he was a youth. A guy spends his whole life playing football and after getting injured once again, faces the real possibility of his career being over. How the hell do you expect him to react? I guess he thinks the losing team in the LLWS were a bunch of pussies because they cried.


Harry had a change of heart. I guess that happens when 1,000,000 people disagree with you and nobody agrees with you.


I think Harry is a stand up guy for admitting being wrong, something we don't hear on the radio much these days. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
lamar hoyt's burrito wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Darren - Tinley Park wrote:
I have to say this was a very enjoyable thread to read. Real intense at times. Huard over Grossman, please. Huard might be losing his job to THE Broydie Croyle (sp). Taking everything into account, Rex right now is an average starting NFL quarterback. He will have his great games and his lousy games; therefore, balancing it out. I still believe Rex could be the quarterback to take the Bears to the super bowl.

And another note, Harry is a complete ass for his Mike Brown comments yesterday. Spaulding hit it right on the nose when she asked if Harry would cry if someone poured a bottle of tequila on the floor right in front of him. But I guess you can expect a comment like that from some one like him who couldn't even plays sports at a competitive level when he was a youth. A guy spends his whole life playing football and after getting injured once again, faces the real possibility of his career being over. How the hell do you expect him to react? I guess he thinks the losing team in the LLWS were a bunch of pussies because they cried.


Harry had a change of heart. I guess that happens when 1,000,000 people disagree with you and nobody agrees with you.


I think Harry is a stand up guy for admitting being wrong, something we don't hear on the radio much these days. :roll:


Unless you heard how he said it. He waffled the whole time, never said he was sorry, then a bit later changed his mind again and took the non-apology back. Douche.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group