It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 11:52 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
KDdidit wrote:
Concern trolling, that's some quality posting.

I enjoy the strategy. Pace is in a really tough spot. The defense is historically good so far. Does he let pride get in the way?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41379
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Remember when Kirkwood used to be funny?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:21 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
good dolphin wrote:
I think Mitch hate has gone off the rails. He was developing nicely as last year progressed. The first two looks at him this year just happened to be the buzzsaw that is the Packers d and a traditionally tough situation in Denver's home opener.

He played well against the Redskins. I expect to see him continue to get better and be a better than competent QB.

Whatever you thought of him coming into this year is the esteem you should hold him in now.


Go take a look at that Redskins game again. While (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky completed a high percentage of his passes during that contest, he wasn't hitting receivers in stride most of the time, even on easy short routes. His inaccuracy combined with his reading comprehension deficiencies make him an albatross the Bears cannot afford to carry during what may be a very small Superbowl window.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57249
Caller Bob wrote:
Remember when Kirkwood used to be funny?

No

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41379
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
RFDC wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Remember when Kirkwood used to be funny?

No

Yeah, me neither.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
billypootons wrote:
a poorly informed and developed take devolves in to even more dumb tangents


don't hesitate to enlighten the masses here.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
I don't think we need to target a great QB at this moment, we need to target a better QB. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is playing like a journeyman QB, in fact that's probably his future, so I disagree with the way you frame (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky as if he's self-evidently better than any journeyman QB.
Who would you have gotten last year that was a clear upgrade over (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky? You would have had to pay him more money and maybe lose some picks.

I mean, of course we would rather have Mahomes or Tom Brady but the reality is they drafted (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, he made good progress from year 1 to year 2, and the other options were seemingly trading or signing Flacco or Case Keenum.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
It seems to me that the overwhelming progress (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky made in year two was wrapped up in the Tampa Bay game.

He remains exactly what TM described him as imo.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I don't think we need to target a great QB at this moment, we need to target a better QB. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is playing like a journeyman QB, in fact that's probably his future, so I disagree with the way you frame (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky as if he's self-evidently better than any journeyman QB.
Who would you have gotten last year that was a clear upgrade over (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky? You would have had to pay him more money and maybe lose some picks.

I mean, of course we would rather have Mahomes or Tom Brady but the reality is they drafted (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, he made good progress from year 1 to year 2, and the other options were seemingly trading or signing Flacco or Case Keenum.



Teddy B

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 11:00 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
312player wrote:
Teddy B
Who was re-upped by the Saints even before the draft, so he wasn't a real option either.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
312player wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I don't think we need to target a great QB at this moment, we need to target a better QB. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is playing like a journeyman QB, in fact that's probably his future, so I disagree with the way you frame (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky as if he's self-evidently better than any journeyman QB.
Who would you have gotten last year that was a clear upgrade over (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky? You would have had to pay him more money and maybe lose some picks.

I mean, of course we would rather have Mahomes or Tom Brady but the reality is they drafted (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, he made good progress from year 1 to year 2, and the other options were seemingly trading or signing Flacco or Case Keenum.



Teddy B
That was a far bigger risk than (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, and pretty expensive for a backup quarterback. Would you rather have Clinton-Dix and Patterson or Teddy B? That would have been about the same price.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
312player wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I don't think we need to target a great QB at this moment, we need to target a better QB. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is playing like a journeyman QB, in fact that's probably his future, so I disagree with the way you frame (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky as if he's self-evidently better than any journeyman QB.
Who would you have gotten last year that was a clear upgrade over (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky? You would have had to pay him more money and maybe lose some picks.

I mean, of course we would rather have Mahomes or Tom Brady but the reality is they drafted (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, he made good progress from year 1 to year 2, and the other options were seemingly trading or signing Flacco or Case Keenum.



Teddy B
That was a far bigger risk than (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, and pretty expensive for a backup quarterback. Would you rather have Clinton-Dix and Patterson or Teddy B? That would have been about the same price.



Id be losing Daniel salary for 5.5 million, TB would come here over Nola.. He knew he could take Mitch job easily.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 4:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
312player wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
312player wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I don't think we need to target a great QB at this moment, we need to target a better QB. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is playing like a journeyman QB, in fact that's probably his future, so I disagree with the way you frame (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky as if he's self-evidently better than any journeyman QB.
Who would you have gotten last year that was a clear upgrade over (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky? You would have had to pay him more money and maybe lose some picks.

I mean, of course we would rather have Mahomes or Tom Brady but the reality is they drafted (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, he made good progress from year 1 to year 2, and the other options were seemingly trading or signing Flacco or Case Keenum.



Teddy B
That was a far bigger risk than (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, and pretty expensive for a backup quarterback. Would you rather have Clinton-Dix and Patterson or Teddy B? That would have been about the same price.



Id be losing Daniel salary for 5.5 million, TB would come here over Nola.. He knew he could take Mitch job easily.

That is true

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Pace has no plan B.. He's so sure that Mitch is the answer he's got blinders on.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 5:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:19 pm
Posts: 980
Regular Reader wrote:
It seems to me that the overwhelming progress (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky made in year two was wrapped up in the Tampa Bay game.

He remains exactly what TM described him as imo.


He was absolutely average last year aside from in the two minute/hurry scenarios where he was significantly better than average, bordering on elite. The Tampa game remains the sole outlier to the 2+ seasons of stats we have on him. And Tampa just about quit that game. Total mental collapse.

In a system that requires some serious mental chops before the snap and in the pocket afterwards, you absolutely worry about the fit of a guy who appears to play better when he stops thinking and just makes plays while mostly on move.

Pace mostly filled the glaring roster holes. Next draft might still be a stretch but after that it is time for him to start drafting a QB every year, like he said he would.

_________________
"Mattress technology has come a long way"

- Dan Bernstein, 2016


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4085
pizza_Place: Lino's
Almost have to draft a developmental QB every couple of years. Luck early retirement is likely a harbinger of the NFL's future, especially now that more is know about CTE, making it important to always have a developing QB prospect on your roster.


Last edited by Clawmaster on Wed Oct 02, 2019 7:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 6:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
The plan to draft a QB every year was a good one. Unfortunately they haven't followed through with it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 02, 2019 6:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Terry's Peeps wrote:
The plan to draft a QB every year was a good one. Unfortunately they haven't followed through with it.

Well Pace has used three picks on the quarterback position so we have that going for us.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 03, 2019 6:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4085
pizza_Place: Lino's
Like the LSU QB, but no way he slips into second round. Plenty of college teams running similar systems, draft pick may understand offense better than Mitch on day one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 03, 2019 6:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
I actually think the decision has been mostly made to give up on Mitch unless he comes back and looks like something we've only seen brief glimpses of or the Bears make a run and win it all. The hit from the fifth year option is massive and he's clearly not worth extending. Nagy very clearly has had enough of him but the rest of the team is so good they've arranged to publicly put faith in (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky just to keep from rocking the boat.

Foles, Carr and Rivers will all be available this off-season either by trade or FA. The Bears will get one of them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 03, 2019 6:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I don't think we need to target a great QB at this moment, we need to target a better QB. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is playing like a journeyman QB, in fact that's probably his future, so I disagree with the way you frame (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky as if he's self-evidently better than any journeyman QB.
Who would you have gotten last year that was a clear upgrade over (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky? You would have had to pay him more money and maybe lose some picks.

I mean, of course we would rather have Mahomes or Tom Brady but the reality is they drafted (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, he made good progress from year 1 to year 2, and the other options were seemingly trading or signing Flacco or Case Keenum.


My take now is more about the front office's view on (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. If they still think he's worth waiting on then theyve condemned the franchise to 5-7 years of mediocrity despite an all-world defense. This guy is not worth wasting that defense.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 03, 2019 8:24 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
312player wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
312player wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Who would you have gotten last year that was a clear upgrade over (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky? You would have had to pay him more money and maybe lose some picks.
I mean, of course we would rather have Mahomes or Tom Brady but the reality is they drafted (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, he made good progress from year 1 to year 2, and the other options were seemingly trading or signing Flacco or Case Keenum.
Teddy B
That was a far bigger risk than (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, and pretty expensive for a backup quarterback. Would you rather have Clinton-Dix and Patterson or Teddy B? That would have been about the same price.



Id be losing Daniel salary for 5.5 million, TB would come here over Nola.. He knew he could take Mitch job easily.

That is true
Daniels was signed to a two year deal, so even if you "lost" his $5.5 mil salary, you would still have the cap hit which would have effected the ability to sign Dix and Patterson. I will state again that Bridgewater was signed by the Saints in March, well before the draft even. With what the Bears did at QB last season, why would you go after another QB in March?

The Bears getting Bridgewater was a fantasy the way things were lined out. It was never going to happen. That doesn't mean I think it would have been a bad move, but there was just no possible way it could have happened unless Daniels retired or something crazy like that.

Now, Bridgewater is on a one year deal with the Saints so if her performs well in the absence of Brees, and the Bears decide to target him this offseason and open things up for him and Mitch for a QB Competition in training camp, I would say that is a smart thing to do. The only fly in the ointment there would be that Daniels gets 3-4 starts and just sets the stat sheet on fire and slings the ball all over the place.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 03, 2019 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The only fly in the ointment there would be that Daniels gets 3-4 starts and just sets the stat sheet on fire and slings the ball all over the place.

:lol: I don't think you have to worry about that

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 03, 2019 8:58 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Probably not, but few thought Josh McGowan was capable of doing what he did.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 03, 2019 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10795
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Antarctica wrote:
I actually think the decision has been mostly made to give up on Mitch unless he comes back and looks like something we've only seen brief glimpses of or the Bears make a run and win it all. The hit from the fifth year option is massive and he's clearly not worth extending. Nagy very clearly has had enough of him but the rest of the team is so good they've arranged to publicly put faith in (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky just to keep from rocking the boat.

Foles, Carr and Rivers will all be available this off-season either by trade or FA. The Bears will get one of them.

This would be logical. The Bears have a history of not being logical.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 11:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
Antarctica wrote:
I actually think the decision has been mostly made to give up on Mitch unless he comes back and looks like something we've only seen brief glimpses of or the Bears make a run and win it all. The hit from the fifth year option is massive and he's clearly not worth extending. Nagy very clearly has had enough of him but the rest of the team is so good they've arranged to publicly put faith in (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky just to keep from rocking the boat.

Foles, Carr and Rivers will all be available this off-season either by trade or FA. The Bears will get one of them.


Lets see. You are throwing this guy outside in his 3rd year of being a quarterback and has a terrific won/loss percentage in the league. I'd say that is a pretty bad decision and it will not be made by Pace and the Bears. He's a very athletic quarterback who has played pretty well over-all. He's not Mahomes but no one in the NFL is better than Mahomes. They will keep him and continue to develop him. What they need and I have been calling for this for years is to find two good offensive tackles and a dependable tight end. Our production out of those three positions is weak and accounts for the very poor running game and spotty pass protection.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4767
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
I disagree with the premise of this thread. The more (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky keeps getting injured, the easier it will be for Pace and the organization to move on from him, because the injuries will provide him cover. They should not even be thinking about giving him another contract at this point. If Pace does give (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky a big contract, and (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky still sucks, that will get Pace fired. I think he knows that. It will be the second QB he's gotten wrong after Glennon, which was a massive error.

The (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky era may be coming to an end sooner than we think. Bears should trade for Tannehill or draft another QB. Eli wouldn't be bad, but he's old.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
I officially recant my opinion about Eli Manning.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 6:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
312player wrote:
Pace has no plan B.. He's so sure that Mitch is the answer he's got blinders on.


In this day an age in the NFL, there really is not any so-called "Plan B" for quarterbacks unless you want to spend a ton of money on the position. Can you name the teams that have a so-called "Plan B" that are contenders in the NFL? And especially contenders. With the salary cap in the NFL, teams do not really have the Luxury of keeping two quarterbacks who are high draft picks on their team.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 6:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14931
pizza_Place: Grazianos
mrgoodkat wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
It seems to me that the overwhelming progress (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky made in year two was wrapped up in the Tampa Bay game.

He remains exactly what TM described him as imo.


He was absolutely average last year aside from in the two minute/hurry scenarios where he was significantly better than average, bordering on elite. The Tampa game remains the sole outlier to the 2+ seasons of stats we have on him. And Tampa just about quit that game. Total mental collapse.

In a system that requires some serious mental chops before the snap and in the pocket afterwards, you absolutely worry about the fit of a guy who appears to play better when he stops thinking and just makes plays while mostly on move.

Pace mostly filled the glaring roster holes. Next draft might still be a stretch but after that it is time for him to start drafting a QB every year, like he said he would.


I remember Mitch (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky absolutely winning games with his arm and his legs. To listen to some on this board you'd think that he has been a disaster as quarterback. Why is that? Does anyone realistically remember how shitty the Bear's quarterbacks have been like for the last 30 years or so?

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group