The KC game stands out. He was atrocious in that game. Other than that he’s played ok lately.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was more good than bad over the past 7 games

Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?

Other than that he’s played ok lately.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

65.1 (Rams)
69.0 (Giants)
118.1 (Detroit)
115.5 (Dallas)
64.5 (Packers)
65.4 (Chiefs)
84.0 (Vikings scrubs)

Former Bears don't hold back when evaluating Mitch (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky
By Dan Santaromita December 29, 2019 4:41 PM
The play of Mitch (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky has been a hot-button topic since he took over as the Bears’ starting quarterback last season.

Last year, he was a polarizing figure with the Bears going 12-4 and (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky showing flashes of good and bad plays. This year, with the Bears out of the playoffs before the final two games of the season, the narrative on (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is more consistently negative.

Four former Bears, Lance Briggs, Alex Brown, Matt Forte and Olin Kreutz, gave their opinions of (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky on the Football Aftershow after the Bears beat the Vikings in the season finale. They didn’t hold back.

Lance Briggs: "I think we all have a good idea of who he is as a football player. He’s probably a fine fellow off the field. He’s probably a fine guy, nice enough, but I know who he is as a football player... He’s a quarterback that doesn’t read defenses very well, can create more time with his feet and if there’s guys that are wide open he can find ways to get the ball to him. Not consistent."


Bears Talk
✔
@NBCSBears
"I know who ((Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky) is as a football player. He's a quarterback who doesn't read defenses very well." -@lancebriggs

Embedded video
194
4:15 PM - Dec 29, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
53 people are talking about this

Alex Brown: “He’s a quarterback that you need to surround him with talent in order for that team to win. I don’t think he makes guys better and I don’t want that guy as my quarterback if I am building my team around the quarterback position. Now, if you want to build your team around the defense and running the football, he can help you win. He can because then you’ll be forced to run the ball and then go off of play-action, getting him out of the pocket, stuff like that. But if you’re going to have him throw the ball 40-45 times a game, he’s not the guy. He’s just not. That didn’t take this year. They could have said that 16 games ago. He’s just not the guy for me.”

Matt Forte: “As a football player I think Mitch is the picture of inconsistency at quarterback. It’s not like he doesn’t have weapons. You got Allen Robinson. You actually have a good running back if they would use him and they have to find a way to use Tarik to help him out. Guys like Taylor Gabriel have been injured, but you have some weapons out there. He’s the picture of inconsistency at quarterback. He is a guy who you can protect or kind of hide with a run game, kind of like how Kirk Cousins does. You’re not going to put him out there and say ‘Go win the game.’ That’s not the guy. In the grand scheme of things, Mitch is a serviceable backup in the NFL. I don’t think he’s a starter.”


Bears Talk
✔
@NBCSBears
"In the grand scheme of things, Mitch is a serviceable backup in the NFL. I don't think he's a starter." -@MattForte22 #FootballAftershow now on @NBCSChicago+ and streaming here: http://bit.ly/2u4jM6p

Embedded video
797
4:19 PM - Dec 29, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
187 people are talking about this

Olin Kreutz: “After this year you feel like he doesn’t have it. When you watched him play, you just don’t... He doesn’t have good awareness in the pocket. He doesn’t process information well right now. You got to run the ball and get him on the move for him to have any success.

So let me get this straight.

Chargers average 21 ppg. Bears hold them to 17
Chargers average 276 pass yards per game. Bears hold them to 201 and intercept the ball once.
Chargers average 90 rushing yards per game and the Bears hold them to 36.

And now Nas says the defense is actually at fault for losing and not (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

Why don't you try telling this to a Bears player on defense and see how they'd respond.

You play the game in front of you. The Bears dominated the ToP IIRC and had a lead of or than 7 points in the 2nd half IIRC. Expecting a great defense to hold a 7+ point lead in the 2nd half shouldn't be too much to ask. Asking a kicker to make a 40 yard kick shouldn't be too much to ask either. Not kneeling with 40 seconds also shouldn't be too much to ask.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

65.1 (Rams)
69.0 (Giants)
118.1 (Detroit)
115.5 (Dallas)
64.5 (Packers)
65.4 (Chiefs) QBR was 5.6 (!)
84.0 (Vikings scrubs)

65.1 (Rams)
69.0 (Giants)
118.1 (Detroit)
115.5 (Dallas)
64.5 (Packers)
65.4 (Chiefs) QBR was 5.6 (!)
84.0 (Vikings scrubs)

Asking your quarterback to NOT have two 4th quarter turnovers shouldn't be too much to ask either. Keep ignoring the elephant in the room.

Their greatest challenge is to deconstruct the offense’s complex, interconnected problems, from the unproven game plans and erratic quarterback play to the void at tight end and countless lost blocks by the line.

Think of it like a cake that was supposed to be delicious but came out of the oven tasting foul. How do you separate the ingredients in the batter to figure out if the eggs were spoiled, the flour was contaminated or the milk was sour?

Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?

There's no one who watched the Giants or Packers game that would say (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was bad.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

You beat me to it. The funny thing is his QBR was pretty much in line for the whole season...he didn't suddenly figure it out like Mitch's Bitches would have you believe.

The first 8 games: 62, 70, 116, 70, 86, 75, 67, 131.

I suppose if you only watched the 4th quarter of the Packers game, you could say (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky played well. But you play the game that is front of you, right? Here is what the mighty Mitch lead offense did with their first eight drives of that game;

6 plays, 18 yards, punt
3 plays, -9 yards, punt
3 plays, 5 yards, punt
15 plays, 49 yards, turnover on downs
8 plays, 52 yards, field goal
1 play, 0 yards, interception
6 plays, 41 yards, turnover on downs
3 plays, 8 yards, punt

I don't know about you Nas, but myself and the rest of the smart football fans on this board would not say that 164 yards and 3 points thru three quarters of football is playing well. Certainly not in a division game with your playoff lives on the line.

Did he put the Bears in a reasonable position to win? If I look at the game thread I doubt that you blamed him for the loss.

This loss is on Nagy and (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky almost redeemed himself but Nagy coached like a fucking coward.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

I suppose if you only watched the 4th quarter of the Packers game, you could say (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky played well. But you play the game that is front of you, right? Here is what the mighty Mitch lead offense did with their first eight drives of that game;

6 plays, 18 yards, punt
3 plays, -9 yards, punt
3 plays, 5 yards, punt
15 plays, 49 yards, turnover on downs
8 plays, 52 yards, field goal
1 play, 0 yards, interception
6 plays, 41 yards, turnover on downs
3 plays, 8 yards, punt

I don't know about you Nas, but myself and the rest of the smart football fans on this board would not say that 164 yards and 3 points thru three quarters of football is playing well. Certainly not in a division game with your playoff lives on the line.

You did; http://www.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopi ... 0#p3296289

Looks like a dominant defensive performance to me. Hard to blame Mitch for that. Sometimes you just run into a buzzsaw.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

There are stretches of offense against the Lions that look similar. Is the 3-11-1 team really a buzzsaw, or does Mitch just suck?

You did; http://www.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopi ... 0#p3296289

Tall Midget and Seacrest were 2 of the biggest (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky haters on this board and both have moderated their (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky opinions recently. You went entirely in the opposite direction despite positive results after your shift.

When the chips were on the table and they needed Mitch to step up and have big games against the Packers, the Charges, the Saints (off a bye), the Eagles, and Rams, he completely sucked.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

Yeah, because; And take it even back to week 1. Get a fucking touchdown against the Packers, and maybe the whole season shakes out different. Who knows.

Other than the Saints, score 24 points and the Bears win every one of those games. Asking (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky to lead 3-4 scoring drives per game should not be too much to ask.

Yes, if only the Bears had Winston or Mariota they would be a playoff team.

Had the Bears employed a better QB this season, it its not unreasonable at all to say they could have won at least two of these games; Packers, Oakland, San Diego, Philadelphia, and Packers.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

Already covered that today;

10-6 and they would have been t he #6 seed by virtue of beating Minnesota twice. Glad to see you are finally coming to your senses.

Other than the Saints, score 24 points and the Bears win every one of those games. Asking (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky to lead 3-4 scoring drives per game should not be too much to ask.

You’re asking the wrong guy. They sure looked like a buzzsaw yesterday

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

I'm laughing at how ridiculous that statement is. You're too stubborn to see differently. Winston threw 6 or 7 touchdowns to the defense and threw more interceptions in 1 season than (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky has his entire career. All of this while playing most of the season with a WR who is superior to Allen Robinson in every way. But of course he would have won THOSE games.

It's more fun to be a victim

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.

I don't think so. From the highlights I saw, there were MANY Packer WRs open in the first half and Rodgers flat out missed the throws. Maybe he was under the weather or something but he looked more like Mitch than ARod to start the day.

Despite all the TOs, Winston had a decidedly better season than (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. Eclipses him in QBR and passer rating. If they're both on the market and you had to pick one, I don't see why a GM would choose (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over Winston.