It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:48 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 189 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:06 pm
Posts: 2202
Location: Champaign, IL
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
I'm hoping some dumbass team that's not the Bears gets an explosive, skin-peeling hard on for Connor Cook and trades a hilarious RG3-esque package for him.

_________________
Quote:
When it comes to the Bears, America is just a slobbering shitwagon. Every single opinion of his regarding this team is the most pristine of doomsday horseshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
This franchise is already derailed for years. The only thing that brings the Bears out of the NFCN basement for the next 3 seasons is a great QB. Now's the time to take the shot.

The Bears will likely be picking top 5 again next year and top 10 the year after that. This is not the only shot they will have at a high pick.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:06 pm
Posts: 2202
Location: Champaign, IL
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
America wrote:
This franchise is already derailed for years. The only thing that brings the Bears out of the NFCN basement for the next 3 seasons is a great QB. Now's the time to take the shot.

The Bears will likely be picking top 5 again next year and top 10 the year after that. This is not the only shot they will have at a high pick.


I agree they need an elite prospect QB but it's slim pickings with college offenses being so spread-happy and system-driven. Finding a traditional pocket passer is pretty damned hard. I'm trying to keep an open mind, though. I thought I read that Pace had graded Mariota as the top QB of both the 2015 and 16 classes, but couldn't sacrifice to the level required to get him.

_________________
Quote:
When it comes to the Bears, America is just a slobbering shitwagon. Every single opinion of his regarding this team is the most pristine of doomsday horseshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92068
Location: To the left of my post
NME wrote:
You and I had a similar disagreement last year too if I'm not mistaken -and my stance isn't going to change. 'Rolling the dice' with your best possible pick in the draft to land an impact player is terrible logic. If you want to 'roll the dice' in the NFL draft, you should do that kind of crap with later picks.
Yeah, and we could very well have Mariota or Winston right now if we did this last year.

NME wrote:
There is no Peyton Manning in this years draft. There is no Andrew Luck either. Its better to move to a different position and select a player that can come right in and have an immediate impact -I prefer D-line in the 1st round, way less things to evaluate with those players to know if they have potential to be good, but whatever.
Ok, so we will wait for a QB that comes out once every 5-10 years, and then we'll hope and pray that we happen to have the #1 pick when it happens. That sounds like a great plan.

NME wrote:
The goal of each draft should be to go out and get guys that have a high probability of helping your team from day 1 -not finding guys to take a chance on. Its baffling to me how anyone could possibly feel this is the best option available with a high pick in an NFL draft.
I think you are misstating what I mean by "rolling the dice". It's about going for the highest probability at the most important position on the field. Eventually, you are going to hit on one of those and you get an Eli, or Rivers, or Rodgers. You may miss out and end up with Christian Ponder but who cares. Roll it again.

In the NFL you get the quarterback and the other things have a way of working themselves out. If Mariota is as good as he has been so far then the Titans are set next year and a ton of people were doubting Mariota prior to him being drafted. It is just what people do now. Every quarterback sucks, unless they are Andrew Luck, who also sucks now.

For a team that supposedly needed to keep someone like Cutler for years because of how important he was regardless of the cost you certainly have a very casual outlook on what we need for the next quarterback. If you want to try and replace Cutler with the 5th best quarterback in this draft then I say good luck.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92068
Location: To the left of my post
Dewskie wrote:
I agree they need an elite prospect QB but it's slim pickings with college offenses being so spread-happy and system-driven. Finding a traditional pocket passer is pretty damned hard. I'm trying to keep an open mind, though. I thought I read that Pace had graded Mariota as the top QB of both the 2015 and 16 classes, but couldn't sacrifice to the level required to get him.
People need to stop saying this too.

There will be good and great quarterbacks coming out of college. The two best quarterbacks this year had massive red flags about them coming out of college too.

Wait for the next Andrew Luck is not an option here unless you want to wait until 2040 to see the Bears find an elite quarterback.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:06 pm
Posts: 2202
Location: Champaign, IL
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Dewskie wrote:
I agree they need an elite prospect QB but it's slim pickings with college offenses being so spread-happy and system-driven. Finding a traditional pocket passer is pretty damned hard. I'm trying to keep an open mind, though. I thought I read that Pace had graded Mariota as the top QB of both the 2015 and 16 classes, but couldn't sacrifice to the level required to get him.
People need to stop saying this too.

There will be good and great quarterbacks coming out of college. The two best quarterbacks this year had massive red flags about them coming out of college too.

Wait for the next Andrew Luck is not an option here unless you want to wait until 2040 to see the Bears find an elite quarterback.


I get your arguments, and I don't know nearly enough about college football to claim I have some beat on prospects and their development. It's just the typical stuff that makes the NFL news circuit that prophesies dark times ahead or some nonsense.

_________________
Quote:
When it comes to the Bears, America is just a slobbering shitwagon. Every single opinion of his regarding this team is the most pristine of doomsday horseshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Andrew Luck is proving himself to be very fucking overrated right now, by the way. He just bulldozed the worst division in football for 3 years and up on the pedestal he went.

Besides, every single year you hear about how weak the draft is. Rarely do you hear that it's loaded, and for the few that are hyped they wind up no better than the others.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
NME wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
NME wrote:
And thats what the Bears should be looking to do this up coming draft: grab a QB in the 3rd round maybe even 2nd if someone incredible slides. None of these guys coming out are worth a 1st round top ten pick imo.
No. No. No.

You draft the best QB available(within reason). Otherwise, you'll be waiting around for 10 years for the next Andrew Luck, and then you won't get him.

Roll the dice and see what you can get.

It would be a great day if the Bears could get the person they consider the best available QB in the draft, even if they have to draft them with 3rd pick instead of 8th pick. That quarterback may be a colossal failure but it is worth it for the chance that they are elite.




You and I had a similar disagreement last year too if I'm not mistaken -and my stance isn't going to change. 'Rolling the dice' with your best possible pick in the draft to land an impact player is terrible logic. If you want to 'roll the dice' in the NFL draft, you should do that kind of crap with later picks.

There is no Peyton Manning in this years draft. There is no Andrew Luck either. Its better to move to a different position and select a player that can come right in and have an immediate impact -I prefer D-line in the 1st round, way less things to evaluate with those players to know if they have potential to be good, but whatever.

The goal of each draft should be to go out and get guys that have a high probability of helping your team from day 1 -not finding guys to take a chance on. Its baffling to me how anyone could possibly feel this is the best option available with a high pick in an NFL draft.



I agree that it too risky for the Bears to blow a high pick if that is what they get. Everyone wants a QB so bad that they would risk passing on the next JJ Watt or Suh or whatever similar player is there that is more of a sure thing to risk a Cade McCown or Jemarcus Russell. Much better to pass on down since you are stuck with Cutler next year regardless. You can hate him all you want but Cutler is far superior to any crap coming out of college this year.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
America wrote:
This franchise is already derailed for years. The only thing that brings the Bears out of the NFCN basement for the next 3 seasons is a great QB. Now's the time to take the shot.

The Bears will likely be picking top 5 again next year and top 10 the year after that. This is not the only shot they will have at a high pick.



By this logic it should be just fine to pass on a shit crop of so so college QB's and wait and see what comes out of college at QB next season.



Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Yeah, and we could very well have Mariota or Winston right now if we did this last year.



There is no way to know how this is going to play out in the long run, both guys could be holding a clip board and wiping the starting QB's brow off by mid season.


Quote:
Ok, so we will wait for a QB that comes out once every 5-10 years, and then we'll hope and pray that we happen to have the #1 pick when it happens. That sounds like a great plan.


Yeah, in the meantime lets pick a guy that doesn't grade out past the 3rd round in the 1st, take at least 3 seasons to admit we're comfortable saying he sucks, and hope we land high enough in the draft to play it out over again -all the while passing on year after year of impact players at other positions that can come in right away and help the team.

Sounds liker a better plan to me.

News flash Rick, you draft a shit QB in this draft with your top pick -you aren't going to draft a QB every year in the 1st round after that until you solve the problem at the position. No one does that. Your scenario only works with a GM that has that kind of lifespan, and a team that is dumb enough to devalue high end picks that much to throw them away year after year.

Well, this is the Bears, so you may be on to something there.


Quote:
I think you are misstating what I mean by "rolling the dice" . It's about going for the highest probability at the most important position on the field. Eventually, you are going to hit on one of those and you get an Eli, or Rivers, or Rodgers. You may miss out and end up with Christian Ponder but who cares. Roll it again.


No, I did not misstate what you typed -unless you typed the wrong thing, or don't know what that phrase means.

And see my above post for the 'roll it again' part. It doesn't work that way.

Quote:
In the NFL you get the quarterback and the other things have a way of working themselves out. If Mariota is as good as he has been so far then the Titans are set next year and a ton of people were doubting Mariota prior to him being drafted. It is just what people do now. Every quarterback sucks, unless they are Andrew Luck, who also sucks now.


I don't think this trend will continue (QB's sucking coming out of college). As is, Mariota and Winston didn't stink coming out, and both had very different reasons for people questioning them. Winston's off field issues lead to his question marks while Mariotas low grades were based on him playing in a notoriously gimmicky college offense known to produce busts. Physically, I don't believe there were many questions about either guy (feel free to correct me there as I don't have the scouting reports memorized).

But they also had their share of fans too, I wasn't one of them, but I'm ok with being wrong on them if I am. It happens.

Quote:
For a team that supposedly needed to keep someone like Cutler for years because of how important he was regardless of the cost you certainly have a very casual outlook on what we need for the next quarterback. If you want to try and replace Cutler with the 5th best quarterback in this draft then I say good luck.


My outlook isn't casual at all. I'm sick and tired of the Kyle Fullers and Shea McClellans of the world getting picked 1st by the team I cheer for. What I want is a straight forward logical and simple approach to the draft (in the 1st round especially): draft impact players, don't reach and take chances. If they evaluate one of these QB's in this years up coming draft and decide that QB is worth it -by all means make that guy the 1st pick then.

But make damn fucking sure its not a 'roll of the dice'.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92068
Location: To the left of my post
NME wrote:
America wrote:
This franchise is already derailed for years. The only thing that brings the Bears out of the NFCN basement for the next 3 seasons is a great QB. Now's the time to take the shot.

The Bears will likely be picking top 5 again next year and top 10 the year after that. This is not the only shot they will have at a high pick.



By this logic it should be just fine to pass on a shit crop of so so college QB's and wait and see what comes out of college at QB next season.



Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Yeah, and we could very well have Mariota or Winston right now if we did this last year.



There is no way to know how this is going to play out in the long run, both guys could be holding a clip board and wiping the starting QB's brow off by mid season.


Quote:
Ok, so we will wait for a QB that comes out once every 5-10 years, and then we'll hope and pray that we happen to have the #1 pick when it happens. That sounds like a great plan.


Yeah, in the meantime lets pick a guy that doesn't grade out past the 3rd round in the 1st, take at least 3 seasons to admit we're comfortable saying he sucks, and hope we land high enough in the draft to play it out over again -all the while passing on year after year of impact players at other positions that can come in right away and help the team.

Sounds liker a better plan to me.

News flash Rick, you draft a shit QB in this draft with your top pick -you aren't going to draft a QB every year in the 1st round after that until you solve the problem at the position. No one does that. Your scenario only works with a GM that has that kind of lifespan, and a team that is dumb enough to devalue high end picks that much to throw them away year after year.

Well, this is the Bears, so you may be on to something there.


Quote:
I think you are misstating what I mean by "rolling the dice" . It's about going for the highest probability at the most important position on the field. Eventually, you are going to hit on one of those and you get an Eli, or Rivers, or Rodgers. You may miss out and end up with Christian Ponder but who cares. Roll it again.


No, I did not misstate what you typed -unless you typed the wrong thing, or don't know what that phrase means.

And see my above post for the 'roll it again' part. It doesn't work that way.

Quote:
In the NFL you get the quarterback and the other things have a way of working themselves out. If Mariota is as good as he has been so far then the Titans are set next year and a ton of people were doubting Mariota prior to him being drafted. It is just what people do now. Every quarterback sucks, unless they are Andrew Luck, who also sucks now.


I don't think this trend will continue (QB's sucking coming out of college). As is, Mariota and Winston didn't stink coming out, and both had very different reasons for people questioning them. Winston's off field issues lead to his question marks while Mariotas low grades were based on him playing in a notoriously gimmicky college offense known to produce busts. Physically, I don't believe there were many questions about either guy (feel free to correct me there as I don't have the scouting reports memorized).

But they also had their share of fans too, I wasn't one of them, but I'm ok with being wrong on them if I am. It happens.

Quote:
For a team that supposedly needed to keep someone like Cutler for years because of how important he was regardless of the cost you certainly have a very casual outlook on what we need for the next quarterback. If you want to try and replace Cutler with the 5th best quarterback in this draft then I say good luck.


My outlook isn't casual at all. I'm sick and tired of the Kyle Fullers and Shea McClellans of the world getting picked 1st by the team I cheer for. What I want is a straight forward logical and simple approach to the draft (in the 1st round especially): draft impact players, don't reach and take chances. If they evaluate one of these QB's in this years up coming draft and decide that QB is worth it -by all means make that guy the 1st pick then.

But make damn fucking sure its not a 'roll of the dice'.
Try again while understanding what I meant by 'roll the dice' please or just don't respond. "Yeah, in the meantime lets pick a guy that doesn't grade out past the 3rd round in the 1st" this is just a complete lack of even trying to understand what I'm saying that I'm not even going to respond to anything else.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:33 am
Posts: 6189
Location: Limbo
pizza_Place: Positanos on 55th Street
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Dr. Ken, always asking the pertinent questions.

Here's one for you. Why did MJ major in Geography?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?



I always wonder that. There are some quote masters here on this board.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92068
Location: To the left of my post
It is 4 embedded quotes, you can quote a million times as long as you don't go 4 deep.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.
Buttaker Rick wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?


Like this.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Try again while understanding what I meant by 'roll the dice' please or just don't respond. "Yeah, in the meantime lets pick a guy that doesn't grade out past the 3rd round in the 1st" this is just a complete lack of even trying to understand what I'm saying that I'm not even going to respond to anything else.




The problem is, you didn't understand the 1st post of mine you quoted to begin with, or just misread it.

I don't personally think atm any QB available in this upcoming draft is worth a 1st round pick, that lead to my post that you quoted. You then inserted your comment which allowed for the Bears to get the QB that they felt was worth that pick.

Two totally different things. I didn't catch that wording the 1st time around.

As I stated in my last response to you (at the end), if the Bears go thru that evaluation process and truly believe that one of those QB's is worth that pick, by all means make that pick.

Do keep in mind that part of this involves me not feeling like the Bears have the right people in place to make such a decision; which makes an argument about them drafting anyone at all high stupid on my part I guess lol.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 9:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
How were you able to embed so many quotes in that post?

I thought we were limited to 4? Do you have a secret code?



I think he just hit the quote button for his last response to me.

I broke the quotes up manually then highlighted them and tapped the 'quote' button for each one. Pretty much how I do it on most forums, unless they have a multi quote function.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 7:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92068
Location: To the left of my post
NME wrote:
The problem is, you didn't understand the 1st post of mine you quoted to begin with, or just misread it.
I understood it. Your stance is that unless Peyton Manning or Andrew Luck is out there that you should just avoid drafting a quarterback in the first round.

You then made it seem like I was saying that they should make one of the biggest reaches in NFL history to draft a quarterback in the top ten who is a third rounder at best.

You are going to wait decades for a time in which a can't miss franchise qb comes out and when you have the top pick.

All the while, someone else is going to get the next Philip Rivers, or Big Ben, or Matt Ryan, or Aaron Rodgers by taking a chance on a guy who has questions about their ability to be a franchise quarterback but is good enough to be a high draft pick.

As of right now, there are two consensus quarterbacks worthy of a top 5 pick this year. That may change, but if it doesn't, I'll take my chances with one of those guys and hope at a minimum he is Philip Rivers. If he ends up being Jamarcus Russell, then you just try again because the best way to win a Super Bowl is to get the elite quarterback. I can point to a lot of first round QB picks that ended up being the main reason a team won a Super Bowl. It's a lot harder with an offensive lineman or a defensive end to do that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 7:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Derek Carr
Teddy Bridgewater
Andy Dalton
Russell Wilson
Nick Foles

Are these GREAT QBs? No. But they all offer(ed) minimum 4 years of dirt cheap control (<$1M).

Fill around and maybe game manage your way through playoffs and maybe to Super Bowl (Grossman!)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Rick, that wasn't my main point. It's my opinion atm that there will be no QB's in this up coming draft worth a 1st round grade, or at least a top 10 grade -so don't go for a QB there. A QB doesn't have to be as highly prospected as Luck or Manning for them to be picked there imo, just used them as quick examples, my bad in not expanding on that more.


All that aside, if we must look at QB that high in this draft.. who ya got so far (I know it's early and this is subject to change)?


I'd say Goff looks the best out of the ones I've watched so far.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92068
Location: To the left of my post
NME wrote:
Rick, that wasn't my main point. It's my opinion atm that there will be no QB's in this up coming draft worth a 1st round grade, or at least a top 10 grade -so don't go for a QB there. A QB doesn't have to be as highly prospected as Luck or Manning for them to be picked there imo, just used them as quick examples, my bad in not expanding on that more.
I just see a lot of qbs out there who are considered elite who weren't considered worthy of a top grade and I want one knowing they may also suck.
NME wrote:
All that aside, if we must look at QB that high in this draft.. who ya got so far (I know it's early and this is subject to change)?
I'd be happy with Connor Cook knowing that he may suck.
NME wrote:
I'd say Goff looks the best out of the ones I've watched so far.
I need more time as him being an elite qb prospect. He seems like a guy who gets pumped up and then pushed way down.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 28, 2015 12:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
I want Jake Butt and I can not lie.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 28, 2015 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Lots of able bodied QBs in this draft. Guys that can be had in a 2nd and 3rd round. I fully expect one to be in a Bears Jersey....even if he needs to order it himself and Ted Phillips forwards him the link to the Bears store.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 28, 2015 4:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:08 am
Posts: 7184
Location: Section 433
pizza_Place: 1. Homemade 2. Jewels
Keyser Soze wrote:
I want Jake Butt and I can not lie.


I would seek out the link to the bears store myself in order to pick up a Butt jersey.

_________________
"I honestly don't see a good bet on the board here."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 28, 2015 9:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2015 12:19 pm
Posts: 362
Location: Depends
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Let it all shake out. Just as there are talents out there that are being overappreciated, there are talents that are underappreciated. We'll get to know them after December.

As an aside, the NFL and Rahm will look pretty smart if the Bears have the #1 pick while the draft is hosted in this city.


Until they take Kendall Fuller and everybody starts booing.


Who?? I don't think so...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 28, 2015 9:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2015 12:19 pm
Posts: 362
Location: Depends
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
IMissMyHair wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Let it all shake out. Just as there are talents out there that are being overappreciated, there are talents that are underappreciated. We'll get to know them after December.

As an aside, the NFL and Rahm will look pretty smart if the Bears have the #1 pick while the draft is hosted in this city.


Until they take Kendall Fuller and everybody starts booing.


Who?? I don't think so...

Inside info....not to quote Bernstien.....say the knee injury is worse than people think....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2015 11:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 11:45 am
Posts: 2940
pizza_Place: Drag's
Just saw a mock suggesting Reggie Ragland LB Alabama at 16. Can he get any more freakish?

http://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/alabam ... -freakish/

_________________
Soccer 1,2,3
Spanish Honor Society 1,2,3,4
Forensics 1,2,3,4

"Smiles with Nostrils"

"...no Hmong, go find some blacks"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2015 12:54 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Bears currently have the 10th pick in the draft.

If we lose out, we could be top 5. Losing to Tampa will be huge because that would give us the draft pick tie breaker probably. :cheers: :cheers:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2015 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
DannyB wrote:
Just saw a mock suggesting Reggie Ragland LB Alabama at 16. Can he get any more freakish?

http://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/alabam ... -freakish/


That kid is a football player. Barring injury he will be a 10 yr pro & occasional Pro Bowler. I'd love to see him on my Saints, or from a pure football joy standpoint, on the Raiders with Khalil Mack.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2015 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 11:45 am
Posts: 2940
pizza_Place: Drag's
Looks like Mich St has possibly the two best OL he'll play against all year so we'll see what he looks like. Monster talent in that game, both sides of the ball.

_________________
Soccer 1,2,3
Spanish Honor Society 1,2,3,4
Forensics 1,2,3,4

"Smiles with Nostrils"

"...no Hmong, go find some blacks"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 189 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group