Nas wrote:
IMU wrote:
Antarctica wrote:
The guy figured out how to connect on the deep ball and keep his eyes down field and he rediscovered his elusiveness and running ability. Most of all he seems to have stopped playing scared. As far as I'm concerned his actual development as an NFL quarterback started at the midpoint of the 2019 season.
But this isn't what happened. What happened was the Bears played a series of mostly weak opponents and he played better against awful teams. Then in Weeks 15 and 16 against the Packers and Chiefs he played poorly.
You don't believe in statistics, but for those that do they can look at his rating, QBR, completion percentage, Y/A or anything else.
His only two good games against opponents with a good record were Week 7 New Orleans and Week 17 Minnesota, and Minnesota played no starters.
He played well against the Packers outside of a pick to a defensive lineman. He played poorly against the Saints. Actually watching the games would tell you this.
Fake news!
viewtopic.php?f=72&t=120070&start=120#p3332258Frank Coztansa wrote:
I suppose if you only watched the 4th quarter of the Packers game, you could say (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky played well. But you play the game that is front of you, right? Here is what the mighty Mitch lead offense did with their first eight drives of that game;
6 plays, 18 yards, punt
3 plays, -9 yards, punt
3 plays, 5 yards, punt
15 plays, 49 yards, turnover on downs
8 plays, 52 yards, field goal
1 play, 0 yards, interception
6 plays, 41 yards, turnover on downs
3 plays, 8 yards, punt
I don't know about you Nas, but myself and the rest of the smart football fans on this board would not say that 164 yards and 3 points thru three quarters of football is playing well. Certainly not in a division game with your playoff lives on the line.
_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.