It is currently Sun Nov 17, 2024 2:38 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 914 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 31  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:42 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
That's not true. The Bulls could have worked out a sign and trade to get Melo IF he wanted to come. Considering that he told them he wanted Taj on the team a sign and trade was his only option IF he wanted all of his money.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
To continue to argue about supporting cast is lunacy because the point has been validated by the free agent season there is a lot of roster engineering going on and the idea of give Melo the ball and you will win a championship was never stated by Goff. He stated that the team would be better if the ball was in Anthony's hands as opposed to Jeremy Lin. That point has pretty much been proven. Interesting is that you never argue the merits of the ball being in Jeremy Lins hands. It's a lot easier to count championship s and attach labels of winning and losing. Regardless the guy is considered a top five player as evidenced by the interest in him. The people who fawn ed over Lin have amnesia as he is not even a starter.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Nas wrote:
That's not true. The Bulls could have worked out a sign and trade to get Melo IF he wanted to come. Considering that he told them he wanted Taj on the team a sign and trade was his only option IF he wanted all of his money.

I think if he could get his money he let's Taj Gibson roll I can't believe that he would let Taj Gibson be deal killer. The Knicks will be terrible next year

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
The Bulls can trade him for second round pick to free up money. KNICKS not interested in sign and trade.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
4 yrs and 72 million is too low

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:52 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
long time guy wrote:
Nas wrote:
That's not true. The Bulls could have worked out a sign and trade to get Melo IF he wanted to come. Considering that he told them he wanted Taj on the team a sign and trade was his only option IF he wanted all of his money.

I think if he could get his money he let's Taj Gibson roll I can't believe that he would let Taj Gibson be deal killer. The Knicks will be terrible next year


He wanted the 5th year. The Bulls couldn't give him the 5th year. His wife probably played a role in it. What happened with LeBron in Cleveland probably did too.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 10:55 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
long time guy wrote:
4 yrs and 72 million is too low


Maybe so. That's why a sign and trade was going to be the route the Bulls went. BTW every team says that they aren't interested in a sign and trade. It's nothing more than posturing.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Nas wrote:
long time guy wrote:
4 yrs and 72 million is too low


Maybe so. That's why a sign and trade was going to be the route the Bulls went. BTW every team says that they aren't interested in a sign and trade. It's nothing more than posturing.
depends on what's being traded. I'm sure if a top 15 pick or a starter were offered they would consider a trade. Have the Bulls offered Taj Gibson I doubt it. Their history has been to over value role players. People who blame the guy for turning down a low ball offer are fools. The Lakers offer was significantly greater than the Bulls. If the Bulls offered was similar I think he takes it

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:18 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
long time guy wrote:
Nas wrote:
long time guy wrote:
4 yrs and 72 million is too low


Maybe so. That's why a sign and trade was going to be the route the Bulls went. BTW every team says that they aren't interested in a sign and trade. It's nothing more than posturing.
depends on what's being traded. I'm sure if a top 15 pick or a starter were offered they would consider a trade. Have the Bulls offered Taj Gibson I doubt it. Their history has been to over value role players. People who blame the guy for turning down a low ball offer are fools. The Lakers offer was significantly greater than the Bulls. If the Bulls offered was similar I think he takes it


I don't believe that you can blame the Bulls for Melo staying in NY. He wanted to cash in and he went into all of this knowing no other team could give him the 5th year and extra $30M. Winning wasn't his top priority.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19355
Nas wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Nas wrote:
long time guy wrote:
4 yrs and 72 million is too low


Maybe so. That's why a sign and trade was going to be the route the Bulls went. BTW every team says that they aren't interested in a sign and trade. It's nothing more than posturing.
depends on what's being traded. I'm sure if a top 15 pick or a starter were offered they would consider a trade. Have the Bulls offered Taj Gibson I doubt it. Their history has been to over value role players. People who blame the guy for turning down a low ball offer are fools. The Lakers offer was significantly greater than the Bulls. If the Bulls offered was similar I think he takes it


I don't believe that you can blame the Bulls for Melo staying in NY. He wanted to cash in and he went into all of this knowing no other team could give him the 5th year and extra $30M. Winning wasn't his top priority.


Well how long until he tries force a trade from the Knicks?

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I think the forcing trade angle is being stupidly overblown. NY is gonna go into next summer with a ton of cap room and unless they strike out completely it will be a minimum of two seasons before we hear noise from Melo.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:32 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
I think the forcing trade angle is being stupidly overblown. NY is gonna go into next summer with a ton of cap room and unless they strike out completely it will be a minimum of two seasons before we hear noise from Melo.


At that point he wouldn't be worth a lot. His game would be on the decline by then.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
The Carmelo Anthony bashing is misguided. Successful franchises want the guy. The Knicks don't offer the guy that amount of money if he is the loser often portrayed. He suits up every night and has never thrown any of teammates under the bus publicly. If he makes a play for the money then that's his preferance. If the Bulls wanted him they should have come up with the max. that they could have offered within a 4 yr pd. They didnt. They were 24 million under the maximum they could have offered and people are criticizing him for not taking it. Gordon Hayward just accepted an offer sheet to play for 2 million less than what the Bulls are offering Carmelo Anthony. There was a problem with the Bulls offer

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I think the forcing trade angle is being stupidly overblown. NY is gonna go into next summer with a ton of cap room and unless they strike out completely it will be a minimum of two seasons before we hear noise from Melo.


At that point he wouldn't be worth a lot. His game would be on the decline by then.

You're talking 12 months. Not a big difference between then and now.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 12:18 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
I thought 24 months was 2 years.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Yeah. I thought you meant by next summer when they have a chance to be good. Melo's game will age well though.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Anthony will be remembered in the same breath as Barkley, Malone, Ewing, and Iverson if he goes back to NY.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
Anthony will be remembered in the same breath as Barkley, Malone, Ewing, and Iverson if he goes back to NY.

I'm not sure that's an insult, although i get your point.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:10 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
veganfan21 wrote:
Anthony will be remembered in the same breath as Barkley, Malone, Ewing, and Iverson if he goes back to NY.


I don't agree. Those guys wanted to win a championship. Barkley almost willed the Suns to beat the Bulls.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Anthony will be remembered in the same breath as Barkley, Malone, Ewing, and Iverson if he goes back to NY.

I'm not sure that's an insult, although i get your point.


Yeah I mean in the short term he'll be ridiculed for choosing the money over wins, but in the long term it'll be somewhat similar to the way we remember the guys I mentioned. To be fair though the difference between 129 million vs whatever the Bulls can do is obviously huge. Then again I'm sure he's got 100 million + in earnings thus far, but whatever it's his call.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
The Bulls gave a save face offer for a guy they supposedly wanted. It's not surprising that their offer was significantly lower than all the other teams in consideration. If the Lakers were in a similar position they would dump almost anyone to get the guy they want. He wants to win but not if he has to give up 60 million to do it. The Bulls should have offered the max for 4 yrs. Their offer is insulting for a guy they want. If they part with Gibson for nothing the deal could work if you're talking max for 4yrs. They are unwilling to do it because Gibson is considered to be a core guy.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls gave a save face offer for a guy they supposedly wanted. It's not surprising that their offer was significantly lower than all the other teams in consideration. If the Lakers were in a similar position they would dump almost anyone to get the guy they want. He wants to win but not if he has to give up 60 million to do it. The Bulls should have offered the max for 4 yrs. Their offer is insulting for a guy they want. If they part with Gibson for nothing the deal could work if you're talking max for 4yrs. They are unwilling to do it because Gibson is considered to be a core guy.


Everything you say is reasonable except you have to account for reports that Anthony himself wanted Taj in place like others have said. I mean the guy was part of the recruiting team. Bulls could have done more if NYK wanted to play ball on a sign and trade, but too many things are/were needed to make that work: Melo wanting to come here via sign and trade, and Phil's willingness to do it. Melo holds little to no leverage in this case since he doesn't want to sign outright with Chicago

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
veganfan21 wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls gave a save face offer for a guy they supposedly wanted. It's not surprising that their offer was significantly lower than all the other teams in consideration. If the Lakers were in a similar position they would dump almost anyone to get the guy they want. He wants to win but not if he has to give up 60 million to do it. The Bulls should have offered the max for 4 yrs. Their offer is insulting for a guy they want. If they part with Gibson for nothing the deal could work if you're talking max for 4yrs. They are unwilling to do it because Gibson is considered to be a core guy.


Everything you say is reasonable except you have to account for reports that Anthony himself wanted Taj in place like others have said. I mean the guy was part of the recruiting team. Bulls could have done more if NYK wanted to play ball on a sign and trade, but too many things are/were needed to make that work: Melo wanting to come here via sign and trade, and Phil's willingness to do it. Melo holds little to no leverage in this case since he doesn't want to sign outright with Chicago

If they could have maxed him out over 4 yrs it would have been interesting. I don't buy the notion that he played the Bulls. He was going to get his money from the Knicks regardless. When he opted out it was known that the Knicks were going to max him out. I think the Bulls could have been more creative. Houston has a max offer on the table for the much maligned Chris Bosh an offer that is 15-16 more than what the Bulls are offering yet Melo is criticized for not wanting to win.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls gave a save face offer for a guy they supposedly wanted. It's not surprising that their offer was significantly lower than all the other teams in consideration. If the Lakers were in a similar position they would dump almost anyone to get the guy they want. He wants to win but not if he has to give up 60 million to do it. The Bulls should have offered the max for 4 yrs. Their offer is insulting for a guy they want. If they part with Gibson for nothing the deal could work if you're talking max for 4yrs. They are unwilling to do it because Gibson is considered to be a core guy.


Everything you say is reasonable except you have to account for reports that Anthony himself wanted Taj in place like others have said. I mean the guy was part of the recruiting team. Bulls could have done more if NYK wanted to play ball on a sign and trade, but too many things are/were needed to make that work: Melo wanting to come here via sign and trade, and Phil's willingness to do it. Melo holds little to no leverage in this case since he doesn't want to sign outright with Chicago

If they could have maxed him out over 4 yrs it would have been interesting. I don't buy the notion that he played the Bulls. He was going to get his money from the Knicks regardless. When he opted out it was known that the Knicks were going to max him out. I think the Bulls could have been more creative. Houston has a max offer on the table for the much maligned Chris Bosh an offer that is 15-16 more than what the Bulls are offering yet Melo is criticized for not wanting to win.


I also don't think he played the Bulls. The problem for Melo is Phil has the power to tie Melo getting paid to playing for the Knicks - he's under no obligation to sign Anthony to big money then trade him to his preferred destination. Like you said it would have been interesting if the Bulls were able to match LAs offer. Would Melo have jumped?

I agree that Houston has been more creative, perhaps even a step ahead of the Bulls. Especially with the Harden acquisition.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 2:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
It's just easy to play the he doesn't want to win card. There is not a player in the NBA that would leave 60 million on the table. I don't believe he would have jumped if the Bulls would have matched LA. That fifth yr for a guy 34 is definitely a wild card

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 5:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91945
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
So, I guess the excuses for Carmelo not having anyone around him can end, since he seems to have chosen New York a second time!

He will be choosing the money over winning he can make about sixty million more with the Knicks anyone would take deal. As far as supporting cast goes the point has been validated by Lebron James he wins when he has a top five player playing with him and leaves when he doesn't. That was always my essential point. Winning is often a product of who you play with.
The point is that he is to be judged on his results. He has now chosen New York twice. Pay no attention to the details of any contracts. It no longer matters. His supporting cast isn't good is no longer a valid excuse.

You are just coming off as a guy that will apologize for Anthony no matter what. We don't need any more validation on his thoughts on New York. We got them. He either thinks he can win a title there, or he doesn't care that he'll never win a title there.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 6:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
So, I guess the excuses for Carmelo not having anyone around him can end, since he seems to have chosen New York a second time!

He will be choosing the money over winning he can make about sixty million more with the Knicks anyone would take deal. As far as supporting cast goes the point has been validated by Lebron James he wins when he has a top five player playing with him and leaves when he doesn't. That was always my essential point. Winning is often a product of who you play with.
The point is that he is to be judged on his results. He has now chosen New York twice. Pay no attention to the details of any contracts. It no longer matters. His supporting cast isn't good is no longer a valid excuse.

You are just coming off as a guy that will apologize for Anthony no matter what. We don't need any more validation on his thoughts on New York. We got them. He either thinks he can win a title there, or he doesn't care that he'll never win a title there.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 6:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
So, I guess the excuses for Carmelo not having anyone around him can end, since he seems to have chosen New York a second time!

He will be choosing the money over winning he can make about sixty million more with the Knicks anyone would take deal. As far as supporting cast goes the point has been validated by Lebron James he wins when he has a top five player playing with him and leaves when he doesn't. That was always my essential point. Winning is often a product of who you play with.
The point is that he is to be judged on his results. He has now chosen New York twice. Pay no attention to the details of any contracts. It no longer matters. His supporting cast isn't good is no longer a valid excuse.

You are just coming off as a guy that will apologize for Anthony no matter what. We don't need any more validation on his thoughts on New York. We got them. He either thinks he can win a title there, or he doesn't care that he'll never win a title there.
So he is supposed to agree to a terrible contract so that he can mesh with your notion of what a winner should be. Which NBA Player would leave 60 million on the table? I will hangup and listen for my answer.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 7:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Your ability to use logic leaves a lot to be desired. The Bulls are asking him to accept a contract that is 30 million less than the Knicks and that is if you remove the 5th yr. That contract offer was insulting. You are coming off as a guy that will criticize him no matter what.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2014 7:13 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Why is this so hard to understand? Melo wanted the Bulls to keep Taj and that is why he was apart of the recruiting team. Melo understood that unless there was a sign and trade or they dumped Gibson he wouldn't get the $96M a team like LA could offer. They didn't offer him a contract. He understood his options. Fact is he didn't want the 4 year deal. He wanted the security of $129M. There was nothing anyone could do about that. Security was the same reason he didn't take a contract similar to Miami's Big 3 when his rookie deal expired.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 914 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 31  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group