IMU wrote:
There is too much shit in there to respond to it all. Your desperation to "1-Up" members on this board is your number one failing. If you actually waited until you had a valid "Gotcha!" you could be a fun poster. Instead, you're The Boy Who Cried Gotcha every time you quote a post. And they're all reaches.
So I'll respond to the Jamal Crawford and McDermott shooting comp. You said McDermott will never shoot 40%. He shot 40% last season. There was a specific reason why I said he will "once again be a 40% shooter." It wasn't an arbitrary number.
Secondly, I pointed out that McDermott's only value is as a spot up shooter. Jamal Crawford was / is a much different scorer. He does shoot threes, yes, but he isn't a "sharpshooter." He would cut and get to the basket...or iso a guy and then jump back for an open shot. He could create a shot...even in desperation and when no other player is able to make something happen. Again - I'm not even a Jamal Crawford fan. I've made this abundantly clear. He has had more of a positive impact in the NBA than Ben Gordon did. That is all. And if the Bulls GM had to pick between those three players for the team, the answer would be fire the GM.
If basketball was solely about hitting open shots, I'd be pretty good in the NBA! I wouldn't have to worry about stupid things like defense, rebounds, passing, or advanced dribbling.
If you don't think that Ben Gordon was a valuable member of the Bulls then you simply don't know basketball. His career fizzled once he left the Bulls but that Detroit situation was a train wreck. That was one of the top 3 worst franchises in the NBA during his time there.
As far as Crawford goes he was and is an NBA loser. He has never made any team in the NBA better. You advocated for him staying with the Bulls until you were informed that he wasn't really that good then you began to do the Ali shuffle. Actually I don't recall you ever saying that you don't like Crawford until now.
As Far as McDermott the guy is proving that he belongs. I think the trib also ran an article about how well he is playing too. You are probably going to disagree with that writer also? You can't simply cherry pick the stats that support your argument and discredit the ones that don't support your claims i.e. Shooting percentages dropping every game. A 40% shooting percentage during a season in which he rarely played is too small of a sample size to suggest that he is a bad shooter. You also made the false claim that Butler is a better shooter? in what universe is that. Without analytics you struggle to make any points that even remotely make sense.
i like the banter obviously and anyone that talks hoops on here is fine by me. You have up your game a little though.
_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.