IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
You need to watch games and stop with talk show narratives.
If Carmelo Anthony is such the loser then why did Denver improve by 26 games with him as its best player during his rookie season?
If he causes teams to lose then why did his teams make the playoffs for the first 9 years of his career?
Why has he had a winning record despite playing in the Western Conf. for the first 9 years of his career?
We've previously discussed all of these points at great length only a couple of years ago. You tried to push the story line that he was the only player on those teams. That was countered by listing the countless All-Star players Denver started surrounding him with. Denver also tanked the hell out of the 2002-2003 season, as many teams did, to try to land LeBron.
When have you named all of these countless All Stars? you are flat lying and if you have then you should have no problem doing it now. WHo are they?
I also knew that you'd duck the questions and your tank theory if pure speculation. Denver had been a garbage ass franchise well before 02-03.
Lastly to illustrate the inconsistency in your argument you just love some Top 10 Jimmy Butler. Where in the hell have Jimmy Butler led teams gone in the 4-5 years that he has been an elite (in your opinion anyway) player?
Carmelo Anthony in 2003-04 was 7th on the team in WS/48, 4th in overall WS, 7th in BPM (0.1), and 4th in VORP. Andre Miller, Marcus Camby and Nene were all higher contributors.
Iverson, Billups, KDdidit Martin were the All Stars. Guys like Camby, Nene and Miller were big contributors that never made the All Star team.
Timberwolves had 16 more wins than the previous season, and the Bulls had 14 fewer wins. Using your own logic, Jimmy Butler is worth approximately 15 wins.
So now you are going back to the tried and not so true method of using John Hollinger to tell me that guys that were never more valuable were more valuable.
My question wasn't about more wins it was about "playoff success" . Where has top 10 Jimmy Butler ever led anyone? Simple question.
Every team has "big contributors". They were also big contributors that had never made a playoff series til Anthony showed up. It is common knowledge that he was the best player on that team from the moment he was drafted. Iverson was over the hill when he got to Denver. Denver got better after they traded him and Detroit got worse. Philly got better after trading him for Miller also. Each instance is backed up by their respective improvement in record.
Of the All Star guys you named (Doubt Martin ever made one in the West by the way) Only Billups had real impact.
Billups was only really available to Denver for one year. He blew his knee or Achilles out the second year and was moved after that. The one year he was available Denver made it to the Conf finals. Won 54 games. Iverson was around for about 2 seasons as I recall and Martin was a role player at best. Nothing you stated adds up to "countless"
_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.