BD wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
You and I may not like Telander work in the Sun Times. However, if you deny that he is a good writer, you never read his work in Sports Illustrated. I used to look forward to reading his pieces every time a new magazine arrived as a child. I believe he was the best writer at the best national sports journal for a good number of years.
He generally takes on subject matter that needs more flesh on the bones than what is allowed in a newspaper column. In reducing his work to a column his work becomes either pointless or has no context. Either way, it is not compelling to a reader. However, he has proven himself more than capable as a long form writer of stories and movies.
His success is not limited to the written word. Telander was also a big portion of the success of the hit radio/tv show "The Sportswriters."
In the big picture, his accomplishments dwarf anything done by any member of the SCORE team. I don't agree with his view on the ballot. I'm not particularly interested in his work at the Sun Times. However, the man has unquestionable skills.
I've never been impressed with his work. I find the subjects of his columns to be non-interesting, and, therefore, I stopped reading his columns awhile back.
I agree with Dolphin. As a feature writer at Sports Illustrated, Telander was perhaps the best sports journalist in America. Since coming to the Sun-Times, though, his work has steadily declined. I can't decide if that's because his approach to writing isn't suited for columns (as dolphin argues) or because he's caught in an early 90s time warp when Michael Jordan towered over the landscape like a sports demigod and people still cared about what Mike Ditka thought. Either way, Telander isn't worth reading, which makes him a perfect match for North, who isn't worthy of a listening audience.
_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.