It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 10:16 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Is this correct?

Reinsdorf gets no credit for "inheriting Jordan" and the guy who drafted Jordan gets no credit because he didn't think Jordan would be the greatest of all time?


If Thorn traded for the third pick to specifically draft Jordan or something similar then I'd be more charitable. But drafting Jordan because the teams ahead of you took the better prospects is really not that difficult. He just took the next guy available and was really fortunate that he blossomed into the GOAT. Not sure what you mean by Reinsdorf - I think you mean Krause. Krase inherited the centerpiece of the six title teams but it took talent on Krause's part to build those teams around Jordan.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Is this correct?

Reinsdorf gets no credit for "inheriting Jordan" and the guy who drafted Jordan gets no credit because he didn't think Jordan would be the greatest of all time?


If Thorn traded for the third pick to specifically draft Jordan or something similar then I'd be more charitable. But drafting Jordan because the teams ahead of you took the better prospects is really not that difficult. He just took the next guy available and was really fortunate that he blossomed into the GOAT. Not sure what you mean by Reinsdorf - I think you mean Krause. Krase inherited the centerpiece of the six title teams but it took talent on Krause's part to build those teams around Jordan.
There have been many times I've said "7 rings" with Jerry and the answer always is "He got lucky by inheriting Jordan". I just want to know who gets credit.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Rick wants to know which old white guy should get credit for Michael Jordan being great at basketball

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Is this correct?

Reinsdorf gets no credit for "inheriting Jordan" and the guy who drafted Jordan gets no credit because he didn't think Jordan would be the greatest of all time?


If Thorn traded for the third pick to specifically draft Jordan or something similar then I'd be more charitable. But drafting Jordan because the teams ahead of you took the better prospects is really not that difficult. He just took the next guy available and was really fortunate that he blossomed into the GOAT. Not sure what you mean by Reinsdorf - I think you mean Krause. Krase inherited the centerpiece of the six title teams but it took talent on Krause's part to build those teams around Jordan.
There have been many times I've said "7 rings" with Jerry and the answer always is "He got lucky by inheriting Jordan". I just want to know who gets credit.


Krause and PJ along with, obviously, the team. I don't downgrade Krause' contributions simply because he didn't luck into Jordan. He inherited Jordan but he didn't inherit a championship team.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Rick wants to know which old white guy should get credit for Michael Jordan being great at basketball
Old white guys win championships.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Is this correct?

Reinsdorf gets no credit for "inheriting Jordan" and the guy who drafted Jordan gets no credit because he didn't think Jordan would be the greatest of all time?


If Thorn traded for the third pick to specifically draft Jordan or something similar then I'd be more charitable. But drafting Jordan because the teams ahead of you took the better prospects is really not that difficult. He just took the next guy available and was really fortunate that he blossomed into the GOAT. Not sure what you mean by Reinsdorf - I think you mean Krause. Krase inherited the centerpiece of the six title teams but it took talent on Krause's part to build those teams around Jordan.
There have been many times I've said "7 rings" with Jerry and the answer always is "He got lucky by inheriting Jordan". I just want to know who gets credit.


Krause and PJ along with, obviously, the team. I don't downgrade Krause' contributions simply because he didn't luck into Jordan. He inherited Jordan but he didn't inherit a championship team.
I agree with you. You are a smart sports fan unlike others.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Drafting is a crapshoot and smart GMs pick busts just as much as bad GMs luck into stars.

That's not true. You're literally saying that there is nothing that seperates good scouts from bad scouts. That's a ridiculous opinion.


What would you say about the skills of scouts who placed Olajuwon, Bowie, and maybe a few others ahead of MJ? i wish I had predraft rankings in front of me so I could speak with certainty, but I have to assume the majority of scouts had Olajuwon and maybe even Bowie ahead of MJ. Even if they did, I don't blame them for not realizing MJ would be eligible for GOAT consideration after 7-8 years in the league.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16823
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
There have been many times I've said "7 rings" with Jerry and the answer always is "He got lucky by inheriting Jordan". I just want to know who gets credit.


I think you answered your own question.


Lady Luck, NBA Executive of the year 1984.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Last edited by shakes on Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Drafting is a crapshoot and smart GMs pick busts just as much as bad GMs luck into stars.

That's not true. You're literally saying that there is nothing that seperates good scouts from bad scouts. That's a ridiculous opinion.


What would you say about the skills of scouts who placed Olajuwon, Bowie, and maybe a few others ahead of MJ? i wish I had predraft rankings in front of me so I could speak with certainty, but I have to assume the majority of scouts had Olajuwon and maybe even Bowie ahead of MJ. Even if they did, I don't blame them for not realizing MJ would be eligible for GOAT consideration after 7-8 years in the league.

Of course scouts can be wrong. What you were saying in the part of your post I quoted is that good scouts and bad scouts are the exact same. That's ridiculous.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Drafting is a crapshoot and smart GMs pick busts just as much as bad GMs luck into stars.

That's not true. You're literally saying that there is nothing that seperates good scouts from bad scouts. That's a ridiculous opinion.


What would you say about the skills of scouts who placed Olajuwon, Bowie, and maybe a few others ahead of MJ? i wish I had predraft rankings in front of me so I could speak with certainty, but I have to assume the majority of scouts had Olajuwon and maybe even Bowie ahead of MJ. Even if they did, I don't blame them for not realizing MJ would be eligible for GOAT consideration after 7-8 years in the league.

Of course scouts can be wrong. What you were saying in the part of your post I quoted is that good scouts and bad scouts are the exact same. That's ridiculous.


So you're the Houston GM and let's say, pre-draft 1984, a scout comes up to you and says you should go with Olajuwon or Bowie with the no. 1 pick. Are you going to say he's wrong?

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Drafting is a crapshoot and smart GMs pick busts just as much as bad GMs luck into stars.

That's not true. You're literally saying that there is nothing that seperates good scouts from bad scouts. That's a ridiculous opinion.


What would you say about the skills of scouts who placed Olajuwon, Bowie, and maybe a few others ahead of MJ? i wish I had predraft rankings in front of me so I could speak with certainty, but I have to assume the majority of scouts had Olajuwon and maybe even Bowie ahead of MJ. Even if they did, I don't blame them for not realizing MJ would be eligible for GOAT consideration after 7-8 years in the league.

Of course scouts can be wrong. What you were saying in the part of your post I quoted is that good scouts and bad scouts are the exact same. That's ridiculous.


So you're the Houston GM and let's say, pre-draft 1984, a scout comes up to you and says you should go with Olajuwon or Bowie with the no. 1 pick. Are you going to say he's wrong?

No, probably not. Who the fuck knows though?

I don't understand what point you're making here. I never said even the best scouts are always right. There's an element of luck with drafting players but it's not only luck that distinguishes good GMs from bad GMs, which is what you're saying.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Is this correct?

Reinsdorf gets no credit for "inheriting Jordan" and the guy who drafted Jordan gets no credit because he didn't think Jordan would be the greatest of all time?


If Thorn traded for the third pick to specifically draft Jordan or something similar then I'd be more charitable. But drafting Jordan because the teams ahead of you took the better prospects is really not that difficult. He just took the next guy available and was really fortunate that he blossomed into the GOAT. Not sure what you mean by Reinsdorf - I think you mean Krause. Krase inherited the centerpiece of the six title teams but it took talent on Krause's part to build those teams around Jordan.
There have been many times I've said "7 rings" with Jerry and the answer always is "He got lucky by inheriting Jordan". I just want to know who gets credit.


Krause and PJ along with, obviously, the team. I don't downgrade Krause' contributions simply because he didn't luck into Jordan. He inherited Jordan but he didn't inherit a championship team.
I agree with you. You are a smart sports fan unlike others.


You could extend the same logic to PJ. Everyone says PJ is overrated because he always had the best players, but those players didn't win anything before PJ came along. He fashioned teams into dynasties and then everyone applies that dynasty backwards in time, as if LA was a dynasty in 2000 when they embarked on their first journey to a championship under PJ. They weren't a dynasty or whatever that season - they became one over time, in large part due to PJ's stewardship. Same thing with Chicago. MJ and Scottie hadn't even been to the finals before PJ came along as a rookie coach. In PJ's second or third year he won a ring, and now people want to downgrade that accomplishment as if he inherited a team that had already been to multiple finals, etc.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Drafting is a crapshoot and smart GMs pick busts just as much as bad GMs luck into stars.

That's not true. You're literally saying that there is nothing that seperates good scouts from bad scouts. That's a ridiculous opinion.


What would you say about the skills of scouts who placed Olajuwon, Bowie, and maybe a few others ahead of MJ? i wish I had predraft rankings in front of me so I could speak with certainty, but I have to assume the majority of scouts had Olajuwon and maybe even Bowie ahead of MJ. Even if they did, I don't blame them for not realizing MJ would be eligible for GOAT consideration after 7-8 years in the league.

Of course scouts can be wrong. What you were saying in the part of your post I quoted is that good scouts and bad scouts are the exact same. That's ridiculous.


So you're the Houston GM and let's say, pre-draft 1984, a scout comes up to you and says you should go with Olajuwon or Bowie with the no. 1 pick. Are you going to say he's wrong?

No, probably not. Who the fuck knows though?

I don't understand what point you're making here. I never said even the best scouts are always right. There's an element of luck with drafting players but it's not only luck that distinguishes good GMs from bad GMs, which is what you're saying.



I provided that scenario because I understood you as saying anyone who said you should draft Bowie or Olajuwon over MJ in 1984 was an idiot. I do think luck plays a massive role in drafting, but that doesn't take away from a scout's talent. Two scouts come up to you and say these two forwards they're scouting are going to be the next big thing. All the things you'd look for are there: quickness, athleticism, height, arm span, etc. They're not finished products obviously but the tools are there. The forwards end up being Dirk and Tyrus Thomas. Is the scout who sold me on Thomas of less quality than the one who scouted Dirk? Why? How could he forecast that Thomas didn't have the heart for the game, and all the other intangible stuff? As for the one who scouted Dirk - he did his job, just like the one who scouted Thomas, but he got lucky Dirk had heart, drive, will, etc., to get better.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
I provided that scenario because I understood you as saying anyone who said you should draft Bowie or Olajuwon over MJ in 1984 was an idiot.

:lol:

Where did I say anything close to that?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Akeem Olajuwon was the overwhelming choice for 1 and had Ewing decided to come out early he'd have gone ahead of all of them. Jordan would have been 4 and history would forever have been altered.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I provided that scenario because I understood you as saying anyone who said you should draft Bowie or Olajuwon over MJ in 1984 was an idiot.

:lol:

Where did I say anything close to that?


My interpretation, but your point of view makes you come close to saying that. What are your thoughts on the scouts who said Bowie is a top 2 pick? I don't have anything bad to say about then, assuming they included footnotes about Bowie's injury(ies).

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I provided that scenario because I understood you as saying anyone who said you should draft Bowie or Olajuwon over MJ in 1984 was an idiot.

:lol:

Where did I say anything close to that?


My interpretation, but your point of view makes you come close to saying that. What are your thoughts on the scouts who said Bowie is a top 2 pick? I don't have anything bad to say about then, assuming they included footnotes about Bowie's injury(ies).

I don't judge scouts and GMs based on one player evaluation. I'd have to know what the guy's other body of work says. Obviously that's a negative mark on the resume.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Is this correct?

Reinsdorf gets no credit for "inheriting Jordan" and the guy who drafted Jordan gets no credit because he didn't think Jordan would be the greatest of all time?


If Thorn traded for the third pick to specifically draft Jordan or something similar then I'd be more charitable. But drafting Jordan because the teams ahead of you took the better prospects is really not that difficult. He just took the next guy available and was really fortunate that he blossomed into the GOAT. Not sure what you mean by Reinsdorf - I think you mean Krause. Krase inherited the centerpiece of the six title teams but it took talent on Krause's part to build those teams around Jordan.
There have been many times I've said "7 rings" with Jerry and the answer always is "He got lucky by inheriting Jordan". I just want to know who gets credit.


Theo

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Is this correct?

Reinsdorf gets no credit for "inheriting Jordan" and the guy who drafted Jordan gets no credit because he didn't think Jordan would be the greatest of all time?


If Thorn traded for the third pick to specifically draft Jordan or something similar then I'd be more charitable. But drafting Jordan because the teams ahead of you took the better prospects is really not that difficult. He just took the next guy available and was really fortunate that he blossomed into the GOAT. Not sure what you mean by Reinsdorf - I think you mean Krause. Krase inherited the centerpiece of the six title teams but it took talent on Krause's part to build those teams around Jordan.
There have been many times I've said "7 rings" with Jerry and the answer always is "He got lucky by inheriting Jordan". I just want to know who gets credit.


Theo
^^^Cubs fan whose opinions don't count.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Is this correct?

Reinsdorf gets no credit for "inheriting Jordan" and the guy who drafted Jordan gets no credit because he didn't think Jordan would be the greatest of all time?


If Thorn traded for the third pick to specifically draft Jordan or something similar then I'd be more charitable. But drafting Jordan because the teams ahead of you took the better prospects is really not that difficult. He just took the next guy available and was really fortunate that he blossomed into the GOAT. Not sure what you mean by Reinsdorf - I think you mean Krause. Krase inherited the centerpiece of the six title teams but it took talent on Krause's part to build those teams around Jordan.
There have been many times I've said "7 rings" with Jerry and the answer always is "He got lucky by inheriting Jordan". I just want to know who gets credit.


Theo
^^^Cubs fan whose opinions don't count.

Random idiot?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I provided that scenario because I understood you as saying anyone who said you should draft Bowie or Olajuwon over MJ in 1984 was an idiot.

:lol:

Where did I say anything close to that?


My interpretation, but your point of view makes you come close to saying that. What are your thoughts on the scouts who said Bowie is a top 2 pick? I don't have anything bad to say about then, assuming they included footnotes about Bowie's injury(ies).

I don't judge scouts and GMs based on one player evaluation. I'd have to know what the guy's other body of work says. Obviously that's a negative mark on the resume.


That's where we differ. Bowie was an acclaimed seven foot college player who was universally regarded as a top prospect for that draft. As long as my scout informed me of Bowie's injury history then I don't fault him at all for recommending picking him in 1984 right before the draft. He wouldn't be alone.

Now that we're the same subject, what if a scout recommended picking Draymond Green 5th overall in 2012? I think GMs would have fired any scout who said draft Draymond Green fifth overall in 2012, including the Warriors' GM. But now they're "geniuses" for drafting him in the second round. It's all luck/chance.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
Now that we're the same subject, what if a scout recommended picking Draymond Green 5th overall in 2012? I think GMs would have fired any scout who said draft Draymond Green fifth overall in 2012, including the Warriors' GM. But now they're "geniuses" for drafting him in the second round. It's all luck/chance.

No scout would have suggested that so it's an absurd hypothetical to entertain.

Your last sentence is wrong and as I said before, it's a ridiculous opinion. If it's all luck/chance than you're saying you/I/Walt/Ltg could draft as well as RC Buford and Sam Presti.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16823
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
long time guy wrote:
Akeem Olajuwon was the overwhelming choice for 1 and had Ewing decided to come out early he'd have gone ahead of all of them. Jordan would have been 4 and history would forever have been altered.


In the article, Thorn says he would've drafted Jordan over Bowie so Jordan still goes to Bulls in that scenario.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Now that we're the same subject, what if a scout recommended picking Draymond Green 5th overall in 2012? I think GMs would have fired any scout who said draft Draymond Green fifth overall in 2012, including the Warriors' GM. But now they're "geniuses" for drafting him in the second round. It's all luck/chance.

No scout would have suggested that so it's an absurd hypothetical to entertain.

Your last sentence is wrong and as I said before, it's a ridiculous opinion. If it's all luck/chance than you're saying you/I/Walt/Ltg could draft as well as RC Buford and Sam Presti.


It doesn't take much skill to draft Kevin Durant once Greg Oden is off the board.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
shakes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Akeem Olajuwon was the overwhelming choice for 1 and had Ewing decided to come out early he'd have gone ahead of all of them. Jordan would have been 4 and history would forever have been altered.


In the article, Thorn says he would've drafted Jordan over Bowie so Jordan still goes to Bulls in that scenario.


I know I could. I don't know about the other 2 guys :lol:

Seriously there are some really good Gms and "talent" guys out there. West used to be really good. Presti and Buford good too. It's not all luck. Riley is good too but he has to own the Beasley pick. I remember McHale being a helluva talent evaluator too.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Now that we're the same subject, what if a scout recommended picking Draymond Green 5th overall in 2012? I think GMs would have fired any scout who said draft Draymond Green fifth overall in 2012, including the Warriors' GM. But now they're "geniuses" for drafting him in the second round. It's all luck/chance.

No scout would have suggested that so it's an absurd hypothetical to entertain.

Your last sentence is wrong and as I said before, it's a ridiculous opinion. If it's all luck/chance than you're saying you/I/Walt/Ltg could draft as well as RC Buford and Sam Presti.


It doesn't take much skill to draft Kevin Durant once Greg Oden is off the board.



It does to take Harden and Westbrook though. Also Serge and Adams too.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Now that we're the same subject, what if a scout recommended picking Draymond Green 5th overall in 2012? I think GMs would have fired any scout who said draft Draymond Green fifth overall in 2012, including the Warriors' GM. But now they're "geniuses" for drafting him in the second round. It's all luck/chance.

No scout would have suggested that so it's an absurd hypothetical to entertain.

Your last sentence is wrong and as I said before, it's a ridiculous opinion. If it's all luck/chance than you're saying you/I/Walt/Ltg could draft as well as RC Buford and Sam Presti.


It doesn't take much skill to draft Kevin Durant once Greg Oden is off the board.

OK, but this is why I keep telling you it's silly to try to judge someone based on one draft.

It does take skill to draft Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook, James Harden, and Serge Ibaka in a three year span, followed by drafting Bledsoe 18th, Reggie Jackson 24th, and Stephen Adams 12th. According to you, it was all luck and you or I could have done it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16823
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
long time guy wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Now that we're the same subject, what if a scout recommended picking Draymond Green 5th overall in 2012? I think GMs would have fired any scout who said draft Draymond Green fifth overall in 2012, including the Warriors' GM. But now they're "geniuses" for drafting him in the second round. It's all luck/chance.

No scout would have suggested that so it's an absurd hypothetical to entertain.

Your last sentence is wrong and as I said before, it's a ridiculous opinion. If it's all luck/chance than you're saying you/I/Walt/Ltg could draft as well as RC Buford and Sam Presti.


It doesn't take much skill to draft Kevin Durant once Greg Oden is off the board.



It does to take Harden and Westbrook though. Also Serge and Adams too.


What skill did it take to draft Harden, the #2 rated prospect in the draft, at #3? And Westbrook was rated #4 and drafted #4. Not exactly Mensa level thinking to come up with those picks.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Now that we're the same subject, what if a scout recommended picking Draymond Green 5th overall in 2012? I think GMs would have fired any scout who said draft Draymond Green fifth overall in 2012, including the Warriors' GM. But now they're "geniuses" for drafting him in the second round. It's all luck/chance.

No scout would have suggested that so it's an absurd hypothetical to entertain.

Your last sentence is wrong and as I said before, it's a ridiculous opinion. If it's all luck/chance than you're saying you/I/Walt/Ltg could draft as well as RC Buford and Sam Presti.


It doesn't take much skill to draft Kevin Durant once Greg Oden is off the board.

OK, but this is why I keep telling you it's silly to try to judge someone based on one draft.

It does take skill to draft Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook, James Harden, and Serge Ibaka in a three year span, followed by drafting Bledsoe 18th, Reggie Jackson 24th, and Stephen Adams 12th. According to you, it was all luck and you or I could have done it.


It is luck. Here's why: if one of the teams before Presti drafts Westbrook (totally plausible), is Presti less smart now? What if Portland shocked the world in 2007 and took Durant over Oden. Is Presti less smart now because he picked the consensus no 1 pick that fell into his lap that year?

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
shakes wrote:
long time guy wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Now that we're the same subject, what if a scout recommended picking Draymond Green 5th overall in 2012? I think GMs would have fired any scout who said draft Draymond Green fifth overall in 2012, including the Warriors' GM. But now they're "geniuses" for drafting him in the second round. It's all luck/chance.

No scout would have suggested that so it's an absurd hypothetical to entertain.

Your last sentence is wrong and as I said before, it's a ridiculous opinion. If it's all luck/chance than you're saying you/I/Walt/Ltg could draft as well as RC Buford and Sam Presti.


It doesn't take much skill to draft Kevin Durant once Greg Oden is off the board.



It does to take Harden and Westbrook though. Also Serge and Adams too.


What skill did it take to draft Harden, the #2 rated prospect in the draft, at #3? And Westbrook was rated #4 and drafted #4. Not exactly Mensa level thinking to come up with those picks.

IIRC the Westbrook pick was criticized at the time because he wasn't supposed to go that high.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group