It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 2:00 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1072 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 ... 36  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
We definitely had a JJ vs Urlacher thread. I took Urlacher too, which may have been the wrong call.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 9:55 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
312player wrote:
Bear fans have little knowledge outside of their own team.
You are the last person on this board who should be saying this. You have little to no knowledge outside of your own butthole. smh.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
312 is the king of inane conjecture

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
rogers park bryan wrote:
312player wrote:
Furious Styles wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Prisoners of the moment here IMO.

Indeed. Khalil Mack has been great for some time. Meatball Bear fans just figuring this out now. :lol:



Rpb couldn't even admit JJ watt was better than Urlacher. Bear fans have little knowledge outside of their own team.

You waaaaayyyyyy overestimate your own knowledge. You're wrong A LOT.

How did you get so conceded? Remember when you thought Jon Gray and Sonny Gray were the same person? Or that Urlacher never won a DPOY?

I dont remember the Watt vs Urlacher discussion. Quote it if you can.


I am wrong a fair amount, but I'm no homer. I just give my honest opinion.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
312player wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
312player wrote:
Furious Styles wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Prisoners of the moment here IMO.

Indeed. Khalil Mack has been great for some time. Meatball Bear fans just figuring this out now. :lol:



Rpb couldn't even admit JJ watt was better than Urlacher. Bear fans have little knowledge outside of their own team.

You waaaaayyyyyy overestimate your own knowledge. You're wrong A LOT.

How did you get so conceded? Remember when you thought Jon Gray and Sonny Gray were the same person? Or that Urlacher never won a DPOY?

I dont remember the Watt vs Urlacher discussion. Quote it if you can.


I am wrong a fair amount, but I'm no homer. I just give my honest opinion.

Fair enough.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
rogers park bryan wrote:
You waaaaayyyyyy overestimate your own knowledge. You're wrong A LOT.

How did you get so conceded?

:lol: :lol:

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
IMU wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
You waaaaayyyyyy overestimate your own knowledge. You're wrong A LOT.

How did you get so conceded?

:lol: :lol:

:oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 12:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57250
Thanking Santa Gruden, again, for the gift that keeps on giving...Khalil Mack.

Image

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 5:43 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Chicago, Il
I hope the number 34 pick in the 2020 draft turns out to be a stud to basically just make this the most one-sided trade in league history.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2018 4:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
RFDC wrote:
Thanking Santa Gruden, again, for the gift that keeps on giving...Khalil Mack.

Image



No kidding. Getting Mack was HUGE. It'd be one thing if the guy was a great player but somekind of an asshole but he is different. He made a very good defense, a GREAT ONE. And with just a small price really in terms of draft picks.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2018 9:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41379
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
So more than likely the Bears will be getting Mack for a late, late 1st round pick in 2019 and a swap of a late first rounder for early 2nd rounder in 2020 right? Good lord, Pace raped Gruden.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2018 9:50 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Caller Bob wrote:
So more than likely the Bears will be getting Mack for a late, late 1st round pick in 2019 and a swap of a late first rounder for early 2nd rounder in 2020 right? Good lord, Pace raped Gruden.


Yep!

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4767
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Rube vindicated today for his criticism of Khalil Mack trade.

No player is worth that many picks, except a HOF quarterback.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/282 ... tics-group


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:24 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Dumbass.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4767
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
This is what happens when you all think like sheep.

Zero sacks for Mack against the Eagles.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Dignified Rube wrote:
This is what happens when you all think like sheep.

Zero sacks for Mack against the Eagles.


Sacks don't tell the whole story, Mack played very good, so did the D. That loss is is on Nagy and the offense. I put some blame on Fangio too, you have to dial up a blitz now n then to keep the offense on their heels.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:34 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Dignified Rube wrote:
This is what happens when you all think like sheep.

Zero sacks for Mack against the Eagles.
Maybe if the Bears had kept Matt Barkley, who you called their QB of the future, they would have beaten the Eagles, right? :roll:

Of course, its totally and completely fair to judge the trade on one single game. :roll:

If you need any further clarification on this, refer to my previous post. :D

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:42 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Quote:
​​When it comes to analytics, the experts at Sloan clearly value draft picks, smaller contracts and full, unabashed rebuilds rather than half-hearted attempts to feign at competing. From this perspective, it makes sense as to why the ​Raiders would have needed to trade Mack.

Due to his dominance and relentlessly consistent production off the edge, he would have required a large contract, which isn't favored by the the Sloan number-crunchers. In addition, the Raiders received a package that included two first-rounders, which will help them either stock up on talent in the upcoming drafts or use them in subsequent trades to sign important players. Finally, the Raiders' cap space gives them flexibility, which is something they wouldn't have had if they had kept ​Mack.
Eat shit, Rube. Eat a giant, steaming bowl of freshly dropped shit.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6861
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Quote:
​​When it comes to analytics, the experts at Sloan clearly value draft picks, smaller contracts and full, unabashed rebuilds rather than half-hearted attempts to feign at competing. From this perspective, it makes sense as to why the ​Raiders would have needed to trade Mack.

Due to his dominance and relentlessly consistent production off the edge, he would have required a large contract, which isn't favored by the the Sloan number-crunchers. In addition, the Raiders received a package that included two first-rounders, which will help them either stock up on talent in the upcoming drafts or use them in subsequent trades to sign important players. Finally, the Raiders' cap space gives them flexibility, which is something they wouldn't have had if they had kept ​Mack.
Eat shit, Rube. Eat a giant, steaming bowl of freshly dropped shit.


Why so much anger toward the Raiders rebuild? Do you not see the value of trading your best player for young potential stars to develop a core? Would you rather the Raiders over pay in FA to sign a 26yr old superstar to 10/300MIL contract or put all their hopes and dreams into a bunch of draft picks who keep underperforming or getting hurt?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
The issue isn't really that the Raiders were smart to rebuild. It's that the Bears fleeced them in the trade.

Bears gave up:
2019 first round pick
2020 first round pick
2020 third round pick
2020 sixth round pick

Raiders gave up:
Mack
2020 second round pick
2020 fifth round pick

So, in effect, the Bears got Mack for a 2019 first round pick, and then moving around with minimal loss of value in 2020.

If the draft order went the exact same for 2020, this is how the trade would have worked.
Bears give up in 2020: 24th pick, 88th pick, 198th pick.
Bears get in 2020: 35th pick, 141st pick.

That's not a huge cost in 2020.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
You forgot to include the record-setting contract....that’s an enormous opportunity cost

And you can’t make assumptions about 2020. It’s the NFL.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The issue isn't really that the Raiders were smart to rebuild. It's that the Bears fleeced them in the trade.

Bears gave up:
2019 first round pick
2020 first round pick
2020 third round pick
2020 sixth round pick

Raiders gave up:
Mack
2020 second round pick
2020 fifth round pick

So, in effect, the Bears got Mack for a 2019 first round pick, and then moving around with minimal loss of value in 2020.

If the draft order went the exact same for 2020, this is how the trade would have worked.
Bears give up in 2020: 24th pick, 88th pick, 198th pick.
Bears get in 2020: 35th pick, 141st pick.

That's not a huge cost in 2020.

The way teams value draft picks, I think all 32 including the Bears would disagree with minimal loss of value in 2020. Team's aren't looking to just give away 3rd round picks.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Kirkwood wrote:
You forgot to include the record-setting contract....that’s an enormous opportunity cost
We don't really know that until we see how he performs throughout the contract though. Rodgers contract could be worse than the Mack contract given Rodgers gets "injured" all the time now.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:22 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
FavreFan wrote:
I think all 32 including the Bears would disagree with minimal loss of value in 2020. Team's aren't looking to just give away 3rd round picks.
The Bears didn't just give away their 3rd. I think all 32 NFL teams would rather have two second round picks in 2020 vs one second round and one third round pick in 2020.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
The way teams value draft picks, I think all 32 including the Bears would disagree with minimal loss of value in 2020. Team's aren't looking to just give away 3rd round picks.
Teams trade third round picks all the time.

For instance, Arizona traded a third round pick, and a fifth round pick to move up 5 total spots in the NFL draft last year.

Of course you would rather have the picks but the Bears moving up from a likely low third round pick to a high second round pick makes a big difference in the value.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I think all 32 including the Bears would disagree with minimal loss of value in 2020. Team's aren't looking to just give away 3rd round picks.
The Bears didn't just give away their 3rd. I think all 32 NFL teams would rather have two second round picks in 2020 vs one second round and one third round pick in 2020.

Huh? That response makes no sense.

Let's go back to what Rick wrote.

If the draft order went the exact same for 2020, this is how the trade would have worked.

Bears give up in 2020: 24th pick, 88th pick, 198th pick.
Bears get in 2020: 35th pick, 141st pick.

32 out of 32 GM's would tell you what the Bears gave up in the above scenario is significantly more valuable than what they received. The comparison of the combo of picks isn't close. Not what else you were rambling on about.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
The way teams value draft picks, I think all 32 including the Bears would disagree with minimal loss of value in 2020. Team's aren't looking to just give away 3rd round picks.
Teams trade third round picks all the time.

For instance, Arizona traded a third round pick, and a fifth round pick to move up 5 total spots in the NFL draft last year.

Of course you would rather have the picks but the Bears moving up from a likely low third round pick to a high second round pick makes a big difference in the value.

And Oakland traded a 3rd and a 5th for one of the best WR's of all time in his prime coming off a 15 TD catch season.

I'd also, like Kirkwood, caution you about projecting low and high round picks in 2020. Lotta regression due for the beloved this season.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
The way teams value draft picks, I think all 32 including the Bears would disagree with minimal loss of value in 2020. Team's aren't looking to just give away 3rd round picks.
Teams trade third round picks all the time.

For instance, Arizona traded a third round pick, and a fifth round pick to move up 5 total spots in the NFL draft last year.

Of course you would rather have the picks but the Bears moving up from a likely low third round pick to a high second round pick makes a big difference in the value.

And Oakland traded a 3rd and a 5th for one of the best WR's of all time in his prime coming off a 15 TD catch season.
Huh?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
The way teams value draft picks, I think all 32 including the Bears would disagree with minimal loss of value in 2020. Team's aren't looking to just give away 3rd round picks.
Teams trade third round picks all the time.

For instance, Arizona traded a third round pick, and a fifth round pick to move up 5 total spots in the NFL draft last year.

Of course you would rather have the picks but the Bears moving up from a likely low third round pick to a high second round pick makes a big difference in the value.

And Oakland traded a 3rd and a 5th for one of the best WR's of all time in his prime coming off a 15 TD catch season.
Huh?

:lol: Huh yourself. Have you been living under a rock the past month?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:34 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
You know its been a rough stretch for Packers fans when they are actively choosing to side with the football savant that is Dignified Rube.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1072 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 ... 36  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: stlmax, The Doctor Of Style and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group