NME wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
More than one Bears beat reporter has been skeptical of the Bears use of consultants in the past. One theory is that they deliberately give the Bears "good", not "great" advice.
1st, I don't give a shit about beat reporters in this town throwing around theories any more than I give a shit about all of us on this message board throwing around 'theories', theories aren't facts. If there are facts out there that reveal this to be true about the Bears front office/ownership then that is a different story. I'm not aware of it being a fact, however -and based off your reply here you aren't either or you would have added it being a fact to your post.
2nd, going out and actually hiring a former GM and well connected NFL guy to lead this process is not mutually exclusive with hiring a 'firm' to conduct the same process. If they have hired a former NFL GM to conduct this exact type of search in the past then I am not aware of it, so feel free to put that out there in this thread as I would like to read about it.
As for Accorsi feeding them half hearted ideas and suggestions? Yeah, I'll file that under bullshit for now as I can't think of any logical reason to believe he would, or anyone else would for that matter. Its not an Area 51 conspiracy we're dealing with here or the JFK assassination, its fucking football.
I don't know if hiring Accorsi will bring the Bears to the promised land and lead to them competing every year with the likes of the Patriots and Green Bay, but I like that they actually seem to be thinking logically about this for once by going out and grabbing a football mind. If indeed Ted Phillips and a McCaskey in one way or the other are simply taking in these suggestions and ignoring them then its buisness as usuall and it won't take long for that stupidity to show up on gameday. But we really have no way of knowing at this moment, we can only go off what we're being given this second, and this second they seem to be doing things differently.
I'll give this a chance.
You somehow ascertained that what I said above wasn't a fact? You're really a sharp guy, aren't you? Did you make that Einsteinian interpretive leap based on the FACT that I used the word "theory" in my post?
As for the rest of your post, YOU seem to be doing a lot of "theorizing" here. You have absolutely no idea whether or not the search firm that identified Angelo as a finalist for the Bears GM position relied on NFL consultants or not, do you? If YOU have these facts at your disposal, please feel free to present them to me. In my estimation, it is reasonable to assume that the search firm relied on multiple "consultations" from "respected" NFL minds to vet candidates. That approach would be consistent with the methods employed by executive search firms in other fields. To hypothesize otherwise reflects a shocking level of ignorance on your part. Consequently, it would seem that this hiring process will be quite similar to the one that brought us Angelo a decade ago.
Further, what happens if Accorsi makes one good recommendation and two bad ones for this position? Do you believe that George and Ted have the ability to discern between a strong candidate and a weak one? If so, why do you believe that's the case? Bear in mind that both of them know Phil Emery quite well, and yet they still couldn't recognize the fact that the man is an incompetent buffoon, something that became fairly obvious to the general public after only a few of his press conferences.
As for Accorsi's reliability under this circumstance, I tend to believe that external consultants are often as interested in serving their own interests as they are the interests of their short-term employers. In this case, it remains to be seen whether or not those interests intersect or not.
Like you, I'll give this "new" process a chance. But that's only because I have no other choice, not because, as you preposterously assert, that the Bears seem to be doing things differently here.
_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.