It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 12:33 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 597 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 20  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:23 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
You keep saying this. McClellan has playes many many sundays, and even knocked Rodgers out on a Mobday. That doesn't mean he was a good pick.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2015 7:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
I'll keep saying it. Anyone with a brain can conclude I'm not referring to Shae McClellan.

Bears have historically ruined first round picks. We get a new GM and he does the same thing. You cannot build a good team screwing up first round picks.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
We have to wait until White plays, which is annoying.

Goldman is probably the best player on the defense other than McPhee, so you have to give Pace a couple of decent grades there. One for a decent FA signing and another for a good 2nd rounder.

Grasu needs a full year of NFL steroids to play. We were told this going in, we'll find out next year.

Langford looks fine when he plays.

Amos made a play I think.

The last guy whatever.

------

So far it's decent for the Bears sexy new GM. Not great but I'd still eat whipped cream out of his ass.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
I'm not saying Fire Pace. All I'm saying is at stands he has an F. We may start next season and White plays like a #7 overall pick. Just have to go off of what the current state is and it right now it's bad.

Credit given for dumping Allen and Bostic....good moves.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2015 1:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
updated:

1- Kevin White - incomplete
2- Eddie Goldman - A
3- Hroniss Grasu - incomplete/B-
4- Jeremy Langford - A+
5- Adrian Amos - A+
6- Tayo Fabuluje - incomplete/F

It still kind of rides on what Kevin White can do next year, but damn that's a great draft from the looks of it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2015 7:25 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
wdelaney72 wrote:
I'm not saying Fire Pace. All I'm saying is at stands he has an F.
Incorrect. Its probably a C, maybe a C+/B- right now.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:01 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
America wrote:
updated:

1- Kevin White - incomplete
2- Eddie Goldman - A
3- Hroniss Grasu - incomplete/B-
4- Jeremy Langford - A+
5- Adrian Amos - A+
6- Tayo Fabuluje - incomplete/F

It still kind of rides on what Kevin White can do next year, but damn that's a great draft from the looks of it.

If White is the player they expect him to be then that becomes the best Bears draft in years.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Langford and Amos get an A+ already?? :lol: :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
wdelaney72 wrote:
He better hope his injured #7 overall pick goes to the Pro Bowl next year...maybe he will, but until then his grade holds at an F.
First round picks must play football on Sundays...right away.

Frank Coztansa wrote:
You keep saying this. McClellan has playes many many sundays, and even knocked Rodgers out on a Mobday. That doesn't mean he was a good pick.

wdelaney72 wrote:
I'll keep saying it. Anyone with a brain can conclude I'm not referring to Shae McClellan.

:lol: :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 11:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
As I've said before....if White turns out to be the second coming of Randy Moss next year, I'll revise Pace's grade. Until then, he still has a #7 pick not playing football.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 8:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
FavreFan wrote:
Langford and Amos get an A+ already?? :lol: :lol:

Well Langford has been putting up 150 + yards from scrimmage in his starts, including against one of the best DL's in the league. When you apparently replace Matt Forte right away with a 4th rounder that's pretty good!

I'm not the biggest PFF guy in the world, but they have Amos ranked as the 5th best rookie overall and as a top 10 safety. He's given up an absurdly low number of completion, like below 5 on the year. If that's not an A+ pick for a rookie 5th rounder I dont know what is.

wdelaney72 wrote:
As I've said before....if White turns out to be the second coming of Randy Moss next year, I'll revise Pace's grade. Until then, he still has a #7 pick not playing football.

This is correct.

Even though you have to get all the way down to Marcus Peters at 18 or Bud Dupree at 22 before you find a player that (1) has been really good and (2) is at a position the Bears could really use. The good news about Kevin White is Vic Beasley and Trae Waynes haven't been able to see the field either, and not for injury reasons.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 8:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
I'm not making excuses for the White pick by the way, I didn't like it from the get go.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
America wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Langford and Amos get an A+ already?? :lol: :lol:

Well Langford has been putting up 150 + yards from scrimmage in his starts, including against one of the best DL's in the league. When you apparently replace Matt Forte right away with a 4th rounder that's pretty good!

I'm not the biggest PFF guy in the world, but they have Amos ranked as the 5th best rookie overall and as a top 10 safety. He's given up an absurdly low number of completion, like below 5 on the year. If that's not an A+ pick for a rookie 5th rounder I dont know what is.

wdelaney72 wrote:
As I've said before....if White turns out to be the second coming of Randy Moss next year, I'll revise Pace's grade. Until then, he still has a #7 pick not playing football.

This is correct.

Even though you have to get all the way down to Marcus Peters at 18 or Bud Dupree at 22 before you find a player that (1) has been really good and (2) is at a position the Bears could really use. The good news about Kevin White is Vic Beasley and Trae Waynes haven't been able to see the field either, and not for injury reasons.


and every WR picked after Cooper but before Diggs have had debilitating injuries this year

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Langford and Amos get an A+ already?? :lol: :lol:

Well Langford has been putting up 150 + yards from scrimmage in his starts, including against one of the best DL's in the league. When you apparently replace Matt Forte right away with a 4th rounder that's pretty good!

I'm not the biggest PFF guy in the world, but they have Amos ranked as the 5th best rookie overall and as a top 10 safety. He's given up an absurdly low number of completion, like below 5 on the year. If that's not an A+ pick for a rookie 5th rounder I dont know what is.

wdelaney72 wrote:
As I've said before....if White turns out to be the second coming of Randy Moss next year, I'll revise Pace's grade. Until then, he still has a #7 pick not playing football.

This is correct.

Even though you have to get all the way down to Marcus Peters at 18 or Bud Dupree at 22 before you find a player that (1) has been really good and (2) is at a position the Bears could really use. The good news about Kevin White is Vic Beasley and Trae Waynes haven't been able to see the field either, and not for injury reasons.

Langford has 65 career rushing attempts, has a 3.5 ypc, and has played in 9 games. Yes, giving him an A+ so far deserves to be laughed at.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 5:37 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Giving Langford and Amos an A+ at this point is laughable.

Just as laughable as giving Pace an F so far.

A year from now we'll see what's up for real.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 5:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Giving Langford and Amos an A+ at this point is laughable.

Just as laughable as giving Pace an F so far.

A year from now we'll see what's up for real.

Agreed. Who gave Pace an F so far though?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
I did.

Let's not mistake a final grade for a current grade. I'll be the first person to join the Pace ALS if White plays and is a stud. Since Game 1 of the season today, there's a #7 overall pick not playing...THAT's. UNACCEPTABLE.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 2:18 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
wdelaney72 wrote:
I'll be the first person to join the Pace ALS if White plays and is a stud. Since Game 1 of the season today, there's a #7 overall pick not playing...THAT's. UNACCEPTABLE.


Injuries happen. Unfortunately it was to the #1 draft pick this season. That does not mean this was a bad or a wrong pick.

Pace cannot control injuries. Is it his fault that Forte has been out with an injury? Obviously not. The same holds true with White.

There is no grade yet for Pace on the White pick. It is an incomplete. The grade will be evident in the future. Could be an F. Could be an A.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
If you are grading Langford on his performance to date, he should get an A. He has been outstanding.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Scorehead wrote:
If you are grading Langford on his performance to date, he should get an A. He has been outstanding.

Would you be happy if he finished his Bears career with a 3.5 ypc average?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 2:24 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
FavreFan wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
If you are grading Langford on his performance to date, he should get an A. He has been outstanding.

Would you be happy if he finished his Bears career with a 3.5 ypc average?

Obviously not. But his receiving work has more than made up for that.

I would say a solid B right now on Langford.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
FavreFan wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
If you are grading Langford on his performance to date, he should get an A. He has been outstanding.

Would you be happy if he finished his Bears career with a 3.5 ypc average?


If he keeps doing everything else, yea. He's been great.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
RFDC wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
If you are grading Langford on his performance to date, he should get an A. He has been outstanding.

Would you be happy if he finished his Bears career with a 3.5 ypc average?

Obviously not. But his receiving work has more than made up for that.

I would say a solid B right now on Langford.

To be clear, I think Langford has a lot of talent, and a great shot to be a worthy successor to Forte. But it's impossible to give him an A+ thus far unless you have very low standards. Todd Gurley gets an A+.

Scorehead wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
If you are grading Langford on his performance to date, he should get an A. He has been outstanding.

Would you be happy if he finished his Bears career with a 3.5 ypc average?


If he keeps doing everything else, yea. He's been great.

You have very low standards.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 3:00 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38348
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/i ... odd-gurley

http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/i ... y-langford

The most impressive stat that is not counted is Langford's ability and willingness to stone blitzers.
It's the hardest part of being a rookie in the NFL and he has excelled at it.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 3:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Anyone can pick a stat & use it to slant your side of an argument. You need to take all of a players stats into consideration when evaluating a player.

For example, Eddie Lacy has a YPC of 3.7. which is .2 better than Langford. Bishop fucking Sankey has a 4.0 YPC. Ka'Deem Cary has a 4.0.

Langford's overall body of work & his stats are great. 435 yards & 5 TD's in basically 3 games is just ridiculous.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
lets not go to crazy on Langford: even in these two games he has started he only has a 3.8 YPC. His receiving has been great. Still, people are talking as if he is the best back on this team right now.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Scorehead wrote:
Langford's overall body of work & his stats are great. 435 yards & 5 TD's in basically 3 games is just ridiculous.


:?:

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Scorehead wrote:
Anyone can pick a stat & use it to slant your side of an argument. You need to take all of a players stats into consideration when evaluating a player.

For example, Eddie Lacy has a YPC of 3.7. which is .2 better than Langford. Bishop fucking Sankey has a 4.0 YPC. Ka'Deem Cary has a 4.0.

Langford's overall body of work & his stats are great. 435 yards & 5 TD's in basically 3 games is just ridiculous.

That's simply false, no matter how many times you keep stating it, and those stats are from 9 games, not basically 3.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
I would say Langford proved he can be tough and can receive a pass and seems fast as well. Forte's successor must do better than 3.5 YPC though.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Adam Pace Scorecard
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 3:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
FavreFan wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
Anyone can pick a stat & use it to slant your side of an argument. You need to take all of a players stats into consideration when evaluating a player.

For example, Eddie Lacy has a YPC of 3.7. which is .2 better than Langford. Bishop fucking Sankey has a 4.0 YPC. Ka'Deem Cary has a 4.0.

Langford's overall body of work & his stats are great. 435 yards & 5 TD's in basically 3 games is just ridiculous.

That's simply false, no matter how many times you keep stating it, and those stats are from 9 games, not basically 3.


http://www.nfl.com/player/jeremylangford/2552379/gamelogs

Langford had 65 yards & 1 TD in the first 6 games.

He has 370 yards & 4 TD's in the last 3 games.

Where I come from, that is a pretty damn good stretch of 3 games.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 597 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group