It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 12:47 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 264 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Peoria Matt wrote:
America, are you telling me you would rather have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky than Watson?

Personally I would rather have Watson, but I'm not an NFL scout. Shit, even if I were an NFL scout it wouldn't matter. There is some sort of magic to finding a QB that just cannot be quantified or known before a guy gets into the league. If the Bears like (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky that's good enough for me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
America wrote:
If the Bears like (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky that's good enough for me.


That should be a red flag.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
America wrote:
If the Bears like (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky that's good enough for me.


Wow.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
America is a fool. We all know this. Why respond anymore?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
^^^that would make a good sig. Who's claiming it?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
I am on the same page as BRogue in that I think (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky may be a good QB. To justify him at 2 he needs to be a star for MANY years.

If that happens then I won't care about the extra picks lost.

But that's a big if for a guy who started 13 college games.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Terry's Peeps wrote:
America wrote:
If the Bears like (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky that's good enough for me.


That should be a red flag.

The Bears current front office has actually shown an adeptness at finding playable QB's, but until this offseason they really didn't try to find a long term starter. Nobody really knows if they can or cannot draft and scout a QB...anyone who tells you this pick is a slam dunk or total failure already is full of shit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
America wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
America, are you telling me you would rather have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky than Watson?

Personally I would rather have Watson, but I'm not an NFL scout. Shit, even if I were an NFL scout it wouldn't matter. There is some sort of magic to finding a QB that just cannot be quantified or known before a guy gets into the league. If the Bears like (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky that's good enough for me.

Well the risk by staying put was that SF would take (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky (supposedly not likely) and the Bears would be "stuck" with Watson. Is that worth giving up the other picks? I don't think so.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65751
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
So...
we give a QB a 3 year 40 something million dollar whatever and then a few months later give up 3 draft picks to move up one to get...
a QB.


Does this seem... odd? What the...
whatever man.
Who the fuck is starting next season?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19370
This guy fucking blows.

But I'm sure Brick loves the pick.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Terry's Peeps wrote:
I am on the same page as BRogue in that I think (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky may be a good QB. To justify him at 2 he needs to be a star for MANY years.

If that happens then I won't care about the extra picks lost.

But that's a big if for a guy who started 13 college games.


If they believe he is a franchise guy, then I get it. But does anyone believe that?

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
America wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
America, are you telling me you would rather have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky than Watson?

Personally I would rather have Watson, but I'm not an NFL scout. Shit, even if I were an NFL scout it wouldn't matter. There is some sort of magic to finding a QB that just cannot be quantified or known before a guy gets into the league. If the Bears like (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky that's good enough for me.

Well the risk by staying put was that SF would take (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky (supposedly not likely) and the Bears would be "stuck" with Watson. Is that worth giving up the other picks? I don't think so.

It is not about the 49ers taking (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

The Bears were bidding against other teams. Cleveland, who is loaded with picks, was almost assuredly among them. We dont know if there were others. The 49ers sold their pick to the highest bidder, they were never going to take (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
denisdman wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
I am on the same page as BRogue in that I think (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky may be a good QB. To justify him at 2 he needs to be a star for MANY years.

If that happens then I won't care about the extra picks lost.

But that's a big if for a guy who started 13 college games.


If they believe he is a franchise guy, then I get it. But does anyone believe that?


Image

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:48 pm
Posts: 379
pizza_Place: Tortorice's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
denisdman wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
I am on the same page as BRogue in that I think (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky may be a good QB. To justify him at 2 he needs to be a star for MANY years.

If that happens then I won't care about the extra picks lost.

But that's a big if for a guy who started 13 college games.


If they believe he is a franchise guy, then I get it. But does anyone believe that?


Image


Holy fuck is that a punch me face

_________________
I am the liquor Randy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16476
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
America wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
America wrote:
If the Bears like (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky that's good enough for me.


That should be a red flag.

The Bears current front office has actually shown an adeptness at finding playable QB's, but until this offseason they really didn't try to find a long term starter. Nobody really knows if they can or cannot draft and scout a QB...anyone who tells you this pick is a slam dunk or total failure already is full of shit.


If they keep him, how will they justify not working him out when they did the other three? To maintain the deception?

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10107
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Darkside wrote:
So...
we give a QB a 3 year 40 something million dollar whatever and then a few months later give up 3 draft picks to move up one to get...
a QB.


Does this seem... odd? What the...
whatever man.
Who the fuck is starting next season?

Glennon's deal probably has a way out after 1 year without too much pain.

Jay Cutler is probably laughing his ass off.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
America wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
America wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
America, are you telling me you would rather have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky than Watson?

Personally I would rather have Watson, but I'm not an NFL scout. Shit, even if I were an NFL scout it wouldn't matter. There is some sort of magic to finding a QB that just cannot be quantified or known before a guy gets into the league. If the Bears like (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky that's good enough for me.

Well the risk by staying put was that SF would take (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky (supposedly not likely) and the Bears would be "stuck" with Watson. Is that worth giving up the other picks? I don't think so.

It is not about the 49ers taking (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

The Bears were bidding against other teams. Cleveland, who is loaded with picks, was almost assuredly among them. We dont know if there were others. The 49ers sold their pick to the highest bidder, they were never going to take (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

Again, staying put would have left them your guy Watson IF (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was targeted by others @ 2. Not worth the bounty IMO.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Glennon's deal is basically a one year deal.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
America wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
America wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
America, are you telling me you would rather have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky than Watson?

Personally I would rather have Watson, but I'm not an NFL scout. Shit, even if I were an NFL scout it wouldn't matter. There is some sort of magic to finding a QB that just cannot be quantified or known before a guy gets into the league. If the Bears like (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky that's good enough for me.

Well the risk by staying put was that SF would take (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky (supposedly not likely) and the Bears would be "stuck" with Watson. Is that worth giving up the other picks? I don't think so.

It is not about the 49ers taking (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

The Bears were bidding against other teams. Cleveland, who is loaded with picks, was almost assuredly among them. We dont know if there were others. The 49ers sold their pick to the highest bidder, they were never going to take (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

Again, staying put would have left them your guy Watson IF (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was targeted by others @ 2. Not worth the bounty IMO.

They really didn't give up that much. Look at the Wentz, Goff, RGIII etc. trades...Bears really got somewhat of a bargain to draft a QB when you look at recent history.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:33 am
Posts: 6189
Location: Limbo
pizza_Place: Positanos on 55th Street
Peoria Matt wrote:
Glennon's deal is basically a one year deal.

But if you were going to draft a QB, why give Glennon 15 mil for the one year?

It just doesn't make any sense.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:48 pm
Posts: 379
pizza_Place: Tortorice's
So the bears for sure aren't trading (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky if Cleveland is trying for cousins

_________________
I am the liquor Randy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Matches Malone wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Glennon's deal is basically a one year deal.

But if you were going to draft a QB, why give Glennon 15 mil for the one year?

It just doesn't make any sense.

It actually makes a lot of sense. Its only a 1 year deal if Glennon sucks, if Glennon is good its a 3 year deal. Bears are trying to create roster redundancies at the QB position, something I (and many, many, many others) have been advocating for a long time. If Glennon is good then the Bears go into next offseason with a very good problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
America wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
America wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
America wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
America, are you telling me you would rather have (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky than Watson?

Personally I would rather have Watson, but I'm not an NFL scout. Shit, even if I were an NFL scout it wouldn't matter. There is some sort of magic to finding a QB that just cannot be quantified or known before a guy gets into the league. If the Bears like (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky that's good enough for me.

Well the risk by staying put was that SF would take (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky (supposedly not likely) and the Bears would be "stuck" with Watson. Is that worth giving up the other picks? I don't think so.

It is not about the 49ers taking (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

The Bears were bidding against other teams. Cleveland, who is loaded with picks, was almost assuredly among them. We dont know if there were others. The 49ers sold their pick to the highest bidder, they were never going to take (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

Again, staying put would have left them your guy Watson IF (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was targeted by others @ 2. Not worth the bounty IMO.

They really didn't give up that much. Look at the Wentz, Goff, RGIII etc. trades...Bears really got somewhat of a bargain to draft a QB when you look at recent history.

They moved up ONE spot for a QB that would likely have still been there while another highly ranked prospect was definitely going to be there. it was ONE spot. You seem to ignore that part.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Scooter wrote:
America is a fool. We all know this. Why respond anymore?


I am telling myself, listen to the beagle.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
They moved up ONE spot for a QB that would likely have still been there while another highly ranked prospect was definitely going to be there. it was ONE spot. You seem to ignore that part.

Right, but they didn't give up a 1st or 2nd round pick. Take a look at the guys drafted in the 3rd and 4th round, a few decent players (and rarely some real standouts) but hardly the kind of success rate you see in the first two rounds. Bears really didn't sacrifice that much...if (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is good you will not be missing those picks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57234
Terry's Peeps wrote:
I am on the same page as BRogue in that I think (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky may be a good QB. To justify him at 2 he needs to be a star for MANY years.

If that happens then I won't care about the extra picks lost.

But that's a big if for a guy who started 13 college games.

Count me in this camp as well.

I do not have a problem with picking him...but they gave up other picks when they have other needs.

They better be right...he better be a great QB for a long time.

The good thing about this is Pace has hung his hat on this dude. He will be judged based on this pick alone. If he is good, Pace will look great, if he is bad Pace will be gone shortly.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
denisdman wrote:
Scooter wrote:
America is a fool. We all know this. Why respond anymore?


I am telling myself, listen to the beagle.

Smart. Bears are really one of the stupidest pro franchises when it comes to the draft. They could miss a piss pot standing one inch from their junk.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
But you could have had Watson by not trading at all!!!!!! This is not that hard to figure out. They got absolutely fucked.



Fuck Pace.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
America wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
America wrote:
If the Bears like (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky that's good enough for me.


That should be a red flag.

The Bears current front office has actually shown an adeptness at finding playable QB's, but until this offseason they really didn't try to find a long term starter. Nobody really knows if they can or cannot draft and scout a QB...anyone who tells you this pick is a slam dunk or total failure already is full of shit.

This is Jimmypastaesque meatball at its finest. "Playable" presumably refers to backups who were marginally better than expected while leading the Bears to losses. Nobody knows if they can or can't draft a QB is because Pace never selected one despite saying they should draft one every year. I can see why you're a true believer.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Hey America, when was the last QB with one year of starting experience in college to become a star in the NFL?

I'll wait for my answer.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 264 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group