It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 4:44 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
So now its bad to have worked for the Bears? per the Bears!

If you didnt like the fact he worked for the Bears, why bring him in?

Nobody knows if Ballard or Pace will be better, but the reasoning here does seem to be based in Teddy retaining control, at least that helped get Teds vote.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Bernsie kept harping about George and Ted being aware of public perception of hiring another Bears employee.

So why in the hell would you interview him!?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
True.
Still...he drafts well and hires good coaching staff, it's irrelevant.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
bigfan wrote:
So now its bad to have worked for the Bears? per the Bears!

If you didnt like the fact he worked for the Bears, why bring him in?

Nobody knows if Ballard or Pace will be better, but the reasoning here does seem to be based in Teddy retaining control, at least that helped get Teds vote.


Yup.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92082
Location: To the left of my post
bigfan seemingly hates the whole NBC Must See TV lineup.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Peoria Matt wrote:
Bernsie kept harping about George and Ted being aware of public perception of hiring another Bears employee.

So why in the hell would you interview him!?


Because they thought he'd just be a better Phil and just be happy to have the job.

They didn't think he'd really want to change anything major.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92082
Location: To the left of my post
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Bernsie kept harping about George and Ted being aware of public perception of hiring another Bears employee.

So why in the hell would you interview him!?


Because they thought he'd just be a better Phil and just be happy to have the job.

They didn't think he'd really want to change anything major.
I'd like to think they realized their mistake or had someone call them up and say "What the hell are you doing?".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
For the record, I'd have been more than happy to have Ballard come back and take a wreaking ball to the place.

My objections to him were due to my thoughts, which apparently were McPhillips' thoughts as well, that he was just going to be an errand boy. Apparently, that wasn't his plan.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
We should actually be firing on Accorsi. He's the consultant Czar. He right away should have screamed "change your org structure!"

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Asking someone to hire the guy who could very possibly be the person who would downgrade your position on the organizational flow chart, doesnt happen that much! :D

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Is Ted hiring the guy or is George?

It damn well better be George.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92082
Location: To the left of my post
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
For the record, I'd have been more than happy to have Ballard come back and take a wreaking ball to the place.

My objections to him were due to my thoughts, which apparently were McPhillips' thoughts as well, that he was just going to be an errand boy. Apparently, that wasn't his plan.
That would be strange though. The guy has very little experience away from the Bears. What makes him qualified to rebuild them differently?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:21 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38357
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Is Ted hiring the guy or is George?

It damn well better be George.


So Doc, you are a successful businessman.

What does taking a wrecking ball look like when the ownership isn't leaving?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Seacrest wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Is Ted hiring the guy or is George?

It damn well better be George.


So Doc, you are a successful businessman.

What does taking a wrecking ball look like when the ownership isn't leaving?


In this case, I'd say reducing Ted's influence in the football operation, cleaning out the scouting department, getting a hot young secretary - not necessarily in that order.

Why is Ted involved in these interviews? Or really George for that matter?

Can't do much about George until you get to know him. After you build that trust, you get George to step back from the football operation meetings and decisions.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Is Ted hiring the guy or is George?

It damn well better be George.


So Doc, you are a successful businessman.

What does taking a wrecking ball look like when the ownership isn't leaving?


In this case, I'd say reducing Ted's influence in the football operation, cleaning out the scouting department, getting a hot young secretary - not necessarily in that order.

Why is Ted involved in these interviews? Or really George for that matter?

.

ding ding

Why do you bring someone into a process, when the result of that process could replace or relegate that person!

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Well,none of us know if Pace (From NY City?!) will be good or bad. I'm just hoping the two Bears stumbled upon something.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
If you are interviewing 2 people and 1 is a better candidate but might be a threat to you, who gets the job?

That's why this assswipe shouldn't be in the room !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
jimmypasta wrote:
Well,none of us know if Pace (From NY City?!) will be good or bad. I'm just hoping the two Bears stumbled upon something.


Stumbling Consultant Ernie Accorsi

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:34 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38357
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Is Ted hiring the guy or is George?

It damn well better be George.


So Doc, you are a successful businessman.

What does taking a wrecking ball look like when the ownership isn't leaving?


In this case, I'd say reducing Ted's influence in the football operation, cleaning out the scouting department, getting a hot young secretary - not necessarily in that order.

Why is Ted involved in these interviews? Or really George for that matter?

Can't do much about George until you get to know him. After you build that trust, you get George to step back from the football operation meetings and decisions.


If Ted was involved in hiring Pace and he is successful. then I don't see his influence diminishing. if he was a Ballard or some other guy, then Pace's success will serve to dial Ted back plenty in time.

I think Pace will bring in his own scouts.

I think as 1, and 1A in an organization, you should spend some time with the people who will be face of your franchise and make sure you agree with them.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Peoria Matt wrote:
If you are interviewing 2 people and 1 is a better candidate but might be a threat to you, who gets the job?

That's why this assswipe shouldn't be in the room !


You shouldn't be hiring someone to work "for" Ted. At worst, he's an equal to Ted in another department. Those type of guys might customarily get an introduction and brief light-hearted conversation with a couple questions during the interview process.

They don't lead it and they certainly aren't involved in the decision beyond a "hey Ted, what did you think of the guy?"

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
In no way does this resume scream GM! He needs some more seasoning.

Image

WOW!


Big Friggin' Deal!:
Over the past two seasons, the Saints have drafted four players who have become regular starters in left tackle Terron Armstead (2013 third round), receivers Kenny Stills (2013 fifth round) and Brandin Cooks (2014 first round) and safety Kenny Vaccaro (2013 first round).

http://www.chicagobears.com/news/articl ... bf90f30277

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Peoria Matt wrote:
If you are interviewing 2 people and 1 is a better candidate but might be a threat to you, who gets the job?

That's why this assswipe shouldn't be in the room !


I hire the best candidate. I hire people who I think are promotable & capable of doing a job at least one level higher than the position they are interviewing for. That is how you build an organization full of talented people who want more responsibility. The possibility that the candidate may be a threat to me never ever enters my mind. Maybe insecure guys who are bad at their jobs like Ted think this way?

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:41 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38357
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Peoria Matt wrote:
If you are interviewing 2 people and 1 is a better candidate but might be a threat to you, who gets the job?

That's why this assswipe shouldn't be in the room !


So who should be in the room?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Seacrest wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
If you are interviewing 2 people and 1 is a better candidate but might be a threat to you, who gets the job?

That's why this assswipe shouldn't be in the room !


So who should be in the room?


George and Accorsi.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:44 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38357
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
If you are interviewing 2 people and 1 is a better candidate but might be a threat to you, who gets the job?

That's why this assswipe shouldn't be in the room !


So who should be in the room?


George and Accorsi.


So do we know that Terd was in the room?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Seacrest wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
If you are interviewing 2 people and 1 is a better candidate but might be a threat to you, who gets the job?

That's why this assswipe shouldn't be in the room !


So who should be in the room?


NOT TED OR GEORGE !!!!!!

I don't give a shit if George and Ted are uncomfortable with organizational change.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:54 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38357
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Peoria Matt wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
If you are interviewing 2 people and 1 is a better candidate but might be a threat to you, who gets the job?

That's why this assswipe shouldn't be in the room !


So who should be in the room?


NOT TED OR GEORGE !!!!!!

I don't give a shit if George and Ted are uncomfortable with organizational change.



Someone who owns an entity shouldn't be in the room for one of their biggest hires?

That's the end of what was never a rational discussion with you PM.

I hope the Bears win the Super Bowl and you and biggie are left to complain about a lack of port a potties on the way into Soldiers Field.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Seacrest wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
If you are interviewing 2 people and 1 is a better candidate but might be a threat to you, who gets the job?

That's why this assswipe shouldn't be in the room !


So who should be in the room?


NOT TED OR GEORGE !!!!!!

I don't give a shit if George and Ted are uncomfortable with organizational change.



Someone who owns an entity shouldn't be in the room for one of their biggest hires?

That's the end of what was never a rational discussion with you PM.

I hope the Bears win the Super Bowl and you and biggie are left to complain about a lack of port a potties on the way into Soldiers Field.


YEAH win the Super Bowl! prove us wrong! Show us how smart the McCaskeys are ! the last 35 years are really no indication of what has been going on!

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
It doesn't have to be either/or.

Pace could still be the best hire (I prefer him to Ballard) but he was decided upon using poor rationale. I don't like the idea that they might have passed on Ballard because he wanted too much say in the operation. However, I still probably didn't want him here anyway.

GO PACE!....fast....

_________________
You know me like that.


Last edited by Dr. Kenneth Noisewater on Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: FRIENDS= BAD
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 5:59 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38357
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Seacrest wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
If you are interviewing 2 people and 1 is a better candidate but might be a threat to you, who gets the job?

That's why this assswipe shouldn't be in the room !


So who should be in the room?


NOT TED OR GEORGE !!!!!!

I don't give a shit if George and Ted are uncomfortable with organizational change.



Someone who owns an entity shouldn't be in the room for one of their biggest hires?

That's the end of what was never a rational discussion with you PM.

I hope the Bears win the Super Bowl and you and biggie are left to complain about a lack of port a potties on the way into Soldiers Field.


bigfan wrote:
YEAH win the Super Bowl! prove us wrong! Show us how smart the McCaskeys are ! the last 35 years are really no indication of what has been going on!


Says the guy who follows the Cubs around even though they haven't won anything since Teddy Roosevelt.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Nardi, The Doctor Of Style and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group