It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:22 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 136 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
pittmike wrote:
They should just look at his WAR and be done with the discussion.

not helpful in comparing different eras


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31616
pizza_Place: What??
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
For those of you that think that Ruth could walk into MLB and be a star with no changes, do you also think the teams he played on would be dominant today too?

I would say he would find a lighter bat to adjust to the greater velocity. He's never seen cutters or sliders or changes the drop off the table. Seen spitballs and balls that were cut and worn out so he did deal with hellacious movement.

His teams would suck. Ruth was a man amongst boys in the '20's. He out homered every other team in 1920. And he did it again in 1927. He was 4 decades better than everybody else. I know for sure he'd be an all star in the '60's. Maybe he's Daniel Palka today. Or he might suck. MANY think they know, but they don't


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Kirkwood wrote:
pittmike wrote:
They should just look at his WAR and be done with the discussion.

not helpful in comparing different eras


Not being facetious but I thought one of the stat head arguments was the metrics do equalize eras?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 9:59 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Look, I don't know if Babe Ruth would have 700+ homers if he played today, but I think its pretty clear that he would not suck.

A relief pitcher who had a 5+ ERA in 2017 saying that he would strike him out all the time is fucking ridiculous though.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
pittmike wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
pittmike wrote:
They should just look at his WAR and be done with the discussion.

not helpful in comparing different eras


Not being facetious but I thought one of the stat head arguments was the metrics do equalize eras?

i don't think you're wrong in that sense.

i'm pointing more towards war being unable to capture the evolution in talent over eras.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Look, I don't know if Babe Ruth would have 700+ homers if he played today, but I think its pretty clear that he would not suck.

A relief pitcher who had a 5+ ERA in 2017 saying that he would strike him out all the time is fucking ridiculous though.


Well in the most simplistic terms the pitcher is right. Pull Ruth out of a vacuum for 4 quick ABs and feed him all the modern junk and 104 mph his stick would miss all of it. Be more realistic as the discussion has gone you clearly get differences of opinion more likely.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Kirkwood wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
pittmike wrote:
They should just look at his WAR and be done with the discussion.

not helpful in comparing different eras


Not being facetious but I thought one of the stat head arguments was the metrics do equalize eras?

i don't think you're wrong in that sense.

i'm pointing more towards war being unable to capture the evolution in talent over eras.


True. It is pretty impossible. Maybe the new HOF committees are the correct way to go. Leave eras where they are compare them internally and be done with it.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
pittmike wrote:
They should just look at his WAR and be done with the discussion.

not helpful in comparing different eras


Not being facetious but I thought one of the stat head arguments was the metrics do equalize eras?

Not WAR.

WAR is specific to the time played.

Babe Ruth's WAR was wins above replacement level for 1927

Replacement level in 2018 is a different benchmark


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:25 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
pittmike wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Look, I don't know if Babe Ruth would have 700+ homers if he played today, but I think its pretty clear that he would not suck.

A relief pitcher who had a 5+ ERA in 2017 saying that he would strike him out all the time is fucking ridiculous though.


Well in the most simplistic terms the pitcher is right. Pull Ruth out of a vacuum for 4 quick ABs and feed him all the modern junk and 104 mph his stick would miss all of it. Be more realistic as the discussion has gone you clearly get differences of opinion more likely.
Ok. Maybe Kershaw or Sale or Arietta get the best of him 4 or 5 times in a row. I would bet that in 4 Abs against this reliever, Ruth does some damage at least once.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
http://www.espn.com/blog/sweetspot/post ... f-all-time

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 7:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:41 am
Posts: 678
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Strange is such a goofy term for pussy.


Do you understand why they call it "strange?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Z would hit 40 plus and throw 95 mph .. he'd crush that fat fuck Ruth back in the day

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:32 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
312player wrote:
Z would hit 40 plus and throw 95 mph .. he'd crush that fat fuck Ruth back in the day



Ridiculous.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
Z would hit 40 plus and throw 95 mph .. he'd crush that fat fuck Ruth back in the day



Ridiculous.


How ?

Dude was 6'5 and 260

He had huge power and threw 91 mph as a lefty and 96 as righty.. he crushed that fat fuck Ruth in skills

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 10:40 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
312player wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
Z would hit 40 plus and throw 95 mph .. he'd crush that fat fuck Ruth back in the day



Ridiculous.


How ?

Dude was 6'5 and 260

He had huge power and threw 91 mph as a lefty and 96 as righty.. he crushed that fat fuck Ruth in skills


And Ruth was 6'2", 215, built like a brick shithouse, and fast as hell. He faced guys like Johnson and Wood who threw harder than Zambrano.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
Z would hit 40 plus and throw 95 mph .. he'd crush that fat fuck Ruth back in the day



Ridiculous.


How ?

Dude was 6'5 and 260

He had huge power and threw 91 mph as a lefty and 96 as righty.. he crushed that fat fuck Ruth in skills


And Ruth was 6'2", 215, built like a brick shithouse, and fast as hell. He faced guys like Johnson and Wood who threw harder than Zambrano.


This really is one of the dumbest arguments around here. Ruth was better than whole teams, but we're supposed to believe what a never been guy screams for attention?

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Regular Reader wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
Z would hit 40 plus and throw 95 mph .. he'd crush that fat fuck Ruth back in the day



Ridiculous.


How ?

Dude was 6'5 and 260

He had huge power and threw 91 mph as a lefty and 96 as righty.. he crushed that fat fuck Ruth in skills


And Ruth was 6'2", 215, built like a brick shithouse, and fast as hell. He faced guys like Johnson and Wood who threw harder than Zambrano.


This really is one of the dumbest arguments around here. Ruth was better than whole teams, but we're supposed to believe what a never been guy screams for attention?



I've said this long before a no name reliever spoke the Truth.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
Z would hit 40 plus and throw 95 mph .. he'd crush that fat fuck Ruth back in the day



Ridiculous.


How ?

Dude was 6'5 and 260

He had huge power and threw 91 mph as a lefty and 96 as righty.. he crushed that fat fuck Ruth in skills


And Ruth was 6'2", 215, built like a brick shithouse, and fast as hell. He faced guys like Johnson and Wood who threw harder than Zambrano.



Imo Ruth never saw a heater over 93

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
And I'd put Ruth at 6 foot 235

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
312player wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
Z would hit 40 plus and throw 95 mph .. he'd crush that fat fuck Ruth back in the day



Ridiculous.


How ?

Dude was 6'5 and 260

He had huge power and threw 91 mph as a lefty and 96 as righty.. he crushed that fat fuck Ruth in skills


And Ruth was 6'2", 215, built like a brick shithouse, and fast as hell. He faced guys like Johnson and Wood who threw harder than Zambrano.



Imo Ruth never saw a heater over 93


Everything he saw above 90 was either cut or loaded up for crazy movement. Which is harder to hit.

And the Big Train.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31616
pizza_Place: What??
312player wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
Z would hit 40 plus and throw 95 mph .. he'd crush that fat fuck Ruth back in the day



Ridiculous.


How ?

Dude was 6'5 and 260

He had huge power and threw 91 mph as a lefty and 96 as righty.. he crushed that fat fuck Ruth in skills


And Ruth was 6'2", 215, built like a brick shithouse, and fast as hell. He faced guys like Johnson and Wood who threw harder than Zambrano.



Imo Ruth never saw a heater over 93

I don't think he saw a heater over 90. According to Fastball, a documentary, Johnson was I think, high 80's.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Pedro would strike out this fat piece of shit with ease


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31616
pizza_Place: What??
He was in MLB for 12 or 13 years before he became a "fat piece of shit". There's more film when he was a "fat piece of shit" so you remember him as a "fat piece of shit".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Regular Reader wrote:
312player wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
Z would hit 40 plus and throw 95 mph .. he'd crush that fat fuck Ruth back in the day



Ridiculous.


How ?

Dude was 6'5 and 260

He had huge power and threw 91 mph as a lefty and 96 as righty.. he crushed that fat fuck Ruth in skills


And Ruth was 6'2", 215, built like a brick shithouse, and fast as hell. He faced guys like Johnson and Wood who threw harder than Zambrano.



Imo Ruth never saw a heater over 93


Everything he saw above 90 was either cut or loaded up for crazy movement. Which is harder to hit.

And the Big Train.



Late movement is the key. But if a guy gas 98 plus stuff..you are jumpy and on edge..gotta be looking heater

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Pedro would strike out this fat piece of shit with ease



This is your best post in 2018 and I agree

Now go watch Major Payne and Div 3 FF

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Last edited by 312player on Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2018 11:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Nardi wrote:
312player wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
312player wrote:
Z would hit 40 plus and throw 95 mph .. he'd crush that fat fuck Ruth back in the day



Ridiculous.


How ?

Dude was 6'5 and 260

He had huge power and threw 91 mph as a lefty and 96 as righty.. he crushed that fat fuck Ruth in skills


And Ruth was 6'2", 215, built like a brick shithouse, and fast as hell. He faced guys like Johnson and Wood who threw harder than Zambrano.



Imo Ruth never saw a heater over 93

I don't think he saw a heater over 90. According to Fastball, a documentary, Johnson was I think, high 80's.



Interesting

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 1:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:13 am
Posts: 17583
Location: BLM Lake Forest Chapter
pizza_Place: Quonset
Nardi should do more homework.

_________________
Don Tiny wrote:
Don't be such a fucking chump.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 7:23 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79550
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nardi wrote:
312player wrote:
Imo Ruth never saw a heater over 93

I don't think he saw a heater over 90. According to Fastball, a documentary, Johnson was I think, high 80's.



Wrong. You guys seem to be suggesting that people "evolved" in two or three generations. There still has never been anyone who threw harder than Nolan Ryan. And nobody in the majors right now throws harder than Feller. Sure, they can take some middling reliever and throw 104 on the scoreboard so goofs like you jizz in your pants but that doesn't mean the guy threw harder than Walter Johnson.

And now you want to shrink Ruth. Well then, I think Carlos Zambrano was 6'0", 220. Hell, I saw the fearsome Teddy Bruschi on Sports Center last night and he looked about 5'8", 160.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Image

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Babe Ruth would suck
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2018 8:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38688
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nardi wrote:
312player wrote:
Imo Ruth never saw a heater over 93

I don't think he saw a heater over 90. According to Fastball, a documentary, Johnson was I think, high 80's.



Wrong. You guys seem to be suggesting that people "evolved" in two or three generations. There still has never been anyone who threw harder than Nolan Ryan. And nobody in the majors right now throws harder than Feller. Sure, they can take some middling reliever and throw 104 on the scoreboard so goofs like you jizz in your pants but that doesn't mean the guy threw harder than Walter Johnson.

And now you want to shrink Ruth. Well then, I think Carlos Zambrano was 6'0", 220. Hell, I saw the fearsome Teddy Bruschi on Sports Center last night and he looked about 5'8", 160.

I do love the notion that hitters in the 20s and 30s were essentially playing lob league amd guys only started throwing hard the last 40 years or so .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 136 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group