It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:42 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 184 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
wdelaney72 wrote:
He may very well end up being a serviceable NFL QB, but a 2nd overall draft pick....no. Bust.

We just have different definitions of bust. It's the same reason I can't call Leonard Floyd a bust. If you end up starting in the NFL for a decade you're not a bust, regardless of draft position. IMO busts are guys who don't make it to second contract and are out of the league at like 26.
Was Tony Mandarich a bust? 2nd overall pick with 7 years in the league.

Is four years a decade?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
FavreFan wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
wdelaney72 wrote:
He may very well end up being a serviceable NFL QB, but a 2nd overall draft pick....no. Bust.

We just have different definitions of bust. It's the same reason I can't call Leonard Floyd a bust. If you end up starting in the NFL for a decade you're not a bust, regardless of draft position. IMO busts are guys who don't make it to second contract and are out of the league at like 26.
Was Tony Mandarich a bust? 2nd overall pick with 7 years in the league.

Is four years a decade?
7 years. Not a decade but a second contract and over 26 which you also specified.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
NME wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
I’m perfectly content with Pagano. The D is still 3rd in the NFL in PPG. Despite all the injuries they’re giving up a measly .5 PPG more than last year. That’s with last year the Bears being 3rd in ToP and this year 16th. Sure, lack of turnovers forced by the D is a factor, but by the same token, when the D scores they go right back on the field.




ToP is a misleading stat for this defense tho -they caused a lot more turnovers last year which helped get them off the field and lower the time they spent on it. I believe they caused more 3 and outs last year too.


Some of their time on the field is their fault.


There is nothing supporting any of your thoughts in this thread except flimsy assumptions easily disproven by stats. The Bears
so far lead the league in three and outs this season on offense. The defense is on the field a lot this year because (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and the offense suck. Try again.

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats ... tsoff/2019

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
They're also seventh worst in third down conversion, sandwiched between a team that is purposely trying to lose (Miami) and a team without a professional QB (Pitt).

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/t ... ersion-pct

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
I meant to say he ( Floyd) shouldn't be starting now.

Maybe he can play safety, he won't be playing at 215 lbs on any team as a starter on the front 7.

Every team in the league game plans to avoid Mack.. Floyd is in the best possible situation imaginable..he sucks.



My question to you all is..

1. How confident do you believe Pace is in Mitch as a long term franchise QB?

2. How confident I Nagy as a long term franchise QB for Mitch?

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82221
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
And he will not be a starter for a decade in this league..

Wrong.


My guess is that if Floyd hit FA next year he would end up getting a nice, multiyear contract and be a starter. He's not great but he is starter level quality.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82221
312player wrote:
I meant to say he ( Floyd) shouldn't be starting now.

Maybe he can play safety, he won't be playing at 215 lbs on any team as a starter on the front 7.

Every team in the league game plans to avoid Mack.. Floyd is in the best possible situation imaginable..he sucks.



My question to you all is..

1. How confident do you believe Pace is in Mitch as a long term franchise QB?

2. How confident I Nagy as a long term franchise QB for Mitch?


I think he was miscast as a pass rusher by the Bear fandom from the very beginning. He didn't have huge sack numbers at Georgia. Instead, he was a guy that was sometimes sent to rush but often dropped into coverage. He was exactly how Fangio used him. I thought he had a good 2018.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82221
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
wdelaney72 wrote:
He may very well end up being a serviceable NFL QB, but a 2nd overall draft pick....no. Bust.

We just have different definitions of bust. It's the same reason I can't call Leonard Floyd a bust. If you end up starting in the NFL for a decade you're not a bust, regardless of draft position. IMO busts are guys who don't make it to second contract and are out of the league at like 26.
Was Tony Mandarich a bust? 2nd overall pick with 7 years in the league.

Is four years a decade?
7 years. Not a decade but a second contract and over 26 which you also specified.


7 years and he sat out a couple in the middle of his career.

He had a reclaimation after the Packers so I would say not a bust.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23837
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
NME wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
I’m perfectly content with Pagano. The D is still 3rd in the NFL in PPG. Despite all the injuries they’re giving up a measly .5 PPG more than last year. That’s with last year the Bears being 3rd in ToP and this year 16th. Sure, lack of turnovers forced by the D is a factor, but by the same token, when the D scores they go right back on the field.




ToP is a misleading stat for this defense tho -they caused a lot more turnovers last year which helped get them off the field and lower the time they spent on it. I believe they caused more 3 and outs last year too.


Some of their time on the field is their fault.


I specifically mentioned turnovers with ToP and that 6 times last year a turnover resulted in the defense going right back on the field because they scored off them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
good dolphin wrote:
312player wrote:
I meant to say he ( Floyd) shouldn't be starting now.

Maybe he can play safety, he won't be playing at 215 lbs on any team as a starter on the front 7.

Every team in the league game plans to avoid Mack.. Floyd is in the best possible situation imaginable..he sucks.



My question to you all is..

1. How confident do you believe Pace is in Mitch as a long term franchise QB?

2. How confident I Nagy as a long term franchise QB for Mitch?


I think he was miscast as a pass rusher by the Bear fandom from the very beginning. He didn't have huge sack numbers at Georgia. Instead, he was a guy that was sometimes sent to rush but often dropped into coverage. He was exactly how Fangio used him. I thought he had a good 2018.
He was cast as a pass rusher by Bears management. From Rich Campbell's Trib article following the draft...

The Bears targeted Floyd for his pass-rushing burst off the edge and 33-inch arms. Their homework convinced them the Buccaneers or Giants, who picked 10th, were high on him. So Pace gave up the Bears' first-round pick and the first of their two fourth-round picks (No. 106 overall) to get their man.
In addition to Floyd's pass-rush prowess, Pace said he believes Floyd will answer questions about his ability to win against power in the run game.
Getting stronger should help Floyd against the run, one of his biggest question marks.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
And he will not be a starter for a decade in this league..

Wrong.


My guess is that if Floyd hit FA next year he would end up getting a nice, multiyear contract and be a starter. He's not great but he is starter level quality.

Of course he would.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:50 pm
Posts: 6284
pizza_Place: PizzaHut
Bears yards per play: 3rd worst. Boom!

https://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/yards-per-play


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
And he will not be a starter for a decade in this league..

Wrong.


My guess is that if Floyd hit FA next year he would end up getting a nice, multiyear contract and be a starter. He's not great but he is starter level quality.

Of course he would.



You still haven't admitted that Lonzo sucks, I'm gonna hold you to that.. and you will admit Floyd and Lauri are bums too by next January.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
I am prettty sure FF said lonzo sucks

312 dont you have something to say about Fox? :D

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 3:58 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
312 always knew who would be great. Always knew who would be bad. He always had everything right, according to him.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 6:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
RFDC wrote:
I am prettty sure FF said lonzo sucks

312 dont you have something to say about Fox? :D



I'm pretty sure he hasn't.. as far as Fox goes..he's a beast, he's hurt.. he'll be back and pick up where he left off..kicking ass.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 6:32 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Frank Coztansa wrote:
312 always knew who would be great. Always knew who would be bad. He always had everything right, according to him.


Then we view his old posts and see that isn't exactly true.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 7:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312 is correct. I still don’t think Lonzo sucks. But the evidence that he does is getting harder to dismiss admittedly.

Although to be clear I never hyped him up much. Just said I think he can be a solid player. And 312 still won’t admit he’s a good defensive player even though that evidence is equally clear so far.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I am prettty sure FF said lonzo sucks

312 dont you have something to say about Fox? :D



I'm pretty sure he hasn't.. as far as Fox goes..he's a beast, he's hurt.. he'll be back and pick up where he left off..kicking ass.

Fox sucked this year when healthy

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
veganfan21 wrote:
NME wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
I’m perfectly content with Pagano. The D is still 3rd in the NFL in PPG. Despite all the injuries they’re giving up a measly .5 PPG more than last year. That’s with last year the Bears being 3rd in ToP and this year 16th. Sure, lack of turnovers forced by the D is a factor, but by the same token, when the D scores they go right back on the field.




ToP is a misleading stat for this defense tho -they caused a lot more turnovers last year which helped get them off the field and lower the time they spent on it. I believe they caused more 3 and outs last year too.


Some of their time on the field is their fault.


There is nothing supporting any of your thoughts in this thread except flimsy assumptions easily disproven by stats. The Bears
so far lead the league in three and outs this season on offense. The defense is on the field a lot this year because (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and the offense suck. Try again.

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats ... tsoff/2019




What are you on about? I’ve never disputed the Bears offense was bad.


That said, it’s football intellectually dishonest to put 100% of the defenses shortcomings this year on the offense. Pointing out they’ve regressed isn’t the same as calling them a bad defense, but they underperformed this year and not all of that is attributable to them being on the field for too long. And even so, some of that is on them, not just the offense. You’re acting like I called the defense dreadful or something along those lines, which isn’t the case.


I’m not sure what you think your ‘gotcha’ moment is here, and I’m even less sure why you need to depend 100% of your opinion on stat metrics instead of your eyes, do you not watch the games?

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 10:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I am prettty sure FF said lonzo sucks

312 dont you have something to say about Fox? :D



I'm pretty sure he hasn't.. as far as Fox goes..he's a beast, he's hurt.. he'll be back and pick up where he left off..kicking ass.

Fox sucked this year when healthy



Get fucked.. what he play 6 games before he got hurt? He kicked some ass in his return last night.

Lonzo D? LMAO ... He's the number 2 pick... If all he's got is a good defender he's a bum.


I said from day one he's a bust, he's Kris Dunn.. and he is. A good backup PG

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 1:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23837
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
NME wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
NME wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
I’m perfectly content with Pagano. The D is still 3rd in the NFL in PPG. Despite all the injuries they’re giving up a measly .5 PPG more than last year. That’s with last year the Bears being 3rd in ToP and this year 16th. Sure, lack of turnovers forced by the D is a factor, but by the same token, when the D scores they go right back on the field.




ToP is a misleading stat for this defense tho -they caused a lot more turnovers last year which helped get them off the field and lower the time they spent on it. I believe they caused more 3 and outs last year too.


Some of their time on the field is their fault.


There is nothing supporting any of your thoughts in this thread except flimsy assumptions easily disproven by stats. The Bears
so far lead the league in three and outs this season on offense. The defense is on the field a lot this year because (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and the offense suck. Try again.

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats ... tsoff/2019




What are you on about? I’ve never disputed the Bears offense was bad.


That said, it’s football intellectually dishonest to put 100% of the defenses shortcomings this year on the offense. Pointing out they’ve regressed isn’t the same as calling them a bad defense, but they underperformed this year and not all of that is attributable to them being on the field for too long. And even so, some of that is on them, not just the offense. You’re acting like I called the defense dreadful or something along those lines, which isn’t the case.


I’m not sure what you think your ‘gotcha’ moment is here, and I’m even less sure why you need to depend 100% of your opinion on stat metrics instead of your eyes, do you not watch the games?


Well Hicks, Trevathan, Smith, and Goldman were hurt. I mean, I guess you can call that regression if you want.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 7:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
KDdidit wrote:
Well Hicks, Trevathan, Smith, and Goldman were hurt. I mean, I guess you can call that regression if you want.




Hicks I’ll give you.. but Goldman has played all 14 games, Smith has played most of this years games (12) and didn’t look good for the majority of them (individual regression) and the defense was showing its regression in the 9 games Trevathan was out there for.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 9:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82221
I think each player on d has been a little bit worse than he was last season and it has shown in the d as a unit.

I can't think of a position on d that has played better than it did in 2018.

They continue the troubling trait from the Fangio era or not getting a stop in the 4Q to protect a lead.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Because the offense has given the d A LOT of margin for error...

Motherfuckers can't convert third downs and lead the entire league in three and outs and yet guys over here imagine the d is blowing three TD leads every week. How can you blow leads when you're one of the lowest scoring units in the league? What leads? Put a competent offense on the field and this team has 10-11 wins at minimum this year all things considered equal.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
veganfan21 wrote:
Because the offense has given the d A LOT of margin for error...

Motherfuckers can't convert third downs and lead the entire league in three and outs and yet guys over here imagine the d is blowing three TD leads every week. How can you blow leads when you're one of the lowest scoring units in the league? What leads? Put a competent offense on the field and this team has 10-11 wins at minimum this year all things considered equal.




Is it common for you to be this melodramatic?


No one is saying our defense is constantly giving up huge leads, I’m not saying that. No one is even saying the defense has been bad or terrible this year. Some are just pointing out that there’s been some regression and you can’t put 100% of that on the offense.


I mean, do you honestly believe Mack is having a shitty year this year because of Mitch (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky?

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Offense and injury are on my defense regression cause list way before player talent and scheme.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
pittmike wrote:
Offense and injury are on my defense regression cause list way before player talent and scheme.

You have to also add in the defense knew the offense was hopeless. No way the defense was going to be able score enough points on behalf of the offense.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40649
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
I didn’t double check them but Mac and Parkins said the Bears are 3-4 in points allowed. That is good enough this year. Especially with all the things to overcome.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 19, 2019 12:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14922
pizza_Place: Grazianos
pittmike wrote:
I didn’t double check them but Mac and Parkins said the Bears are 3-4 in points allowed. That is good enough this year. Especially with all the things to overcome.


As I see it the over-all Bear's defense is not as good as it was last year and it is mainly do to not being anywhere near where they were last year in takeaways. THen couple that with the fact that other teams have decided to do everything in their power to contain Mack by double and sometimes triple covering him and running plays away from wherever he lines up. Some have said that Mack has regressed. I don't think he has really. He is getting the shit pounded out of him by two guys on virtually every play. The problem also has a lot to do with Hicks getting hurt and others not stepping up to make up for it.

My other criticism of the defense is this. For whatever reason, the defense seems to sit back too much at the beginning of each half and the Bears get behind way too much early. It happens in almost all of their games. Maybe Fangio is too passive early and waits too long to go in attack mode?

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 184 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: The Doctor Of Style, UltraMAGA, USA and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group