It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:37 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1072 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 36  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Honestly though it is disappointing that the Bears couldn't hold up their end of the bargain on both teams being good for the first time since 2010. Just a one year wonder smh

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
If the Raiders actually do make playoffs..Furious might even become a more insufferable fuck than Favre Fan.
I actually enjoy the Packers meatballs going nuts on here like Zippy, FF, and Kirkwood because for the first time in a long time the Packers are actually really good.

:lol:

Careful Rick. We aren’t Vikings fans. I don’t think you wanna do the recent success comparison with us you tried with IMU.
The Packers have been better but this is the first year they've been really good since 2011. 2014 maybe if you think the Bears were really good last year as they had the same record.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
If the Raiders actually do make playoffs..Furious might even become a more insufferable fuck than Favre Fan.
I actually enjoy the Packers meatballs going nuts on here like Zippy, FF, and Kirkwood because for the first time in a long time the Packers are actually really good.

:lol:

Careful Rick. We aren’t Vikings fans. I don’t think you wanna do the recent success comparison with us you tried with IMU.
The Packers have been better but this is the first year they've been really good since 2011.

They made the NFCCG in 2014 and 2016 ya dope.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
:lol:

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
They made the NFCCG in 2014 and 2016 ya dope.
I'm talking about the regular season here. The Raiders are 5-4. The Packers are 8-2.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
They made the NFCCG in 2014 and 2016 ya dope.
I'm talking about the regular season here. The Raiders are 5-4. The Packers are 8-2.

Good for you. I'm just talking about good teams and saying I was hoping the Bears and Packers would finally be good at the same time again. Your replies to that have been a little nonsensical.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:28 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
FavreFan wrote:
They made the NFCCG in 2014 and 2016 ya dope.
And lost.

Not since the 1969 Cubs has any pro sports team done less with more than the Aaron Rodgers' Packers.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
They made the NFCCG in 2014 and 2016 ya dope.
And lost.

Not since the 1969 Cubs has any pro sports team done less with more than the Aaron Rodgers' Packers.

Yeah that's just dumb but I know it's really your only go-to when trying to insult the Packers. You would trade the Bears "success" for the Packers success in a second and I of course wouldn't. Because of that, that type of remark just rings hollow.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:32 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
The Bears have largely been awful since their Super Bowl appearance. That doesn't take away from the fact that Rodgers is probably going to go down as second or third best QB to ever play the game, and his only Super Bowl appearance was due to a Cutler knee injury.

Nobody has done less with more.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
They made the NFCCG in 2014 and 2016 ya dope.
I'm talking about the regular season here. The Raiders are 5-4. The Packers are 8-2.

Good for you. I'm just talking about good teams and saying I was hoping the Bears and Packers would finally be good at the same time again. Your replies to that have been a little nonsensical.

I'm not sure what you are talking about but you replied directly to my comment and then talked about the Bears and Packers being good at the same time again AFTER that.

I guess it is nonsensical if you aren't reading the direct quotes provided in my responses.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13340
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
They made the NFCCG in 2014 and 2016 ya dope.
And lost.

Not since the 1969 Cubs has any pro sports team done less with more than the Aaron Rodgers' Packers.

Yeah that's just dumb but I know it's really your only go-to when trying to insult the Packers. You would trade the Bears "success" for the Packers success in a second and I of course wouldn't. Because of that, that type of remark just rings hollow.


I hate the Packers and, to a lesser extent, FF but Rodgers has won a Super Bowl. Comparing the Packers under him to the '69 Cubs is just silly.

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:37 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
It's not. The Packers have had the best or second best QB in the game taking nearly every snap for them over the past 13 years. Rodgers has played in as many Super Bowls as Rex Grossman has. Poster child for underachievement.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
They made the NFCCG in 2014 and 2016 ya dope.
I'm talking about the regular season here. The Raiders are 5-4. The Packers are 8-2.

Good for you. I'm just talking about good teams and saying I was hoping the Bears and Packers would finally be good at the same time again. Your replies to that have been a little nonsensical.

I'm not sure what you are talking about but you replied directly to my comment and then talked about the Bears and Packers being good at the same time again AFTER that.

I guess it is nonsensical if you aren't reading the direct quotes provided in my responses.

I said I wanted the Bears and Packers to be good at the same time and it was disappointing they weren't because Chicago couldn't hold up their end. You responded nonsensically by saying the Packers haven't been really good (you modified the qualifier to really to help your point) in a long time, and after you were proven incorrect you responded nonsensically about only talking about regular season, which nobody had specified up to that point.

Hope that helps.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
FrankDrebin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
They made the NFCCG in 2014 and 2016 ya dope.
And lost.

Not since the 1969 Cubs has any pro sports team done less with more than the Aaron Rodgers' Packers.

Yeah that's just dumb but I know it's really your only go-to when trying to insult the Packers. You would trade the Bears "success" for the Packers success in a second and I of course wouldn't. Because of that, that type of remark just rings hollow.


I hate the Packers and, to a lesser extent, FF but Rodgers has won a Super Bowl. Comparing the Packers under him to the '69 Cubs is just silly.

This guy gets it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The Bears have largely been awful since their Super Bowl appearance. That doesn't take away from the fact that Rodgers is probably going to go down as second or third best QB to ever play the game, and his only Super Bowl appearance was due to a Cutler knee injury.

Nobody has done less with more.

Rodgers has won a Super Bowl. It's really hard to win a Super Bowl, as evidenced by your team not having won one since you were still in diapers. There's nothing you can say that will get me to think "Ah shit, it really sucks I've only seen the Packers win TWO Super Bowls by the time I was 25".

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:52 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Why bring up Farve's Super Bowl? That has nothing to do with Rodger's career achievement of playing in one Super Bowl.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
They made the NFCCG in 2014 and 2016 ya dope.
I'm talking about the regular season here. The Raiders are 5-4. The Packers are 8-2.

Good for you. I'm just talking about good teams and saying I was hoping the Bears and Packers would finally be good at the same time again. Your replies to that have been a little nonsensical.

I'm not sure what you are talking about but you replied directly to my comment and then talked about the Bears and Packers being good at the same time again AFTER that.

I guess it is nonsensical if you aren't reading the direct quotes provided in my responses.

I said I wanted the Bears and Packers to be good at the same time and it was disappointing they weren't because Chicago couldn't hold up their end. You responded nonsensically by saying the Packers haven't been really good (you modified the qualifier to really to help your point) in a long time, and after you were proven incorrect you responded nonsensically about only talking about regular season, which nobody had specified up to that point.

Hope that helps.
All my responses included the exact quote I was responding to. However, for the bolded content.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
If the Raiders actually do make playoffs..Furious might even become a more insufferable fuck than Favre Fan.
I actually enjoy the Packers meatballs going nuts on here like Zippy, FF, and Kirkwood because for the first time in a long time the Packers are actually really good.

The Raiders are basically the same as 15 other NFL teams that aren't that good but they aren't that bad so they get to be in a playoff hunt.

I was talking about the Packers this year so that means the regular season. The Packers this year are clearly better than 2014 and 2016.

But ultimately, the point is the 5-4 Raiders aren't worth bragging about.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Why bring up Farve's Super Bowl? That has nothing to do with Rodger's career achievement of playing in one Super Bowl.

It goes to show how ridiculous your argument is. You sound as arrogant as a Pats fan but you’re a Bears fan. You’re trying to argue Rodgers should have had more success when he’s already absolutely owned your team throughout his career :lol:

And Favre owned you guys as well.

You should take Frank Drebin’s advice. He’s trying to help you.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 1:59 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Why bring up Farve's Super Bowl? That has nothing to do with Rodger's career achievement of playing in one Super Bowl.

It goes to show how ridiculous your argument is. You sound as arrogant as a Pats fan but you’re a Bears fan. You’re trying to argue Rodgers should have had more success when he’s already absolutely owned your team throughout his career :lol:

And Favre owned you guys as well.

You should take Frank Drebin’s advice. He’s trying to help you.
I'm not arguing Rodgers should have more success. I'm saying he definitely should have more January and February success.

Outside of last season, beating the Bears is not something that has been hard to do for the better part of the last 5-6 seasons.

You keep spinning this around to try and bash the Bears. I know my team hasn't won in forever. They were the NFC Browns for like 4 years before Nagy took over. I'm not talking about regular season. It's hard to make and win a Super Bowl for sure. Its a hellava lot easier when you have the second best QB ever taking snaps.

In this day and age where passing is everything and QBs can barely get touched, nobody has done less with a HOF career than the Packers with Aaron Rodgers. Nobody.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82221
FrankDrebin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
They made the NFCCG in 2014 and 2016 ya dope.
And lost.

Not since the 1969 Cubs has any pro sports team done less with more than the Aaron Rodgers' Packers.

Yeah that's just dumb but I know it's really your only go-to when trying to insult the Packers. You would trade the Bears "success" for the Packers success in a second and I of course wouldn't. Because of that, that type of remark just rings hollow.


I hate the Packers and, to a lesser extent, FF but Rodgers has won a Super Bowl. Comparing the Packers under him to the '69 Cubs is just silly.


I hate FF and, to a lesser extent, his parents and I also hate the Packers

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Why bring up Farve's Super Bowl? That has nothing to do with Rodger's career achievement of playing in one Super Bowl.

It goes to show how ridiculous your argument is. You sound as arrogant as a Pats fan but you’re a Bears fan. You’re trying to argue Rodgers should have had more success when he’s already absolutely owned your team throughout his career :lol:

And Favre owned you guys as well.

You should take Frank Drebin’s advice. He’s trying to help you.
I'm not arguing Rodgers should have more success. I'm saying he definitely should have more January and February success.

Outside of last season, beating the Bears is not something that has been hard to do for the better part of the last 5-6 seasons.

You keep spinning this around to try and bash the Bears. I know my team hasn't won in forever. They were the NFC Browns for like 4 years before Nagy took over. I'm not talking about regular season. It's hard to make and win a Super Bowl for sure. Its a hellava lot easier when you have the second best QB ever taking snaps.

In this day and age where passing is everything and QBs can barely get touched, nobody has done less with a HOF career than the Packers with Aaron Rodgers. Nobody.

That's just wrong. Look at Drew Brees. You're either trolling poorly or Brady and the Pats have completely clouded your ability to view the NFL. You're not supposed to win 3-4 Super Bowls even with a HOF QB. It very rarely happens. Rodgers has one. Favre has one. Marino has zero. Brees has one. Steve Young has one. Peyton only had one up until his last season when he was worse than Trent Dilfer and got carried to one by Denver's defense. Elway had 0 when he was Rodgers current age.

Are you starting to get it now?

And Rodgers isn't done yet.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:08 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Rodgers > Brees. And Brees isn't done yet.

Peyton Manning played in four Super Bowls.
Jim Kelly played in four consecutive Super Bowls
Steve Young has three Super Bowl rings because he was the backup to perhaps the great post season QB ever.
John Elway played in five Super Bowls.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
In this day and age where passing is everything and QBs can barely get touched, nobody has done less with a HOF career than the Packers with Aaron Rodgers. Nobody.
This guy here gets it.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
So you aren't starting to get it. Oh well, I tried and FrankDrebin your fellow Bear fan tried. Some folks just want to stay stuck on stupid.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:11 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I'm sorry you don't hold the GOATs to a higher standard.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I'm sorry you don't hold the GOATs to a higher standard.

I don't consider Rodgers the GOAT and haven't since like 2011. I also think a lot of people would disagree with you that he's clearly superior to Brees all time. They're both two of the greatest ever and instant first ballot HOFers. But you don't want to believe that because it destroys your narrative.

Also, just a pro-tip, if you have to quote your own post and say "This guy gets it", you probably don't get it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19044
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Frank Coztansa wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Why bring up Farve's Super Bowl? That has nothing to do with Rodger's career achievement of playing in one Super Bowl.

It goes to show how ridiculous your argument is. You sound as arrogant as a Pats fan but you’re a Bears fan. You’re trying to argue Rodgers should have had more success when he’s already absolutely owned your team throughout his career :lol:

And Favre owned you guys as well.

You should take Frank Drebin’s advice. He’s trying to help you.
I'm not arguing Rodgers should have more success. I'm saying he definitely should have more January and February success.

Outside of last season, beating the Bears is not something that has been hard to do for the better part of the last 5-6 seasons.

You keep spinning this around to try and bash the Bears. I know my team hasn't won in forever. They were the NFC Browns for like 4 years before Nagy took over. I'm not talking about regular season. It's hard to make and win a Super Bowl for sure. Its a hellava lot easier when you have the second best QB ever taking snaps.

In this day and age where passing is everything and QBs can barely get touched, nobody has done less with a HOF career than the Packers with Aaron Rodgers. Nobody.


Pretty sure the Packers would be a Jeff Fischer-esque 7 and 9 for the past decade but for Rodgers.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19044
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I'm sorry you don't hold the GOATs to a higher standard.

I don't consider Rodgers the GOAT and haven't since like 2011. I also think a lot of people would disagree with you that he's clearly superior to Brees all time. They're both two of the greatest ever and instant first ballot HOFers. But you don't want to believe that because it destroys your narrative.

Also, just a pro-tip, if you have to quote your own post and say "This guy gets it", you probably don't get it.


Brees should be more successful than Rodgers considering the tools Brees had to work with over the same span.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:21 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Nah, you're the guy who isn't getting it FF. But its my fault for even taking it this far. I posted stats yesterday that showed Dix was better than Amos and you literally said, "Dix is worse."

So we'll just leave it as you don't get it.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nah, you're the guy who isn't getting it FF. But its my fault for even taking it this far. I posted stats yesterday that showed Dix was better than Amos and you literally said, "Dix is worse."

So we'll just leave it as you don't get it.

Now SS is telling you that you are wrong. How many people other than myself will it take?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Khalil Mack Thread
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2019 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
SpiralStairs wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I'm sorry you don't hold the GOATs to a higher standard.

I don't consider Rodgers the GOAT and haven't since like 2011. I also think a lot of people would disagree with you that he's clearly superior to Brees all time. They're both two of the greatest ever and instant first ballot HOFers. But you don't want to believe that because it destroys your narrative.

Also, just a pro-tip, if you have to quote your own post and say "This guy gets it", you probably don't get it.


Brees should be more successful than Rodgers considering the tools Brees had to work with over the same span.

Maybe. Brees has gotten fucked pretty badly the last two years in the Playoffs. Rodgers really only has the Bostick botched onside kick thing that was on par with those two losses.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1072 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 36  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: badrogue17 and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group