It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:51 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 835 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:40 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Nardi wrote:
FrankDrebin wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
FrankDrebin wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
Score host is saying the kick was tipped. True?


Yep. Video showed it.


Does it show the trajectory changed?


Just getting a fingertip on it can change the speed/trajectory/rotation of the ball.

Could have helped the trajectory for all we know. Maybe it's WAY left without the two fingers.

Maybe the shocker would have put it right down the middle.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24551
pizza_Place: It's gone
If that ball goes thru and the Bears win nobody is talking about the offense or defense or special teams mistakes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:41 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
good dolphin wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Yards ain’t shit. I’m cherry picking stats. I’m all ears to hear your side of the argument that leads with something other than “I think”


Not sure who you're talking to, but the number 2 overall pick, with nearly two full seasons under his belt, must play better at home against a defense that you said all week sucked and a team that was supposedly afraid to come to Chicago. If the Eagles D was really that bad, the Bears should have put up 30 at home. They were also gifted a couple missed interceptions, including one that was thrown right to the Philly safety.


No, the story all week was how important playoff experience is and how it would be the deciding factor in the game. If this was mitch without experience I anxiously await the rest of his career


Oh, come on. People don't automatically get better with "playoff experience." Football is the same game in the playoffs as it is in the regular season.

I will agree that QB's need experience in general, but Mitch is at the end of his second year. He has had his moments, but he played poorly today. As peeps said, I'm not sure how someone could have watched the game and thought he played particularly well. I'm rooting for the guy, obviously, but he needed to play better today.


That was exactly the position held by many paid football experts this week.

Mitch didn’t lose the game today. But, he didn’t win it, either.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
good dolphin wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Yards ain’t shit. I’m cherry picking stats. I’m all ears to hear your side of the argument that leads with something other than “I think”


Not sure who you're talking to, but the number 2 overall pick, with nearly two full seasons under his belt, must play better at home against a defense that you said all week sucked and a team that was supposedly afraid to come to Chicago. If the Eagles D was really that bad, the Bears should have put up 30 at home. They were also gifted a couple missed interceptions, including one that was thrown right to the Philly safety.


No, the story all week was how important playoff experience is and how it would be the deciding factor in the game. If this was mitch without experience I anxiously await the rest of his career


Oh, come on. People don't automatically get better with "playoff experience." Football is the same game in the playoffs as it is in the regular season.

I will agree that QB's need experience in general, but Mitch is at the end of his second year. He has had his moments, but he played poorly today. As peeps said, I'm not sure how someone could have watched the game and thought he played particularly well. I'm rooting for the guy, obviously, but he needed to play better today.


That was exactly the position held by many paid football experts this week.




Those ‘paid’ experts are wrong as often as ‘unpaid’ experts. Some of you put too much stock in this.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
One thing lost in all the disappointment, the bears pulled that same shot with the miller “reception” that they did against the packers a couple of years ago. When will they learn to pick up the ball just in case

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24551
pizza_Place: It's gone
they did enough to win the game. the kid just needed to make the fg. It's the playoffs, nothing goes perfect. That's why its called the playoffs. you have to find a way to win. many times the best team doesn't win in the playoffs. the experience you get in the playoffs is on how to win games like this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Mr. Reason wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Yards ain’t shit. I’m cherry picking stats. I’m all ears to hear your side of the argument that leads with something other than “I think”


Not sure who you're talking to, but the number 2 overall pick, with nearly two full seasons under his belt, must play better at home against a defense that you said all week sucked and a team that was supposedly afraid to come to Chicago. If the Eagles D was really that bad, the Bears should have put up 30 at home. They were also gifted a couple missed interceptions, including one that was thrown right to the Philly safety.


No, the story all week was how important playoff experience is and how it would be the deciding factor in the game. If this was mitch without experience I anxiously await the rest of his career


Oh, come on. People don't automatically get better with "playoff experience." Football is the same game in the playoffs as it is in the regular season.

I will agree that QB's need experience in general, but Mitch is at the end of his second year. He has had his moments, but he played poorly today. As peeps said, I'm not sure how someone could have watched the game and thought he played particularly well. I'm rooting for the guy, obviously, but he needed to play better today.


That was exactly the position held by many paid football experts this week.

Mitch didn’t lose the game today. But, he didn’t win it, either.




But he kind of did. Who would get credited with a game winning drive if Parkey does his job

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Mitch drove the team down in the last two minutes of both halves. That is a good indication of decelopment

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:46 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
good dolphin wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:

Not sure who you're talking to, but the number 2 overall pick, with nearly two full seasons under his belt, must play better at home against a defense that you said all week sucked and a team that was supposedly afraid to come to Chicago. If the Eagles D was really that bad, the Bears should have put up 30 at home. They were also gifted a couple missed interceptions, including one that was thrown right to the Philly safety.


No, the story all week was how important playoff experience is and how it would be the deciding factor in the game. If this was mitch without experience I anxiously await the rest of his career


Oh, come on. People don't automatically get better with "playoff experience." Football is the same game in the playoffs as it is in the regular season.

I will agree that QB's need experience in general, but Mitch is at the end of his second year. He has had his moments, but he played poorly today. As peeps said, I'm not sure how someone could have watched the game and thought he played particularly well. I'm rooting for the guy, obviously, but he needed to play better today.


That was exactly the position held by many paid football experts this week.

Mitch didn’t lose the game today. But, he didn’t win it, either.




But he kind of did. Who would get credited with a game winning drive if Parkey does his job

I know who gets credited with a game losing drive...the D.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:47 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
good dolphin wrote:
One thing lost in all the disappointment, the bears pulled that same shot with the miller “reception” that they did against the packers a couple of years ago. When will they learn to pick up the ball just in case

Yeah...but there wasn't really a receiver in the area...and the officials were clearly waving incomplete. I can understand why none of them went after the ball.

The defense has no excuse...always go get the ball no matter what. There were 2 guys right there in the area.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24551
pizza_Place: It's gone
Mitch is not the qb at this point of career to single handly win games for you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
HawaiiYou wrote:
Mitch is not the qb at this point of career to single handly win games for you.


And yet, there they were because of him

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24551
pizza_Place: It's gone
good dolphin wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
Mitch is not the qb at this point of career to single handly win games for you.


And yet, there they were because of him


yes he did enough to put them in a position to win.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 10:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
veganfan21 wrote:
NME wrote:


I’m not holding Fangio to an impossible standard at all. I’m asking for the coach to do what is necessary during a game to put his players in the best position to succeed. Not swapping Mack around more (when we saw him move Mack around all year) when Mack was clearly struggling against Peters, and not attacking an immobile QB up the middle to force him to move around more (for example) on key drives is not doing those things.


He did this in the Miami game as well as the games against the Patriots and the 1st Packers game.. You cannot sit back all the time and constantly give the opponent chances to pick you apart on defense in close games because this is what happens more often than not when you do. He was criticized for this in San Fran as well so this isn’t news breaking stuff I’m pointing out here.



The Bears D was the best in the NFL and Fangio is the architect. There is no perfect system and no perfect coach. I believe your baseline is perfection because even given criticisms here and there of Fangio he still was the best DC this year and you want him gone. Who do you want instead? There is no playcall to produce an interception when one is needed or a sack or whatever. Some guys make plays and sometimes they don't. Calls go your way and sometimes they don't. I think your argument assumes these guys are robots where you can program out errors. You can't. The game is flawed and shit happens.

At the end if the day if your DC led the league in the most essential statistical categories then you've got it good.




1st off, I didn’t say I wanted him gone. I said this is the issue I have with him as a coordinator and it’s what I won’t miss if he does leave.


I’d be just fine with him staying and said as much in my opening post about this.


2nd -no one is above criticism, and this is my criticism of him as a play caller and has been for some time now. Your ‘perfection’ analogy here make absolutely no sense. Me being critical of something is not the same as asking for perfection. This team hangs its hat on the defense, if the defense would have come up with a pick or forced fumble we’d all be comfortable saying this is what the Bears do, this defense is ‘special’, lean on your defense to win it and so on. But that didn’t happen tonight, and it’s my opinion that it didn’t happen because Fangio did not put his defense in the best position to stop a late drive the opponent needed to win.


I also criticized Nagy’s playcalling too.


And in case everyone missed it, here it is again flat out -this is a coaching loss. It’s not on Mitch, and it’s not on Parkey. Bad play calling lost us this game. And I’ll stand by this opinion.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
good dolphin wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
Mitch is not the qb at this point of career to single handly win games for you.


And yet, there they were because of him


They lost. I'm not saying it's all on him, but you're acting as though they won. Kickers don't automatically make kicks. He put them in a position to have a chance, perhaps. But I could argue that a 12-4 3-seed playing at home shouldn't have left it up to the kicker.

Look, I want (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky to succeed as much as anyone else. On top of being the Bears QB, he seems like a genuinely good kid. And he has made progress. But I don't understand why some of you take any critique of him so personally. He still has a ways to go if he wants to live up to the expectations of a 2nd overall pick who was in the same class as Mahomes and Watson. It shouldn't be controversial to say that.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
That one touchdown was awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24551
pizza_Place: It's gone
Peoria Matt wrote:
That one touchdown was awesome.



Shit I already forgot how the Bears scored a TD tonight. Still can't remember it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13257
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
leashyourkids wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
Mitch is not the qb at this point of career to single handly win games for you.


And yet, there they were because of him


They lost. I'm not saying it's all on him, but you're acting as though they won. Kickers don't automatically make kicks. He put them in a position to have a chance, perhaps. But I could argue that a 12-4 3-seed playing at home shouldn't have left it up to the kicker.

Look, I want (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky to succeed as much as anyone else. On top of being the Bears QB, he seems like a genuinely good kid. And he has made progress. But I don't understand why some of you take any critique of him so personally. He still has a ways to go if he wants to live up to the expectations of a 2nd overall pick who was in the same class as Mahomes and Watson. It shouldn't be controversial to say that.

I love Leash’s sports thoughts. Right on the money.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:11 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Peoria Matt wrote:
That one touchdown was awesome.

And enough to win if the D dies their job.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
Mitch is not the qb at this point of career to single handly win games for you.


And yet, there they were because of him


They lost. I'm not saying it's all on him, but you're acting as though they won. Kickers don't automatically make kicks. He put them in a position to have a chance, perhaps. But I could argue that a 12-4 3-seed playing at home shouldn't have left it up to the kicker.

Look, I want (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky to succeed as much as anyone else. On top of being the Bears QB, he seems like a genuinely good kid. And he has made progress. But I don't understand why some of you take any critique of him so personally. He still has a ways to go if he wants to live up to the expectations of a 2nd overall pick who was in the same class as Mahomes and Watson. It shouldn't be controversial to say that.

I love Leash’s sports thoughts. Right on the money.


Three home teams lost this weekend

I criticize Mitch often. He played fine today

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16486
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Mr. Reason wrote:
Nardi wrote:
FrankDrebin wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
FrankDrebin wrote:
HawaiiYou wrote:
Score host is saying the kick was tipped. True?


Yep. Video showed it.


Does it show the trajectory changed?


Just getting a fingertip on it can change the speed/trajectory/rotation of the ball.

Could have helped the trajectory for all we know. Maybe it's WAY left without the two fingers.

Maybe the shocker would have put it right down the middle.


:lol:

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 5:43 pm
Posts: 2220
pizza_Place: ....
HawaiiYou wrote:
If that ball goes thru and the Bears win nobody is talking about the offense or defense or special teams mistakes.

True. It was actually a pretty heroic game before that bullshit.

_________________
I like thinking big. . . If you're going to be thinking anything, you might as well think big.
-Donald J. Trump, BPE
FavreFan wrote:
I apologize to The Hawk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Mr. Reason wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
I don't know if CH is attractive or not.

I’m going to go with unattractive. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

All I know is, if the D steps up and stops the Eagle on the the last TD, Parkey is not a factor.

Callahan and Jackson being out made all the difference on D. Burton being out on O was also big.

That little fuck Parkey should have won the game.

Agreed.

All 3 phases had a chance to win it. Offense goes 3 and out. Defense allows TD, special teams cant kick a FG.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Nas wrote:
Complaining about (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is dumb. The guy had a touchdown drive in the 4tg quarter to put the Bears in the lead. Then he got the Bears in FG range after getting the ball with 50 seconds left. That's what you want your quarterback to do in the 4th quarter of a playoff game. Nagy, the defense or (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky aren't responsible for this loss. This is 100% on Parkey.

You can blame Parkey for the loss and still point out how Nagy and the offense could have been way better.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
leashyourkids wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Yards ain’t shit. I’m cherry picking stats. I’m all ears to hear your side of the argument that leads with something other than “I think”


Not sure who you're talking to, but the number 2 overall pick, with nearly two full seasons under his belt, must play better at home against a defense that you said all week sucked and a team that was supposedly afraid to come to Chicago. If the Eagles D was really that bad, the Bears should have put up 30 at home. They were also gifted a couple missed interceptions, including one that was thrown right to the Philly safety.


No, the story all week was how important playoff experience is and how it would be the deciding factor in the game. If this was mitch without experience I anxiously await the rest of his career


Oh, come on. People don't automatically get better with "playoff experience." Football is the same game in the playoffs as it is in the regular season.

I will agree that QB's need experience in general, but Mitch is at the end of his second year. He has had his moments, but he played poorly today. As peeps said, I'm not sure how someone could have watched the game and thought he played particularly well. I'm rooting for the guy, obviously, but he needed to play better today.

Nagy handcuffed him with terrible over simplified play calling for 3 quarters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
At least we don't have to hear about 'Club Dub' today. Consolation prize.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41377
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
What about the oriental kicker from Notre Dame?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
NME wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
NME wrote:


I’m not holding Fangio to an impossible standard at all. I’m asking for the coach to do what is necessary during a game to put his players in the best position to succeed. Not swapping Mack around more (when we saw him move Mack around all year) when Mack was clearly struggling against Peters, and not attacking an immobile QB up the middle to force him to move around more (for example) on key drives is not doing those things.


He did this in the Miami game as well as the games against the Patriots and the 1st Packers game.. You cannot sit back all the time and constantly give the opponent chances to pick you apart on defense in close games because this is what happens more often than not when you do. He was criticized for this in San Fran as well so this isn’t news breaking stuff I’m pointing out here.



The Bears D was the best in the NFL and Fangio is the architect. There is no perfect system and no perfect coach. I believe your baseline is perfection because even given criticisms here and there of Fangio he still was the best DC this year and you want him gone. Who do you want instead? There is no playcall to produce an interception when one is needed or a sack or whatever. Some guys make plays and sometimes they don't. Calls go your way and sometimes they don't. I think your argument assumes these guys are robots where you can program out errors. You can't. The game is flawed and shit happens.

At the end if the day if your DC led the league in the most essential statistical categories then you've got it good.




1st off, I didn’t say I wanted him gone. I said this is the issue I have with him as a coordinator and it’s what I won’t miss if he does leave.


I’d be just fine with him staying and said as much in my opening post about this.


2nd -no one is above criticism, and this is my criticism of him as a play caller and has been for some time now. Your ‘perfection’ analogy here make absolutely no sense. Me being critical of something is not the same as asking for perfection. This team hangs its hat on the defense, if the defense would have come up with a pick or forced fumble we’d all be comfortable saying this is what the Bears do, this defense is ‘special’, lean on your defense to win it and so on. But that didn’t happen tonight, and it’s my opinion that it didn’t happen because Fangio did not put his defense in the best position to stop a late drive the opponent needed to win.


I also criticized Nagy’s playcalling too.


And in case everyone missed it, here it is again flat out -this is a coaching loss. It’s not on Mitch, and it’s not on Parkey. Bad play calling lost us this game. And I’ll stand by this opinion.


I still think you're absolving the defense for responsibility over their own actions and instead transferring that responsibility to Fangio. There are a number of blitzes and prevent style coverages Fangio called late in the game that didn't produce sacks or INTs. Is that on Fangio? Khalil Mack was totally neutralized by that offense line. Is that on Fangio? Fangio can call whatever he want. There's no call in his playbook however that makes the Philly o line less talented.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
rogers park bryan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Yards ain’t shit. I’m cherry picking stats. I’m all ears to hear your side of the argument that leads with something other than “I think”


Not sure who you're talking to, but the number 2 overall pick, with nearly two full seasons under his belt, must play better at home against a defense that you said all week sucked and a team that was supposedly afraid to come to Chicago. If the Eagles D was really that bad, the Bears should have put up 30 at home. They were also gifted a couple missed interceptions, including one that was thrown right to the Philly safety.


No, the story all week was how important playoff experience is and how it would be the deciding factor in the game. If this was mitch without experience I anxiously await the rest of his career


Oh, come on. People don't automatically get better with "playoff experience." Football is the same game in the playoffs as it is in the regular season.

I will agree that QB's need experience in general, but Mitch is at the end of his second year. He has had his moments, but he played poorly today. As peeps said, I'm not sure how someone could have watched the game and thought he played particularly well. I'm rooting for the guy, obviously, but he needed to play better today.

Nagy handcuffed him with terrible over simplified play calling for 3 quarters.


I'm very skeptical of fans critiquing playcalling. To an extent, I think it can be valid, especially run/pass ratio. But we have no idea what the progressions on some of those passes are or if (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky has options on the play call at the line or any number of things. Maybe the playcalling was the same as always but (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was being tentative and checking down or locking onto one guy. Additionally, playcalling critiques by fans tend to be contradictory. People yesterday were bitching that Nagy wasn't being aggressive while simultaneously bitching that they weren't running enough.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
veganfan21 wrote:
I still think you're absolving the defense for responsibility over their own actions and instead transferring that responsibility to Fangio. There are a number of blitzes and prevent style coverages Fangio called late in the game that didn't produce sacks or INTs. Is that on Fangio? Khalil Mack was totally neutralized by that offense line. Is that on Fangio? Fangio can call whatever he want. There's no call in his playbook however that makes the Philly o line less talented.


They held the opposition to 16 points. That should be an automatic win. The offense did not do enough. Period. End of Story.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 835 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 24, 25, 26, 27, 28  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group