It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 11:46 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 158 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
NME wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
NME wrote:
Well, one things for sure -the Packers aren’t on the list. At least not on anyone’s list that uses logic to make choices in life rather than emotion.

Logic says Packers, Vikings, and Bears are all similar heading in to the season. Emotional Bears fans think everything that happened last year is gonna happen again this year.




^Bases opinions on emotion combined with a strong lack of functional football knowledge rather than logic.


The day I start hanging out on a Wisconsin based radio station forum in a thread dedicated to the Packers responding to every post made about my team is the day you can claim I’m the one emotionaly responding to things lmao


But that’s not where we are, and that’s not what’s happening here.

I've been posting here for over 12 years. Most people don't care. It's always fun when a few like you though get all sensitive about it.

I don't think you wanna compare functional football knowledge buddy. I've seen your thoughts.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 2:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
They are. But whatever.

It's a completely different team than last year. If you're gonna troll at least get some actual material.


The Bears have improved offensively. They have RBs that fit their system, more experience with the system, better health and an improved quarterback.

Defensively, they have some questions in their secondary and a new coach, but they also have all pro talent at every level.

The Bears are objectively a better football team. Most experts are basing their Packers predictions on Rodgers being healthy and playing like he did 3 years ago.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 2:25 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
The Bears also had questions in their secondary going into last season.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
FF, you predicting a week one win against Chicago?

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
They are. But whatever.

It's a completely different team than last year. If you're gonna troll at least get some actual material.


The Bears have improved offensively. They have RBs that fit their system, more experience with the system, better health and an improved quarterback.

Defensively, they have some questions in their secondary and a new coach, but they also have all pro talent at every level.

The Bears are objectively a better football team. Most experts are basing their Packers predictions on Rodgers being healthy and playing like he did 3 years ago.

You have no idea if they have an improved QB and better health on offense yet.

There's no "objective" reason to think they are a better football team. They lost their DC and Amos, replaced them with subpar options, and put an unproven rookie and career backup in to replace Howard. Also, judging by historical trends, their defense is likely to create significantly less turnovers this season and they are likely to have more starters land on the injured list than last season.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
FF, you predicting a week one win against Chicago?

Not sure yet. Bears -3 sounds about right.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 2:34 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
My guess is its like last year- GB wins @Lambeau, Bears win @Soldiers

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 4:06 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
They are. But whatever.

It's a completely different team than last year. If you're gonna troll at least get some actual material.


The Bears have improved offensively. They have RBs that fit their system, more experience with the system, better health and an improved quarterback.

Defensively, they have some questions in their secondary and a new coach, but they also have all pro talent at every level.

The Bears are objectively a better football team. Most experts are basing their Packers predictions on Rodgers being healthy and playing like he did 3 years ago.

You have no idea if they have an improved QB and better health on offense yet.

There's no "objective" reason to think they are a better football team. They lost their DC and Amos, replaced them with subpar options, and put an unproven rookie and career backup in to replace Howard. Also, judging by historical trends, their defense is likely to create significantly less turnovers this season and they are likely to have more starters land on the injured list than last season.


(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was a better QB at the end of the season than he was at the start. That's indisputable.

The defense dealt with plenty of injuries to key players last year and the offense did as well. Amos is more than replaceable and our all pro safety will likely improve as will our stud rookie linebacker.

Look forward to a 3rd straight losing season.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:

The defense dealt with plenty of injuries to key players last year and the offense did as well.

Wrong!

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat- ... ost-part-i

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 4:14 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:

The defense dealt with plenty of injuries to key players last year and the offense did as well.

Wrong!

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat- ... ost-part-i


That link means nothing beyond the players who were questionable and even then it may mean very little because of the way teams report injuries. For example the Patriots are always working the system to gain an edge.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 4:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:

The defense dealt with plenty of injuries to key players last year and the offense did as well.

Wrong!

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat- ... ost-part-i


That link means nothing beyond the players who were questionable and even then it may mean very little because of the way teams report injuries. For example the Patriots are always working the system to gain an edge.

No it means the Bears had a lot of injury luck and are very likely to regress in that department.

Let’s setup some appointments, I’m willing to tutor you on this stuff for a fee.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 4:23 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:

The defense dealt with plenty of injuries to key players last year and the offense did as well.

Wrong!

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat- ... ost-part-i


That link means nothing beyond the players who were questionable and even then it may mean very little because of the way teams report injuries. For example the Patriots are always working the system to gain an edge.

No it means the Bears had a lot of injury luck and are very likely to regress in that department.

Let’s setup some appointments, I’m willing to tutor you on this stuff for a fee.


It doesn't mean that. It doesn't show the players listed doubtful or out. It essentially shows that the Bears didn't really game the system by designating players "questionable" when they weren't. They ranked near the middle of the league for players who were designated questionable and played.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 4:31 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
The Bears had all pro and important players miss games. The Packers had washed up players or role players miss time.

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... juries.htm

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... juries.htm

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 4:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Poor Nas. Dabbling in alternative facts now.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5091
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
FavreFan wrote:
NME wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
NME wrote:
Well, one things for sure -the Packers aren’t on the list. At least not on anyone’s list that uses logic to make choices in life rather than emotion.

Logic says Packers, Vikings, and Bears are all similar heading in to the season. Emotional Bears fans think everything that happened last year is gonna happen again this year.




^Bases opinions on emotion combined with a strong lack of functional football knowledge rather than logic.


The day I start hanging out on a Wisconsin based radio station forum in a thread dedicated to the Packers responding to every post made about my team is the day you can claim I’m the one emotionaly responding to things lmao


But that’s not where we are, and that’s not what’s happening here.

I've been posting here for over 12 years. Most people don't care. It's always fun when a few like you though get all sensitive about it.

I don't think you wanna compare functional football knowledge buddy. I've seen your thoughts.




You mean like when you said ‘Leonard Floyd is already a great player’? Or more recently when you said Amos was one of the best safety’s in the NFL..?


No, we can’t compare football thoughts between us. Mine aren’t ridiculous brain aneurysms produced by emotionaly charged reactions to win arguments on the internet like yours.


I don’t mind that you post here, on the contrary, I’m just pointing out that my posts are placed in the appropriate section in accordance to my fandom. While yours, well..

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Yeah like when you said Floyd was a bust and when I said he was a good player and when I was proven right?

Humorous that you’re doubling down on being wrong on Amos also :lol:

You were also against the Nagy hire :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5091
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Frank Coztansa wrote:
My guess is its like last year- GB wins @Lambeau, Bears win @Soldiers





Sweep. Bust out the broom my friend. I think we split with the Queens this year tho.. I think they’re the real 2nd best team in the division and have a bounce back year.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 5:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5091
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
FavreFan wrote:
Yeah like when you said Floyd was a bust and when I said he was a good player and when I was proven right?

Humorous that you’re doubling down on being wrong on Amos also :lol:

You were also against the Nagy hire :lol:




I don’t recall being against the Nagy hire. Skeptical and putting the jury out maybe, but that’s not the same.


Similar to my concerns with Pagano as the new D coordinator. I don’t dislike the hire at all, but I’m skeptical due to his only success coming from a defense he did not build and develop.


Now if I were reacting emotionally, like you, I’d have much different reactions to these things.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Im not even ready to say Floyd is good. He'll be 27 by week one.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 5:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
NME wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Yeah like when you said Floyd was a bust and when I said he was a good player and when I was proven right?

Humorous that you’re doubling down on being wrong on Amos also :lol:

You were also against the Nagy hire :lol:




I don’t recall being against the Nagy hire. Skeptical and putting the jury out maybe, but that’s not the same.


Similar to my concerns with Pagano as the new D coordinator. I don’t dislike the hire at all, but I’m skeptical due to his only success coming from a defense he did not build and develop.


Now if I were reacting emotionally, like you, I’d have much different reactions to these things.

Interesting that you’re denying facts now. I guess that was always the logical outcome for you in this thread considering how you started.

Keep referring to the Vikings as Queens though. Very logical and not all emotional :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 5:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
Im not even ready to say Floyd is good. He'll be 27 by week one.

Correct. He will be a good 27 year old by week 1.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 5:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
I hope you're right, I'm just not there yet.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5091
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
FavreFan wrote:
NME wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Yeah like when you said Floyd was a bust and when I said he was a good player and when I was proven right?

Humorous that you’re doubling down on being wrong on Amos also :lol:

You were also against the Nagy hire :lol:




I don’t recall being against the Nagy hire. Skeptical and putting the jury out maybe, but that’s not the same.


Similar to my concerns with Pagano as the new D coordinator. I don’t dislike the hire at all, but I’m skeptical due to his only success coming from a defense he did not build and develop.


Now if I were reacting emotionally, like you, I’d have much different reactions to these things.

Interesting that you’re denying facts now. I guess that was always the logical outcome for you in this thread considering how you started.

Keep referring to the Vikings as Queens though. Very logical and not all emotional :lol:




You don’t know what ‘facts’ are either. I’m not surprised.


I’d tell you to ‘be better’, but you can’t. This is it -this is the fiber of your fabrics.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 6:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
NME wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
NME wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Yeah like when you said Floyd was a bust and when I said he was a good player and when I was proven right?

Humorous that you’re doubling down on being wrong on Amos also :lol:

You were also against the Nagy hire :lol:




I don’t recall being against the Nagy hire. Skeptical and putting the jury out maybe, but that’s not the same.


Similar to my concerns with Pagano as the new D coordinator. I don’t dislike the hire at all, but I’m skeptical due to his only success coming from a defense he did not build and develop.


Now if I were reacting emotionally, like you, I’d have much different reactions to these things.

Interesting that you’re denying facts now. I guess that was always the logical outcome for you in this thread considering how you started.

Keep referring to the Vikings as Queens though. Very logical and not all emotional :lol:




You don’t know what ‘facts’ are either. I’m not surprised.


I’d tell you to ‘be better’, but you can’t. This is it -this is the fiber of your fabrics.

It’s a fact you were against the hire and now it’s a fact you are denying it. Very sad.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 6:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5091
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
312player wrote:
Im not even ready to say Floyd is good. He'll be 27 by week one.




What he is today or tomorrow is irrelevant to what FF said that I’m calling out -2 seasons ago he said Floyd was ‘already great’.


Now either FF doesn’t understand what the word great signifies, or he has a very different definition of the word than the rest of us.


I think he’s ok, good enough to start. His speed/quickness gives him very good blitz potential but that hasn’t panned out yet.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 6:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5091
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
FavreFan wrote:
NME wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
NME wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Yeah like when you said Floyd was a bust and when I said he was a good player and when I was proven right?

Humorous that you’re doubling down on being wrong on Amos also :lol:

You were also against the Nagy hire :lol:




I don’t recall being against the Nagy hire. Skeptical and putting the jury out maybe, but that’s not the same.


Similar to my concerns with Pagano as the new D coordinator. I don’t dislike the hire at all, but I’m skeptical due to his only success coming from a defense he did not build and develop.


Now if I were reacting emotionally, like you, I’d have much different reactions to these things.

Interesting that you’re denying facts now. I guess that was always the logical outcome for you in this thread considering how you started.

Keep referring to the Vikings as Queens though. Very logical and not all emotional :lol:




You don’t know what ‘facts’ are either. I’m not surprised.


I’d tell you to ‘be better’, but you can’t. This is it -this is the fiber of your fabrics.

It’s a fact you were against the hire and now it’s a fact you are denying it. Very sad.




It’s a fact you called Floyd ‘great’ two seasons ago, and a fact you called Amos ‘one of the best safety’s in the league’ during the off-season.


Neither of those things are factual.


It’s also a fact you react emotionally in these discussions rather than logically.


Keep trying.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5091
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
You’re also wrong about me calling Floyd a bust. I corrected you last year on this too when I quoted the post and thread in question -I said it was too early at that time to call him a bust, you were arguing with others about him being a bust and called him ‘already a great player’ -that’s when I started in on you.


And that remains a terrible football thought on your end for that time. Which is a fact.


Let us know how many more examples of ‘facts’ you need in case there’s still confusion on your end. Happy to help.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 6:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
NME wrote:
312player wrote:
Im not even ready to say Floyd is good. He'll be 27 by week one.




What he is today or tomorrow is irrelevant to what FF said that I’m calling out -2 seasons ago he said Floyd was ‘already great’.


Now either FF doesn’t understand what the word great signifies, or he has a very different definition of the word than the rest of us.


I think he’s ok, good enough to start. His speed/quickness gives him very good blitz potential but that hasn’t panned out yet.

You said he was a bust. I said he was a good player. One of us was right. The other one is you.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 6:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
NME wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
NME wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
NME wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Yeah like when you said Floyd was a bust and when I said he was a good player and when I was proven right?

Humorous that you’re doubling down on being wrong on Amos also :lol:

You were also against the Nagy hire :lol:




I don’t recall being against the Nagy hire. Skeptical and putting the jury out maybe, but that’s not the same.


Similar to my concerns with Pagano as the new D coordinator. I don’t dislike the hire at all, but I’m skeptical due to his only success coming from a defense he did not build and develop.


Now if I were reacting emotionally, like you, I’d have much different reactions to these things.

Interesting that you’re denying facts now. I guess that was always the logical outcome for you in this thread considering how you started.

Keep referring to the Vikings as Queens though. Very logical and not all emotional :lol:




You don’t know what ‘facts’ are either. I’m not surprised.


I’d tell you to ‘be better’, but you can’t. This is it -this is the fiber of your fabrics.

It’s a fact you were against the hire and now it’s a fact you are denying it. Very sad.




It’s a fact you called Floyd ‘great’ two seasons ago, and a fact you called Amos ‘one of the best safety’s in the league’ during the off-season.


Neither of those things are factual.


It’s also a fact you react emotionally in these discussions rather than logically.


Keep trying.

Amos is one of the best safeties in the league. You’ll notice that this year with Haha in his place, even despite your lack of functional football knowledge.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2019 6:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
NME wrote:
You’re also wrong about me calling Floyd a bust. I corrected you last year on this too when I quoted the post and thread in question -I said it was too early at that time to call him a bust, you were arguing with others about him being a bust and called him ‘already a great player’ -that’s when I started in on you.


And that remains a terrible football thought on your end for that time. Which is a fact.


Let us know how many more examples of ‘facts’ you need in case there’s still confusion on your end. Happy to help.

More lies. Sad.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 158 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group