It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 2:32 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 260 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2019 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
IMU wrote:
I don't. I've always been against the PG being a team's top scoring option...or best deep threat. Besides, Beverly certainly isn't a butcher outside...he shoots about 40% from 3 his last 4 seasons.

The Bulls have 3P shooting covered. They need defense and smart, talented guards.

Lonzo is a perfect fit.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 22, 2019 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Rubio

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 1:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57226
Read on Twitter a thing saying that the Bulls and Rockets were talking about a Chris Paul for Markk/Dunn deal

They definitely need to address PG, but I would hope Markk would not be traded. I am pretty much good with anyone else going

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Yeah I hope that was bullshit. They would be a disaster of a trade :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 02, 2019 9:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
Yeah I hope that was bullshit. They would be a disaster of a trade :lol:


Sounds like something the Bulls would do.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 03, 2019 8:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Yeah I hope that was bullshit. They would be a disaster of a trade :lol:


Sounds like something the Bulls would do.


Trading for Paul would be the new version of signing Rondo and Wade to be the new faces of a youth movement.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 09, 2019 4:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
I assume the Bulls will sign Isaiah Thomas. Sounds like something they would do.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza


I wouldn't be opposed to this.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
That works.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13328
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Terry's Peeps wrote:


I wouldn't be opposed to this.


So the Bulls lose the #7 pick and Zach Lavine in return for #4 and Lonzo. I wouldn't mind it.

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Don't like that trade at all. Moving up from 7 to 4 in what's widely seen as a 2-3 player draft isn't very desirable, and I'm even less crazy about the idea of Ball on this team when it involves losing the most productive offensive player.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
ZephMarshack wrote:
Don't like that trade at all. Moving up from 7 to 4 in what's widely seen as a 2-3 player draft isn't very desirable, and I'm even less crazy about the idea of Ball on this team when it involves losing the most productive offensive player.

I think Garland vs whoever would be there at 7 is a pretty significant upgrade.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13328
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
FavreFan wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Don't like that trade at all. Moving up from 7 to 4 in what's widely seen as a 2-3 player draft isn't very desirable, and I'm even less crazy about the idea of Ball on this team when it involves losing the most productive offensive player.

I think Garland vs whoever would be there at 7 is a pretty significant upgrade.


So they get Garland; what do you do with Lonzo.

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
FrankDrebin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Don't like that trade at all. Moving up from 7 to 4 in what's widely seen as a 2-3 player draft isn't very desirable, and I'm even less crazy about the idea of Ball on this team when it involves losing the most productive offensive player.

I think Garland vs whoever would be there at 7 is a pretty significant upgrade.


So they get Garland; what do you do with Lonzo.

Play him next to Garland. They have pretty different skill sets that should be able to work together.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
FavreFan wrote:
ZephMarshack wrote:
Don't like that trade at all. Moving up from 7 to 4 in what's widely seen as a 2-3 player draft isn't very desirable, and I'm even less crazy about the idea of Ball on this team when it involves losing the most productive offensive player.

I think Garland vs whoever would be there at 7 is a pretty significant upgrade.

I don't really get how much of an upgrade he necessarily is, especially if you're landing your PG of the future in Ball anyway. I guess maybe you could try to play them together to make up for the newly created hole at the 2, but I'd have wanted to see a lot more from Garland before I'd attempt that experiment. And I'm not sure why one would prefer that to just trading for Ball straight up and running him with LaVine instead.

Setting aside Ball, I also don't think the gap between Garland and White or whoever at 7 is anywhere near as big as the one between Morant and Garland.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Only time will tell I suppose. I think Garland is closer to Morant than he is to White as a prospect.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Garland seems like he would be a good grab, but I'm not as sure on how well Ball and Garland can get on together, nor do I care about Solomon Hill. And I don't even like Lavine.

How many two PG lineups have worked in NBA history? You seem to hear about "oh these two guys will be able to play each other" but when did it actually play well?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13328
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
IMU wrote:
Garland seems like he would be a good grab, but I'm not as sure on how well Ball and Garland can get on together, nor do I care about Solomon Hill. And I don't even like Lavine.

How many two PG lineups have worked in NBA history? You seem to hear about "oh these two guys will be able to play each other" but when did it actually play well?


I remember the Sixers with Iverson and Eric Snow.

Lonzo would be the facilitator and primary defender of the best guard. Garland would be your scorer.

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
IMU wrote:
Garland seems like he would be a good grab, but I'm not as sure on how well Ball and Garland can get on together, nor do I care about Solomon Hill. And I don't even like Lavine.

How many two PG lineups have worked in NBA history? You seem to hear about "oh these two guys will be able to play each other" but when did it actually play well?

Chris Paul and James Harden almost beat GS last year. Then Paul got hurt.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
FavreFan wrote:
IMU wrote:
Garland seems like he would be a good grab, but I'm not as sure on how well Ball and Garland can get on together, nor do I care about Solomon Hill. And I don't even like Lavine.

How many two PG lineups have worked in NBA history? You seem to hear about "oh these two guys will be able to play each other" but when did it actually play well?

Chris Paul and James Harden almost beat GS last year. Then Paul got hurt.

Warriors didn't have Iggy, and Chris Paul wants out of Houston now.

Not exactly a long, successful partnership with Harden.

And Harden is hardly a PG.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
IMU wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
IMU wrote:
Garland seems like he would be a good grab, but I'm not as sure on how well Ball and Garland can get on together, nor do I care about Solomon Hill. And I don't even like Lavine.

How many two PG lineups have worked in NBA history? You seem to hear about "oh these two guys will be able to play each other" but when did it actually play well?

Chris Paul and James Harden almost beat GS last year. Then Paul got hurt.

Warriors didn't have Iggy, and Chris Paul wants out of Houston now.

Not exactly a long, successful partnership with Harden.

And Harden is hardly a PG.

Harden is clearly a PG.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
FrankDrebin wrote:
IMU wrote:
Garland seems like he would be a good grab, but I'm not as sure on how well Ball and Garland can get on together, nor do I care about Solomon Hill. And I don't even like Lavine.

How many two PG lineups have worked in NBA history? You seem to hear about "oh these two guys will be able to play each other" but when did it actually play well?


I remember the Sixers with Iverson and Eric Snow.

Lonzo would be the facilitator and primary defender of the best guard. Garland would be your scorer.



Snow sucked.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
You could trade #7 pick to Lakers for ball, they'd take it. I don't want that buster Ball on the Bulls.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
FavreFan wrote:
IMU wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
IMU wrote:
Garland seems like he would be a good grab, but I'm not as sure on how well Ball and Garland can get on together, nor do I care about Solomon Hill. And I don't even like Lavine.

How many two PG lineups have worked in NBA history? You seem to hear about "oh these two guys will be able to play each other" but when did it actually play well?

Chris Paul and James Harden almost beat GS last year. Then Paul got hurt.

Warriors didn't have Iggy, and Chris Paul wants out of Houston now.

Not exactly a long, successful partnership with Harden.

And Harden is hardly a PG.

Harden is clearly a PG.

I say he is a SG if we're labeling him one of the 5 traditional positions. 80+% of his career minutes have him sharing the floor with either Westbrook, Lin, Beverly or Paul.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
IMU wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
IMU wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
IMU wrote:
Garland seems like he would be a good grab, but I'm not as sure on how well Ball and Garland can get on together, nor do I care about Solomon Hill. And I don't even like Lavine.

How many two PG lineups have worked in NBA history? You seem to hear about "oh these two guys will be able to play each other" but when did it actually play well?

Chris Paul and James Harden almost beat GS last year. Then Paul got hurt.

Warriors didn't have Iggy, and Chris Paul wants out of Houston now.

Not exactly a long, successful partnership with Harden.

And Harden is hardly a PG.

Harden is clearly a PG.

I say he is a SG if we're labeling him one of the 5 traditional positions. 80+% of his career minutes have him sharing the floor with either Westbrook, Lin, Beverly or Paul.

What does a PG do that Harden doesn't do over the past 3 years? Nothing? Exactly. He is a PG. Arguing otherwise is just wanting to argue semantics rather than the actual point.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 6:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57226
I would be happy with that trade as well.

Lonzo and the 4.

Hope it happens

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 7:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:49 pm
Posts: 4492
pizza_Place: Rosati's
LaVine would be the best asset in that whole deal. Why don’t the Bulls get Davis themselves?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 7:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Ron Wolfley wrote:
LaVine would be the best asset in that whole deal. Why don’t the Bulls get Davis themselves?

I’d rather have Garland on his rookie contract than lavine for $20 million a year.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 7:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
ZephMarshack wrote:
Don't like that trade at all. Moving up from 7 to 4 in what's widely seen as a 2-3 player draft isn't very desirable, and I'm even less crazy about the idea of Ball on this team when it involves losing the most productive offensive player.



Agreed, if the Bulls want to move Lavine..they can. Moving from 7-4 means dick this year.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
IMU wrote:

And Harden is hardly a PG.


:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 260 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 9  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group