FrankDrebin wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FrankDrebin wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
You don't need 21st century glasses to see that Robert E. Lee took up arms against his own country.
Fuck General Lee and any of his supporters, but this is a god awful reason to dislike the man. John Brown took up arms against his own country and he's one of the best Americans who ever lived.
Every single founder of America did as well.
They did, but not to preserve their right to keep their slavery industry.
American Revolution was more based on taxation and failure to have representation in the British government.
It was said earlier that looking at the Confederacy through 2017 eyes, there is nothing good about their actions. I believe in state's rights to a point, but using them to protect slavery is not one of them.
I admire General Lee's ability as a military tactician and leadership qualities that inspired his soldiers to fight and succeed in some situations where they faced overwhelming odds in terms of the North's manpower and industrial advantage.
Seems to me that you hate America. Am I off base?
No, I love America even with all her imperfectations.
To Great Britain, the colonies were rebelling, an act of treason. Any historian that looks at the reasons behind the rebellion will agree they were doing so for honorable reasons.
The Confederacy rebelled for an honorable principle: maintaining state sovereignty against a seemingly out of control federal government. They picked the wrong issue (slavery) to proceed with secession.
John Brown was brought up; he was hated in the South for his actions, while abolitionists and blacks cheered him. He took up arms against the federal government (Lee was in command of the forces who quelled the rebellion btw), an act of treason. But since his actions ignited the powder keg that led to the Civil War, he is considered a patriot.
The state sovereignty argument is bullshit and crap Jefferson made up when he didn't like that Washington essentially sided with Hamilton on monetary policy and Jefferson saw that those policies would negatively impact the role of farming and Virginia in the economy. Madison at the Constitutional Convention wanted the central government to be able to veto state laws. Washington, Hamilton, Madison, and others, all wanted a strong central government given the failure of Articles of Confederation and, for Washington and Hamilton, the states' failure to fund and staff the Continental Army during the Revolution. Also, Jefferson had no problem asserting federal power when he was President, despite bitching and moaning whenever Washington or Adams did it.