It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:26 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 455 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 16  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 8:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Big Chicagoan is tanking his posts.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Is there a fan base in more denial than Sox fans. You think the Sox have been attempting to compete the last 3 years? They fill the roster with mediocre talent by doing busy work in the offseason making trades for mediocre players and signing mediocre free agents. The fans think they are building a major league roster to compete, but they are really just building a roster to keep ticket sales just good enough not hurt and not good enough so they have to pay the state money.

The Sox are not trying to win anything. Why people believe otherwise in the face of evidence to the contrary, I do not know. Ventura? LaRoche? Frazier? Whatever that loser from Oakland's name is? You think they were trying to win?!?!?

You don't try to win and continuously end up with one of the worst records in baseball. They don't care, but Sox fans just keep lying to themselves. Still blinded by 2005. Had Kenny not lucked into that roster, maybe the fans could see them for what they are. Con men.

Yeah, this is stupid. By your logic, every team that has been bad for more than one season in a row is purposely trying to lose. They clearly are *trying* to compete. Rick, Kenny, and whoever else are just lousy at their jobs.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
FavreFan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Is there a fan base in more denial than Sox fans. You think the Sox have been attempting to compete the last 3 years? They fill the roster with mediocre talent by doing busy work in the offseason making trades for mediocre players and signing mediocre free agents. The fans think they are building a major league roster to compete, but they are really just building a roster to keep ticket sales just good enough not hurt and not good enough so they have to pay the state money.

The Sox are not trying to win anything. Why people believe otherwise in the face of evidence to the contrary, I do not know. Ventura? LaRoche? Frazier? Whatever that loser from Oakland's name is? You think they were trying to win?!?!?

You don't try to win and continuously end up with one of the worst records in baseball. They don't care, but Sox fans just keep lying to themselves. Still blinded by 2005. Had Kenny not lucked into that roster, maybe the fans could see them for what they are. Con men.

Yeah, this is stupid. By your logic, every team that has been bad for more than one season in a row is purposely trying to lose. They clearly are *trying* to compete. Rick, Kenny, and whoever else are just lousy at their jobs.


Denial.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 8:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Big Chicagoan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Is there a fan base in more denial than Sox fans. You think the Sox have been attempting to compete the last 3 years? They fill the roster with mediocre talent by doing busy work in the offseason making trades for mediocre players and signing mediocre free agents. The fans think they are building a major league roster to compete, but they are really just building a roster to keep ticket sales just good enough not hurt and not good enough so they have to pay the state money.

The Sox are not trying to win anything. Why people believe otherwise in the face of evidence to the contrary, I do not know. Ventura? LaRoche? Frazier? Whatever that loser from Oakland's name is? You think they were trying to win?!?!?

You don't try to win and continuously end up with one of the worst records in baseball. They don't care, but Sox fans just keep lying to themselves. Still blinded by 2005. Had Kenny not lucked into that roster, maybe the fans could see them for what they are. Con men.

Yeah, this is stupid. By your logic, every team that has been bad for more than one season in a row is purposely trying to lose. They clearly are *trying* to compete. Rick, Kenny, and whoever else are just lousy at their jobs.


Denial.

It's not denial. There's no lack of criticism coming from the Sox fan base toward the front office. What you wrote is just patently stupid.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 8:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Lyin' Chicagoan.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 8:47 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
How are Sox fans in denial? Im not sure there is one guy on this board who has said the Sox should be buyers because they are a good team right now. Not even Keyser, who is the Soxiest fan of them all.

You're just making stupid post after stupid post BC

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
FavreFan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Is there a fan base in more denial than Sox fans. You think the Sox have been attempting to compete the last 3 years? They fill the roster with mediocre talent by doing busy work in the offseason making trades for mediocre players and signing mediocre free agents. The fans think they are building a major league roster to compete, but they are really just building a roster to keep ticket sales just good enough not hurt and not good enough so they have to pay the state money.

The Sox are not trying to win anything. Why people believe otherwise in the face of evidence to the contrary, I do not know. Ventura? LaRoche? Frazier? Whatever that loser from Oakland's name is? You think they were trying to win?!?!?

You don't try to win and continuously end up with one of the worst records in baseball. They don't care, but Sox fans just keep lying to themselves. Still blinded by 2005. Had Kenny not lucked into that roster, maybe the fans could see them for what they are. Con men.

Yeah, this is stupid. By your logic, every team that has been bad for more than one season in a row is purposely trying to lose. They clearly are *trying* to compete. Rick, Kenny, and whoever else are just lousy at their jobs.


Denial.

It's not denial. There's no lack of criticism coming from the Sox fan base toward the front office. What you wrote is just patently stupid.


Not really criticism when you always end it with "but they are trying to win". They aren't intentionally losing, they are just putting teams on the field that lose a lot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 8:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
They are trying to win, and they are failing horribly at it. If you don't think that is criticism, you're a pretty confused person.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 9:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Image

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 11:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
The material difference comes from making the decision after a failed attempt at competing, vs not attempting to compete whatsoever over the course of multiple seasons. It's not a difference of degree as you're suggesting.


Could the Sox still mathematically win their division or a wild card?

Sure, mathematically. But that's a shitty attempt at a "gotcha". It's clear to anyone who's paying attention that they are not going to make the playoffs, or even come close. As I said, they attempted to compete this year and failed.


:lol: So when is not trying your best to win acceptable and when is it not? 1/4 of the way through the season? 1/3? This is so obviously making up your own rules, it's comical.

Not surprising that you can't catch fish with that defeatist attitude.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 11:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
It's not a difficult difference to grasp. I believe it's ok to tank the last 70 games of the season if you are out of the race. I would not be happy if they tore everything down so far that they publicly admitted the Sox wouldn't be competitive for the next 2-3 seasons.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 11:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
It's not a difficult difference to grasp. I believe it's ok to tank the last 70 games of the season if you are out of the race. I would not be happy if they tore everything down so far that they publicly admitted the Sox wouldn't be competitive for the next 2-3 seasons.


But they're not out of the race. Not even close. So who decides when it's okay to start tanking, from an ethical perspective?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It's not a difficult difference to grasp. I believe it's ok to tank the last 70 games of the season if you are out of the race. I would not be happy if they tore everything down so far that they publicly admitted the Sox wouldn't be competitive for the next 2-3 seasons.


But they're not out of the race. Not even close. So who decides when it's okay to start tanking, from an ethical perspective?

:lol: I don't think it's that serious.

I'm mainly just speaking from my own personal point of view. What Theo did seems to have had successful results right now, but I would never want a team I root for to be intentionally bad for three straight seasons. I understand the counter point, especially because the Sox are unintentionally bad every year anyway. I've never argued the ethics of it and would find anyone who did amusing.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 7:05 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
I don't really think it's an ethical situation as much as a practical one. If the Sox tried to do what the Cubs did there would be almost no one at the ballpark. Now, I guess Reinsdorf's lease makes such a thing doable in the same way the specialness of Wrigley made it doable for the Cubs. But hell, twenty years later, fucking Sox fans still whine about the "White Flag" trade. That didn't make me mad at the time. I agreed with Reinsdorf that they were never gonna catch Cleveland. Plus, you see that the Sox aren't gonna catch a break from the media. They tank, it's "White Flag". The Cubs tank, it's a necessary act of sheer genius.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 7:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92042
Location: To the left of my post
It would be comparable if the sox now tanked for 3 straight years like the cubs did after trying to compete and failing to do so. If they get new gm who does that then we can talk about this subject.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 7:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I don't really think it's an ethical situation as much as a practical one. If the Sox tried to do what the Cubs did there would be almost no one at the ballpark. Now, I guess Reinsdorf's lease makes such a thing doable in the same way the specialness of Wrigley made it doable for the Cubs. But hell, twenty years later, fucking Sox fans still whine about the "White Flag" trade. That didn't make me mad at the time. I agreed with Reinsdorf that they were never gonna catch Cleveland. Plus, you see that the Sox aren't gonna catch a break from the media. They tank, it's "White Flag". The Cubs tank, it's a necessary act of sheer genius.


Well,not with all Cub fans. If the Sox got 4 grade A prospects plus a decent SP in return,that wouldn't be such a bad deal for Sale. The question is who is judging these prospects.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 8:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
I thought Texas got cleaned out with Cole Hamels trade..I don't think they have enough talent left to make a Sale trade.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It would be comparable if the sox now tanked for 3 straight years like the cubs did after trying to compete and failing to do so. If they get new gm who does that then we can talk about this subject.


So, what is an acceptable amount of "tanking"?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Is there a fan base in more denial than Sox fans. You think the Sox have been attempting to compete the last 3 years? They fill the roster with mediocre talent by doing busy work in the offseason making trades for mediocre players and signing mediocre free agents. The fans think they are building a major league roster to compete, but they are really just building a roster to keep ticket sales just good enough not hurt and not good enough so they have to pay the state money.

The Sox are not trying to win anything. Why people believe otherwise in the face of evidence to the contrary, I do not know. Ventura? LaRoche? Frazier? Whatever that loser from Oakland's name is? You think they were trying to win?!?!?

You don't try to win and continuously end up with one of the worst records in baseball. They don't care, but Sox fans just keep lying to themselves. Still blinded by 2005. Had Kenny not lucked into that roster, maybe the fans could see them for what they are. Con men.

Yeah, this is stupid. By your logic, every team that has been bad for more than one season in a row is purposely trying to lose. They clearly are *trying* to compete. Rick, Kenny, and whoever else are just lousy at their jobs.

Its not far fetched at all to suggest they sign players with ticket sales (not championships) in mind

That's why they always get well known veterans past their prime


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92042
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It would be comparable if the sox now tanked for 3 straight years like the cubs did after trying to compete and failing to do so. If they get new gm who does that then we can talk about this subject.


So, what is an acceptable amount of "tanking"?
Going into the season not wanting to win? 1 year at most with a plan to compete the next year.

Selling at the deadline when it doesn't work out in a given year is fine though.

I mean, it has worked out pretty well for the Cubs, though a lot of that is just them finally spending like a big market team, but plenty of teams do one year rebuilds too.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It would be comparable if the sox now tanked for 3 straight years like the cubs did after trying to compete and failing to do so. If they get new gm who does that then we can talk about this subject.


So, what is an acceptable amount of "tanking"?
Going into the season not wanting to win? 1 year at most with a plan to compete the next year.

Selling at the deadline when it doesn't work out in a given year is fine though.

I mean, it has worked out pretty well for the Cubs, though a lot of that is just them finally spending like a big market team, but plenty of teams do one year rebuilds too.









:lol:

Last three seasons win total
63
73
76
2016-?

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 11:01 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
leashyourkids wrote:
But they're not out of the race. Not even close.

The Sox are 46-50. 10 game back in the divsion, and 7 games back of the Wild Card with 5 teams in front of them. Since their hot start over the first 33 games, they are 23-40.

I know you are used to following losing Cubs teams, but the Sox are out of it. Trading pieces now to build for next year is not even remotely similar to what the Cubs did. Besides the Sox have "tried" to win for the last few years and failed, so why not try something different.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Trading pieces now to build for next year is not even remotely similar to what the Cubs did. Besides the Sox have "tried" to win for the last few years and failed, so why not try something different.

That's not trying something different.

No one other than Quintana/Sale/Eaton will yield a player that'll build for next year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Kirkwood wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Trading pieces now to build for next year is not even remotely similar to what the Cubs did. Besides the Sox have "tried" to win for the last few years and failed, so why not try something different.

That's not trying something different.

No one other than Quintana/Sale/Eaton will yield a player that'll build for next year.


Please don't attribute Frank's dumb quotes to me.

Edit: you fixed.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Frank Coztansa wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
But they're not out of the race. Not even close.

The Sox are 46-50. 10 game back in the divsion, and 7 games back of the Wild Card with 5 teams in front of them. Since their hot start over the first 33 games, they are 23-40.

I know you are used to following losing Cubs teams, but the Sox are out of it. Trading pieces now to build for next year is not even remotely similar to what the Cubs did. Besides the Sox have "tried" to win for the last few years and failed, so why not try something different.


You're all over the place. You contradicted yourself no less than three times.

Let me ask you this, Frank: what are your main criticisms of what the Cubs did? What effects of not fielding the best team possible did you find to be distasteful?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 11:21 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
The fact that the President of baseball operations said that "every season is sacred"

And then he went out to the intention of losing for at least 2, probably 3 seasons in a row.


Kirkwood, you are not a GM so you dont know diddley.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The fact that the President of baseball operations said that "every season is sacred"

And then he went out to the intention of losing for at least 2, probably 3 seasons in a row.


Kirkwood, you are not a GM so you dont know diddley.


No, I mean who specifically did that action negatively impact? The players? The fans? The owners?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 1:13 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Talk about being all over the place. You asked for my criticism about the Cubs tanking.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
There is no legit gripe about the Cubs' 'tanking.' Look at where we are now. We made an investment and it is paying off.

Think of it like going to college. You're poor for 4 years. But long term...you're likely to be in a much better position.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sell off 2016
PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 1:17 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
IMU wrote:
Think of it like going to college. You're poor for 4 years. But long term...you're likely to be in a much better position.
Not necessarily in today's world. But you have made the perfect anaolgy for "your" club coming off a 3rd place finish.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 455 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 16  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group