It is currently Sun Nov 17, 2024 11:23 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1665 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 ... 56  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 2:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4035
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:

That isn't what you said in your prior post. You said Abreu has a better eye, which (using the conventional understanding of the term being ability to draw a walk) isn't true in that Rizzo's walk rate is far superior to Abreu's.


This is really dumb. A "good eye" is about getting on base. You can either hit your way on or walk your way on. In any case, Abreu has gotten on better than Rizzo. But keep arguing against that nagging fact if you wish.


So if you are at a baseball game and a hitter swings at a pitch 2 feet over his head and bloops a double into RF you're going to yell "Good eye"?

Seems logical/smart to me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Arlington Hts Archie wrote:
given rizzo's whole package (performance, leadership, marketability, future) i don't think anyone in mlb takes rizzo over abreu.


This guy gets it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 2:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 11:03 am
Posts: 214
pizza_Place: nino's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Arlington Hts Archie wrote:
given rizzo's whole package (performance, leadership, marketability, future) i don't think anyone in mlb takes rizzo over abreu.


This guy gets it.

d'oh :lol:

i suck


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91945
Location: To the left of my post
bigfan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
bigfan wrote:
I would like to know what the Sox fans here dont like about Rizzo?
Couldn't we ask the same question of you and Abreu?

I mean, this is your thread, about Rizzo, that was really about Abreu.


I dont dislike Abreu, so thats the answer. I stated he is a better pure hitter than Rizzo, if thats dislike...well? Not sure what else I can say about the guy....

Rizzo has worked his ass off to become a really good hitter, on any given day can even be better than Abreu, or for stretches...

I recognize, give credit and like Abreu's pure natural ability to hit....can we agree that I actually like the guy as a baseball player?

I dont know Abreu, dont think anyone really does, which to a degree is a detriment for him when comparisons come out, considering Rizzo is the new Peyton Manning (That should get some play)

....and I do think Rizzo is a much better defender and maybe even more dedicated to staying in shape and being prepared.

So....Why dont you like Rizzo?
Well, I don't dislike Rizzo then.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91945
Location: To the left of my post
Arlington Hts Archie wrote:
given rizzo's whole package (performance, leadership, marketability, future) i don't think anyone in mlb takes rizzo over abreu.

not a knock on abreu. it's just how much rizzo has blossomed.
Abreu will be better this year though. Right?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 2:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4035
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:

That isn't what you said in your prior post. You said Abreu has a better eye, which (using the conventional understanding of the term being ability to draw a walk) isn't true in that Rizzo's walk rate is far superior to Abreu's.


This is really dumb. A "good eye" is about getting on base. You can either hit your way on or walk your way on. In any case, Abreu has gotten on better than Rizzo. But keep arguing against that nagging fact if you wish.


JORR returns from the bathroom and his buddy says, "You won't believe this, that hitter just swung at strike three and the ball was behind him!!! But he advanced to first on the dropped third strike."

"That guy has a good eye I'll tell ya" - JORR


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 2:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4035
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:

That isn't what you said in your prior post. You said Abreu has a better eye, which (using the conventional understanding of the term being ability to draw a walk) isn't true in that Rizzo's walk rate is far superior to Abreu's.


This is really dumb. A "good eye" is about getting on base. You can either hit your way on or walk your way on. In any case, Abreu has gotten on better than Rizzo. But keep arguing against that nagging fact if you wish.


A blind guy stands at homeplate and gets drilled in the pecker with a fastball.

According to JORR he has a good eye...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
One Post wrote:
[
A blind guy stands at homeplate and gets drilled in the pecker with a fastball.

According to JORR he has a good eye...


If he did that 40% of the time he'd have a GREAT eye.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 2:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23766
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:

That isn't what you said in your prior post. You said Abreu has a better eye, which (using the conventional understanding of the term being ability to draw a walk) isn't true in that Rizzo's walk rate is far superior to Abreu's.


This is really dumb. A "good eye" is about getting on base. You can either hit your way on or walk your way on. In any case, Abreu has gotten on better than Rizzo. But keep arguing against that nagging fact if you wish.


A blind guy stands at homeplate and gets drilled in the pecker with a fastball.

According to JORR he has a good eye...

According to One Post a guy that has 2 walks and hits .100 has a better eye than a guy with 1 walk and hits 1.000.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:07 pm
Posts: 3705
good dolphin wrote:
this is regular season level arguing and I am still in spring training shape but Rizzo is already well into his 26 year and will be 27 2/3 into the year


At this rate...it's going to be a LOOOONG season!

_________________
Proud to be UNVERIFIED.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40618
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Arlington Hts Archie wrote:
given rizzo's whole package (performance, leadership, marketability, future) i don't think anyone in mlb takes rizzo over abreu.


This guy gets it.


:lol:

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 3:32 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79479
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:

That isn't what you said in your prior post. You said Abreu has a better eye, which (using the conventional understanding of the term being ability to draw a walk) isn't true in that Rizzo's walk rate is far superior to Abreu's.


This is really dumb. A "good eye" is about getting on base. You can either hit your way on or walk your way on. In any case, Abreu has gotten on better than Rizzo. But keep arguing against that nagging fact if you wish.


So if you are at a baseball game and a hitter swings at a pitch 2 feet over his head and bloops a double into RF you're going to yell "Good eye"?

Seems logical/smart to me.


Yogi made the Hall of Fame with an eye like that. And Vlad will too. That's exactly what a "good eye" is. See the ball and hit it.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 3:34 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79479
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:

That isn't what you said in your prior post. You said Abreu has a better eye, which (using the conventional understanding of the term being ability to draw a walk) isn't true in that Rizzo's walk rate is far superior to Abreu's.


This is really dumb. A "good eye" is about getting on base. You can either hit your way on or walk your way on. In any case, Abreu has gotten on better than Rizzo. But keep arguing against that nagging fact if you wish.


JORR returns from the bathroom and his buddy says, "You won't believe this, that hitter just swung at strike three and the ball was behind him!!! But he advanced to first on the dropped third strike."

"That guy has a good eye I'll tell ya" - JORR


You know you've lost an argument when you bring up silly shit like this. How many times have Rizzo and Abreu reached on dropped third strikes?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 4:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4035
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:

That isn't what you said in your prior post. You said Abreu has a better eye, which (using the conventional understanding of the term being ability to draw a walk) isn't true in that Rizzo's walk rate is far superior to Abreu's.


This is really dumb. A "good eye" is about getting on base. You can either hit your way on or walk your way on. In any case, Abreu has gotten on better than Rizzo. But keep arguing against that nagging fact if you wish.


JORR returns from the bathroom and his buddy says, "You won't believe this, that hitter just swung at strike three and the ball was behind him!!! But he advanced to first on the dropped third strike."

"That guy has a good eye I'll tell ya" - JORR


You know you've lost an argument when you bring up silly shit like this. How many times have Rizzo and Abreu reached on dropped third strikes?


The point has eluded you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 4:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4035
KDdidit wrote:
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:

That isn't what you said in your prior post. You said Abreu has a better eye, which (using the conventional understanding of the term being ability to draw a walk) isn't true in that Rizzo's walk rate is far superior to Abreu's.


This is really dumb. A "good eye" is about getting on base. You can either hit your way on or walk your way on. In any case, Abreu has gotten on better than Rizzo. But keep arguing against that nagging fact if you wish.


A blind guy stands at homeplate and gets drilled in the pecker with a fastball.

According to JORR he has a good eye...

According to One Post a guy that has 2 walks and hits .100 has a better eye than a guy with 1 walk and hits 1.000.


Nope, as you can see I've talked about walk rates, not aggregate number of walks. Big difference.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 4:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4035
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:

That isn't what you said in your prior post. You said Abreu has a better eye, which (using the conventional understanding of the term being ability to draw a walk) isn't true in that Rizzo's walk rate is far superior to Abreu's.


This is really dumb. A "good eye" is about getting on base. You can either hit your way on or walk your way on. In any case, Abreu has gotten on better than Rizzo. But keep arguing against that nagging fact if you wish.


So if you are at a baseball game and a hitter swings at a pitch 2 feet over his head and bloops a double into RF you're going to yell "Good eye"?

Seems logical/smart to me.


Yogi made the Hall of Fame with an eye like that. And Vlad will too. That's exactly what a "good eye" is. See the ball and hit it.


No, that is what hitting is. Drawing a walk is a completely different skill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 5:05 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79479
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Oh, you're a modern walk zombie who has read too many Absracts. I'm sure you overvalue Darrell Porter too. Anyway, there is no reason to coax a walk when you can see the ball and drive it into a gap.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 5:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4035
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Oh, you're a modern walk zombie who has read too many Absracts. I'm sure you overvalue Darrell Porter too. Anyway, there is no reason to coax a walk when you can see the ball and drive it into a gap.



Ok, we are making progress, you at least appear to understand that hitting and walking are two distinct, albeit related, skills.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 5:24 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79479
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Oh, you're a modern walk zombie who has read too many Absracts. I'm sure you overvalue Darrell Porter too. Anyway, there is no reason to coax a walk when you can see the ball and drive it into a gap.



Ok, we are making progress, you at least appear to understand that hitting and walking are two distinct, albeit related, skills.


They both have to do with seeing the pitched ball. You just hate the FACT that Abreu has been more successful at such than Rizzo.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23766
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
So walk rates is more important than OBP. Your posts fail the eye test.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Oh, you're a modern walk zombie who has read too many Absracts. I'm sure you overvalue Darrell Porter too. Anyway, there is no reason to coax a walk when you can see the ball and drive it into a gap.



Ok, we are making progress, you at least appear to understand that hitting and walking are two distinct, albeit related, skills.


They both have to do with seeing the pitched ball. You just hate the FACT that Abreu has been more successful at such than Rizzo.

Based on what?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:57 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79479
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Scooter wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Oh, you're a modern walk zombie who has read too many Absracts. I'm sure you overvalue Darrell Porter too. Anyway, there is no reason to coax a walk when you can see the ball and drive it into a gap.




Ok, we are making progress, you at least appear to understand that hitting and walking are two distinct, albeit related, skills.


They both have to do with seeing the pitched ball. You just hate the FACT that Abreu has been more successful at such than Rizzo.

Based on what?


OBP.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
No. Not practical. But funny. 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 10:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4035
KDdidit wrote:
So walk rates is more important than OBP. Your posts fail the eye test.


Kindly point out where I said walk rate is more important than OBP. Just use the quote function, should be easy for you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 10:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4035
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
One Post wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Oh, you're a modern walk zombie who has read too many Absracts. I'm sure you overvalue Darrell Porter too. Anyway, there is no reason to coax a walk when you can see the ball and drive it into a gap.



Ok, we are making progress, you at least appear to understand that hitting and walking are two distinct, albeit related, skills.


They both have to do with seeing the pitched ball. You just hate the FACT that Abreu has been more successful at such than Rizzo.


Yep, they both have to do with visibly seeing a pitched ball, no question about that. A catcher's ability to field his position also has to do with seeing the pitched ball, so do numerous other things. That doesn't mean that there aren't divergent skills necessary to be successful in different ways depending on an action or non-action as it relates to the pitched ball.

Once the ball is seen , the skill to draw a walk is a combination of 1) the ability to determine if the pitched ball is going to intersect a three dimensional area and 2) the ability to stand.

The skill to reach base on a hit once the ball is seen involves 1) determining where the ball with be in proximity to the hitter at a given point in time in which the hitter can 2) strike the ball with a cylindrical wooden rod, and 3) some degree of good fortune.

So again, let me ask you this simple question. If someone swings at a pitch 2 feet over their head and dribbles the ball 5 feet down the third base line but beats the throw to first would you cheer "Good Eye."

Again, this is a yes or no question, so you can refrain from pulling your bullshit cart along for your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 10:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23766
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
One Post wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
So walk rates is more important than OBP. Your posts fail the eye test.


Kindly point out where I said walk rate is more important than OBP. Just use the quote function, should be easy for you.


Quote your own stupidity, I've done it enough. The fact you think somebody who gets on base less than someone else has a "better eye" than the guy with the higher obp is laughable. Feel free to make up more stupid hypotheticals to mask your dumb-ass opinion. Maybe throw some babip and TTO in there to muddy the waters. Just use the reply function, should be easy for you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 11:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:28 am
Posts: 4035
KDdidit wrote:
One Post wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
So walk rates is more important than OBP. Your posts fail the eye test.


Kindly point out where I said walk rate is more important than OBP. Just use the quote function, should be easy for you.


Quote your own stupidity, I've done it enough. The fact you think somebody who gets on base less than someone else has a "better eye" than the guy with the higher obp is laughable. Feel free to make up more stupid hypotheticals to mask your dumb-ass opinion. Maybe throw some babip and TTO in there to muddy the waters. Just use the reply function, should be easy for you.


Hard to quote something that wasn't said isn't it? Thanks for participating though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 11:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23766
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
One Post wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
One Post wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
So walk rates is more important than OBP. Your posts fail the eye test.


Kindly point out where I said walk rate is more important than OBP. Just use the quote function, should be easy for you.


Quote your own stupidity, I've done it enough. The fact you think somebody who gets on base less than someone else has a "better eye" than the guy with the higher obp is laughable. Feel free to make up more stupid hypotheticals to mask your dumb-ass opinion. Maybe throw some babip and TTO in there to muddy the waters. Just use the reply function, should be easy for you.


Hard to quote something that wasn't said isn't it? Thanks for participating though.


You forgot to add a stupid hypothetical. Here's one so people don't feel cheated, hypothetically I'd rather have a guy who slugs 2.000 on pitches 2 feet out of the strike zone and never walks than a guy that slugs .600 on strikes with a walk rate of whatever the fuck walk rate you think is a good walk rate. What? That's stupid? So are yours.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 7:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
One Post wrote:
[ Just use the quote function, should be easy for you.


not for me

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rizzo
PostPosted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 7:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82153
Are we using the ol' little league definition of good eye that is used to encourage a kid who has no other hope of reaching base other than a walk?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1665 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 ... 56  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group