It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 8:17 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 278 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5120
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The idea is Glennon could be good but in a bad situation with that mess of an organization.

So this mess of an organization can unlock his potential!





The idea is bad.



Just re-sign Hoyer and draft a guy with the 2nd or 3rd round pick. Don't overpay for a nobody that looks like a grown up stunt double for the banjo player in Deliverance.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
NME wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The idea is Glennon could be good but in a bad situation with that mess of an organization.

So this mess of an organization can unlock his potential!





The idea is bad.



Just re-sign Hoyer and draft a guy with the 2nd or 3rd round pick. Don't overpay for a nobody that looks like a grown up stunt double for the banjo player in Deliverance.

Glennon may have a better chance if success over a second round pick and certainly over a third round pick.

It is interesting logic. No QB is worth the third pick in the draft! Let's build around a guy who is much worse than the guy who isn't worth a third round pick!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 1:28 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38373
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
NME wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The idea is Glennon could be good but in a bad situation with that mess of an organization.

So this mess of an organization can unlock his potential!





The idea is bad.



Just re-sign Hoyer and draft a guy with the 2nd or 3rd round pick. Don't overpay for a nobody that looks like a grown up stunt double for the banjo player in Deliverance.


Hoyer doesn't have the arm strength to be consistently good in the red zone.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 3:49 pm
Posts: 9340
Location: UM?
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Seacrest wrote:
NME wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The idea is Glennon could be good but in a bad situation with that mess of an organization.

So this mess of an organization can unlock his potential!





The idea is bad.



Just re-sign Hoyer and draft a guy with the 2nd or 3rd round pick. Don't overpay for a nobody that looks like a grown up stunt double for the banjo player in Deliverance.


Hoyer doesn't have the arm strength to be consistently good in the red zone.


And Jay had all the arm strength in the world and was consistently the worst qb in the league in the red zone. I'd rather have a middle of the road qb at a cheap cost like Hoyer that can be a bridge to a potential franchise qb than Cutler.

_________________
Hank Scorpio wrote:
What the hell, I would. Post op is OK right? Right?!?!?!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:23 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Unless the Bears fix their offensive line in this one offseason (not likely), I do not expect them to make MANY trips into the red zone.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:27 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38373
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Chris_in_joliet wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
NME wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The idea is Glennon could be good but in a bad situation with that mess of an organization.

So this mess of an organization can unlock his potential!





The idea is bad.



Just re-sign Hoyer and draft a guy with the 2nd or 3rd round pick. Don't overpay for a nobody that looks like a grown up stunt double for the banjo player in Deliverance.


Hoyer doesn't have the arm strength to be consistently good in the red zone.


And Jay had all the arm strength in the world and was consistently the worst qb in the league in the red zone. I'd rather have a middle of the road qb at a cheap cost like Hoyer that can be a bridge to a potential franchise qb than Cutler.


My comment wasn't a reference to Cutler.

The Bears had a top 5 offense last year in yards per play. They just struggled to put the ball in the end zone once they got inside the 20. Cutler aside, Hoyer has had this issue over his career.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 3:49 pm
Posts: 9340
Location: UM?
pizza_Place: Aurelios
I understand that your comment wasnt a reference to Cutler but I was just saying that I dont believe having arm strength leads to success in the redzone. I think if Hoyer had a better line and made better decisions he might have been more successful.

_________________
Hank Scorpio wrote:
What the hell, I would. Post op is OK right? Right?!?!?!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11010
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
i like glennon. but i cant put a price on how much i like him. reports are he may have turned down 7 mil per from tampa... could he actually land a deal that is osweiler level of stupid? young backup qbs have to start hoping they can put 2-3 good games on tape when given a chance because the asking price in FA for that potential (osweiler, garapolo, glennon) is insane


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16490
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Unless the Bears fix their offensive line in this one offseason (not likely), I do not expect them to make MANY trips into the red zone.


I thought the offensive line was their one strength?

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Unless the Bears fix their offensive line in this one offseason (not likely), I do not expect them to make MANY trips into the red zone.


I thought the offensive line was their one strength?

Nope. Whitehair looks good, Long is overpaid and overrated, Sitton is old, and they might have the worst OT situation in the NFL.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
FavreFan wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Unless the Bears fix their offensive line in this one offseason (not likely), I do not expect them to make MANY trips into the red zone.


I thought the offensive line was their one strength?

Nope. Whitehair looks good, Long is overpaid and overrated, Sitton is old, and they might have the worst OT situation in the NFL.


They should immediately get on the phone with DJ Fluker.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4773
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
FavreFan wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Unless the Bears fix their offensive line in this one offseason (not likely), I do not expect them to make MANY trips into the red zone.


I thought the offensive line was their one strength?

Nope. Whitehair looks good, Long is overpaid and overrated, Sitton is old, and they might have the worst OT situation in the NFL.


They have to draft an OT at three, if they're not drafting a QB.

Don't even talk to me about safety.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 6:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
FavreFan wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Unless the Bears fix their offensive line in this one offseason (not likely), I do not expect them to make MANY trips into the red zone.


I thought the offensive line was their one strength?

Nope. Whitehair looks good, Long is overpaid and overrated, Sitton is old, and they might have the worst OT situation in the NFL.



Long is pretty damn good when healthy, I just dunno if we will see him healthy ever again.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 7:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Unless the Bears fix their offensive line in this one offseason (not likely), I do not expect them to make MANY trips into the red zone.


I thought the offensive line was their one strength?

Nope. Whitehair looks good, Long is overpaid and overrated, Sitton is old, and they might have the worst OT situation in the NFL.



Long is pretty damn good when healthy, I just dunno if we will see him healthy ever again.

Nah, he's average and that's if I'm being pretty generous. He was objectively terrible last season.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 7:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5120
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Glennon may have a better chance if success over a second round pick and certainly over a third round pick.

It is interesting logic. No QB is worth the third pick in the draft! Let's build around a guy who is much worse than the guy who isn't worth a third round pick!




Yeah, even better logic to build around a guy who was a 3rd round pick that has actual playing time under his belt and didn't flash anything worth the 15$ million per you're going to over pay him.


Brilliant.


The real difference between my 2nd or 3rd round pick and yours is that you're going to pay a lot less to find out if mine can play.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 7:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5120
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Seacrest wrote:
NME wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The idea is Glennon could be good but in a bad situation with that mess of an organization.

So this mess of an organization can unlock his potential!





The idea is bad.



Just re-sign Hoyer and draft a guy with the 2nd or 3rd round pick. Don't overpay for a nobody that looks like a grown up stunt double for the banjo player in Deliverance.


Hoyer doesn't have the arm strength to be consistently good in the red zone.




Irrelevant.

Hoyer is a cheap stop gap while the 2nd or 3rd rounder develops -or plays right away. Glennon becomes a 15 million dollar a year albatross if he doesn't pan out.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 7:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Where are you guys coming up with 15 mill per for Glennon? Everything I've read says there is no demand for him, The Bears are bidding against Tampa who has a franchise QB and offered him 7 million to be a backup.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 8:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5120
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
312player wrote:
Where are you guys coming up with 15 mill per for Glennon? Everything I've read says there is no demand for him, The Bears are bidding against Tampa who has a franchise QB and offered him 7 million to be a backup.






NFL.com is still showing it. And its a general figure that's widely being thrown around by talk shows and so on.


I have no issue with Glennon coming here if he's cheap. The money is the only thing I have an issue with here.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 8:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
NME wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Glennon may have a better chance if success over a second round pick and certainly over a third round pick.

It is interesting logic. No QB is worth the third pick in the draft! Let's build around a guy who is much worse than the guy who isn't worth a third round pick!




Yeah, even better logic to build around a guy who was a 3rd round pick that has actual playing time under his belt and didn't flash anything worth the 15$ million per you're going to over pay him.


Brilliant.


The real difference between my 2nd or 3rd round pick and yours is that you're going to pay a lot less to find out if mine can play.
I predict Glennon has a better career over whatever best available QB is there in the third round. It's probably a coin flip with the second rounder depending on how many go in the first.

That's more on the rookies though. Glennon is unlikely to be anything but above average.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 8:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
NFL.com is just spitballing ideas, I'd be stunned if he got over 10 million per, That site also has the Skins trading Cousins to to San Francisco. Another pipe dream.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 8:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41380
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
FavreFan wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Unless the Bears fix their offensive line in this one offseason (not likely), I do not expect them to make MANY trips into the red zone.


I thought the offensive line was their one strength?

Nope. Whitehair looks good, Long is overpaid and overrated, Sitton is old, and they might have the worst OT situation in the NFL.

lol, outside of Whitehair, none if this is accurate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 8:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Do the Bears need another backup QB?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16490
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
I can't stand Cutler, but I'd rather see him again for one more year (or even Kaepernick for sheer entertainment value) before Glennon. I mean, how sad would it be to sign Tampa's backup to be your starter?

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 11:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Caller Bob wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Unless the Bears fix their offensive line in this one offseason (not likely), I do not expect them to make MANY trips into the red zone.


I thought the offensive line was their one strength?

Nope. Whitehair looks good, Long is overpaid and overrated, Sitton is old, and they might have the worst OT situation in the NFL.

lol, outside of Whitehair, none if this is accurate.

Didn't watch a lot of Bears this year, huh? I can't blame you.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 12:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Whitehair will play tackle and Grasu will start at C. Long is bad at T but pretty good at G. They will probably look to draft or sign someone, but I cannot pretend to know who that will be. Its honestly one of the better OL groups the Bears have had in my lifetime, which really doesn't mean they'll be good.

Long was mediocre last year but his shit was pretty well fucked up. I was rough on him for playing poorly but his injuries were extensive and he was playing through what would be a season-ender for a lot of players. I dont know why he stuck it out for that shit team but whatever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 12:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Signing Glennon and drafting Mahomes in the 2nd round is a perfectly adequate situation going into next season. 1. Glennon 2. Shaw 3. Mahomes.

If Glennon gets hurt to start the year Shaw is a guy they liked last year. Or Mahomes wins the #2 job in camp, which is fine too. If Glennon just sucks Mahomes gets his shot. If Glennon is good the Bears will be able to groom and hype Mahomes and probably find a willing trade partner in 2-3 years. They could do this with a number of other guys in rounds 2-4 but Mahomes is the guy I like the most. Not drafting a QB at all is unforgivable at this point no matter what they do in FA.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 12:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57262
America wrote:
Signing Glennon and drafting Mahomes in the 2nd round is a perfectly adequate situation going into next season. 1. Glennon 2. Shaw 3. Mahomes.

If Glennon gets hurt to start the year Shaw is a guy they liked last year. Or Mahomes wins the #2 job in camp, which is fine too. If Glennon just sucks Mahomes gets his shot. If Glennon is good the Bears will be able to groom and hype Mahomes and probably find a willing trade partner in 2-3 years. They could do this with a number of other guys in rounds 2-4 but Mahomes is the guy I like the most. Not drafting a QB at all is unforgivable at this point no matter what they do in FA.

I dont think you are getting Mahomes in the 2nd round.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 6:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Why not just start Barkley or Hoyer if all they want is a "bridge" quarterback? Seems stupid to throw money at a guy just because he has experience.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 6:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 3:49 pm
Posts: 9340
Location: UM?
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Jaw Breaker wrote:
I can't stand Cutler, but I'd rather see him again for one more year (or even Kaepernick for sheer entertainment value) before Glennon. I mean, how sad would it be to sign Tampa's backup to be your starter?



Cutler might be a plus on the offense side compared to a guy like Hoyer or Glennon but its not that dramatic. The thing is he's actually so bad at decision making that it leads to a negative for your defense causing them to be on the field more with his turnovers.


Never forget when I was told by someone that turnovers dont matter and dont effect the game.

_________________
Hank Scorpio wrote:
What the hell, I would. Post op is OK right? Right?!?!?!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Glennon
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 8:50 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Unless the Bears fix their offensive line in this one offseason (not likely), I do not expect them to make MANY trips into the red zone.

I thought the offensive line was their one strength?

Nope. Whitehair looks good, Long is overpaid and overrated, Sitton is old, and they might have the worst OT situation in the NFL.
lol, outside of Whitehair, none if this is accurate.

Didn't watch a lot of Bears this year, huh? I can't blame you.
The interior of the OLine isn't too bad. Long is good and Whitehair seems like he could be a real player. Their tackles absolutely suck.

The more I think about this, the more I would hate them signing Glennon. This team is not just a QB or a couple of pieces away from winning. They need a QB, OLine, TE, and an entire secondary. Draft a QB, Shaw as your #2, and let Hoyer start. This is likely going to be 6-8 win season anyway, with a small outside chance at 9 wins if literally everything goes their way. I am 98% sure they are not a playoff team, and 99.999% sure they are not a Super Bowl team. I don't really care about the money for Glennon, but there is no reason to waste time with him playing for this team at all.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 278 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: WL Bill and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group