It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 10:23 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 181 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Who is the better QB in 2020? (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky or Minshew?
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky 33%  33%  [ 6 ]
Minshew 67%  67%  [ 12 ]
Total votes : 18
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
nobody's telling me where to get a top QB to replace (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 9:55 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hatchetman wrote:
nobody's telling me where to get a top QB to replace (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


Some believe that every QB available is better.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Nas wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
nobody's telling me where to get a top QB to replace (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


Some believe that every QB available is better.


even if were true, marginally better isn't going to cut it.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Hatchetman wrote:
nobody's telling me where to get a top QB to replace (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


Because he's done so much last year to prove to you that he's the best QB for the team moving forward.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
veganfan21 wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
nobody's telling me where to get a top QB to replace (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


Because he's done so much last year to prove to you that he's the best QB for the team moving forward.


was that supposed to address my comment?

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 10:27 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hatchetman wrote:
Nas wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
nobody's telling me where to get a top QB to replace (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


Some believe that every QB available is better.


even if were true, marginally better isn't going to cut it.


You need something close to a stud at the very least if you expect to win long term. They aren't on the free agent market. Your best bet is to draft and develop one.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Hatchetman wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
nobody's telling me where to get a top QB to replace (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.


Because he's done so much last year to prove to you that he's the best QB for the team moving forward.


was that supposed to address my comment?


(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky was less than mediocre last year. Even a mediocre QB would be an upgrade at this point, let alone a "top" one.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
mediocre is no help. you need very good to great. I'm all on board for finding one of those.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
veganfan21 wrote:
IMU wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
This management would proceed in the same way at QB even if they had unlimited money to blow. Mitch is their QB. On some level, I agree with their philosophy. You spent the highest of picks on him. You have to have definitive proof he can't play before moving on.

That's the same logic that causes an investor to lose his entire life savings instead of taking a 10% hit on a deal and cutting losses.


Yep


Nope. Sunk cost in sports context deals with cutting an underperforming veteran player with a bad contract.

Player development is an entirely different consideration. Money isn't a negative issue, in fact, it is a benefit. I don't think Mitch's performance last year was definitive. It's just that the development is in conflict with a window of opportunity created by surrounding talent.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
veganfan21 wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
This management would proceed in the same way at QB even if they had unlimited money to blow. Mitch is their QB. On some level, I agree with their philosophy. You spent the highest of picks on him. You have to have definitive proof he can't play before moving on.


Sunk cost fallacy.

It's actually not anywhere close to a sunk cost. Whether they cut (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky today or he is on the roster for next season he costs the exact same price. A sunk cost fallacy is spending extra money because you have already spent money. There is no decision for this year to spend even a single extra dollar on (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. Even if you think there is a 1% chance that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky returns back to the form of his 2nd season you must keep him. Draft a rookie or sign a potential starter but (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky must be on the team for next year.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:29 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Nas wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
nobody's telling me where to get a top QB to replace (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.
Some believe that every QB available is better.
Most QB's available aren't worse than Mitch.

Teddy Two Gloves would lead the Bears at least to the NFC title game next year.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Most QB's available aren't worse than Mitch.

Teddy Two Gloves would lead the Bears at least to the NFC title game next year.
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is better than most free agent quarterbacks. Bridgewater is the exception but spending $25 million a year on him because of 3 good games he has played in the past 4 years may be a bigger gamble than seeing if (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky can be as good as he was in his second year.

If they can't fit in Rivers, or Brady I would probably just draft a qb in the second round and let him sit behind (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky for a year.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:39 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I have said previously I am not opposed to them drafting another QB. I would not necessarily anoint Mitch the starter though. From MANY reports, he had a terrible camp last year. If a rookie has an impressive/better camp than Mitch does, he should be the #1 heading into the season.

Regardless, the offense needs to play more than three snaps in the preseason next year. Injury risk aside, it cannot hurt to have them run plays for real against another team.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:41 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
He hasn't earned going into camp without competition. I'm not sure I would draft a quarterback in the 2nd round but I'm definitely using the 4th on a quarterback.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have said previously I am not opposed to them drafting another QB. I would not necessarily anoint Mitch the starter though. From MANY reports, he had a terrible camp last year. If a rookie has an impressive/better camp than Mitch does, he should be the #1 heading into the season.
It's rare for any rookie quarterback to be ready to start and be really good. If you draft a quarterback to be the backup the likeliest scenario is that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is at least the starter for the beginning of the season.

If anything, it takes some of the pressure off the rookie qb.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:43 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Nas wrote:
He hasn't earned going into camp without competition.
Exactly. If there is zero real competition and a guy like Daniel is the #2 heading into camp, this organization is FUBAR.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Trade (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and a 2nd for Joe Burrow

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have said previously I am not opposed to them drafting another QB. I would not necessarily anoint Mitch the starter though. From MANY reports, he had a terrible camp last year. If a rookie has an impressive/better camp than Mitch does, he should be the #1 heading into the season.
It's rare for any rookie quarterback to be ready to start and be really good. If you draft a quarterback to be the backup the likeliest scenario is that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is at least the starter for the beginning of the season.

If anything, it takes some of the pressure off the rookie qb.



Murray and Minishew looked a hell of a lot better than Mitch.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:49 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Trade (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and a 2nd for Joe Burrow


The Bengals just may do it for a little bit more. I would do it.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:53 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's rare for any rookie quarterback to be ready to start and be really good. If you draft a quarterback to be the backup the likeliest scenario is that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is at least the starter for the beginning of the season.

If anything, it takes some of the pressure off the rookie qb.
I know it is rare, but if the Bears are really being honest in self scouting, and they can say, "Hey this rookie does these two things just as good as Mitch, and these two things a little better than Mitch," why would they not start him from day one?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
312player wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have said previously I am not opposed to them drafting another QB. I would not necessarily anoint Mitch the starter though. From MANY reports, he had a terrible camp last year. If a rookie has an impressive/better camp than Mitch does, he should be the #1 heading into the season.
It's rare for any rookie quarterback to be ready to start and be really good. If you draft a quarterback to be the backup the likeliest scenario is that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is at least the starter for the beginning of the season.

If anything, it takes some of the pressure off the rookie qb.



Murray and Minishew looked a hell of a lot better than Mitch.
Murray was #1 overall though. I'm not penciling in a 6th round pick as a starter in game 1 of next year.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
312player wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have said previously I am not opposed to them drafting another QB. I would not necessarily anoint Mitch the starter though. From MANY reports, he had a terrible camp last year. If a rookie has an impressive/better camp than Mitch does, he should be the #1 heading into the season.
It's rare for any rookie quarterback to be ready to start and be really good. If you draft a quarterback to be the backup the likeliest scenario is that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is at least the starter for the beginning of the season.

If anything, it takes some of the pressure off the rookie qb.



Murray and Minishew looked a hell of a lot better than Mitch.
Murray was #1 overall though. I'm not penciling in a 6th round pick as a starter in game 1 of next year.

Even if he has a cool mustache?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's rare for any rookie quarterback to be ready to start and be really good. If you draft a quarterback to be the backup the likeliest scenario is that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is at least the starter for the beginning of the season.

If anything, it takes some of the pressure off the rookie qb.
I know it is rare, but if the Bears are really being honest in self scouting, and they can say, "Hey this rookie does these two things just as good as Mitch, and these two things a little better than Mitch," why would they not start him from day one?

Ideally, you would give any rookie qb time to sit and get acclimated to the NFL. Some quarterbacks are so good from the beginning that it doesn't matter but I think there is value in not starting your first game as a rookie.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:59 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
312 is definitely meatball enough to have the mustache in the pro column.

Da Coatch, Coatch Q, and Minchew all have mustaches. Gotta get a guy with a mustache to win!

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
312player wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have said previously I am not opposed to them drafting another QB. I would not necessarily anoint Mitch the starter though. From MANY reports, he had a terrible camp last year. If a rookie has an impressive/better camp than Mitch does, he should be the #1 heading into the season.
It's rare for any rookie quarterback to be ready to start and be really good. If you draft a quarterback to be the backup the likeliest scenario is that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is at least the starter for the beginning of the season.

If anything, it takes some of the pressure off the rookie qb.



Murray and Minishew looked a hell of a lot better than Mitch.
Murray was #1 overall though. I'm not penciling in a 6th round pick as a starter in game 1 of next year.

Even if he has a cool mustache?
That's the kind of guy that shows up to save the season.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
312player wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have said previously I am not opposed to them drafting another QB. I would not necessarily anoint Mitch the starter though. From MANY reports, he had a terrible camp last year. If a rookie has an impressive/better camp than Mitch does, he should be the #1 heading into the season.
It's rare for any rookie quarterback to be ready to start and be really good. If you draft a quarterback to be the backup the likeliest scenario is that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is at least the starter for the beginning of the season.

If anything, it takes some of the pressure off the rookie qb.



Murray and Minishew looked a hell of a lot better than Mitch.

Image

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
the best they can do is draft a lottery ticket late

There must be legitimate veteran competition for Mitch this year

Maybe Sam Ehlinger can eventually be a QB. I was touting Kelly Bryant. Get these guys very late or undrafted

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 1:02 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
the best they can do is draft a lottery ticket late

There must be legitimate veteran competition for Mitch this year

Maybe Sam Ehlinger can eventually be a QB. I was touting Kelly Bryant. Get these guys very late or undrafted


Pick up that other quarterback the Bengals had. I can't remember his name but several teams were trying to acquire him a couple of years ago. I believe he's a free agent.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
good dolphin wrote:
the best they can do is draft a lottery ticket late

There must be legitimate veteran competition for Mitch this year

Maybe Sam Ehlinger can eventually be a QB. I was touting Kelly Bryant. Get these guys very late or undrafted

If the right guys falls to them in the second round you definitely do it. I think that is unlikely though.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
the best they can do is draft a lottery ticket late

There must be legitimate veteran competition for Mitch this year

Maybe Sam Ehlinger can eventually be a QB. I was touting Kelly Bryant. Get these guys very late or undrafted

If the right guys falls to them in the second round you definitely do it. I think that is unlikely though.

Who's the right guy?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 181 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group