It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 4:22 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2053 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 69  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:20 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Quadrophenia wrote:
shakes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Quadrophenia wrote:


I'd love to hear Kane's shitty defense. "I was really drunk, but she was all over me at the bar. She invited herself over to my house where my friends and I were going back to read Walt Whitman passages. We got to fooling around and she never said no at all. I have no idea why she would be distraught and call her family member and go to the hospital after leaving my place. She did comment that I had a real nice house. Oh, and those bite marks. She said she liked pain and loved when guys bit her. I didn't want to do that."



Yeah, if these latest facts really are the facts they're not very good for Patrick Kane. But a few days ago he had statutorily raped a fifteen year old he picked up at a place called Mickey Rat's, so I'm not sure how credible any of the information we're getting is.



I don't agree. If she was of age and went to the house willingly it will be very difficult to prove there wasn't consent. If the extent of physical "damage" left to her person is bite marks and there is no trauma to the vagina it will turn into a he said she said situation and its going to be nearly impossible to prove his guilt in a criminal court. Bite marks are not that out of the ordinary for consensual sex and by themselves would be very poor evidence to prove a rape.

Her going over to the house doesn't give consent. Since her friend came along and he had his friends going back to his house, i take it more as an after party. Girls go to after parties all the time. Also, i don't think bite marks are the norm for sexual encounters. Especially for someone who just met. Do i think Kane is a crazed rapist? No, i think he was probably drunk and figured that since he got the girl home with him and alone in a room that he had the green light for sex. Was he too drunk to hear her saying stop? Did he get lost in the moment?

Whatever happened in that room, we do know that as soon as she left she is calling a family member @ 4am. I'm sure it wasn't a pleasant conversation taking place. Her actions after the incident give her story more credence IMO.


1) It's difficult to interpret the meaning of the marks without knowing their severity. So far, I have only heard that the victim had bite marks on her shoulders and a scratch on her leg. Any decent defense attorney would attempt to minimize both by claiming they resulted from "rough" or "wild" but consensual sex. My understanding is that such arguments succeed in court pretty frequently.

2) I agree that the call to the family member seems bad for Kane. But again, there are ways to spin this if you are a good defense attorney, especially given the resources Kane has at his disposal.

Based on the scant details available, it seems hard to imagine that Kane will be convicted, if he is even charged with a crime.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:22 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Quadrophenia wrote:
For the people who think Kane is innocent, why would the woman make up what happened? What's in it for her?

Im hearing a lot of people saying she's after money. When told her family already has money it turns to "she wants fame" or "she wants her own money"


But do bite marks on her shoulder and a single scratch on her legs necessarily suggest the sex wasn't consensual?

Did it start out as consensual and then become non-consensual?

Based on what I've heard so far, this one is tough to figure.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55943
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
lol at Tall Midget's sig in all this.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
"I just fucked Patrick Kane, now we can go through with the plan."

"Okay, go to the hospital and have a rape kit done and then call me. We are gonna ruin this mother fucker for not coming to Buffalo"

I already have this thing figured out. Hopefully this girl does some jail time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Tall Midget wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Quadrophenia wrote:
For the people who think Kane is innocent, why would the woman make up what happened? What's in it for her?

Im hearing a lot of people saying she's after money. When told her family already has money it turns to "she wants fame" or "she wants her own money"


But do bite marks on her shoulder and a single scratch on her legs necessarily suggest the sex wasn't consensual?

Did it start out as consensual and then become non-consensual?

Based on what I've heard so far, this one is tough to figure.

I dont know but the people Im referring to werent really discussing the details. They just brushed it off as gold digging.


I dont think the woman set up to do this to Kane and I dont think she's after money. But that's assuming the facts that have slipped out are correct.

The reflex of "she's after his money" whenever this happens with a rich person is troubling.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92040
Location: To the left of my post
She's after his stock portfolio.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Quadrophenia wrote:
For the people who think Kane is innocent, why would the woman make up what happened? What's in it for her?

I don't think he's innocent; without more details, I can't really form any belief one way or the other. But if you're looking for plausible reasons for why she would make it up, I'd say the most likely case would be that he severely pissed her off after they had sex. People can react in an extremely irrational manner if they're sufficiently pissed off. Being shamed when you're at your most vulnerable can piss one off to an extreme degree.

Again to be clear: I'm not saying I think this is the case, or even that it's likely. Just plausible. People react extremely strangely sometimes. Take the girl from that "A rape on campus" story last year; it's almost inconceivable that a girl would invent a story of a gang-rape happening at a fraternity in order to try and gain the attention of a boy, yet that does seem to be what happened. She was willing to share her 'story' with Rolling Stone, even though she knew it was false.

We'll know a lot more going forward, because apparently she had a friend there, and I believe Kane had friends there. There's a lot more evidence to come, and I don't think there's much use in coming to any conclusions at this point.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:39 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
She's after his stock portfolio.


Maybe she's the granddaughter of the cab driver Kane pummeled and is seeking vengeance in his name.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:41 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79548
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Tall Midget wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Quadrophenia wrote:
For the people who think Kane is innocent, why would the woman make up what happened? What's in it for her?

Im hearing a lot of people saying she's after money. When told her family already has money it turns to "she wants fame" or "she wants her own money"


But do bite marks on her shoulder and a single scratch on her legs necessarily suggest the sex wasn't consensual?

Did it start out as consensual and then become non-consensual?

Based on what I've heard so far, this one is tough to figure.



Obviously, the reason women are often reluctant to prosecute such cases. But there seems to be a lot of facts that suggest this isn't some nitwit broad hunting money or fame and that it wasn't a case of drunken regret at a later date. Some bad facts for Kane, especially if her girlfriend who was with her has some credible testimony on her behalf. And let's face it, Kane's reputation doesn't really help him in the court of public opinion.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92040
Location: To the left of my post
Tall Midget wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
She's after his stock portfolio.


Maybe she's the granddaughter of the cab driver Kane pummeled and is seeking vengeance in his name.
:lol:

Are we sure that this wasn't actually the work of Kane's drunk idiot cousin?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:42 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
MattInTheCrown wrote:
Quadrophenia wrote:
For the people who think Kane is innocent, why would the woman make up what happened? What's in it for her?

I don't think he's innocent; without more details, I can't really form any belief one way or the other. But if you're looking for plausible reasons for why she would make it up, I'd say the most likely case would be that he severely pissed her off after they had sex. People can react in an extremely irrational manner if they're sufficiently pissed off. Being shamed when you're at your most vulnerable can piss one off to an extreme degree.



This is more or less how I think Kane's attorney would spin things, especially if the alleged victim's injuries are minor.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Even if Kane is innocent the Hawks and himself are better off trying to pay this girl off right away so they can start worrying about the upcoming season.

Most of Chicago will forgive him as soon as he scores his first game winning goal and every other NHL city will ruthlessly heckle him even if this girl comes out tomorrow and says it was all a lie.

The quicker they can bury this, the better.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:47 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Quadrophenia wrote:
For the people who think Kane is innocent, why would the woman make up what happened? What's in it for her?

Im hearing a lot of people saying she's after money. When told her family already has money it turns to "she wants fame" or "she wants her own money"


But do bite marks on her shoulder and a single scratch on her legs necessarily suggest the sex wasn't consensual?

Did it start out as consensual and then become non-consensual?

Based on what I've heard so far, this one is tough to figure.



Obviously, the reason women are often reluctant to prosecute such cases. But there seems to be a lot of facts that suggest this isn't some nitwit broad hunting money or fame and that it wasn't a case of drunken regret at a later date. Some bad facts for Kane, especially if her girlfriend who was with her has some credible testimony on her behalf. And let's face it, Kane's reputation doesn't really help him in the court of public opinion.


The "facts" as they have been presented so far certainly don't cast Kane in a positive light, but nothing I've heard suggests he would be convicted of sexual assault.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92040
Location: To the left of my post
Tall Midget wrote:
The "facts" as they have been presented so far certainly don't cast Kane in a positive light, but nothing I've heard suggests he would be convicted of sexual assault.
The whole idea that he was some sort of reformed person who just had some youthful indiscretions is hopefully gone forever. He's a bad guy who doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt.

As has been pointed out though, hockey seems to be full of bad guys so I guess you just deal with it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 1:55 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79548
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Tall Midget wrote:
The "facts" as they have been presented so far certainly don't cast Kane in a positive light, but nothing I've heard suggests he would be convicted of sexual assault.



Yeah, I think putting facts in quotes here is appropiate.

Without some eyewitness testimony from the woman's friend, I have my doubts the case will even be prosecuted. That certainly doesn't mean he isn't guilty though.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 2:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33812
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Yeah, I think putting facts in quotes here is appropiate.

Without some eyewitness testimony from the woman's friend, I have my doubts the case will even be prosecuted. That certainly doesn't mean he isn't guilty though.


She could lie and Kane could be innocent. She could tell the truth and he could be guilty as hell. This all sucks. You are right, he needed to be smarter.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Spaulding wrote:
[. You are right, he needed to be smarter.


chloroform & a shovel?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 2:32 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Hatchetman wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
[. You are right, he needed to be smarter.


chloroform & a shovel?

:lol:

That's terrible.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 2:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33812
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
It is terrible. :lol:

I was thinking more of you can't have drunk/party sex with somebody you don't know.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 2:39 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Let's say it does go to trial and Kane gets off. People are gonna say it's just the Buffalo people protecting their hero.

But you know what? There might not be the evidence. At the end of the day, if you're a juror, are you really gonna send somebody away if you really aren't sure? No. And it really is gonna come down to his word against hers.

That's why date rape is the toughest one to convict.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16815
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Quadrophenia wrote:
Her going over to the house doesn't give consent. Since her friend came along and he had his friends going back to his house, i take it more as an after party. Girls go to after parties all the time. Also, i don't think bite marks are the norm for sexual encounters. Especially for someone who just met. Do i think Kane is a crazed rapist? No, i think he was probably drunk and figured that since he got the girl home with him and alone in a room that he had the green light for sex. Was he too drunk to hear her saying stop? Did he get lost in the moment?

Whatever happened in that room, we do know that as soon as she left she is calling a family member @ 4am. I'm sure it wasn't a pleasant conversation taking place. Her actions after the incident give her story more credence IMO.


Of course going to someone's house doesn't imply consent, I never said otherwise. Whether or not bite marks are normal is totally subjective, even for a first time encounter. What is normal for you may not be normal for someone else. Now, if there was significant vaginal trauma that suggested a struggle that would be a different story.

If she was underage or if she had been drugged this would be a slam dunk for the prosecution, but the fact that she was of age, was hammered at the bar and willingly agreed to attend the after party means this is going to be one of those he said she said debates about consent...and those are basically impossible to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

Calling a family member at 4am doesn't prove anything...defense could easily paint the picture that she just starfucked Pat kane and wanted to brag about it. Also, do we know for sure that she called at 4am? Lots and lots of unsubstantiated rumors floating around. Even if she called and said she was raped that doesn't prove that she was raped or make it any more or less likely that its true.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 2:46 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Even significant vagina trauma doesn't prove rape. Some people like it hard and rough.

Her girlfriend will be the key witness. If she can testify to her screaming for help then they can put Kane away. We don't even know if the girlfriend was awake. She could have been passed out drunk.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 2:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Beardown wrote:
Even significant vagina trauma doesn't prove rape. Some people like it hard and rough

The defense should open with this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 3:01 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Hockey Gay wrote:
Beardown wrote:
Even significant vagina trauma doesn't prove rape. Some people like it hard and rough

The defense should open with this.


:lol:

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 3:07 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Tall Midget wrote:
Hockey Gay wrote:
Beardown wrote:
Even significant vagina trauma doesn't prove rape. Some people like it hard and rough

The defense should open with this.


:lol:


I don't know why you guys are laughing. Prosecutors are gonna bring that up as proof at trial. The defense attorney would absolutely say that to combat that argument.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:51 pm
Posts: 6302
Location: Calumet City
pizza_Place: Johns in Cal City
So now assuming that she was not underage, and recognizing that the police haven't arrested anyone, I think its safe to assume that lawyers are in a room piling up fees. I think the only question left is how many zero's will the check have.

_________________
STU-GOTZ wrote:
Well Mac told me to to tell you to go FUCK YOURSELF!!! ..So now it's been said .. .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 3:19 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Friends of the alleged victim are saying the lawyer has started to talk $$$$$ with Kaner. Also, she's a former cheerleader at the University of Buffalo.

http://sportsmockery.com/2015/08/rumor-the-friends-of-patrick-kanes-accuser-are-already-talking-million-dollar-settlement/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38688
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
So now assuming that she was not underage, and recognizing that the police haven't arrested anyone, I think its safe to assume that lawyers are in a room piling up fees. I think the only question left is how many zero's will the check have.

Yep. So if goes down that way , makes it look like she's goldigging even if 88 has invested in rohypnol factories.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 3:22 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Wow. They said the girl voluntarily took Molly before going to the bar. That's not good for her case.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 3:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16815
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Beardown wrote:
Wow. They said the girl voluntarily took Molly before going to the bar. That's not good for her case.


Although probably 25% of the people at a nightclub are on Molly I do agree that it doesn't look good for her case. Molly is a euphoric drug and will cause heightened sexual behaviors and desires. Doesn't mean you can't be raped if you are on Molly, but it sure does lend credence to the "consent" camp.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2053 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 69  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group