It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 2:22 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I completely agree with you. Even right down to the getting sick part, I will actually feel a little nautious. Hes definitively the best player on the planet right now, should be for the next 5-7 years, and could win 3-4 titles in that span with the Bulls and the right compliment of players, of which we have plenty.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Candyland
Would make me sick, too. But I think Pax already screwed the pooch on this one...

_________________
"Tubby? Oh yes, Tubby."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
We can't give up our whole team to get him. Kobe is not good enough to win a title on his own. He needs a secondary player better than Lamar Odom to win and if we give up Gordon, Hinrich, and Deng then we are basically just trading for the same one man team that the Lakers are now.

I don't think you make the deal if Deng is involved, not because Deng is untouchable, but because you have nothing but a great individual player who can't make his teammates that much better and a bunch of players who are not good enough to stop him from being double teamed.

If the Bulls could keep Hinrich and Deng and get Kobe then I say they go for it otherwise Kobe doesn't give the Bulls any better chance of winning a championship. We can fill in the rest but having a point guard to get the ball to Kobe and a second scoring option must stay on the roster.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
We can't give up our whole team to get him. Kobe is not good enough to win a title on his own. He needs a secondary player better than Lamar Odom to win and if we give up Gordon, Hinrich, and Deng then we are basically just trading for the same one man team that the Lakers are now.

Exactly. I want Kobe on the Boo, but how? I just can't envision any trade whereby the Lakers got acceptably-equal value and the Bulls were a Championship lock.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
We can't give up our whole team to get him. Kobe is not good enough to win a title on his own. He needs a secondary player better than Lamar Odom to win and if we give up Gordon, Hinrich, and Deng then we are basically just trading for the same one man team that the Lakers are now.

I don't think you make the deal if Deng is involved, not because Deng is untouchable, but because you have nothing but a great individual player who can't make his teammates that much better and a bunch of players who are not good enough to stop him from being double teamed.

If the Bulls could keep Hinrich and Deng and get Kobe then I say they go for it otherwise Kobe doesn't give the Bulls any better chance of winning a championship. We can fill in the rest but having a point guard to get the ball to Kobe and a second scoring option must stay on the roster.


Well first of all any deal would have to include Ben Wallace, just so the contracts match up. After that I would say it would have to include Ben Gordon because those two would not coexist well on the court together. So you got Wallace/Gordon then you could possibly throw in Noc and 2 first round picks. I think Mitch Kupchack is dumb enough to consider Wallace/Gordon/Noc and 2 1st rounders for Kobe. That would leave you with Kobe/Joe Smith/Kirk/Deng/Tyrus/Duhon/Noah/Sefalosha. Depending on how good Noah can be right away and how much Tyrus has improved(which I think is alot) that team can win a championship.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
MattInTheCrown wrote:
Exactly. I want Kobe on the Boo, but how? I just can't envision any trade whereby the Lakers got acceptably-equal value and the Bulls were a Championship lock.


This is the same team that traded Shaq away for basically 30 cents on the dollar. Knowing Kupchack he would jump at 65 cents on the dollar.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
We can't give up our whole team to get him. Kobe is not good enough to win a title on his own. He needs a secondary player better than Lamar Odom to win and if we give up Gordon, Hinrich, and Deng then we are basically just trading for the same one man team that the Lakers are now.

I don't think you make the deal if Deng is involved, not because Deng is untouchable, but because you have nothing but a great individual player who can't make his teammates that much better and a bunch of players who are not good enough to stop him from being double teamed.

If the Bulls could keep Hinrich and Deng and get Kobe then I say they go for it otherwise Kobe doesn't give the Bulls any better chance of winning a championship. We can fill in the rest but having a point guard to get the ball to Kobe and a second scoring option must stay on the roster.


Well first of all any deal would have to include Ben Wallace, just so the contracts match up. After that I would say it would have to include Ben Gordon because those two would not coexist well on the court together. So you got Wallace/Gordon then you could possibly throw in Noc and 2 first round picks. I think Mitch Kupchack is dumb enough to consider Wallace/Gordon/Noc and 2 1st rounders for Kobe. That would leave you with Kobe/Joe Smith/Kirk/Deng/Tyrus/Duhon/Noah/Sefalosha. Depending on how good Noah can be right away and how much Tyrus has improved(which I think is alot) that team can win a championship.


If the Lakers would take Ben Wallace then I take the deal immediately. The Noah pick actually ends up not being that bad since Wallace is gone. They can have Gordon since he is a scorer but really not needed with Kobe(assuming we still have Deng). Noc is a decent player but expendable.

I don't see how Mitch Kupchak trades Kobe for Ben Wallace/Ben Gordon/Noc and keeps his job but I guess Kevin McHale still has his so anything is possible.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
I wouldn't make the deal either if Deng is involved unless it could be a straight up trade which it can't be. I would have no problem seeing Hinrich or any other player go. If the Bulls could somehow convince the Lakers to take Wallace that would be even better. The Bulls wouldn't have to gut their team to get Bryant. They have enough talent where they will still be able to compete and win in the East. This team the Bulls have still doesn't have that guy you could go to with the game on the line that will deliver or that guy that you can count on for 82 games a year. I could see Kobe in Deng being a MJ and Pippen type of combo. Deng is the ultimate team player just like Pippen and would be a better complement for Kobe than Odom.


I still think that Hinrich is still needed. I don't know if a Tyrus Thomas or Nocioni third option is a championship quality team. I think Hinrich would be a great third option/ball handler.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Candyland
I would think if the Lakers are taking Kobe's contract, the Bulls would have to take back a bad contract of theirs. Kwame? Radmonovich?

_________________
"Tubby? Oh yes, Tubby."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
We can't give up our whole team to get him. Kobe is not good enough to win a title on his own. He needs a secondary player better than Lamar Odom to win and if we give up Gordon, Hinrich, and Deng then we are basically just trading for the same one man team that the Lakers are now.

I don't think you make the deal if Deng is involved, not because Deng is untouchable, but because you have nothing but a great individual player who can't make his teammates that much better and a bunch of players who are not good enough to stop him from being double teamed.

If the Bulls could keep Hinrich and Deng and get Kobe then I say they go for it otherwise Kobe doesn't give the Bulls any better chance of winning a championship. We can fill in the rest but having a point guard to get the ball to Kobe and a second scoring option must stay on the roster.


Well first of all any deal would have to include Ben Wallace, just so the contracts match up. After that I would say it would have to include Ben Gordon because those two would not coexist well on the court together. So you got Wallace/Gordon then you could possibly throw in Noc and 2 first round picks. I think Mitch Kupchack is dumb enough to consider Wallace/Gordon/Noc and 2 1st rounders for Kobe. That would leave you with Kobe/Joe Smith/Kirk/Deng/Tyrus/Duhon/Noah/Sefalosha. Depending on how good Noah can be right away and how much Tyrus has improved(which I think is alot) that team can win a championship.


If the Lakers would take Ben Wallace then I take the deal immediately. The Noah pick actually ends up not being that bad since Wallace is gone. They can have Gordon since he is a scorer but really not needed with Kobe(assuming we still have Deng). Noc is a decent player but expendable.

I don't see how Mitch Kupchak trades Kobe for Ben Wallace/Ben Gordon/Noc and keeps his job but I guess Kevin McHale still has his so anything is possible.


the two number 1's would be big chips also. I think we agree that it would not be equal value for Kobe, but Mitch is a big dumbass. Just look at some of the trades he has made in the past 3 years, its really pathetic(and some of the trades he didnt make..Jermaine Oneal, Kidd). I think he is dumb enough to do this, and the biggest reason for optimism for Bulls fans is Chicago keeps being mentioned as the Number 1 target team. Pax is 10x smarter than Mitch so I trust him to out-think him in this possible deal.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I dont know about that Nas. He defends their best player almost every single game, and I guess with Kobe he could take that place, but Hinrich is a difference maker in games when it comes to containing the other teams best perimeter players.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Paxson isn't the smartest guy when it comes to making trades so I don't really trust him. Besides he treats the guys he drafted like they are his kids.


Hes very careful not to make dumb trades, which seperates him from all but a handful of GMs in the NBA, but I dont know of any bad trades he has made.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92041
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
I wouldn't make the deal either if Deng is involved unless it could be a straight up trade which it can't be. I would have no problem seeing Hinrich or any other player go. If the Bulls could somehow convince the Lakers to take Wallace that would be even better. The Bulls wouldn't have to gut their team to get Bryant. They have enough talent where they will still be able to compete and win in the East. This team the Bulls have still doesn't have that guy you could go to with the game on the line that will deliver or that guy that you can count on for 82 games a year. I could see Kobe in Deng being a MJ and Pippen type of combo. Deng is the ultimate team player just like Pippen and would be a better complement for Kobe than Odom.


I still think that Hinrich is still needed. I don't know if a Tyrus Thomas or Nocioni third option is a championship quality team. I think Hinrich would be a great third option/ball handler.


When you have Kobe you really only need 1 other option and a bunch of guys that can shoot and defend. Deng and Kobe plus a bunch of role players would be good enough. Duhon and Thabo are not really that far behind Hinrich. Hinrich in my opinion is probably the most overrated player on the Bulls team. He plays hard every game but with the exception of a handful of games a year he isn't a difference maker.


Chris Duhon is not close to Hinrich. Hinrich is an above average NBA player and Duhon is a below average NBA player. He is a decent bench player but he probably will lose minutes to Jameson Curry this year.

Hinrich may not be a top 15 point guard, but he is better than any pg the Bulls have or could get. Thabo has potential, but he's not as consistent as Hinrich.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Hinrich may not be a top 15 point guard, but he is better than any pg the Bulls have or could get. Thabo has potential, but he's not as consistent as Hinrich.


Wow. I definitely think Hinrich is a top 10 PG. Right around the 7-10 range probably. If hes not a top 15 PG I would like to hear of these other 15 PGs that are better. Also Tablo wasnt nearly as consistent as Kirk but was a rookie, and came into the league alot less polished than Kirk. I think Tablo has a good future ahead of him.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Hinrich is an above average defender but he is often on the bench in the first few minutes of a game for committing dumb fouls. He is still shooting below 45% after all these years in the league which means he probably won't get better. He really isn't a true point guard either. When you have Kobe on your team you don't need a PG unless his name is Jason Kidd. Kobe will handle the ball 75% of the time. If Hinrich is the reason the Bulls won't get Kobe than Paxson needs to be run out of town.


Come on Nas, thats like when advertisers say "Less than $1,000 and its $999.99". Hinrich is shooting .448 last season, thats pretty damn near .450, and has increased significantly every season hes been in the NBA, so how do you think it wont get better? The evidence strongly disputes that. Also hes good at making open 3s and would be way better with Kobe next to him. He also could take alot of defensive pressure off of Kobe. He would compliment him way better than you are giving him credit for.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Paxson isn't the smartest guy when it comes to making trades so I don't really trust him. Besides he treats the guys he drafted like they are his kids.


Hes very careful not to make dumb trades, which seperates him from all but a handful of GMs in the NBA, but I dont know of any bad trades he has made.


I'm trying to find a trade that Paxson made that was good. Can you help me? Besides finding talent in the early 1st round (he won't be able to do that after this year) he has been a bad GM. All of his signings and trades have been bad at best.


The evidence just doesnt support your claim. He has not made great trades, thats fine, the Spurs havent for the most part either. Alot of their main talent is through the draft, I think they are doing ok. Like I said he avoids bad salarys and bad trades, none of them are bad at best, they all make sense, except you can argue the Wallace signing but lets give him more than a year.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Candyland
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Paxson isn't the smartest guy when it comes to making trades so I don't really trust him. Besides he treats the guys he drafted like they are his kids.


Hes very careful not to make dumb trades, which seperates him from all but a handful of GMs in the NBA, but I dont know of any bad trades he has made.


I'm trying to find a trade that Paxson made that was good. Can you help me? Besides finding talent in the early 1st round (he won't be able to do that after this year) he has been a bad GM. All of his signings and trades have been bad at best.


Trading Curry and getting the two draft picks wasn't bad. Time will tell, but I think Tyrus will be good, and Noah will be a solid rotation guy. Curry is a good scorer, but he's terrible at everything else.

_________________
"Tubby? Oh yes, Tubby."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Bulldog Scott wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Paxson isn't the smartest guy when it comes to making trades so I don't really trust him. Besides he treats the guys he drafted like they are his kids.


Hes very careful not to make dumb trades, which seperates him from all but a handful of GMs in the NBA, but I dont know of any bad trades he has made.


I'm trying to find a trade that Paxson made that was good. Can you help me? Besides finding talent in the early 1st round (he won't be able to do that after this year) he has been a bad GM. All of his signings and trades have been bad at best.


Trading Curry and getting the two draft picks wasn't bad. Time will tell, but I think Tyrus will be good, and Noah will be a solid rotation guy. Curry is a good scorer, but he's terrible at everything else.


Good call Scott, forgot about that one, although he was dealing with Isaiah so the degree of difficulty in making a trade in that situation is basically zero.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Hinrich is an above average defender but he is often on the bench in the first few minutes of a game for committing dumb fouls. He is still shooting below 45% after all these years in the league which means he probably won't get better. He really isn't a true point guard either. When you have Kobe on your team you don't need a PG unless his name is Jason Kidd. Kobe will handle the ball 75% of the time. If Hinrich is the reason the Bulls won't get Kobe than Paxson needs to be run out of town.


Come on Nas, thats like when advertisers say "Less than $1,000 and its $999.99". Hinrich is shooting .448 last season, thats pretty damn near .450, and has increased significantly every season hes been in the NBA, so how do you think it wont get better? The evidence strongly disputes that. Also hes good at making open 3s and would be way better with Kobe next to him. He also could take alot of defensive pressure off of Kobe. He would compliment him way better than you are giving him credit for.


Hinrich's has made 41.4% of his FG for his career. I don't care how you dress it up that's not good. I'm not saying I don't want the guy to play for the Bulls but I wouldn't let him stop me from getting Kobe if he is a guy the Lakers want.


Well you dont care how I dress it up, but hes played 4 years, not 14, so your career FG% stat is misleading and I think you realize that.

03-04 .386 12.0 PPG
04-05 .397 15.7 PPG
05-06 .418 15.9 PPG
06-07 .448 16.6 PPG

I dont know too many fans that complain about progress like that from your PG, especially those who preach patience with Rex.

Your last sentence I agree with.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
He gave away a 7 foot guy that can score for just about nothing. Tyrus has potential but it's highly unlikely he will have the type of impact on a game that Curry could and Noah is bad.

He got lucky that the Knicks became a lottery team but he didn't hit the jackpot with his picks.

No team would trade Curry for Thomas and Noah.


Again none of these statements is true. I know they are your opinions but they simply arent true. Tyrus is a much more promising prospect than Curry is/ever was. Curry sucks, he cant rebound despite his massive size, cant play D, is a big softy, has bad hands, is a crybaby, and has a big heart problem, pun intended. Nobody wanted this guy except the worst GM in all of sports.

How in the hell did he get lucky the Knicks were in the lottery? They have been a horrible, horrible franchise for awhile now, it wasnt exactly an out-on-the-limb prediction to see them in the lottery,

The last sentence is just ridiculous. Every single team in the NBA right now would rather have Tyrus and Noah than Curry.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Even 45% isn't good for a guard.


In what NBA is that bad for a guard? I covered this twice now, but my point is he has improved every single year hes been in the NBA, why would it be unusual to think it would continue to go up and probably peak around 47-49%, which is pretty good for an NBA PG.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Well I disagree and think most NBA GM's would too, but we have made our points, but my last one is.. Did you really just describe Curry as "An athletic 7 footer?" I just found that funny.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Quote:
doesn't have a lot of upside. He isn't good at anything. He plays with a lot of energy but that's it. That translates into being a bad NBA player


People used to say that about Ben Wallace.
Quote:
Tyrus Thomas has potential but he also has the IQ of Hester and the only thing he does well is dunk and block shots.


Tyrus has showed alot of improvement since his first game last season at rebounding and his post moves. If you watched his footwork and back to the basket ability against Milwaukee a couple games ago you had to be at least a little happy about the improvement he has seemed to make in that area. I think he still has a very high ceiling.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Did you really just describe Curry as "An athletic 7 footer?" I just found that funny.


What would you call him? I can't think of a 7 foot guy that can move like Curry. He has great footwork and can score on anyone.


A fat blob that is pretty good at scoring and is more intrigued at the idea of being good at NBA Live on his XBOX 360 than at being an all star.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I think Tyrus will average over 15 PPG in a season in his career. I think he can improve enough offensively to actually be considered a thread. I know he has to work on his shooting more, but like I said I like the improvement I have seen in just one year in his hands, his footwork, and his low post moves, as well as him seeing to have an eye for the ball and always making plays that make you turn your head.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
To take this in another direction Nas, I have a feeling you like the Knicks this year with Randolph. I liked the Balkman pick(Isaiah's one great quality is eye for talent), but I dont see them winning 40 games this year. I feel like I could post up Curry/Randolph.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Candyland
Nas wrote:
He gave away a 7 foot guy that can score for just about nothing. Tyrus has potential but it's highly unlikely he will have the type of impact on a game that Curry could and Noah is bad. When you trade away a scoring big you should get something good in return. He got lucky that the Knicks became a lottery team but he didn't hit the jackpot with his picks. No team would trade Curry for Thomas and Noah. How did the Wallace signing work out when you had a younger and better version of him on your team? How did the box of rocks he got back for Chandler and Crawford work out? What about the J.R. Smith trade? What did he do with all the big expiring contracts? Why didn't he try to get another expiring contract during the deadline? Paxson is a nice guy but he really isn't a good GM.


I think we've had this discussion before :wink: . I agree, most of his other moves haven't worked out, but when you factor in that Curry had a bum ticker at the time and there was still doubt whether he would play in another NBA game and they could have gotten NOTHING for him, he did alright.

_________________
"Tubby? Oh yes, Tubby."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Candyland
I will say, if the Bulls had Curry last year to throw the ball into, they probably make it to the finals.

_________________
"Tubby? Oh yes, Tubby."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
I think they will be a top 5 team in the East this year. I had them making the playoffs last year. They had a 1 game lead until Isiah sign his new contract then they decided to stop playing.


We'll see. They coulda/woulda/shoulda had a lead and got in but bottom line is finished with 33 wins and only beat 3 teams in the very weak East. I think they finish somewhere around 37-45. I see at the very least Detroit, Cleveland, Chicago, Miami, New Jersey, Washington, Orlando, Boston and Toronto being better than them, basically all the playoff teams from last season and Boston. I cant really envision a scenario in which the Knicks are better than any of these teams this season.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Last edited by FavreFan on Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:19 pm
Posts: 85
Location: Waukegan
Quote:
I feel real good about the Knicks.


Allan Houston coming back will do that for you, and isnt eddy curry hurt?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 95 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group