It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 12:54 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 102 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky did not have 20 piss poor plays last night. He was better than the first two games. Now, he couldn't have been much worse but he was better last night. It was not an MVP type performance, but he was still better. I'm not worried about what he did or didn't do last season. Continuing to improve this season is what I want out of Mitch.

There was some plays Mitch looked pretty bad on last night, however, some of those were due to the swiss cheese Oline he had in front of him. I don't care if you have Aaron Rodgers or Tom Brady behind an Oline like that, they will look quite and at times as well.


Dak Prescott has nearly identical production against the Redskins and is hailed for his efforts


Only by Skip Bayless and deluded Dallas residents. Everyone else knows he's been on a bum of the week tour to this point.


Sure, but us objective Chicago residents skewer Mitch


Fixed

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky did not have 20 piss poor plays last night. He was better than the first two games. Now, he couldn't have been much worse but he was better last night. It was not an MVP type performance, but he was still better. I'm not worried about what he did or didn't do last season. Continuing to improve this season is what I want out of Mitch.

There was some plays Mitch looked pretty bad on last night, however, some of those were due to the swiss cheese Oline he had in front of him. I don't care if you have Aaron Rodgers or Tom Brady behind an Oline like that, they will look quite and at times as well.


Dak Prescott has nearly identical production against the Redskins and is hailed for his efforts


Only by Skip Bayless and deluded Dallas residents. Everyone else knows he's been on a bum of the week tour to this point.


Sure, but us objective Chicago residents skewer Mitch


Fixed

:lol:

I like to bash Mitch as much as anyone but you aren't objective about him. You'd rather have Eli! That's insane. Your Mitch Derangement Syndrome is out of control.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:46 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He's not Mahomes. He never will be. Mahomes, barring injury, is on the path to maybe being one of the best quarterbacks of all time.


Fine, but he's not even close to being as good as Watson at this point. That's the killer.
They were virtually the same last season.

This year, the difference is that Watson has had two good games whereas (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky has had one.

I think Watson will prove to be better than (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over the long term but the gap right now isn't that big.


Watson was better in every statistical category during a season in which he was coming off a major knee injury. Maybe (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky will get lucky and Watson will hurt his knee again. That seems like the only way he can catch up to Watson.

But of course, Watson is just the tip of the iceberg here. It looks like Mitch will soon be overtaken by a bunch of other young QBs before settling into "journeyman" territory.

With that said, it must be acknowledged that Nagy has apparently engaged in a form of coaching malpractice. He seems to have badly misunderstood Mitch's development and has not been able to implement a clean, efficient offense. Nagy has regressed as a coach, and that may be the cause of some, if not all, of Mitch's problems.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Eli is a veteran QB who can lead a team down the field consistently. As far as I know he doesn't stare down receivers each play and he knows how to read a defense. That's all. If Mitch can do those things consistently then I'd be fine with him.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
Eli is a veteran QB who can lead a team down the field consistently. As far as I know he doesn't stare down receivers each play and he knows how to read a defense. That's all. If Mitch can do those things consistently then I'd be fine with him.

Are you still living in 2011?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Eli is a veteran QB who can lead a team down the field consistently. As far as I know he doesn't stare down receivers each play and he knows how to read a defense. That's all. If Mitch can do those things consistently then I'd be fine with him.

Are you still living in 2011?


So I said "can" deliberately. With proper weapons I still think Eli can be effective. He would have scored more points than Mitch did against the Eagles in the playoffs.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Eli is a veteran QB who can lead a team down the field consistently. As far as I know he doesn't stare down receivers each play and he knows how to read a defense. That's all. If Mitch can do those things consistently then I'd be fine with him.

Are you still living in 2011?


So I said "can" deliberately. With proper weapons I still think Eli can be effective. He would have scored more points than Mitch did against the Eagles in the playoffs.

:lol: :lol:

None of that is true. The gap between Mitch and Eli right now is probably the same as the gap between Mitch and Aaron Rodgers. Eli probably isn't one of the best 50 QB's in the league currently. This guy has been absolutely atrocious for 6 years now.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Eli had Odell Beckham, Saquon Barkley, and Evan Engram last year and was absolutely dogshit. But oh, if he only had the proper weapons!! :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 9:59 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
veganfan21 wrote:
Eli is a veteran QB who can lead a team down the field consistently.
I'm no NFL expert, but I think its quite difficult to engineer a scoring drive from the 20 yard line when you're riding the pine.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Misleading. Sacked 47 times last year due to offensive line issues and OBJ didn't play all games. I think the TE was injured too.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:01 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
veganfan21 wrote:
Misleading. Sacked 47 times last year due to offensive line issues and OBJ didn't play all games. I think the TE was injured too.
If Eli is good as you say he is, shouldn't he have been able to overcome these issues to consistently lead his team down the field?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:03 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Mitch is a bumslayer, nothing more. And he didn't even fill that niche particularly well last night. The Bears should've put up 50 against that defense.
They were up by 25 points at halftime. The offense put 21 points on the board in the second quarter. They played soft on offense and defense most of the second half. The goal is to win the game, not run up the score like college. They did exactly what they needed to do in order to win the game last night after such a tremendous first half.


Do you think Mitch looked good for most of the first half?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Misleading. Sacked 47 times last year due to offensive line issues and OBJ didn't play all games. I think the TE was injured too.
If Eli is good as you say he is, shouldn't he have been able to overcome these issues to consistently lead his team down the field?


Not with a weak line. I'm not saying he's great. Im saying he's better than Mitch. Low bar.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:12 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
At one time, Eli was better than Mitch. Presently, Mitch is the better option 100% of the time.

Tall Midget wrote:
Do you think Mitch looked good for most of the first half?
Yeah, he looked alright. As I said earlier, it was not an MVP type game from him, but it was a QB performance you can definitely win with. There were a few bad plays/throws here and there, but only the most elite top 2 or 3 QBs in the league go a game without throwing a duck here and there.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
I would say he looked better in second quarter than first. I also have a hard time giving him a completely fair total grade because all those penalties were so distracting and drive altering.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Misleading. Sacked 47 times last year due to offensive line issues and OBJ didn't play all games. I think the TE was injured too.
If Eli is good as you say he is, shouldn't he have been able to overcome these issues to consistently lead his team down the field?


Not with a weak line. I'm not saying he's great. Im saying he's better than Mitch. Low bar.

It’s a little late now but seriously, watch a non Bears game once in awhile. Most of those sacks were on Eli holding on to it too long and he was consistently worse than Mitch at throwing the ball down field, something people criticize Mitch for not being able to do well. He was a lot better throwing downfield than Eli and he didn’t have Odell Beckham.

I’d like you to make the case Eli is better than mitch. All you really say is he can read defenses. Great. So can Andy Reid and I don’t think Andy Reid is a better QB than Mitch right now.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:20 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
That is true, Mike. He had some bad plays in the first quarter.

The penalties are a fucking killer. Nagy needs to clean that BS up right away. In three games the Bears have had a 1st & 40, a 2nd & 29, and an offsides on an extra point. Inexcusable.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41379
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Tall Midget wrote:
Mitch is a bumslayer, nothing more. And he didn't even fill that niche particularly well last night. The Bears should've put up 50 against that defense.

By your logic Carson Wentz and Dak Prescott are bum slayers too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10795
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
JFC.....it was the Washington Redskins.

Mitch is Kirk Cousins at best....translation...a bumslayer. Plenty of evidence to support there's nothing to get excited about.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 11:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
I think that making Mitch stay in the pocket is a mistake by Nagy. He needs to move him around and allow his receivers some time to shake the defender. I like (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky's mobility but with this offensive line, particularly the tackles, he is very limited in the passes that he has time to throw.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 11:20 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Defenses are keeping Mitch in the pocket this season.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38636
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
The Hawk wrote:
I think that making Mitch stay in the pocket is a mistake by Nagy. He needs to move him around and allow his receivers some time to shake the defender. I like (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky's mobility but with this offensive line, particularly the tackles, he is very limited in the passes that he has time to throw.


He was definitely at his best when they were moving the pocket for him last night.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
How Long Can the Bears Defense Carry Mitchell (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky?

The Chicago Bears survived Monday night in Washington, just as they did last Sunday in Denver. They're winning ugly, thanks almost entirely to a defense that stumped the Green Bay Packers in a Week 1 loss, shut down the Broncos in Week 2 and then had a takeaway party against the Redskins in Week 3.

Is it sustainable?

Eventually, the Bears will have to become more consistent on offense. And eventually, they'll have to get a hell of a lot more from third-year franchise quarterback Mitchell (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

The Bears did at least generate 31 points against the Redskins after scoring just one touchdown in the first two weeks of the season, but seven of those points came on a pick-six, and 17 more came off Washington turnovers. That included a touchdown drive in which they totaled just four yards of offense after recovering a fumble in the red zone.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky didn't have an awful Monday Night Football performance, but the league's third-lowest-rated passer entering the evening was babied by head coach Matt Nagy. He finished 25-of-31, but 24 of those completions traveled fewer than 15 yards in the air. He completed a beautiful deep touchdown throw to Taylor Gabriel in the second quarter, but that was his only deep completion and one of just three deep attempts.

It's become obvious Nagy lacks trust in (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, who was relegated to dinks and dunks against a vulnerable, winless opponent. Prior to Monday's game, (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was averaging a league-low 4.8 yards per attempt, and now he's in the second-to-last spot at 5.6 (ahead of only Josh Rosen).



The problem is the Bears don't get to play the dumpster-fire Redskins every week. And as stacked as they are on defense, nobody can consistently force five turnovers. The D bailed out a still-not-right offense by intercepting three Case Keenum passes and forcing a pair of Keenum fumbles, and yet the Redskins still made this a game in the fourth quarter.

Against a playoff-caliber team, this might have been a loss for Chicago.

In fact, it marked the second consecutive week in which the Bears had to sweat despite owning a double-digit fourth-quarter lead.

The defense was lights-out early against Denver, but then Chicago couldn't sustain drives on offense, and the Broncos won the time-of-possession battle and ran 19 more plays than the Bears. The Chicago D was gassed in the fourth quarter as a result, and Denver marched down the field on two scoring drives to take a late lead.

The Washington experience was similar, with the Bears holding the Redskins to just 90 yards, 3.2 yards per play and one third-down conversion in a dominant first half before cooling off down the stretch. Khalil Mack, Danny Trevathan, Leonard Floyd and the Chicago defensive front were all over Keenum early, but Washington adjusted.


Patrick Semansky/Associated Press
That's typical. It's tough for any unit to play that well for four quarters in this league, especially when fatigue sets in. The Redskins ran 42 second-half plays compared to just 25 for the Bears, and that partly explained why Washington had a shot with the ball in the red zone in a two-score game midway through the fourth quarter. It looked destined to find the end zone for a third consecutive time before a baffling Keenum fumble essentially iced the game.

It shouldn't have come down to that, and it wouldn't have if (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky hadn't thrown a dreadful interception at the goal line late in the third quarter, just as the Redskins were ready to cry uncle.



And again, the Bears won't have the good fortune of facing Keenum every week.

Next week, they draw the Minnesota Vikings, who have been nearly flawless on both sides of the ball in two of their three games. Unless Minnesota fails to show up, that's not a winnable contest for Chicago with the version of (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky we've watched this month.

And it won't get any easier. After a Week 6 bye, it's the New Orleans Saints, Los Angeles Chargers, Philadelphia Eagles, Detroit Lions and Los Angeles Rams. In December, it's the Dallas Cowboys, Packers, Kansas City Chiefs and Vikings.

Those teams are a lot less likely to give (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky touchdown looks like this:




The Bears defense was special in 2018, and it looks just as strong this year. That alone might be enough for Chicago to remain competitive, but it likely won't be enough for the Bears to make a championship run.

This is too much of an offense-favoring, passing-oriented game. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is going to have to make plays, and said plays can't be as rare as they've been thus far in 2019. Chicago's schedule is too strong for that, as is the NFC North.

The Bears aren't just looking to survive. It's clear that in Year 2 of the Nagy era, the goal is to thrive. And though they're off to a 2-1 start, this formula won't get it done come winter.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/285 ... l-trubisky

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
veganfan21 wrote:
How Long Can the Bears Defense Carry Mitchell (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky?

GB is asking the same thing about Aaron Rodgers right now.

R-E-L-A-X

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
veganfan21 wrote:
The Chicago Bears survived Monday night in Washington,


Huh?

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:09 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Tall Midget wrote:
Mitch is a bumslayer, nothing more. And he didn't even fill that niche particularly well last night. The Bears should've put up 50 against that defense.


This is complete bullshit. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky had 6 mediocre to AWFUL games last year. Of those 6 games, a total of 4 came against teams who didn't make the playoffs.

The first Lions game was huge. The Bears were 5-3 and fighting for the division lead. He destroyed the Bucs when pretty much no one except me predicted a Bears victory. He carved up the Packers defense when they and a healthy Aaron Rodgers were still fighting for a playoff spot. He played well against the Vikings on the road when they needed a win to make the playoffs. He also played well against the Eagles in the playoffs. Especially in the 2nd half. He had a decent game against the Seahawks too. By the numbers he had 9 good to great games last year and 6 of those games came against teams who were great or fighting for the division lead or a playoff spot at the time.


https://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/30 ... eason=2018

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:29 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Tall Midget wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He's not Mahomes. He never will be. Mahomes, barring injury, is on the path to maybe being one of the best quarterbacks of all time.


Fine, but he's not even close to being as good as Watson at this point. That's the killer.


Last year Watson played 16 games with DeAndre Hopkins and had 26 touchdowns and 9 interceptions. DeAndre Hopkins is no worse than the 2nd best WR in the NFL. Watson had 26 touchdowns and 9 interceptions and completed 345 passes. Of those 345 passes completed 115 went to Hopkins. Of the 26 touchdowns he threw 11 of them went to Hopkins. That's a 1/3 of his completions and nearly half his touchdowns that were thrown to Hopkins. He's nothing without Hopkins.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky played in only 14 games and had 24 touchdowns and 12 in 14. His best receiver is literally a game who is no better than the 5th best WR in his division. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky didn't have an amazing crutch like Hopkins so he was forced to spread the ball around. He had 4 players with 50+ receptions and 3 players with 5 or more touchdowns.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky also outplayed Watson in the playoffs despite going up against a superior defense. Pump the brakes on Watson.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Defenses are keeping Mitch in the pocket this season.


They studied the Rams game this offseason and Nagy didn't. Nagy has struggled making the adjustment. He appeared to make some attempts last game.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He's not Mahomes. He never will be. Mahomes, barring injury, is on the path to maybe being one of the best quarterbacks of all time.


Fine, but he's not even close to being as good as Watson at this point. That's the killer.


Last year Watson played 16 games with DeAndre Hopkins and had 26 touchdowns and 9 interceptions. DeAndre Hopkins is no worse than the 2nd best WR in the NFL. Watson had 26 touchdowns and 9 interceptions and completed 345 passes. Of those 345 passes completed 115 went to Hopkins. Of the 26 touchdowns he threw 11 of them went to Hopkins. That's a 1/3 of his completions and nearly half his touchdowns that were thrown to Hopkins. He's nothing without Hopkins.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky played in only 14 games and had 24 touchdowns and 12 in 14. His best receiver is literally a game who is no better than the 5th best WR in his division. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky didn't have an amazing crutch like Hopkins so he was forced to spread the ball around. He had 4 players with 50+ receptions and 3 players with 5 or more touchdowns.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky also outplayed Watson in the playoffs despite going up against a superior defense. Pump the brakes on Watson.

:lol:

Those are quite the mental gymnastics. Watson has scored almost twice as many TDs as Mitch has since they came in to the league. He has a better a QB rating. He has a better completion percentage. He averages more yards per attempt. He has a better winning percentage. He’s outperformed Mitch in every way you can outperform a peer.

Saying Mitch isn’t as good as Watson isn’t an opinion. It’s an irrefutable fact at this point.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 24, 2019 7:46 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He's not Mahomes. He never will be. Mahomes, barring injury, is on the path to maybe being one of the best quarterbacks of all time.


Fine, but he's not even close to being as good as Watson at this point. That's the killer.


Last year Watson played 16 games with DeAndre Hopkins and had 26 touchdowns and 9 interceptions. DeAndre Hopkins is no worse than the 2nd best WR in the NFL. Watson had 26 touchdowns and 9 interceptions and completed 345 passes. Of those 345 passes completed 115 went to Hopkins. Of the 26 touchdowns he threw 11 of them went to Hopkins. That's a 1/3 of his completions and nearly half his touchdowns that were thrown to Hopkins. He's nothing without Hopkins.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky played in only 14 games and had 24 touchdowns and 12 in 14. His best receiver is literally a game who is no better than the 5th best WR in his division. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky didn't have an amazing crutch like Hopkins so he was forced to spread the ball around. He had 4 players with 50+ receptions and 3 players with 5 or more touchdowns.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky also outplayed Watson in the playoffs despite going up against a superior defense. Pump the brakes on Watson.

:lol:

Those are quite the mental gymnastics. Watson has scored almost twice as many TDs as Mitch has since they came in to the league. He has a better a QB rating. He has a better completion percentage. He averages more yards per attempt. He has a better winning percentage. He’s outperformed Mitch in every way you can outperform a peer.

Saying Mitch isn’t as good as Watson isn’t an opinion. It’s an irrefutable fact at this point.


I'm focusing on last year when (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky wasn't getting plays from Dowell Loggains. There is nothing you can dispute about my post. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky also won more games than Watson without playing a full season and playing in a better division. Watson has an unbelievable crutch and his numbers were only slightly better than (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky's even though he played 16 games.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 102 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Reared on the Score, Sneakers O'Toole and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group